Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Airbus Or Boeing Failing To Deliver On Time  
User currently offlineMax78 From United Kingdom, joined Jan 2007, 19 posts, RR: 0
Posted (6 years 11 months 2 weeks 1 day 15 hours ago) and read 3445 times:

We have heard lots of noise recently following A400M and B787 delays announcements (in forums, in the news, magazines, etc..) However, nothing really new !! i remember not too long ago the A380  Smile, Eurofighter or worse.. the Nimrod !

I havent really seen any major AC program on time especially when these introduce either new technologies such as fly by wire, composites among others or new business models such as leveraging the role of suppliers into shared risk program, or the utilisation of multiple CAD/CAM software for the same AC and so on..

And I dont think we will be able to find more than 2 or 3 examples of civil AC delivered on time on quality on budget (maybe Falcon7X ?) and certainly none in the military world.

It is clear that Airbus and Boeing put lots of energy on changing that: they deploy new software, they launch Lots of new processes: Collaborative Design and Supply, Virtual Assembly, Lean Manufacturing, integrated planning ... But still we have seen recently on the B787 that "On time delivery" still fails and there is still a major impact for the manufacturer with penalties, cost explosion, stock drop ..

I am looking for your reaction on that subject and I am also trying to understand a couple of things like:
1- How much is the penalty given by customer to the manufacturer ? in civil/military
2-If this is not new for us, how does airbus' finance or boeing finance anticipate that ?
3-Is the same story going to repeat on the A350 ?!

4 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineBurkhard From Germany, joined Nov 2006, 4398 posts, RR: 2
Reply 1, posted (6 years 11 months 2 weeks 1 day 15 hours ago) and read 3426 times:

As far as I learned, Boeing got the 777 out as planned, but I agree that one exception does not falsify a general rule.

AFAIK, the penalties are low in the military section - high penalties in the contract mean that the initial offer just will be more expensive. I also assume that some average penalties already are calculated into the list price, so unless things get really bad they pose no real problem.

The A350? Airbus has a long time to design and build it - 2013 still is far away. If Airbus uses the time until than, they may succeed, but if they don't do their home works now they will regret later - but how was it when we went to school?


User currently offlineStitch From United States of America, joined Jul 2005, 31062 posts, RR: 87
Reply 2, posted (6 years 11 months 2 weeks 1 day 15 hours ago) and read 3423 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting Max78 (Thread starter):
1- How much is the penalty given by customer to the manufacturer ? in civil/military

For a commercial program, it depends on the customer. I believe the only data we have if for QF and the A380, and it was less then $200 million, as I recall.

For a military program, at least in the US, there does not seem to be a penalty. The DoD just picks up the tab if the program is written to allow cost-overruns, and the company does if it does not.

Quoting Max78 (Thread starter):
2-If this is not new for us, how does airbus' finance or Boeing finance anticipate that?

They likely set aside money to cover the payments.

Quoting Max78 (Thread starter):
3-Is the same story going to repeat on the A350 ?!

I would not be surprised if it did, but that's just a reflection on how complex modern airliner programs are, and not a slap at Airbus. I would not be surprised if the 737RS program or the 787HGW/Y3 program slips, as well.


User currently offlineRigo From Australia, joined Sep 2005, 91 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (6 years 11 months 2 weeks 1 day 15 hours ago) and read 3412 times:

As far as I know, the A300 was delivered on time, and it was also a very ambitious and innovative programme at the time.

User currently offlineAvek00 From United States of America, joined Oct 2004, 4391 posts, RR: 19
Reply 4, posted (6 years 11 months 2 weeks 1 day 13 hours ago) and read 3186 times:

All such issues are addressed in the contractual agreements between the carrier, financiers, and manufacturer.


Live life to the fullest.
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
What Is Easiest Way To Determine Airbus Or Boeing? posted Wed Feb 16 2005 16:46:07 by Bpaulg
Airbus Or Boeing On The Web. posted Wed Sep 10 2003 06:48:34 by Irishpower
AirMalta To Announce Airbus Or Boeing By 15 May posted Sun Apr 28 2002 16:48:41 by LMML 14/32
Boeing Expects To Deliver 737 Replacement By 2015 posted Tue Jun 26 2007 20:10:33 by Parapente
Suppose There Was No Airbus Or Boeing? posted Mon Sep 25 2006 03:02:02 by JAM747
Boeing Close To Breakeven On 787 posted Sun May 21 2006 13:29:02 by Lumberton
2005 Orders, Who Won? Airbus Or Boeing? posted Wed Jan 4 2006 22:37:26 by ElGreco
Boeing Looks To Stay On Top! + 900 Orders 2005? posted Wed Jan 4 2006 14:34:50 by Halibut
Why No Airbus Or Boeing RJ? posted Fri Jun 17 2005 05:12:22 by Airbus3801
Factory Tours, Airbus Or Boeing? posted Wed Dec 15 2004 14:49:09 by Manu