Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Codeshare Flights- Why A Price Difference?  
User currently offlineBWI5OH From United States of America, joined Apr 2007, 158 posts, RR: 0
Posted (6 years 9 months 2 weeks 2 days 16 hours ago) and read 4750 times:

Hello all. Recently, I went online to delta.com to book a ticket from BWI-DSM. After searching through the flights and connections, most were between $450-$500 R/T for the time frame I wanted to arrive and depart. However, one option on their site was a codeshare NW flight...and the price was over $100 cheaper! I chose these flights obviously. They have DL flight numbers, but it says "Operated by NW Airlines as flight ***" Don't get me wrong, Delta is my choice carrier, but in this instance, Northwest metal will suffice due to price differences. My question is why would Delta even offer that codeshare in that market, knowing the price to be much cheaper? Does Delta get the money for the seat I purchased, or does Northwest? Why hasn't Delta lowered their ticket prices to be more competitive (and the same being said for Northwest...why haven't they raised theirs to match Delta?) I'm confused by it all and would like to know the answers from all of you airline gurus out there!! By the way, this my first ever codeshare flight, so I'm sure this will make sense in the future when it happens again!! Thanx! LONG LIVE THE WIDGET!


"It's all fun and games until the cops show up"
17 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlinePlaneguy727 From United States of America, joined Mar 2007, 1239 posts, RR: 1
Reply 1, posted (6 years 9 months 2 weeks 2 days 15 hours ago) and read 4719 times:

It has everything to do with the number of seats in the different fare codes. The airlines in codeshares usually have seat set at fare codes and the operating carrier may sell out those less expensive seats before the codeshare airline does and vice versa. I have seen something similar with US & UA. I have booked via UA for US shuttle flights for LGA-DCA to save money (hundreds sometimes).


I want to live in an old and converted 727...
User currently offlineAvek00 From United States of America, joined Oct 2004, 4336 posts, RR: 19
Reply 2, posted (6 years 9 months 2 weeks 2 days 15 hours ago) and read 4718 times:

The operating carrier gets the revenue from the ticket, with the issuing carrier retaining a nominal administrative fee.


Live life to the fullest.
User currently offlineBWI5OH From United States of America, joined Apr 2007, 158 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (6 years 9 months 2 weeks 2 days 15 hours ago) and read 4704 times:

I think i understand...so what you are saying is that airlines have a pre-selected number of seats for each specific market set at a certain cost. So when the "cheapest" seats are sold out on one carrier (in my case, DL) NW still had some of their cheaper seats available. Is that right? So when NW sells out all of their cheap seats, their price will rise until that next pre-determined amount of seats are sold, and so on and so forth until no more seats are available. Correct?


"It's all fun and games until the cops show up"
User currently offlineGoldorak From France, joined Sep 2006, 1830 posts, RR: 4
Reply 4, posted (6 years 9 months 2 weeks 2 days 14 hours ago) and read 4664 times:

There are diffrent types of code-share agreements :
- the code-shared airline (other than the one operating the flight) has an allocated number of seats they can sell
- or both airlines (the operating carrier and the code-shared airline) can sell any number of seats until the flight is fully booked

But in these agreements, both airlines remain free to have their own pricing policies, explaining why you may have different prices from the operating carrier and the code-shared one. Also the lowest fares may be fully sold for one carrier but not for the other one (as said in reply #1)


User currently offlineOzarkD9S From United States of America, joined Oct 2001, 5002 posts, RR: 21
Reply 5, posted (6 years 9 months 2 weeks 2 days 13 hours ago) and read 4625 times:

I can't explain the anomoly, but I have certainly taken advantage of it in the past.

I've managed to save several hundred dollars:

Booked NW STL-TUS-STL via NW Airlink to MEM, COEx to IAH, CO to TUS same on return, the RT fare was over $150 less than the one connection on NW via MSP, and around $80 cheaper than CO just via IAH. Both NW and CO websites had similar offers. I booked thru CO.

STL-TPA via ORD (UAX), DCA (UA), on to TPA on US. Saved just over $100 RT than a nonstop or single airline connection. This one was odd because I booked it thru UA, the cheapest thing I found on US was nearly $100 MORE than the cheapest fare on ANYONE.

STL-BNA on NW and DL via CVG and MEM. Only saved $80 RT over the AA Connection nonstop, but my friends couldn't pick me up until after 4pm so I spent the day zig-zagging. Booked that one thru DL.

If you're a cheap bastard (like me) and have some spare time, and enjoy flying (if you don't... get off this website NOW) those multi-airline/connecting fares are wonderful!



Next Up: STL-LGA-RIC-ATL-STL
User currently offlineBWI5OH From United States of America, joined Apr 2007, 158 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (6 years 9 months 2 weeks 2 days 11 hours ago) and read 4533 times:

Thanks for all of the explanations! I had no clue airlines did this so often and how cost effective it is for us who don't mind flying roundabout ways and on different metal at that!!


