Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Boeing,GE And VS Testing Biofuel Next Year?(articl  
User currently offlineUSADreamliner From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Posted (7 years 3 months 3 weeks 3 days 8 hours ago) and read 2649 times:

I was reading an article on The Seattle Times, about Boeing working on biofuels, testing soybeans and algae as sources.
The company is planning to fly a 747 across the Atlantic in partnership with GE and Virgin Atlantic some time next year.

The article is very interesting.


"Any change in fuel specifications is a huge issue for the industry," said Paul O'Neill, a London-based airline expert with Deloitte. "If you get adulterated or bad fuel, the aircraft might drop out of the sky.
Boeing estimates that biofuels could reduce flight-related greenhouse-gas emissions by 60 to 80 percent. That figure takes into account not only a lower emissions rate, but also the carbon dioxide absorbed by the vegetable crops used in producing the biofuel."

http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/htm...ogy/2003858756_boeingenergy30.html

10 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineTravellin'man From United States of America, joined May 2001, 530 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (7 years 3 months 3 weeks 3 days 6 hours ago) and read 2598 times:

This is a HUGE development, and an exciting one. It takes huge vision to take this problem on, and I hope fruitful research and ideas, and eventually implementations come from this work.


It is not enough to be rude; one must also be incorrect.
User currently offlineKaitak744 From United States of America, joined Jul 2005, 2410 posts, RR: 3
Reply 2, posted (7 years 3 months 3 weeks 2 days 19 hours ago) and read 2491 times:

For the transatlantic test flight, are all 4 engines on the 747 going to be Biofuel powered, or just 1?

User currently offlinePaddy From Taiwan, joined Jul 2003, 390 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (7 years 3 months 3 weeks 2 days 7 hours ago) and read 2384 times:

I have no idea about the economics and logistics of this. I have heard and read that there is not enough agricultural production capability on the planet to both feed people and produce enough biofuel for even a large minority of the world's automobiles. And according to the article, it would take the amount of acreage in Florida to make even a 15% bio-blend Jet-A (if that's still what you would call it). However, the algae concept is particularly intriguing isnt it?

[Edited 2007-09-01 07:51:30]

User currently offlineIkramerica From United States of America, joined May 2005, 21583 posts, RR: 59
Reply 4, posted (7 years 3 months 3 weeks 2 days 7 hours ago) and read 2374 times:

Quoting Paddy (Reply 3):
I have no idea about the economics and logistics of this. I have heard and read that there is not enough agricultural production capability on the planet to both feed people and produce enough biofuel for even a large minority of the world's automobiles. And according to the article, it would take the amount of acreage in Florida to make even a 15% bio-blend Jet-A (if that's still what you would call it). However, the algae concept is particularly intriguing isnt it?

It's already driving food prices up throughout the world and creating shortages of beef and tequila as feed is diverted and crops are substituted. It's a disaster in the making, and is currently an energy negative proposition. It is also mere speculation that the crops would "use more CO2" because this is in comparison to what... a desert? you can't plant in a desert. You have to plant in a climate that would otherwise have, on the same lands: farming; forests; prairies. Thus you are not creating biomass, thus not creating a carbon sink. You are just diverting what you use the existing biomass for...

I hope for our own sake this fad dies out. It's quite dangerous.



Of all the things to worry about... the Wookie has no pants.
User currently offlineAveugle From United States of America, joined Aug 2007, 65 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (7 years 3 months 3 weeks 2 days 7 hours ago) and read 2368 times:

I saw Richard Branson talking about this in an interview tonight on CNN. Interesting stuff.

User currently offlinePaddy From Taiwan, joined Jul 2003, 390 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (7 years 3 months 3 weeks 2 days 5 hours ago) and read 2346 times:

Quoting Ikramerica (Reply 4):
It's already driving food prices up throughout the world and creating shortages of beef and tequila as feed is diverted and crops are substituted. It's a disaster in the making, and is currently an energy negative proposition. It is also mere speculation that the crops would "use more CO2" because this is in comparison to what... a desert? you can't plant in a desert. You have to plant in a climate that would otherwise have, on the same lands: farming; forests; prairies. Thus you are not creating biomass, thus not creating a carbon sink. You are just diverting what you use the existing biomass for...

I hope for our own sake this fad dies out. It's quite dangerous.

I would tend to agree that, for instance, cane plantations (isnt that what they do in Brazil?) for biofuel is probably not the best use of resources but what if we can sucessfully and space-efficiently produce algae for biofuel? I have selected below an excerpt from an article by University of New Hampshire physicist Michael Briggs http://www.unh.edu/p2/biodiesel/article_alge.html that outlines where the concept stood 3 years ago. I'm not sure if these problems have yet been solved but a quick google search shows that there is a lot of interest on this front. The article adresses some of Ikramerica's concerns and suggests a combination of biodiesel sources. From what is suggested in the article, algae production is quite a bit more efficient than the surface feedstocks currently in use:

NREL's research focused on the development of algae farms in desert regions, using shallow saltwater pools for growing the algae. Using saltwater eliminates the need for desalination, but could lead to problems as far as salt build-up in bonds. Building the ponds in deserts also leads to problems of high evaporation rates. There are solutions to these problems, but for the purpose of this paper, we will focus instead on the potential such ponds can promise, ignoring for the moment the methods of addressing the solvable challenges remaining when the Aquatic Species Program at NREL ended.

