Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
OAK Back To East Bay O&D?  
User currently offlineIaddca From United States of America, joined Jul 2007, 286 posts, RR: 0
Posted (6 years 11 months 3 weeks 3 days 16 hours ago) and read 2317 times:

..with VX, B6, and WN adding LCC service over the last 6 months at SFO?

That bus from OAK to the BART stop is slow and ghetto, much rather do the direct BART board at SFO. Now that fares are coming into line across the Bay, do you think OAK will go back to just serving O&D pax on the East Bay?

15 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineWedgetail737 From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 5893 posts, RR: 6
Reply 1, posted (6 years 11 months 3 weeks 3 days 12 hours ago) and read 2266 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

With WN entrenched at OAK, I don't think the airport will revert back to its old days. OAK will only expand, albeit, slowly with all of the construction and the lack of gates.

Right now, most of the south half of terminal 1's airside is closed because of construction. Some of T1's tenants are using T2 gates.


User currently offlineTimz From United States of America, joined Sep 1999, 6810 posts, RR: 7
Reply 2, posted (6 years 11 months 3 weeks 3 days 9 hours ago) and read 2214 times:

Quoting Iaddca (Thread starter):
That bus from OAK to the BART stop is slow and ghetto

For those considering the bus, "slow" means 12-15 minutes. "Ghetto" means nothing.


User currently offlineBoston92 From United States of America, joined Aug 2006, 3390 posts, RR: 7
Reply 3, posted (6 years 11 months 3 weeks 3 days 7 hours ago) and read 2169 times:

If you live in OAK, the 10 minute bus ride is nothing compared to the 1+hour train ride "direct" to SFO.


"Why does a slight tax increase cost you $200 and a substantial tax cut save you 30 cents?"
User currently onlineAeroWesty From United States of America, joined Oct 2004, 20481 posts, RR: 62
Reply 4, posted (6 years 11 months 3 weeks 3 days 7 hours ago) and read 2165 times:

Quoting Boston92 (Reply 3):
If you live in OAK, the 10 minute bus ride is nothing compared to the 1+hour train ride "direct" to SFO.

Well you have to get to where the 10-minute bus ride starts, first.



International Homo of Mystery
User currently offlineBoston92 From United States of America, joined Aug 2006, 3390 posts, RR: 7
Reply 5, posted (6 years 11 months 3 weeks 3 days 7 hours ago) and read 2161 times:

Quoting AeroWesty (Reply 4):
Well you have to get to where the 10-minute bus ride starts, first.

I said if you live in Oakland. The bart ride from Oakland takes at least an hour. If you live south of Oakland, it will take up to 2 hours.



"Why does a slight tax increase cost you $200 and a substantial tax cut save you 30 cents?"
User currently onlineAeroWesty From United States of America, joined Oct 2004, 20481 posts, RR: 62
Reply 6, posted (6 years 11 months 3 weeks 3 days 6 hours ago) and read 2146 times:

Quoting Boston92 (Reply 5):
I said if you live in Oakland.

19th St. to Coliseum plus the connection time plus the bus ride would take how much time in comparison to Powell St. to SFO? Not too much difference I wouldn't think.



International Homo of Mystery
User currently offlineBoston92 From United States of America, joined Aug 2006, 3390 posts, RR: 7
Reply 7, posted (6 years 11 months 3 weeks 3 days 6 hours ago) and read 2138 times:

Quoting AeroWesty (Reply 6):

Okay...using your example:

OAK 19th Street to SFO would be a 58 minute trip. Tack on an extra 15 minutes for the airTrain to take you from the Bart station to the actual terminal. That would be a 1 hour and 13 minute trip.

Oak19th Street to OAK would be a 10 minute ride plus the avg 8 minute connetion time plus the 12 minute bus ride and that comes to be a 30 minute trip.



"Why does a slight tax increase cost you $200 and a substantial tax cut save you 30 cents?"
User currently offlineModesto2 From United States of America, joined Jul 2000, 2790 posts, RR: 5
Reply 8, posted (6 years 11 months 3 weeks 3 days 5 hours ago) and read 2109 times:

I'm happy to see SFO with great new service, but for those of us in the East Bay, OAK still rocks! How do you beat OAK-LAX with 22 daily frequencies on WN?

User currently offlineBayareapilot From United States of America, joined Nov 2004, 73 posts, RR: 0
Reply 9, posted (6 years 11 months 3 weeks 3 days 5 hours ago) and read 2088 times:

I think the OP has a very valid point. SFO now has more "LCCs" than OAK. The days of OAK attracting pax from the entire Bay Area are likely over. Arguing whether someone living in Oakland will use OAK is beside the point. The point is people in the city, the peninsula, or the south bay are less likely to make the hike to OAK with all of the new service at SFO.

User currently offlineWedgetail737 From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 5893 posts, RR: 6
Reply 10, posted (6 years 11 months 3 weeks 3 days 4 hours ago) and read 2063 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting Bayareapilot (Reply 9):
I think the OP has a very valid point. SFO now has more "LCCs" than OAK. The days of OAK attracting pax from the entire Bay Area are likely over. Arguing whether someone living in Oakland will use OAK is beside the point. The point is people in the city, the peninsula, or the south bay are less likely to make the hike to OAK with all of the new service at SFO.

It all depends on where you fly. OAK still has the cheaper fares to many of the cities that SFO still has a higher price. One example is SEA.


User currently offlineIaddca From United States of America, joined Jul 2007, 286 posts, RR: 0
Reply 11, posted (6 years 11 months 3 weeks 3 days 3 hours ago) and read 2050 times:

Quoting Wedgetail737 (Reply 10):
OAK still has the cheaper fares to many of the cities that SFO still has a higher price. One example is SEA.

but how many transcons will make it?


User currently offlineFlyOakland2IAH From United States of America, joined Aug 2007, 64 posts, RR: 0
Reply 12, posted (6 years 11 months 3 weeks 2 days 15 hours ago) and read 1954 times:

My 2 cents about BART and SFO...

One time, we went into SFO instead of OAK, shortly after the SFO BART connection started running. It took a good 20 minutes of hiking from the CO baggage claim to the BART station... had to take an elevator down to the garage level, walk through a tunnel, take a garage elevator up to the inter terminal train, ride the pokey train, take more stairs..., then over an hour ride on BART to our destination in the East Bay. Phew!

At OAK, the AirBART leaves pretty much outside baggage claim. 15 minutes, and you're at the Coliseum BART (but be careful of the hustlers trying to get tips for showing you how to use the BART ticket machines!). It's 20 minutes from the Colisuem BART to downtown SF, vs. 35 minutes from SFO. This is why I advocate OAK!


User currently offlineLegacyins From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 2070 posts, RR: 0
Reply 13, posted (6 years 11 months 3 weeks 2 days 14 hours ago) and read 1945 times:

Quoting FlyOakland2IAH (Reply 12):
One time, we went into SFO instead of OAK, shortly after the SFO BART connection started running. It took a good 20 minutes of hiking from the CO baggage claim to the BART station... had to take an elevator down to the garage level, walk through a tunnel, take a garage elevator up to the inter terminal train, ride the pokey train, take more stairs..., then over an hour ride on BART to our destination

2 weeks ago, SFO opened a new bridge directly from the Terminal to the Airtrain. No more dragging your baggage through the garage.



John@SFO
User currently offlineFlyOakland2IAH From United States of America, joined Aug 2007, 64 posts, RR: 0
Reply 14, posted (6 years 11 months 3 weeks 1 day 6 hours ago) and read 1817 times:

Quoting Legacyins (Reply 13):
2 weeks ago, SFO opened a new bridge directly from the Terminal to the Airtrain. No more dragging your baggage through the garage.

Finally!  veryhappy 

Although I'll probably still favor OAK for less hassles (although SFO is the place to be for great spotting...)


User currently offlineN77014 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 15, posted (6 years 11 months 1 week 2 days 22 hours ago) and read 1647 times:

Quoting Legacyins (Reply 13):
2 weeks ago, SFO opened a new bridge directly from the Terminal to the Airtrain. No more dragging your baggage through the garage.

A much appreciated feature on my last visit.


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Harmony Airways To Serve JFK & OAK posted Fri Apr 28 2006 03:20:45 by Wedgetail737
Mid-East Protest, Iran Etc. To Effect EK & Others? posted Sun Feb 5 2006 19:14:56 by FFlyer
O&D Demand From VIE To M. East, N. Africa, Etc. posted Sun Nov 13 2005 11:55:08 by Pe@rson
Trinidad & Tobago Back To Cat. I Status posted Fri Aug 5 2005 07:59:28 by MAH4546
"The High & The Mighty" Coming Back To TV Soon posted Sun Jun 19 2005 17:16:16 by FlagshipAZ
LH HON & Senators Mileage Overdraft Back To 50k! posted Sun Apr 24 2005 20:40:34 by Fbgdavidson
Corsair Back To OAK posted Wed Mar 20 2002 15:06:28 by Corsairf/a
Why Did CO96 (EWR-TXL) On 8/28 Divert To Goose Bay posted Fri Aug 31 2007 05:54:51 by PA101
WN To Add RDU & BUF-FLL posted Mon Aug 27 2007 21:39:10 by PVD757
Will AA Ever Come Back To FSD? posted Mon Aug 27 2007 05:07:41 by Airbusaddict