Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Why Doesn't ONT Serve More Major Cities  
User currently offlineLesismore From United States of America, joined May 2007, 142 posts, RR: 1
Posted (7 years 2 weeks 4 days 3 hours ago) and read 2158 times:

I've always wondered why ONT doesn't serve more major destinations.

When I used to live in MI, I was a much more frequent flyer than I am now, and when flying from DTW into ONT, I was limited to my choices of airlines and aircraft.

From DTW for example: on NW - I had to fly through MSP. Why couldn't I just fly straight to ONT? I know NW flies non-stop from DTW to LAX and SNA, why not ONT too?

If I flew on UA - I had to fly through DEN, which wasn't too bad. I know UA serves LAX and SNA non-stop from ORD, why not ONT as well?

AA flies non-stop to ONT from DFW, and not from ORD.

CO flies non-stop to ONT from IAH, but not from EWR.

I think it would be a great if all of the major airlines at least served all of their respective hubs from ONT. Such as UA to ORD and IAD, AA to ORD and MIA, NW to DTW and MEM, US to PIT, CLT, and PHL, CO to EWR, DL flies non-stop to ATL, not sure about CVG though. Wouldn't passengers and carriers both benefit from this? Why is this not the case?

Thanks!


I'm a success today because I had a friend who believed in me and I didn't have the heart to let him down. - Abe Lincoln
12 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineLincoln From United States of America, joined Nov 2004, 3887 posts, RR: 8
Reply 1, posted (7 years 2 weeks 4 days 3 hours ago) and read 2138 times:

Quoting Lesismore (Thread starter):
From DTW for example: on NW - I had to fly through MSP. Why couldn't I just fly straight to ONT? I know NW flies non-stop from DTW to LAX and SNA, why not ONT too?

Probably because they already have flights from DTW to LAX and SNA and there wasn't enough demand out of ONT to warrant opening another route -- after all when planning a trip out of LAX, why would you choose, say, one flight a day out of ONT vs 5 or 6 or however many out of LAX?

As an aside, I thought NW had discontinued all flying into/out of ONT with the exception of code shares on other people's metal.

Lincoln



CO Is My Airline of Choice || Baggage Claim is an airline's last chance to disappoint a customer || Next flts in profile
User currently offlineJimbobjoe From United States of America, joined Oct 2001, 657 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (7 years 2 weeks 4 days ago) and read 2066 times:

I also suspect that the airlines aren't very interested in competing with Southwest, and are content to give ONT to them.

User currently offlineSANFan From United States of America, joined Aug 2006, 5439 posts, RR: 12
Reply 3, posted (7 years 2 weeks 4 days ago) and read 2052 times:

Quoting Lesismore (Thread starter):
I've always wondered why ONT doesn't serve more major destinations.

The subject of Ontario and its importance and place in the LA metro area has been discussed a lot. If you do a search, you will find quite a few discussions. It's not up there with "NW DC-9s" or "Airbus vs Boeing" (listed here simply alphabetically  Wink ), but it comes up often.

The only thing I will add to what Lincoln and Jimbobjoe said (where do these names come from!?  Wink ) is the "population vs existing service" situation. ONT is certainly the airport of the future for the LA-area -- it's just a matter of how soon the future arrives.

(Boo! Linc.)

bb


User currently offlineSANFan From United States of America, joined Aug 2006, 5439 posts, RR: 12
Reply 4, posted (7 years 2 weeks 4 days ago) and read 2038 times:

Quoting Lincoln (Reply 1):
As an aside, I thought NW had discontinued all flying into/out of ONT with the exception of code shares on other people's metal.

Correct. No NW metal from anywhere to ONT any more. (Which might reinforce what we are saying re: ONT service.)

bb


User currently offlineMir From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 21643 posts, RR: 55
Reply 5, posted (7 years 2 weeks 4 days ago) and read 2019 times:

Quoting Lincoln (Reply 1):
Probably because they already have flights from DTW to LAX and SNA and there wasn't enough demand out of ONT to warrant opening another route -- after all when planning a trip out of LAX, why would you choose, say, one flight a day out of ONT vs 5 or 6 or however many out of LAX?

