Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
American Airlines Md-11's  
User currently offlineDfw-man From United States of America, joined Jul 1999, 218 posts, RR: 0
Posted (15 years 1 month 4 weeks 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 1605 times:

does anyone know the reason as to why american wants to phase out its md-11,s,and how many does american currently have?

8 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlinePW4056 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted (15 years 1 month 4 weeks 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 1604 times:

I believe 777 is the main reason for phrasing out MD-11, since MD-11 under performs its original expectations. Also, I believe FedEx approahed AA for the MD-11s at a pretty good price.

User currently offlineFlynhopo From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (15 years 1 month 4 weeks 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 1604 times:

Here is how the story goes: when Boeing made plans to manufacture a twin engine-long range-aircraft (of course I'm talking about the triple 7) it offered it first to American....however American was lured by McDonell promesing AA that its Md-11 will not only have a longer range but also a bigger passenger capacity.. Anyways, Boeing being in this predicament turned to its second option: United and this is how United was the first customer launch for the 777. Meanwhile American soon realize that the Md-11 is faaaarrrr away from the performance of the 777, but it was too late to put in the orders so AA had to stand back in line behind United, then British Air, Cathay Pacific, and the rest of the Asian big airlines this is why American just now is getting its triple 7's and now getting rid of its older Md-11's which are outperformed by the better Boeing competitor,
Well that's the story, I'm not sure how many Md-11 AA originally had or now has, hope to answer your question
Benito Camelas.


User currently offlineFlyf15 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (15 years 1 month 4 weeks 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 1604 times:

They have 11.

User currently offline767-400ER From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 4, posted (15 years 1 month 4 weeks 1 day 20 hours ago) and read 1604 times:

You all know that the MD-11 is know better then it was originaly said in the begining of teh MD-11 project.

You all seem to dislike the MD-11 because it has bad performance, farrrrr bad performance as one said. The MD-11 is much better now then in the early 90's.

It has exceeded the originaly specification that McDonnell Douglas said to it's customers when the project started. But it's a fact that the reputation is badly hurted because of it's early faults.


Rooz


User currently offlineFlynhopo From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 5, posted (15 years 1 month 4 weeks 1 day 19 hours ago) and read 1603 times:

Some people need to be more informed about aircraft, no one denies the capabilities of the Md-11 but surely not as good as the triple 7

User currently offlineVIflyer From US Virgin Islands, joined May 1999, 500 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (15 years 1 month 4 weeks 1 day 17 hours ago) and read 1604 times:

The fact of the matter is that the MD-11 has indeed become a better aircraft since it's introduction. But it's a case to too little too late. By the time MD finally fixed the range problems with MD-11 (it was a fuel burn rate problem) , the figures for the preformance of the triple 7 were out and it made more economic sense to buy the triple 7 than pay the economic penities cause by updating the MD-11 to reach it projected range. One major thing no one had brought up is the fact that MD got bought out by Boeing. So the MD-11 production line was going to stop anyhow. So AA had to face the fact that they had a plane that 1. didn't live up to it's potental and 2. was going to be out of production soon.



I reject your reality and subsitute my own
User currently offlineCubanaair From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 7, posted (15 years 1 month 3 weeks 6 days 19 hours ago) and read 1605 times:

American has been phasing out the MD11 for many years now, way before anyone knew about Boeing buying McDonald Douglas.Even before we took delivery of the last firm order, wich brought the fleet count to 30,plans were being firmed up with FedEx to sell them all the a/c, but this of course was only after suitable long-range a/c could be adquired to replace the 747SP and to use on Asia routes planed but not yet operating, wich were originally to be MD11. There were so many problems , not only with late a/c deliveries , but serious mechanical faults in practically all a/c systems that some new service stat-up dates had to be pushed back and SJC-TOKYO svc. had to start operating with DC10-30s that would take-off from SJC and land in OAKLAND!! to to fuel-up for the Pacific crossing (something about take-off weights with a full fuel load) a MESS!!

User currently offlineDC-10 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 8, posted (15 years 1 month 3 weeks 6 days 17 hours ago) and read 1604 times:

They want to standardize to 767s and 777s. they werent getting the sort of performance out of them that they were hoping for...not sure how many are in the fleet, under 20 i believe

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
American Airlines MD-11 posted Tue May 29 2001 01:20:57 by Crank
American Airlines MD-11's posted Fri Oct 13 2000 15:32:25 by ContinentalEWR
American Airlines Md-11's posted Wed Jul 28 1999 01:32:06 by Dfw-man
American Airlines MD-80 posted Mon Apr 24 2006 19:47:41 by Dcbat2072
American Airlines MD 80s posted Wed Apr 14 2004 21:17:32 by FlightLover
American Airlines Flight 11 posted Sat Sep 14 2002 15:22:49 by ContinentalEWR
Delta Airlines, MD-11 With Different Flap Tracks? posted Fri Aug 9 2002 11:35:13 by Ual747
American Airlines MD-8? posted Sat Jul 7 2001 22:45:40 by Lubcha132
KLM & China Airlines MD-11 Replacement? posted Sat Dec 2 2000 12:18:18 by Airmale
American Airlines MD-83 posted Sat Apr 22 2000 22:12:51 by SWA737-500