"It's all fun and games until the cops show up"
User currently offlineJetdeltamsy From United States of America, joined Nov 2000, 2987 posts, RR: 8
Reply 7, posted (6 years 9 months 2 weeks 2 days 10 hours ago) and read 4479 times:

You are far from the only one who is confused by this whole, insane "code sharing" chaos.

Every day people show up at the wrong ticket counters and are sold seats that are actaully on airlines they would prefer not to fly.

A manager at Delta tried to explain to me that the company's revenue is increased by such activities. But it all sounded like a bunch of hooie to me. A confused customer is not a good thing.

In the good old days, airlines offered JOINT FARES. Joint Fares gave the benefits of a connecting fare while fully disclosing to the customer whose airplane they would be flying. For example...Delta, New Orleans to Bermuda and return. One could fly either Delta to Atlanta to connect Delta's flight to Bermuda OR one could choose to take Eastern's flight to Atlanta and connect to Delta'a flight to Bermuda...either one for the same price. The Eastern flight to Atlanta offered a later departure from New Orleans and a tighter, move convenient connecting time in Atlanta. Everyone who was ticketed as EA to DL knew what they were getting up front.

I think the current code-share system amounts to false advertising. It is confusing to customers and employees alike.



Tired of airline bankruptcies....EA/PA/TW and finally DL.
User currently onlineCubsrule From United States of America, joined May 2004, 22718 posts, RR: 20
Reply 8, posted (6 years 9 months 2 weeks 2 days 10 hours ago) and read 4458 times:

Quoting Jetdeltamsy (Reply 7):
I think the current code-share system amounts to false advertising. It is confusing to customers and employees alike.

It's not like it is difficult to determine who is operating the flights. While airports and airlines could certainly make it less confusing, it seems like anyone with half a brain can figure out who is operating their flight. Booking websites generally display the information pretty prominently.



I can't decide whether I miss the tulip or the bowling shoe more
User currently offlineBWI5OH From United States of America, joined Apr 2007, 158 posts, RR: 0
Reply 9, posted (6 years 9 months 2 weeks 2 days 6 hours ago) and read 4392 times:

I knew that I was booking a flight on NW tin, but why even give it a Delta flight number? It already has a NW flight number!! Do they do that for revenue purposes?


"It's all fun and games until the cops show up"
User currently offlineMasseyBrown From United States of America, joined Dec 2002, 5365 posts, RR: 7
Reply 10, posted (6 years 9 months 2 weeks 2 days 6 hours ago) and read 4365 times:

Quoting Jetdeltamsy (Reply 7):
I think the current code-share system amounts to false advertising. It is confusing to customers and employees alike.

The economics of code-sharing is even stranger. There is a theory that says NW doesn't offer code-share BWI-DSM fares in order to make money carrying people between those two cities; instead they do it in order to reduce available capacity on BWI-MSP and MSP-DSM in order to raise yields on the much greater O&D traffic of those monopoly routes.



I love long German words like 'Freundschaftsbezeigungen'.
User currently offlineAtrude777 From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 5692 posts, RR: 52
Reply 11, posted (6 years 9 months 2 weeks 2 days 6 hours ago) and read 4355 times:

I definetly recall being a CSA for WN at STL..

Everytime people booked on ATA, they would go to Air Tran and try to check in first.

Then come over here and go where is the ATA ticket Counter?!

Alex



Good things come to those who wait, better things come to those who go AFTER it!
User currently offlineANother From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 12, posted (6 years 9 months 2 weeks 2 days 5 hours ago) and read 4321 times:

Quoting Jetdeltamsy (Reply 7):
In the good old days, airlines offered JOINT FARES. Joint Fares gave the benefits of a connecting fare while fully disclosing to the customer whose airplane they would be flying. For example...Delta, New Orleans to Bermuda and return. One could fly either Delta to Atlanta to connect Delta's flight to Bermuda OR one could choose to take Eastern's flight to Atlanta and connect to Delta'a flight to Bermuda...either one for the same price. The Eastern flight to Atlanta offered a later departure from New Orleans and a tighter, move convenient connecting time in Atlanta. Everyone who was ticketed as EA to DL knew what they were getting up front.

Well in these bad new days it's CRS display that counts. The insane rules (imposed by DOT) give priority to on-line over interline connections. While these rules have expired the CRSs still use them. So a DL-DL connection (even if one or both are operated by OAL) takes priority over a EA/DL connection - even if the interline connection is better.

Rather than fix the model they lie to their customers.


User currently offlineLimaNiner From United States of America, joined Oct 2006, 400 posts, RR: 0
Reply 13, posted (6 years 9 months 2 weeks 2 days 4 hours ago) and read 4299 times:

Quoting Jetdeltamsy (Reply 7):
A confused customer is not a good thing.