ONT and the surrounding Inland Empire is becoming a major city in its own right - I think it's the the fastest growing metropolitan area in the US (or certainly in the top five).

ONT will be a major airport in the future. Not for passengers who would have flown to LAX (for which it isn't a great alternative), but for passengers who are travelling to the Inland Empire.

-Mir



7 billion, one nation, imagination...it's a beautiful day
User currently offlineSANFan From United States of America, joined Aug 2006, 5439 posts, RR: 12
Reply 6, posted (7 years 2 weeks 4 days ago) and read 2009 times:

 white  (here we go...)

User currently offlineTargowski From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 127 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (7 years 2 weeks 3 days 23 hours ago) and read 1980 times:

ATA introduced ONT-MDW nonstop. My girlfriend's family lives in Corona (Inland Empire) and we live in SW Michigan, so its the most convenient nonstop from CHI. Its once daily and a redeye eastbound (which is great, i love redeyes) and then turns around and leaves MDW to ONT at like 715am, which is too early. maybe they will go double daily in the future. It was cheap too, started at like $79 each way plus tax.

User currently offlineIFlyATA From United States of America, joined Dec 2005, 242 posts, RR: 3
Reply 8, posted (7 years 2 weeks 3 days 16 hours ago) and read 1830 times:

Quoting Targowski (Reply 7):
ATA introduced ONT-MDW nonstop. My girlfriend's family lives in Corona (Inland Empire) and we live in SW Michigan, so its the most convenient nonstop from CHI. Its once daily and a redeye eastbound (which is great, i love redeyes) and then turns around and leaves MDW to ONT at like 715am, which is too early. maybe they will go double daily in the future. It was cheap too, started at like $79 each way plus tax.

Actually, they're bringing it down to Mon/Wed/Sat/Sun service as the summer travel season winds down. It'll probably be back to daily by winter though, but for the next month or two it'll be a few less days.

The turn from MDW is essential because the outbound from ONT is later that day, and the same plane continues. Also, there is the issue of gate space for TZ in MDW, as they already had to push back the early flight from LGA-MDW to ensure all the aircraft had gates. Keep in mind too that the OAK-MDW redeye arrives/departs back to OAK around the same time.

Glad you're enjoying the low fares though, that is the game plan  Smile

[Edited 2007-09-08 06:17:17]


ATA - an honestly different airline.
User currently offlineJRDC930 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 9, posted (7 years 2 weeks 3 days 14 hours ago) and read 1781 times:

Quoting Lesismore (Thread starter):
I think it would be a great if all of the major airlines at least served all of their respective hubs from ONT.

I do too, but i doubt it will happen soon. Eventually because LAX is overcrowded it will have to happen, but unfortunately nit soon enough. We get stuck with the world of god awful connections to get to ONT. ONT being a much better option than LAX for Inland empire travelers, who want to avoid the worlds longest parking lot.


User currently offlineFlyONT From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 10, posted (7 years 2 weeks 2 days 21 hours ago) and read 1644 times:

Quoting Mir (Reply 5):
ONT will be a major airport in the future. Not for passengers who would have flown to LAX (for which it isn't a great alternative), but for passengers who are travelling to the Inland Empire.

Your right on with that. I live in Corona, only 25 minutes from ONT and the expansion will eventually happen. I personally hope UA will take advantage at ONT and start nonstop ORD service as it is greatly needed! Everytime I fly from ONT to DEN or DFW there are always tons of people connecting to Chicago.

