Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Low Flying 747  
User currently offlineMarcusair From Canada, joined Sep 2007, 35 posts, RR: 0
Posted (8 years 8 months ago) and read 3832 times:

I am not completley up to snuff with airplanes and the distances that they are allowed to fly over a city but, I was in Burnaby, BC, Canada at the bottom of a Skytrain Station at Metrotown Mall and I was talking to a friend and all of a sudden a 747 came over a couple of tall buildings and it was so close that you could read the registration number the plane was operated by OASIS Hong Kong (which could also be clearly read ot the side of the 747) after it went over Metrotown mall it zig-zagged its way over towards surrey, after about 10 minutes you could see this plane landing on the normal flight path for YVR. What was even more odd is as it was flying over Metrotown another plane (an orange plane, which I think was a Conair Canadair firefighting plane) was heading south and flew just under the 747, I don't know what the didtance was between the 2 planes because I was on the ground but it looked pretty close, but my question is how close is a plane allowed to fly over a city?

6 replies: All unread, jump to last
User currently offlineBoeingboy From Bouvet Island, joined Jul 2007, 149 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (8 years 7 months 4 weeks 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 3832 times:

How close is the city to the airport. A 747 is a large aircraft and appears closer and slower because of that. On the other hand it could be that Oasis Hong Kong has no idea where the hell they are going.

10% is the best we can do
User currently offlineVV701 From United Kingdom, joined Aug 2005, 8668 posts, RR: 25
Reply 2, posted (8 years 7 months 4 weeks 1 day 17 hours ago) and read 3832 times:

This cannot be a coincidence. Take a look at this:

View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Jenny Coffey

The Oasis Hong Kong 744 pictured here was participating in the annual Eastbourne Airbourne sea front show in August. It was flown to the show from LGW which is less than 50 miles from Eastbourne during a stop over on a HKG-LGW-HKG rotation for promotional purposes.

So was there an air or any other kind of show that the aircraft at Burnaby could have been participating in?

By the way the photo above was taken from Beachy Head which is a famous British chalk headland on the south coast of England. Its height above sea level is 530 feet (162m). So the aircraft appears to have made a pass over the sea at the Airbourne show at a height of between 430 and 500 feet.

User currently offlinePnwtraveler From Canada, joined Jun 2007, 2406 posts, RR: 11
Reply 3, posted (8 years 7 months 4 weeks 1 day 17 hours ago) and read 3832 times:

The plane may have done a go round or aborted landing. If they abort a landing they don't climb as high as they necessarily may be on approach. At YYZ a go round may be at 2,000 to 3,000 feet. They join the approach pattern where ever a gap can be made for them and fly at that altitude until they reach the glide scope at the marker. They usually fly at that height here for noise abatement purposes. Planes zig zag to either bleed speed to slow down or more like to allow additional separation with the plane in front of them on the approach pattern, or both.

User currently offlineScooter01 From Norway, joined Nov 2006, 1284 posts, RR: 6
Reply 4, posted (8 years 7 months 4 weeks 1 day 7 hours ago) and read 3832 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting Pnwtraveler (Reply 3):
At YYZ a go round may be at 2,000 to 3,000 feet.

Living in the Leaside Towers once, 37th. floor, I had a pretty unobstucted view to the North and West.
Once during a thunderstorm I could watch a BA 747 that came in from the West, turned South to fly by me low enough that I could see the individual windows.
There was also a Lufthansa 747 that regularily stayed fairly low on it's outbound climb-out, we used to joke about the pilot must have friends or family in the Pickering-area.

Scooter  airplane 

There is always a good reason to watch airplanes
User currently offlineKtachiya From Japan, joined Sep 2004, 1859 posts, RR: 1
Reply 5, posted (8 years 7 months 4 weeks 1 day 5 hours ago) and read 3832 times:

When you refer to low, I don't know how low but I can talk from my experience.

I once flow on JL 18 to YVR from NRT. We were very low by the time we hit Burnaby, about 2000 feet (I suspect). I could even see the Telus building near 41st and Kingways and could even read the Telus signs. Then we came near the Alex Fraser River and did a steep right turn over the Fraser River. I later found out that it was one of the normal proedures to reach a VOR point called Weet (later renamed to Totem). I think this approach path was referred to as the Shark 5 arrival. I think the normal approach path was called the Victoria 9 (something like this) arrival but aircrafts operated on this Shark 5 arrival once in a while. Other approaches that I have seen is coming in from White Rock (Surrey) flying over Boundary bay, and then making a steep left turn over totem.

Flown on: DC-10-30, B747-200B, B747-300, B747-300SR, B747-400, B747-400D, B767-300, B777-200, B777-200ER, B777-300
User currently offlineMarcusair From Canada, joined Sep 2007, 35 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (8 years 7 months 2 weeks 1 day 23 hours ago) and read 3783 times:

Yes, You are right, I beleive that this is a common route, since I first seen the Oasis (now thats Ironic, seeing an oasis) But I have witnessed another Oasis, Japan Airlines, Air Canada and China Airlines following the exact same route, However this time there was no small aircraft flying under the belly of the planes.

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Virgin 747 Low Flying Around MCO posted Sat Sep 22 2007 02:13:34 by Tonytifao
Low Flying Aircraft On Friday 6/4 - Help Anyone? posted Sun Apr 8 2007 17:01:50 by Fell90
Low Flying (I Mean Low!) Jet Into FWA Tonight posted Tue Jul 4 2006 04:55:49 by SuseJ772
Strange Low Flying Slow Moving Aircraft Bury UK posted Mon Jul 3 2006 10:11:21 by Musapapaya
Death By Low-flying Aircraft? posted Thu Sep 29 2005 10:35:18 by Joshdean
Extreme Low Flying Video posted Fri Mar 11 2005 02:35:41 by Alberchico
Cost To Airline Of Flying 747 LHR-JFK? posted Wed Jul 21 2004 12:31:01 by BCAL
Anybody Seen Unusualy Low Flying Aircraft? posted Sun Sep 14 2003 01:45:09 by 3green
Aeroflot Flying 747-400'S? posted Fri Jul 11 2003 16:50:40 by UTA_flyinghigh
Low Flying A32X Circling Coventry Yesterday? posted Sat May 24 2003 12:12:33 by Jmc757