Since when do US carriers care about their customers?

It's sad, but the relationship between US carriers and their customers has been adversarial for a while now: the airlines don't give a crap about their customers, and the customers aren't willing to pay for anything. The only way out of the mess is to "reformat" the industry. The legacy airlines have billions of dollars of liabilities from insane pension benefits that they promised their employees starting in the 60's and 70's. These are breaking the bank, so current employees are getting screwed -- I'm pretty sure my car mechanic makes more money than RJ pilots, not to mention flight attendants.


User currently offlineDallasnewark From Estonia, joined Nov 2005, 495 posts, RR: 1
Reply 14, posted (6 years 9 months 2 weeks 2 days 4 hours ago) and read 4287 times:

Quoting LimaNiner (Reply 13):
These are breaking the bank, so current employees are getting screwed -- I'm pretty sure my car mechanic makes more money than RJ pilots, not to mention flight attendants.

This is as easy as the law of supply and demand. I never understood why flight attendants want high salary, what special skills are required to be a flight attendant rather than administrative assistant?

I know I would get flamed for that, but the truth in this case does hurt



B732/3/4/5/6/7/8/9, B742/4, B752/3,B762/3/4, B772/3, A306, A318/9/20/21, A332/3, A343/6, MD80/83/88, L1011, TU104/134, F
User currently offline6thfreedom From Bermuda, joined Sep 2004, 3322 posts, RR: 20
Reply 15, posted (6 years 9 months 2 weeks 2 days 4 hours ago) and read 4270 times:

Under some agreements, the airlines must sell differently.
Take the Australia-South Africa route, where, Qf and SA codeshare.

because they own almost 70% of the market, a restriction of the codeshare agreement is that they must price independantly (anti collusion).

the codeshare agreement is also a blocked space arrangement, where blocks of seats are purchased at a set price..

So say QF has 25 seats of its allocated 80 to sell on SA.
Unless it sells them, it still pays SA for them (no handback).
In this case, QF may consider dropping its fares below what SA charge..


User currently offlineBCA2005 From India, joined Sep 2005, 246 posts, RR: 0
Reply 16, posted (6 years 9 months 2 weeks 1 day 17 hours ago) and read 4106 times:

I know AI do this on their codeshares with TG and MH on BKK-BOM-BKK and KUL-BOM-KUL respectively. AI is often alot cheaper purchased as a codeshare compared to buying the ticket through TG or MH.

User currently offlineViscount724 From Switzerland, joined Oct 2006, 24817 posts, RR: 22
Reply 17, posted (6 years 9 months 2 weeks 1 day 10 hours ago) and read 4042 times:

Quoting Goldorak (Reply 4):
But in these agreements, both airlines remain free to have their own pricing policies, explaining why you may have different prices from the operating carrier and the code-shared one. Also the lowest fares may be fully sold for one carrier but not for the other one (as said in reply #1)

And if DL's and NW's fares were always identical on that flight, it would imply that they were discussing and coordinating the fares which would be totally illegal since DL and NW do not have antitrust immunity. When booking any flights where codesharing is involved it's always best to check the fares on each carrier as there will often be major differences, especially on longhaul international routes.

For example, you can sometimes travel in business class on Virgin Atlantic between LHR and the USA at much lower fares if you book CO's codeshare flight numbers. Just did a quick check of CO and VS fares in J class LAX-LHR departing October 24 and returning October 31, and the CO fare is over $1000 lower than the VS fare for travel in the same "Upper Class" seat on the VS-operated flights in both directions. I've often seen much bigger differences.


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
How To Purchase CO Skyteam Codeshare Flights? posted Sat Sep 22 2007 19:09:48 by BlueheronNC
AS Codeshare Flights And Curbside Baggage Check-in posted Thu Apr 5 2007 15:25:17 by GentFromAlaska
IB And SN Cancel Codeshare Flights posted Fri Feb 2 2007 00:04:56 by Aisak
Question On Earning Miles On Codeshare Flights posted Tue Dec 12 2006 15:51:45 by Coal
Price Difference From AA To Travelocity posted Tue Oct 10 2006 01:12:54 by CIDFLYER
KLM & AeroMexico Codeshare Flights posted Mon Apr 24 2006 04:48:17 by EddieDude
Child Free Flights - Why Not? posted Mon Apr 3 2006 14:37:51 by Cxsjr
Turkish Jetfuel Price Difference For Dom./Int. posted Sun Mar 26 2006 19:38:45 by TK787
Why The Difference Between EK's A345 And B773ERs posted Wed Feb 1 2006 00:01:00 by FlyingHippo
Pacific Ferry Flights: Why Such A Long Routing? posted Mon Dec 26 2005 00:05:46 by RobK