There was talk going on about adding train service to ONT from cities around the Inland Empire and Orange County but since houses now cover every inch of land in this area there just isn't the space. If that would have been put in I gurantee that ONT would of gotten a lot more service. But all the greedy developer's took all the land for some ugly houses that are all getting foreclosed now...  Yeah sure


User currently offlineN1120A From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 26508 posts, RR: 75
Reply 11, posted (7 years 2 weeks 2 days 21 hours ago) and read 1628 times:

Quoting Lesismore (Thread starter):
I know NW flies non-stop from DTW to LAX and SNA, why not ONT too?

NW doesn't fly DTW-SNA

Quoting Lesismore (Thread starter):
I know UA serves LAX and SNA non-stop from ORD, why not ONT as well?

LAX-ORD is one of the busiest routes in the world and United has hubs at both ends. SNA pulls in much higher yielding traffic than ONT. That is why.

Quoting Lesismore (Thread starter):

AA flies non-stop to ONT from DFW, and not from ORD.

If United can't make it work, American can't either. DFW is their mega fortress, which means ONT makes sense.

Quoting Lesismore (Thread starter):

CO flies non-stop to ONT from IAH, but not from EWR.

See AA at DFW and add that CO's main domestic hub is IAH, while EWR is for international connections, which are not nearly as important for ONT

Quoting Lincoln (Reply 1):

As an aside, I thought NW had discontinued all flying into/out of ONT with the exception of code shares on other people's metal.

Correct

Quoting Mir (Reply 5):

ONT and the surrounding Inland Empire is becoming a major city in its own right - I think it's the the fastest growing metropolitan area in the US (or certainly in the top five).

The Inland Empire, no matter how many people have moved there, is still absolutely dependent on Los Angeles as its economic hub. Bedroom communities don't support higher yielding business traffic.

Quoting Mir (Reply 5):
but for passengers who are travelling to the Inland Empire.

Which is going to be VFR and leisure, not business traffic.

Quoting JRDC930 (Reply 9):
Eventually because LAX is overcrowded it will have to happen,

LAX isn't overcrowded, at least not when it comes to field capacity.

Quoting FlyONT (Reply 10):
But all the greedy developer's took all the land for some ugly houses that are all getting foreclosed now... Yeah sure

Or that are just not selling.



Mangeons les French fries, mais surtout pratiquons avec fierte le French kiss
User currently offlineLesismore From United States of America, joined May 2007, 142 posts, RR: 1
Reply 12, posted (7 years 2 weeks 22 hours ago) and read 1424 times:

Thanks everyone for the posts, it sure sheds light on my inquiry.
The reason I said that NWA flew MSP - ONT was because I flew that route many times when I lived in MI, but since I moved back to CA in 2004, I haven't. I had no idea that it was cancelled - thanks for the update!
Also, there has been some talk here in SoCal about Ontario expanding.
http://www.sbsun.com/news/ci_6841824



I'm a success today because I had a friend who believed in me and I didn't have the heart to let him down. - Abe Lincoln
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Why Doesn't CO Serve KIX? posted Mon Oct 24 2005 09:46:52 by Centrair
Why Doesn't EK Serve NRT? posted Fri Oct 22 2004 00:35:27 by SQNo1
Why Doesn't IB Serve Dubai Yet? posted Fri Sep 10 2004 13:12:34 by EE-Kay
Why Isn't ONT Used More? posted Thu Dec 11 2003 19:20:08 by PropJock04
So Why Doesn't Southwest Serve Wichita?! posted Thu Jun 19 2003 16:57:13 by Tom in NO
Why Doesn't BMI Serve New York? posted Fri Jan 3 2003 20:32:43 by PROSA
Why Doesn't Southwest Serve Detroit City? posted Fri Mar 29 2002 02:22:45 by 727LOVER
Why Doesn't Airtran Serve Chs? posted Thu Mar 28 2002 02:03:26 by Gsoflyer
Why Doesn't Iberia Serve Asia? posted Sun Mar 3 2002 18:45:34 by Airplanetire
Why Doesn't American Serve Billings, MT? posted Mon Feb 18 2002 02:08:02 by Serge