CGH: Still Latin America's Busiest? — Civil Aviation Forum

Sponsor Message:


My Starred Topics \| Profile \| New Topic \| Forum Index \| Help \| Search

CGH: Still Latin America's Busiest?

Sampa737 From Brazil, joined May 2005, 637 posts, RR: 1
Posted (5 years 7 months 3 weeks 6 days 2 hours ago) and read 827 times:

With the new regulations now in effect at Sao Paulo's Congonhas airport, is it still the busiest in Latin America? If not, who gets the title now?

4 replies: All unread, jump to last

MTYFREAK From Mexico, joined Apr 2004, 374 posts, RR: 2
Reply 1, posted (5 years 7 months 3 weeks 6 days 2 hours ago) and read 813 times:

I think that stiil with regulations CGH is probably still the busiest LatAm airport,

if not, maybe MEX could get the title but I would need to check the numbers,

saludos amigos!

Only here for the beer...

Fyano773 From Mexico, joined Mar 2004, 747 posts, RR: 1
Reply 2, posted (5 years 7 months 3 weeks 5 days 20 hours ago) and read 717 times:

From this thread: Latin American Largest Airports: 2004 (by Pzurita1 Jun 15 2005 in Civil Aviation)

Quote:

PAX handled in 2004 (million)

1. MEX 22.994
2. CGH 13.611
3. GRU 12.940
4. SJU 11.000 (estimated)
5. CUN 10.011

6. BSB 9.926
7. BOG 7.570
8. GIG 6.485
9. CCS 6.234
10. SCL 6.055

11. EZE 5.567
12. GDL 5.375
13. AEP 5.245
14. LIM 5.232 (estimated)
15. SDU 4.887

16. MTY 4.288
17. SSA 4.145
18. TIJ 3.382
19. POA 3.215
20. PLU 3.194

21. REC 3.173
22. MBJ 3.115
23. CWB 2.840
24. GYE 2.780 (2003)
25. SDQ 2.400 (2003)

I don't know current figures but this might be very similar as of today. I think CGH is still the 2nd busiest but I wouldn't be surprised if CGH is surpassed by GRU now that many flights have been relocated there.

Fyano

[Edited 2007-10-03 01:20:30]

[Edited 2007-10-03 01:21:16]

LAXspotter From India, joined Jan 2007, 3650 posts, RR: 5
Reply 3, posted (5 years 7 months 3 weeks 5 days 20 hours ago) and read 713 times:

CGH would have to be the second busiest, no doubt about it. MEX is much busier, however if all the ops were moved to Garulhos, then maybe, but that would be impossible correct?

"Patriotism is the last refuge of the scoundrel" Samuel Johnson

LipeGIG From Brazil, joined May 2005, 11201 posts, RR: 61
Reply 4, posted (5 years 7 months 3 weeks 4 days 13 hours ago) and read 629 times:

AIRLINERS.NET CREW
FORUM MODERATOR

Quoting LAXspotter (Reply 3):
CGH would have to be the second busiest, no doubt about it. MEX is much busier, however if all the ops were moved to Garulhos, then maybe, but that would be impossible correct?

Guarulhos become the 2nd busiest in August. CGH is now the 3rd one.

Is impossible to see Guarulhos bigger than MEX without an additional terminal.

Felipe

New York + Rio de Janeiro = One of the best combinations !

Top Of Page

Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics: