Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Another Tristar Question.  
User currently offlineTristar4ever From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2000, 84 posts, RR: 1
Posted (13 years 11 months 2 weeks 5 days 16 hours ago) and read 1350 times:

My only experience of the tristar is flying those dreaded charter flights from the uk to canada on Air Transat, actauly they`re a great airline with really good service, just no leg room!
specificaly several trips from Belfast to Toronto, much as I love the tristar it seems that when stuffed with 360 pax and loads of baggage they really strugle to get off the ground, I remember the aircraft on all flights seemingly unsing all of the available runway then finaly begining to climb, however the climb rate seemed incredibly slow, the nose was pitched up but the aircraft appeared to be hardly climbing at all. I remember seeing an ATA tristar at gatwick, it used all the runway climbed away pitched up but not climbing that fast compared to other aircraft. I hve flown on Air Transats tristar 500`s and they understandably have much better take off performance.
Is this just my imagination, or does the tristar in charter config have poor take off performance???????


mike.

6 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineCeilidh From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted (13 years 11 months 2 weeks 5 days 15 hours ago) and read 1333 times:

Nope, it's down to the amount of thrust put out by the RB211-22Bs on the Air Transat 'longbodies' versus the higher thrust of the RB211-254B4s on the L1011-500s at MTOW.

User currently offlineHmmmm... From Canada, joined May 1999, 2109 posts, RR: 5
Reply 2, posted (13 years 11 months 2 weeks 5 days 13 hours ago) and read 1321 times:

Of course the L-1011 "in charter configuration" is going to climb slower than if the seats had more pitch. Quite simply, such a sardine can flight is operating closer to the MGTOW of the aircraft. It is heavier. A heavier aircraft will take more runway to get airborne and will climb slower.

Hmmmm...



An optimist robs himself of the joy of being pleasantly surprised
User currently offlineAirlineguy From United States of America, joined Apr 2000, 348 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (13 years 11 months 2 weeks 5 days 13 hours ago) and read 1319 times:

Somewhat off the subject...but how much floor space is aviable on a -200 or -500 L1011?

User currently offlineDelta73Spilot From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 4, posted (13 years 11 months 2 weeks 5 days 12 hours ago) and read 1313 times:

To answer your question TriStar, yes the TriStar -1 is underpowered at max T/O weight compared to the newer jets. I have flown the -1,-200 and -500 and the bigger engines on the latter 2 models make a world of difference! The configuration of the plane has nothing to do with it, a 1011 on a cross Atlantic flight will always be right at Max Weight, regardless of pasenger seating (more or less). It uses a tremendous amount of Rwy compared with a 747-400, its initial climb is rather weak (especially on a hot day!), and once it passes on the high 20's upwards, its rate of climb can best be described as anemic! Once it levels off though, it sure loves to cruise at .84 plus, blowing by most others (especially any Airbus tooling along up there!). The later 1011s though with the extra 8,000 lbs per engine are awesome planes powerwise!
Still, the Tritanic will always have the prime real estate in my heart!
T.A.


User currently offlineCeilidh From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 5, posted (13 years 11 months 2 weeks 5 days 7 hours ago) and read 1294 times:

Delta73Spilot - did you notice much difference (either in terms of fuel consumption or performance) between the -524B4 and the -524B4Is as currently used by DL?

The L1011-500 is a very nice performer - rockets off the runway and has good climb performance.


User currently offlineDelta73Spilot From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 6, posted (13 years 11 months 2 weeks 5 days 4 hours ago) and read 1275 times:

Sorry Ceilidh,
I flew the bigger motor TriStars back in 95 for an outfit that is no longer with us...., we had only one type -524's and for the life of me I can't remember a whole lot of numbers!
Sorry I couldn't help you!


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
PIA To Lease Another Tristar posted Mon Nov 13 2006 14:09:17 by 777way
Another Reg Question: AMS - EWR On SQ 04/2001 posted Mon May 8 2006 20:19:10 by Oli80
BA TriStar Question In The Mid-80's. posted Tue Apr 26 2005 11:48:46 by Timetable
Another IND Question posted Fri Oct 29 2004 01:51:27 by 7E72004
Another Southwest Question posted Wed Apr 21 2004 04:55:30 by SFOintern
Another Stansted Question posted Mon Aug 25 2003 14:02:48 by Udo
Another Interiors Question - Eastern posted Sat Oct 12 2002 02:27:36 by Exitrowaisle
Tristar Question. posted Wed Jan 3 2001 14:23:57 by Tristar4ever
Another A3XX Question! posted Wed Aug 23 2000 19:30:29 by Delta777-XXX
TWA Tristar Question? posted Mon Jun 26 2000 18:31:42 by Montenegro