Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
US Airline Industry - Bad  
User currently offline777kicksass From United Kingdom, joined Sep 2000, 668 posts, RR: 0
Posted (14 years 8 months 4 weeks 1 day 8 hours ago) and read 1501 times:

In the US why do all of the big airlines just buy out competitors instead of actually trying? In my opinion they are just lazy. If they competed properly (like in the UK - BA vs. Virgin) they would get better and better producing better service and comfort (just look at BA and Virgin)

What do you think?
(Dont take offence, it's just my opinion)

4 replies: All unread, jump to last
User currently offlineGoingboeing From United States of America, joined Dec 1999, 4875 posts, RR: 15
Reply 1, posted (14 years 8 months 4 weeks 1 day 7 hours ago) and read 1480 times:

Whle I am totally against all these mergers, even after a AA/TWA or UAL/U merger the US will have far more airlines than any other country. Everybody knows that TWA was "financially troubled", but at the same time, many have questioned whether or not USAir can survive without the merger (I personally wish they could). So, perhaps it's just "survival of the fittest" at work.

I guess the reason that the US airlines don't work harder at service and comfort is because both of those result in higher fares. Give us a choice, and the vast majority of us will take price over anything else.

User currently offlineYaki1 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (14 years 8 months 4 weeks 1 day 7 hours ago) and read 1471 times:

For many airports the availability of landing slots at peak times is the critical factor that stops airlines from expanding.

User currently offlineMatt D From United States of America, joined Nov 1999, 9502 posts, RR: 43
Reply 3, posted (14 years 8 months 4 weeks 1 day 7 hours ago) and read 1455 times:

You can call it "laziness" or "cheating" or whatever you want, but the bottom line is this:
it is capitalism at its finest. Why take the time to build market share over a period of several months or years, which might not even be successful when you can just buy it and have it overnight? Buying out an airline has a dual purpose in the eyes of the shareholders:
1. Like I said, it's a shortcut to building up a market.
2. It eliminates that much competition.

User currently offlineAC320 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 4, posted (14 years 8 months 4 weeks 1 day 6 hours ago) and read 1447 times:

Well, at least it means there will be less crappy airlines to choose from. Hopefully, if they are not troubled by competitors, they can devote more resources to improving customer comfort and service ( I won't hold my breath). I am sorry if any one takes offense, but my experiences with several airlines have been less than satisfactory.

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Video About The US Airline Industry posted Fri Sep 15 2006 20:00:49 by Flyf15
US Airline Industry Finally Rebounding For Good? posted Fri Mar 3 2006 05:50:02 by AviationAddict
School Project On US Airline Industry, Need Help posted Thu Nov 17 2005 16:52:42 by Cadet57
The Future Of The US Airline Industry posted Sun Aug 14 2005 05:36:31 by DeltaGuy767
Why Is The US Airline Industry In Such Big Trouble posted Thu Jan 6 2005 21:09:18 by Cedarjet
State Of US Airline Industry posted Fri Sep 10 2004 11:12:30 by UAXDXer
US Airline Industry 10 Years From Now? posted Mon Oct 6 2003 05:59:52 by NWAA330
Gays And The US Airline Industry posted Sun Feb 23 2003 15:08:15 by ContinentalEWR
Newsweek Article On US Airline Industry posted Mon Apr 16 2001 07:01:08 by Watewate
2005 A Bad Year For The American Airline Industry? posted Tue Jan 31 2006 23:11:22 by JetBlueGuy2006