Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
AA Hubs  
User currently offlineIwannagothere From United States of America, joined Aug 2007, 41 posts, RR: 0
Posted (6 years 10 months 2 weeks 3 days 8 hours ago) and read 6958 times:

Would AA consider adding another hub? They seem to continue international and domestic growth at JFK, but since the close of BOS, RDU, BNA, and the large downsizing of STL, AA really hasnt added any new hubs. Will it stay this way?

74 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineERJ170 From United States of America, joined Apr 2004, 6756 posts, RR: 17
Reply 1, posted (6 years 10 months 2 weeks 3 days 8 hours ago) and read 6954 times:

American already has enough hubs and focus city that they do not need to add anymore..

HUBS: MIA, ORD, DFW, STL, SJU
Focus: LAX, BOS, DFW, LGA, JFK

I think they have everything WELL covered..



Aiming High and going far..
User currently offlineSkyyMaster From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (6 years 10 months 2 weeks 3 days 8 hours ago) and read 6932 times:

Highly unlikely they would open a new hub as ERJ170 points out. Besides where would they get the planes to operate it without cutting elsewhere? They've got the map well covered, unless that long rumored Bozeman hub goes through  biggrin 

User currently offlineIwannagothere From United States of America, joined Aug 2007, 41 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (6 years 10 months 2 weeks 3 days 8 hours ago) and read 6929 times:

How can they support SJU and MIA. They are so close. Why not just route all carribean flights through MIA? What about a west coast hub. I guess there are just no available cities left. Does AA regret never really investing in a west coast up besides their minor stint in Reno? THey could've really grown at LAX, why was there never a push there?

User currently offlineSkyyMaster From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 4, posted (6 years 10 months 2 weeks 3 days 7 hours ago) and read 6894 times:

Quoting Iwannagothere (Reply 3):
How can they support SJU and MIA.

SJU has a high percentage of AT7 flights to small Caribbean island destinations that could not support a daily service from MIA. SJU was actually a hub before MIA. While some of the major islands are accessible from MIA, the smaller ones go through SJU and this has been working out quite well for many years. Also, SJU doesn't have the services to Central and South America as does MIA. MIA can also support much more domestic feed from US cities for it's international services. SJU would not do nearly was well. Close perhaps but totally different markets.


User currently offlineCOERJ145 From United States of America, joined Jun 2005, 1421 posts, RR: 1
Reply 5, posted (6 years 10 months 2 weeks 3 days 7 hours ago) and read 6871 times:

Skymaster beat me to the post.

[Edited 2007-09-14 04:43:36]

User currently offlineElmoTheHobo From United States of America, joined Aug 2006, 1536 posts, RR: 1
Reply 6, posted (6 years 10 months 2 weeks 3 days 7 hours ago) and read 6849 times:

Quoting Iwannagothere (Reply 3):
What about a west coast hub. I guess there are just no available cities left. Does AA regret never really investing in a west coast up besides their minor stint in Reno? THey could've really grown at LAX, why was there never a push there?

Everytime American gets a Western hub, be it Reno or San Jose, they shut it down. American only has themselves to blame for not having a hub out West. After Air Cal and Reno Air, American gave up its attempts at running a West coast hub, and it concentrates most of its West Coast flights out of Los Angeles and to a lesser extent San Francisco.

American's push at LAX is being outdone by Delta's, though American remains a strong number two carrier at LAX.

For now American relies on Alaska Airlines for its West coast connections.

Beyond the West coast you won't see American add any kind of hub. Boston will continue to slowly lose frequencies, which is a shame considering they're (finally) giving their terminal a face lift. Raleigh/Durham will remain in purgatory, mainline and eagle won't come close to 100 daily flights, let alone hang around 75 once their routes competing with ExpressJet are pulled.

Look for more growth at ORD, DFW, MIA and JFK.

Miami and San Juan serve different markets. Miami is a business center on its own, and connects mainland passengers to Latin America and the Caribbean, while San Juan is a Caribbean hub, catering to O/D, Caribbean connections a few connection to the mainland, with nowhere near the business traffic that Miami sees.


User currently offlineIwannagothere From United States of America, joined Aug 2007, 41 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (6 years 10 months 2 weeks 3 days 7 hours ago) and read 6820 times:

What was the rumor of AA at Bozeman? Could that succede? Its kind of a cool idea.

User currently offlineSTT757 From United States of America, joined Mar 2000, 16819 posts, RR: 51
Reply 8, posted (6 years 10 months 2 weeks 3 days 7 hours ago) and read 6813 times:

Quoting ElmoTheHobo (Reply 6):
American's push at LAX is being outdone by Delta's,

In what way, AA has DL beat in every market from LAX except LAX-CVG, SLC and ATL. And that's only because AA is not in those markets from LAX.



Eastern Air lines flt # 701, EWR-MCO Boeing 757
User currently offlineJacobin777 From United States of America, joined Sep 2004, 14968 posts, RR: 60
Reply 9, posted (6 years 10 months 2 weeks 3 days 7 hours ago) and read 6785 times:

Quoting STT757 (Reply 8):
Quoting ElmoTheHobo (Reply 6):
American's push at LAX is being outdone by Delta's,

In what way, AA has DL beat in every market from LAX except LAX-CVG, SLC and ATL. And that's only because AA is not in those markets from LAX.

 checkmark .....DL doesn't even come close to AA in terms of flights/pax out of LAX.....



"Up the Irons!"
User currently offlineSHUPirate1 From United States of America, joined Sep 2003, 3670 posts, RR: 17
Reply 10, posted (6 years 10 months 2 weeks 3 days 7 hours ago) and read 6736 times:

ERJ...DFW is certainly big enough to be called both a hub and a focus city, but somehow I think that AA would prefer it just be called a hub.


Burma's constitutional referendum options: A. Yes, B. Go to Insein Prison!
User currently offlineElmoTheHobo From United States of America, joined Aug 2006, 1536 posts, RR: 1
Reply 11, posted (6 years 10 months 2 weeks 3 days 7 hours ago) and read 6704 times:

Quoting STT757 (Reply 8):
In what way, AA has DL beat in every market from LAX except LAX-CVG, SLC and ATL. And that's only because AA is not in those markets from LAX.



Quoting Jacobin777 (Reply 9):
  .....DL doesn't even come close to AA in terms of flights/pax out of LAX.....

I don't remember writing anywhere that Delta was bigger than American. American isn't expanding, Delta is, therefore American's expansion (non really to speak of beyond new flights to XNA and SAT) has been outdone by Delta's.

Even after all the expansion is spoken for this year, American will be at 50-75% bigger than Delta in terms of passengers.


User currently offlineFreequentFlier From United States of America, joined Feb 2007, 893 posts, RR: 12
Reply 12, posted (6 years 10 months 2 weeks 3 days 6 hours ago) and read 6682 times:

Quoting ElmoTheHobo (Reply 11):
I don't remember writing anywhere that Delta was bigger than American. American isn't expanding, Delta is, therefore American's expansion (non really to speak of beyond new flights to XNA and SAT) has been outdone by Delta's.

Even after all the expansion is spoken for this year, American will be at 50-75% bigger than Delta in terms of passengers.

DL's "expansion" of LAX is a joke, I believe they are all XE's RJs that were no longer being used once CO decided to jettison them. XE needed a place to put them and I believe are assuming all risks (and probably losses) for these LAX flights. DL is not expanding LAX so much as letting XE lose money for them.


User currently offlineElmoTheHobo From United States of America, joined Aug 2006, 1536 posts, RR: 1
Reply 13, posted (6 years 10 months 2 weeks 3 days 6 hours ago) and read 6656 times:

Quoting FreequentFlier (Reply 12):
DL is not expanding LAX so much as letting XE lose money for them.

Expansion is expansion, and it isn't all ExpressJet. Delta has launched plenty of new mainline routes. As a traveler, I don't care whether it is ExpressJet, Skywest, ASA or Delta, as long as the Delta name is on the ticket.

American has been standing by the wayside, as they have neither the aircraft nor the terminal space to compete with Delta.

Quoting FreequentFlier (Reply 12):
I believe they are all XE's RJs that were no longer being used once CO decided to jettison them

Correct.