NREL's research showed that one quad (7.5 billion gallons) of biodiesel could be produced from 200,000 hectares of desert land (200,000 hectares is equivalent to 780 square miles, roughly 500,000 acres), if the remaining challenges are solved (as they will be, with several research groups and companies working towards it, including ours at UNH). In the previous section, we found that to replace all transportation fuels in the US, we would need 140.8 billion gallons of biodiesel, or roughly 19 quads (one quad is roughly 7.5 billion gallons of biodiesel). To produce that amount would require a land mass of almost 15,000 square miles. To put that in perspective, consider that the Sonora desert in the southwestern US comprises 120,000 square miles. Enough biodiesel to replace all petroleum transportation fuels could be grown in 15,000 square miles, or roughly 12.5 percent of the area of the Sonora desert (note for clarification - I am not advocating putting 15,000 square miles of algae ponds in the Sonora desert. This hypothetical example is used strictly for the purpose of showing the scale of land required). That 15,000 square miles works out to roughly 9.5 million acres - far less than the 450 million acres currently used for crop farming in the US, and the over 500 million acres used as grazing land for farm animals.


User currently offlineScbriml From United Kingdom, joined Jul 2003, 12886 posts, RR: 46
Reply 7, posted (7 years 3 months 3 weeks 2 days 4 hours ago) and read 2319 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting Ikramerica (Reply 4):
and is currently an energy negative proposition

That's my understanding as well. BioFuel production causes more emissions than the fuel saves!  crazy 

Is it just another energy bandwagon?  scratchchin 



Time flies like an arrow, but fruit flies like a banana! #44cHAMpion
User currently offlineTravellin'man From United States of America, joined May 2001, 530 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (7 years 3 months 3 weeks 1 day 16 hours ago) and read 2245 times:

Quoting Ikramerica (Reply 4):
I hope for our own sake this fad dies out. It's quite dangerous.

Doijng nothing about our current use of fossil fuels is dangerous.

A hundred years ago and change people thought aviation was a dangerous fad, and said that trains were better, safer, more reliable, could haul more cargo, and so on. How many people do you think told the Wright brothers that they were crazy, before and after Kitty Hawk? That no one had ever flown, and therefore, no one ever should? Should they have listened, and given up?

The issue is not put biofuel in the tanks today. It is to study the feasibility of producing fuels and enery sources that are not carbon based that we can use tomorrow sustainably. The case for getting off carbon based fuels is becoming more and more pressing, both in economic and environmental terms, as was discussed in the recent thread about global oil reserves and aviation. It's not going to happen overnight. The early forms of energy and fuel generated may be insufficient, but a lot of research can make it happen. We HAVE to make it happen.

I imagine a world where we find ways to generate energy that are sustainable, non-polluting, do not contribute to global warming, and will one day be more energy concentrated, ie efficient, than fossil fuels. That's not a fad, but a necessity, one we can accomplish with effort, commitment and imagination. But we have to start sometime, somewhere, and if airplane and engine manufacturers want to participate in the R+D, I salute them.



It is not enough to be rude; one must also be incorrect.
User currently offlinePlanenutzTB From United States of America, joined Sep 2005, 256 posts, RR: 1
Reply 9, posted (7 years 3 months 3 weeks 1 day 16 hours ago) and read 2224 times:

Quoting Aveugle (Reply 5):
I saw Richard Branson talking about this in an interview tonight on CNN. Interesting stuff.

Richard Branson was on CNN Glenn Beck show last night for the full hour. Fascinating interview, Branson is the Howard Hughes of our time. He says that within a year he will fly a plane with bio fuel, one engine of four, no passengers. He also talked about Virgin flying sub-orbital flights from New York to Australia in an hour, sometime in the future. This man is truly a visionary.



I am extraordinarily patient, provided I get my own way in the end.
User currently offlineMika From Sweden, joined Jul 2000, 2881 posts, RR: 4
Reply 10, posted (7 years 3 months 3 weeks 1 day 16 hours ago) and read 2212 times:

Quoting Ikramerica (Reply 4):
It's already driving food prices up throughout the world and creating shortages of beef and tequila as feed is diverted and crops are substituted. It's a disaster in the making, and is currently an energy negative proposition. It is also mere speculation that the crops would "use more CO2" because this is in comparison to what... a desert? you can't plant in a desert. You have to plant in a climate that would otherwise have, on the same lands: farming; forests; prairies. Thus you are not creating biomass, thus not creating a carbon sink. You are just diverting what you use the existing biomass for...

I hope for our own sake this fad dies out. It's quite dangerous.

Yeah, and every sceintist that is working on this theory is just plain wrong..

 Yeah sure


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Boeing To Retire 25 727's Next Year posted Wed Dec 20 2000 07:03:18 by CactusA319
Austrian And Varig To YYZ Next Year! posted Sun Oct 29 2000 17:25:31 by Slawko
AV Changes For Next Year: CCS, MEX And Domestic posted Wed Oct 12 2005 02:09:02 by SOUTHAMERICA
Boeing Vs Airbus Orders Per Year posted Fri May 6 2005 03:22:19 by Dirkou
GE Capital Confirms Order For Boeing 777 And 737 posted Thu Oct 5 2000 05:51:17 by Boeing747-400
Boeing 777X And GE-90 posted Tue Jul 20 1999 18:10:22 by GoA340
New UA, QX SBP Service Next Year? posted Fri Aug 24 2007 04:07:01 by Dc10s2hnl
GE And PW Engines - Visual Differences posted Sat Aug 11 2007 10:36:09 by WunalaYann
LOT To Beijing Next Year posted Fri Aug 10 2007 10:28:04 by Jarek
Loads On BA And VS posted Thu Aug 2 2007 09:54:32 by Industrybuff