Quoting FreequentFlier (Reply 12):
DL's "expansion" of LAX is a joke

Metal on the ground is hardly a joke. Though they certainly won't beat Southwest's numbers to reach number 3 at LAX, nor will they beat American or United's seat offerings, they are making good use of available aircraft and terminal space flying point to point services that can, and probably will, be part of a feeder network from more international flights.

This is going on as American twiddles its thumbs and considers what it will have to do when and where they will move Eagle when the commuter terminal is torn down.

Also, American's gate situation is exacerbated when it loses 2 gates early in the morning and again in the evening as Qantas uses Terminal 4 for its Sydney flight.


User currently offlineThePinnacleKid From United States of America, joined Feb 2005, 724 posts, RR: 8
Reply 14, posted (6 years 10 months 2 weeks 3 days 6 hours ago) and read 6639 times:

Quoting FreequentFlier (Reply 12):
XE needed a place to put them and I believe are assuming all risks (and probably losses) for these LAX flights. DL is not expanding LAX so much as letting XE lose money for them.

No... 10 of the 18 planes are contract just like ASA's were... the remaining 8 are on a shared expense at-risk effort... so slightly more than half the XE Delta Connection aircraft are guaranteed revenue... rumor has it that they are doing very well with the exception of poor Tijuana which I guess is now pulled...



"Sonny, did we land? or were we shot down?"
User currently onlineMAH4546 From Sweden, joined Jan 2001, 32605 posts, RR: 72
Reply 15, posted (6 years 10 months 2 weeks 3 days 6 hours ago) and read 6622 times:

Quoting ThePinnacleKid (Reply 14):
rumor has it that they are doing very well with the exception of poor Tijuana which I guess is now pulled...

No, they aren't. Results are pretty mixed. A lot of the Mexican routes aren't doing that hot, and it isn't easy competing with AS and UA on some of the west coast routes at fares that are favourable for XE/DL.

[Edited 2007-09-14 05:58:13]


a.
User currently offlineSESGDL From United States of America, joined Jan 2001, 3466 posts, RR: 10
Reply 16, posted (6 years 10 months 2 weeks 3 days 6 hours ago) and read 6576 times:

Quoting STT757 (Reply 8):
In what way, AA has DL beat in every market from LAX except LAX-CVG, SLC and ATL. And that's only because AA is not in those markets from LAX.

DL has AA beat in quite a few markets from LAX: SEA, PDX, YVR, GEG, BOI, RNO, ICT, MSY, MCO, SLC, JAX, CVG, ATL, RDU, BDL, ANC and a number of other cities which I can't remember. The LA market is a lot more than just flights to SFO, DFW, ORD, JFK, IAD, BOS, and MIA. And it's not only because AA isn't in those markets that DL is successful. This little idea that DL has no market penetration anywhere compared to AA is ridiculous. DL has a great presence at LAX which is only continuing to grow.

Quoting Jacobin777 (Reply 8):

checkmark .....DL doesn't even come close to AA in terms of flights/pax out of LAX.....

Strangely he never said that. Look at the stats again and you'll realize that AA and affiliates offer just under 20 more daily flights from LAX than DL, and DL serves many more destinations than AA.

Jeremy


User currently offlineHPAEAA From United States of America, joined May 2006, 1024 posts, RR: 1
Reply 17, posted (6 years 10 months 2 weeks 3 days 6 hours ago) and read 6546 times:

Quoting SESGDL (Reply 16):
Strangely he never said that. Look at the stats again and you'll realize that AA and affiliates offer just under 20 more daily flights from LAX than DL, and DL serves many more destinations than AA.



Quoting SESGDL (Reply 16):
DL has AA beat in quite a few markets from LAX: SEA, PDX, YVR, GEG, BOI, RNO, ICT, MSY, MCO, SLC, JAX, CVG, ATL, RDU, BDL, ANC and a number of other cities which I can't remember. The LA market is a lot more than just flights to SFO, DFW, ORD, JFK, IAD, BOS, and MIA. And it's not only because AA isn't in those markets that DL is successful. This little idea that DL has no market penetration anywhere compared to AA is ridiculous. DL has a great presence at LAX which is only continuing to grow.

Most of these markets are new... I doubt there making money right out of the gate... give it a year, we'll see how many still exhist... AA, DL, UA, US, who ever.. no airline is that good..



Why do I fly???
User currently offlineElmoTheHobo From United States of America, joined Aug 2006, 1536 posts, RR: 1
Reply 18, posted (6 years 10 months 2 weeks 3 days 6 hours ago) and read 6526 times:

Quoting SESGDL (Reply 16):
Look at the stats again and you'll realize that AA and affiliates offer just under 20 more daily flights from LAX than DL, and DL serves many more destinations than A

Yes, but American flies bigger jets on most of its routes, and still crushes Delta in terms of capacity.

It'll be interesting where Delta stands vis a vis American in two years when they run out of space to grow, or if they even keep growing.


User currently offlineTSS From United States of America, joined Dec 2006, 3065 posts, RR: 5
Reply 19, posted (6 years 10 months 2 weeks 3 days 6 hours ago) and read 6521 times:

Quoting SkyyMaster (Reply 2):
They've got the map well covered, unless that long rumored Bozeman hub goes through Big grin

Yes, that gateway to the vast untapped O&D markets of Billings, Great Falls, and Missoula.  Wink

Quoting Iwannagothere (Reply 3):
Does AA regret never really investing in a west coast up besides their minor stint in Reno?

I can only assume AA bought Reno Air to eliminate competition, not to build up a prospective West coast hub in Northern Nevada.

Quoting ElmoTheHobo (Reply 6):
Everytime American gets a Western hub, be it Reno or San Jose, they shut it down. American only has themselves to blame for not having a hub out West.

Re RNO: In my limited scope, two non-parallel runways and 23 gates on two short concourses doesn't seem like anywhere near enough capacity for anything approaching a hub, especially if it's expected to serve a large portion of the West coast. AA would have had to add a bare minimum of a dedicated concourse and one more full-length runway to RNO to make it even halfway serviceable as a hub.

Although for purely selfish reasons I'd dearly love for either or both to happen, AA turning RNO into a serious hub for the West coast would make about as much fiscal sense as AA turning BHM into a serious hub for the East coast.



Able to kill active threads stone dead with a single post!
User currently offlineCommavia From United States of America, joined Apr 2005, 11417 posts, RR: 62
Reply 20, posted (6 years 10 months 2 weeks 3 days 5 hours ago) and read 6465 times:

Quoting Iwannagothere (Thread starter):
Would AA consider adding another hub?

It's impossible to say. It's easy right now, looking at the U.S. domestic market as it stands at the moment, to say, "no - absolutely not." But, of course, if a major U.S. legacy competitor were to go out of business, or get bought out, etc., who knows? The landscape could easily change in a split second. There are many places in the U.S. that I could conceivably see AA going after aggressively if the market dynamics in those places were to change substantially (with LGA and DCA at the top of the list).

Quoting Iwannagothere (Thread starter):
They seem to continue international and domestic growth at JFK, but since the close of BOS, RDU, BNA, and the large downsizing of STL, AA really hasnt added any new hubs. Will it stay this way?

JFK is growing because AA has a huge presence in the New York area, and one of the largest concentrations of FFs and corporate customers in that region of any in their network, and because they are now fighting on the defensive against a resurgent DL adding flights left and right and CO still growing at their massive hub across town at EWR.

As for BOS - as with out West, there is no point in fighting a losing game: JetBlue keeps driving AA out of more and more markets there, to say nothing of other competitors who are much more committed to fighting it out up there. RDU and BNA are both still important markets in AA's network, with large concentrations of FFs, and RDU still acts as a "base" if not a "hub" with dozens of Eagle flights daily to important northeast business markets like LGA, DCA, BOS, etc.

Quoting Iwannagothere (Reply 3):
How can they support SJU and MIA. They are so close.

They serve two completely different markets. MIA is the higher-yielding, O&D-centric hub that offers connections to some premium travelers from around the U.S. heading to most of the Caribbean's major markets. SJU is the hub for diverting lower-yielding connecting traffic to the islands, supplemented by higher-yielding VFR traffic going to some of the smaller islands that can't support MIA flights (DOM, PTP, FDF, etc.). Then still, after those two, you have the JFK-Caribbean flights (SJU, PAP, SDQ, STI, etc.), which overfly both SJU and MIA, and are almost 100% VFR traffic with some mix of primarily high-yield O&D (and some connections from BOS and Canada) leisure travelers.

Quoting Iwannagothere (Reply 3):
Why not just route all carribean flights through MIA?

As others said, some markets in the Caribbean couldn't support multiple flights per week to Miami, outside of maybe a Saturday-only 737, and still more, are actually so small that their airports literally cannot handle anything larger than a turboprop to SJU or another neighboring island.

Quoting Iwannagothere (Reply 3):
What about a west coast hub. I guess there are just no available cities left.

The only two cities that could ever have served a viable hub for AA have both been tried: SJC and LAX. SJC is now basically a shadow of its former self, and AA will never be anything really big there again: they've given up just about all of their gates and facilities there. As for LAX, long-term, AA could still expand here, but they would have to sort out a very severe gate shortage problem if they were ever to expand in a major way, as their gates at T4 are nearly maxed-out - very well utilized, but maxed-out.

Quoting Iwannagothere (Reply 3):
Does AA regret never really investing in a west coast up besides their minor stint in Reno? THey could've really grown at LAX, why was there never a push there?

It's not that they never invested in the West. Back around 2000, AA was adding flights left and right out west. They had tons of MD80s every day from LAX to SFO, SJC, RNO, LAS, PHX, COS, plus ERJs were being added to markets like SMF, OAK, etc. The problem, though, was that AA could never profitably compete in these markets on price because the price-setter always was, and still is, Southwest.

As for LAX: it's not like AA didn't try. Again, back around 2000, AA was growing so fast at LAX and had flights to cities all up and down the west coast. (That was also back in the days when AA had the split T3/T4 operation at LAX.) After 9/11, though, they made the decision to pull out of these markets where they would never make anything more than a tiny profit, if any profit at all, and concentrate on their core strength. Plus, once the AS/QX codeshare came along, AA now has a huge presence out West without any of the cost.

Quoting TSS (Reply 19):
I can only assume AA bought Reno Air to eliminate competition, not to build up a prospective West coast hub in Northern Nevada.

I disagree with that. First, I doubt it was much about "eliminating competition," as AA and QQ hardly competed at all - they had virtually no route overlap because, up until the 1999 acquisition, and after the drawndown of the former-Air Cal SJC hub in 1993-1994, AA really had virtually no intra-West Coast flying outside of Eagle's SAAB hub at LAX which, at one time, did include 1-2 daily flights to SFO. Beyond that, I think the real reason AA bought QQ was genuinely because they wanted to grow their presence in the West. The mistake AA made in their calculus, however, was assuming the market would respond differently than it did. AA never factored in that AA's costs were way, way above QQ's, and they assumed that they would make up for the cost difference by generating higher unit revenues on the intra-West flights because they would attract higher-yielding customers with their global scope, AAdvantage, etc. The problem with that thinking was, of course, that the West Coast markets - before and after the QQ acquisition - continued to be dominated by the same factors that had dominated it historically: price, price and price. The West Coast markets are incredibly competitive, incredibly low-yielding, and the price is basically set by Southwest. In that type of an environment, no airline with the costs of a mainline legacy carrier (especially 1999-2000) would ever be able to compete.


User currently offlineJacobin777 From United States of America, joined Sep 2004, 14968 posts, RR: 60
Reply 21, posted (6 years 10 months 2 weeks 3 days 3 hours ago) and read 6373 times:

Quoting Commavia (Reply 20):
Plus, once the AS/QX codeshare came along, AA now has a huge presence out West without any of the cost.

 checkmark ...I quite often purchase an AA ticket and fly maybe part of my journey on AS, in fact, I'll be doing that next week.... yes 

Quoting ElmoTheHobo (Reply 6):

American's push at LAX is being outdone by Delta's, though American remains a strong number two carrier at LAX.



Quoting SESGDL (Reply 16):
Quoting Jacobin777 (Reply 8):

checkmark .....DL doesn't even come close to AA in terms of flights/pax out of LAX.....

Strangely he never said that.

...maybe I was imbued by STT757...I'll just blame it on him instead.. stirthepot  gnasher 

Quoting Commavia (Reply 20):
SJC is now basically a shadow of its former self, and AA will never be anything really big there again: they've given up just about all of their gates and facilities there.

....SJC is basically a shadow of its former self. I was speaking with one of the board members of the SJC Airport Committee and he was telling many jobs of the ".dot bomb" hey-day haven't returned (a bit obvious)-thus carriers such as AA aren't willing to expand at all..However, he was optimistic that once the new terminal is built and Silicon Valley stabilizes more (in terms of jobs) then we can see AA possibly "expand" again....there was also an interview with AA management stating they "always keep an eye" at AA.....that being said, I don't expect anything to happen anytime soon.. no 

I miss they days of AA's MASSIVE B772ER flying over my house to NRT.. crying  hissyfit 



"Up the Irons!"
User currently offlineCommavia From United States of America, joined Apr 2005, 11417 posts, RR: 62
Reply 22, posted (6 years 10 months 2 weeks 3 days 3 hours ago) and read 6347 times:

Quoting Jacobin777 (Reply 21):
...I quite often purchase an AA ticket and fly maybe part of my journey on AS, in fact, I'll be doing that next week.... yes

And there are thousands more like you, and thousands further still who never even buy the AA ticket, but just travel on AS/QX, but get AAdvantage miles (elite-qualifying, at that) for their flights. That is a huge benefit to both companies.

Quoting Jacobin777 (Reply 21):
....SJC is basically a shadow of its former self. I was speaking with one of the board members of the SJC Airport Committee and he was telling many jobs of the ".dot bomb" hey-day haven't returned (a bit obvious)-thus carriers such as AA aren't willing to expand at all..However, he was optimistic that once the new terminal is built and Silicon Valley stabilizes more (in terms of jobs) then we can see AA possibly "expand" again....there was also an interview with AA management stating they "always keep an eye" at AA.....that being said, I don't expect anything to happen anytime soon..

I really don't see AA doing much expansion ever again at SJC. They have basically no gates now, and even if they did when the new terminal is built, there is just no market anymore. The most I could possibly see would perhaps be adding another flight or two back to ORD (from its pathetic present level of 2x MD80s), maybe another flight or two to DFW, and maybe a 757 to JFK and maybe - longshot - BOS or MIA years down the road. Beyond that, and maybe - just maybe - upgrading one or two of the ERJs to LAX to MD80s in a few years, I just don't see anything else coming.

Quoting Jacobin777 (Reply 21):
I miss they days of AA's MASSIVE B772ER flying over my house to NRT.

AA growth or no AA growth at SJC, I think the return of the NRT flight is all but certain to never occur. (Sadly.) It was a nice flight - I flew on it several times on the way to Asia - good FAs, and just about the right length for a flight to NRT.


User currently offlineAAJFKSJUBKLYN From United States of America, joined Jul 2007, 901 posts, RR: 1
Reply 23, posted (6 years 10 months 2 weeks 2 days 22 hours ago) and read 6197 times:

Quoting Iwannagothere (Reply 3):
How can they support SJU and MIA. They are so close

MIA and SJU are about the same mileage away from each other as say NY and ORD, and ORD STL. The system does work..SJU although be it pretty small HUB, is organized well. Those ATR's always seem full, atleast to STT, SDQ and BGI..when I did them. 266 people feeding that airport on nearly every flight on an A300 from the mainland supports it very very well. As far as LAX, they need more space, that terminal is like 1000 lbs of you know what stuffed into a 500lb bag. Although be it the nicest looking terminal...a lot better then its pre-1999 state.


User currently offlineCommavia From United States of America, joined Apr 2005, 11417 posts, RR: 62
Reply 24, posted (6 years 10 months 2 weeks 2 days 22 hours ago) and read 6189 times:

Quoting AAJFKSJUBKLYN (Reply 23):
Although be it the nicest looking terminal...a lot better then its pre-1999 state.

Exactly. It's the nicest and most recently renovated terminal at LAX, but it is definitely reaching its limit. If you're there in the morning rush (0600-0800) or, believe it or not, the evening/redeye rush (2100-2300), the place is completely packed - especially when those two QANTAS 747s are sitting there boarding 400+ people to Australia.


25 BosWashSprStar : I think AA more than makes up for the loss of gates with the revenue its gets from that deal. AA does a huge amount of feed for these flights, and ma
26 Commavia : Absolutely. As you mentioned, the incremental revenue from the QF codeshares alone is massive - in the tens of millions annually, the last I heard. P
27 Floridaflyboy : I'm not sure what the rumor was as I have never heard of it before, but no it could not succede. No Montana city has enough O&D to even consider bein
28 Post contains images SkyyMaster : DL is "supposedly" looking to rebuild LAX into a hub as they get more aircraft capable of doing trans-Pacific runs. Whether it actually happens is an
29 Post contains images Jacobin777 : ....as Michael Jordan once said..."never say never"..... .....depends on what their plans would be down the line.....AA until a few years ago had 5x/
30 Cubsrule : It's probably worth noting that AA does offer limited connections over some of its focus cities, especially RDU. It's not a hub in the sense that it d
31 BoeingFever777 : Does AA consider AUS a focus city yet? I know I have heard talks of it becoming one. AUS-SEA 1x AUS-SJC 3x AUS-SNA 1x AUS-ORD 5x AUS-DFW 15x AUS-DAL 8
32 Ckfred : About the only city that could become an AA hub is SEA, provided that AA buys AS. The chance of that happening is less than the winner of the ND/UofM
33 ElmoTheHobo : A matter of when rather than if, IMO. MIA-AUS has been rumored for awhile, and with MD-80s at JFK, it won't be long before American connects the dots
34 N200WN : I guess I missed something...what's new for SAT?
35 KDCA : The real question is why do we not see UA trying to initiate any domestic growth in this market. Clearly the addition of LAX-HKG shows commitment to t
36 Rampart : Just to compare, MIA to ORD, DFW, JFK, and SJU are approximately the same distance, all over 1000 miles, and no more than 150 miles difference betwee
37 ElmoTheHobo : American tried to impress Texan authorities in its bid to keep the Wright Agreement. They added flights to secondary cities in Texas, STL-IAH, additi
38 SkyyMaster : Umm...hello? Did you not see the smiley face at the end of the post about Bozeman? That was a joke. You know, humor?
39 FXramper : 13 Dec. 13 Dec. 13 Dec. I heard good things about MIA, LAS, JFK, and official word on AUS as a focus city, and bad things about SEA. Something offici
40 HPAEAA : well it's already been downgraded to seasonal... hopfully that doesn't get completely cut...
41 ElmoTheHobo : Really? When do we get to hear about the new AUS flights?
42 BoeingFever777 : Read what he says! 13 Dec. 2007.
43 FXramper : Hobo, I heard the SEA flight is seasonal as of 13 Dec and some more AA news for AUS happens the same date. Up until a week ago I was only hearing JFK
44 Commavia : Yeah, the SEA flight definitely is going seasonal - but at least as of now, it is not supposed to be discontinued altogether, but returning on 7 Apri
45 ERJ170 : Well, how about AUS-SJU.. then AUS would be connected to ALL the AA hubs, focus cities, and near-focus cities..
46 Cubsrule : If ORD can only support 2 daily flights to SJU on AA (there's also a daily UA 320), it would be hard for AUS to support a daily flight. There's also
47 Cubsrule : If ORD can only support 2 daily flights to SJU on AA (there's also a daily UA 320), it would be hard for AUS to support a daily flight. There's also
48 AA1818 : I agree everytrhing is well covered but i would have put STL as a focus and JFK as a psuedo hub but mroe than a focus given their considerable intern
49 Cubsrule : STL is a hub.
50 CIDflyer : STL is considered a hub by American, it still has 200 flights a day, on par with NW in MEM or CO in CLE. Definitely a hub.
51 AA1818 : but STL has no International flights right????? Just a question- not doubting you! How about JFK?? How many flight a day?? AA1818
52 ElmoTheHobo : +/- 93 flights a day right now, it'll be +/- 100 flights by April of 2008. Not anyomore. Puerto Vallarta didn't cut it after this past season; Toront
53 Viscount724 : There is one current international scheduled flight from STL, USA 3000 (U5) A320 once a week STL-PUJ (Punta Cana, Dominican Republic).
54 Iwannagothere : are the chances good for STL-LHR/GTW, in the near future? seems like it could succede. Must be lack of a/c right?
55 SkyyMaster : Not at all likely, especially considering multiple daily nonstops to LHR from ORD just up the road. IMO, AA will never return any trans-Atlantic flig
56 Floridaflyboy : Yes, I saw the smiley face, and yes, I realized it was a joke. No need to be rude about it. If you'd read the post I was replying to, you would see t
57 SkyyMaster : I wasn't being rude, sorry if you took it that way. One of the problems with this form of communication (the internet) is that it is too easy to read
58 AAJFKSJUBKLYN : I was just reading that AE will fly PIT to JFK...I would assume AA is beefing up JFK with feeder flights for International Flights. Nice addition...JF
59 Commavia : Yeah, now if only they could add some more flights to domestic cities (even if just 1x daily) and finally get serious about expanding internationally
60 SkyyMaster : I agree. Think they will actually get the chance before the FAA gets their nose into things and starts putting some type of restrictions on NYC airpo
61 Commavia : Good question. Though I suspect that the FAA does come in and screw things up even more than they already have, it will probably be much more targete
62 AAJFKSJUBKLYN : I dont anyone will be blaming AA for the scheduling issues at JFK. I think we know how this has happened...and why..to know end. Its definately not AA
63 SkyyMaster : Yes, your point is valid. However, when (yes I say when because I think it is inevitable) the FAA imposes whatever restrictions on the NYC airports (
64 B752OS : I don't see how making equal cuts would go over well. I know airlines who want to grow in NYC being told to cut flights will not be happy, but wouldn
65 AAJFKSJUBKLYN : Why would other airlines not do what AA and UA did at ORD? They pulled back and other airlines didn't-and nearly a few months later B6 is flying JFK-O
66 SkyyMaster : When I say equal, I mean percentages. not total numbers. It is the only equitable way to do it to affect carriers the same. But this is veering this
67 MAH4546 : Dusseldorf, Moscow, and Nice.
68 Flavio340 : What are the chances of Africa out of JFK? I would love Cairo, but I am a realist though and understand that this very much a pipe dream.
69 Atrude777 : AA does not offer any intl flights at STL correct, but other airlines offer intl at STL such as.... Connection, not Eagle, the majority, like 99.9% a
70 Post contains links MrSTL : Speaking of hubs and STL; AA announced a new Regional Sales Director today for STL and surrounding states- I wish her much success!: http://biz.yahoo.
71 Cubsrule : There is one 'line' of MQ flying through STL. It's daily, and it goes SGF-STL STL-BNA BNA-STL STL-JFK JFK-STL STL-SGF This is operated by an ER3. The
72 Atrude777 : Which translates to 3 daily Eagle flights for STL? STL-BNA, STL-JFK and STL-SGF. While the rest are Connection. Alex
73 MAH4546 : Africa is in AA's long-term plans, but most of that will probably come from Miami. I don't foresee Africa realistically happening until AA gets some
74 Cubsrule : Yup, and what, about 150 AX?
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Former AA Hubs posted Sun Nov 13 2005 23:53:36 by Airlinebuff77
AA Hubs At Nashville And RDU posted Fri Aug 20 2004 04:27:45 by Jfrworld
Remembering Former AA Hubs: BNA And RDU. posted Mon Aug 11 2003 17:39:38 by Tommy767
De-peaking AA's Hubs Provides Network Benefits posted Wed Feb 19 2003 19:17:54 by LoneStarMike
AA's Hubs In BNA And Rdu! posted Sun Jan 6 2002 04:46:31 by Alexinwa
AA Hubs posted Mon Jul 16 2001 23:46:44 by Modesto2
AA HUBs? posted Thu Mar 30 2000 12:15:45 by El Al 001
AA Hubs posted Fri Jul 23 1999 04:30:35 by AA757
Service From AA Hubs posted Mon Apr 19 1999 01:42:48 by NYC Int'l
AA Announces Over 50 New Flights From It's Hubs posted Fri Jun 11 2004 21:36:10 by Iowaman