Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Could Easyjet Move Into MAN?  
User currently offlineMAN23R From United Kingdom, joined Aug 2007, 256 posts, RR: 0
Posted (7 years 6 days 22 hours ago) and read 2256 times:

Morning,

with the recent buyout of GB airways could easyjet be preparing to enter MAN in the not too distant future?
also with the acquired aircraft be painted in EZY colours?

MAN really needs a carrier like easyjet, MAN is currently in abit of a mess and needs something to change....

interesting times ahead...

PS. maybe being alittle biased due to MAN is my home airport!

regards

scott

19 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineFlyTUITravel From United Kingdom, joined May 2007, 723 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (7 years 6 days 21 hours ago) and read 2246 times:

Surely U2 into MAN is inevitable anyway, with the GT acquisition...

User currently offlineGilesdavies From United Kingdom, joined Dec 2003, 3041 posts, RR: 2
Reply 2, posted (7 years 6 days 21 hours ago) and read 2209 times:

I don't see it happening and would expect the GB Airways flights from MAN being discontinued from the end of March 08. easyJet has always taken the view that their LPL base sufficently covers the Northwest of England. Plus if easyJet had wanted to into MAN, I think they would have done so by now...

If easyJet moved into MAN, airlines like Jet2 and BMI Baby would be in big trouble. But I don't think any of the airlines have an appitite for a price war on existing routes, and does MAN really need any further capacity to the likes of Spain?

These are good airlines but easyJet really knows how to run a LCC airline and make routes viable which other LCC struggle to fly!


User currently offlineEXTspotter From United Kingdom, joined May 2007, 992 posts, RR: 1
Reply 3, posted (7 years 6 days 19 hours ago) and read 2113 times:

If U2 started MAN, it would be curtains for most of their current low costers. With sizeable competition from the Jet2, bmi baby and Flybe hubs, plus all the other LCCs, Ryanair, Helvetic, Air Southwest, Air Berlin, Aer Arran and all the Scheduled/Charters to the med, Mytravel, First Choice, XL, Thomsonfly, Thomas Cook, Monarch...

It wouldn't be in the interest of the U2 or other airlines or the airport to start a price war.



AF BE BY FR MV PD SZ U2 VZ DHC6, 8-3/4Q, 732/8, 763ER, A319, A380
User currently offlineTOMfly From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2004, 73 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (7 years 6 days 19 hours ago) and read 2070 times:

I agree its not the best option for U2 to move into MAN - however, I feel this is only the first of take overs between LCC's in the UK in the coming few years. If U2 made a bid for BMIBaby then this would complement all their bases give them presence at Manchester without causing a fare war. I'm a big fan of BMIBaby, but their failure to expand significantly has left them with no chance of gaining vital market share. Baby would fit perfectly with the U2 business model, the 737 Classics could initially be replaced by 737NG's in the short term. This only becomes possible if BMI put Baby up for sale, but if the discussed rumours of a BA buyout of BMI surface, this might be a nice little pay off for the BABY management team.

Sorry to drift off the topic - but I believe the only way you will see a significant U2 base at MAN is with such a takeover!



NO URLS in signature
User currently offlineSK736 From United Kingdom, joined Aug 2006, 527 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (7 years 6 days 19 hours ago) and read 2063 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting MAN23R (Thread starter):
MAN really needs a carrier like easyjet, MAN is currently in abit of a mess and needs something to change

How exactly would MAN's problems be solved by easyJet? Ultimately the market decides where airlines operate from. If easyJet thought MAN had any potential they would have been operating from there a long time ago.


User currently offlineBennett123 From United Kingdom, joined Aug 2004, 7705 posts, RR: 3
Reply 6, posted (7 years 6 days 18 hours ago) and read 2033 times:

In fact, U2 has got B737-700's going spare.

User currently onlineHUYfan From United Kingdom, joined Oct 2001, 1411 posts, RR: 3
Reply 7, posted (7 years 6 days 18 hours ago) and read 2024 times:

I don't think EZY will continue the Manchester operation. It doesn't make sense in any case. MAN actually has a great range of low cost flights, it doesn't NEED EZY or FR at all. There are, admittedly a few gaps, but these will invariably be filled in time.

Regards

Mike


User currently offlinePlymSpotter From Spain, joined Jun 2004, 11673 posts, RR: 60
Reply 8, posted (7 years 6 days 18 hours ago) and read 1977 times:

Quoting Gilesdavies (Reply 2):
I don't see it happening and would expect the GB Airways flights from MAN being discontinued from the end of March 08. easyJet has always taken the view that their LPL base sufficently covers the Northwest of England. Plus if easyJet had wanted to into MAN, I think they would have done so by now...

This was said about BHX - with EMA up the road they didn't need to fly from Birmingham, but now they are starting flights.


Dan Smile



...love is just a camouflage for what resembles rage again...
User currently offlineCYatUK From United Kingdom, joined Apr 2006, 810 posts, RR: 0
Reply 9, posted (7 years 6 days 17 hours ago) and read 1955 times:

Quoting Gilesdavies (Reply 2):
I don't see it happening and would expect the GB Airways flights from MAN being discontinued from the end of March 08. easyJet has always taken the view that their LPL base sufficiently covers the Northwest of England. Plus if easyJet had wanted to into MAN, I think they would have done so by now...

If easyJet moved into MAN, airlines like Jet2 and BMI Baby would be in big trouble. But I don't think any of the airlines have an appetite for a price war on existing routes, and does MAN really need any further capacity to the likes of Spain?

Ok I may be a bit biased here but don't forget the flights GB operates to PFO, Cyprus and other non-Spanish destinations.

The scheduled flights to PFO started as 3 per week 2 years ago (with CY operating another 3 per week at that time) and increased to 6 per week by GB and 5 per week by CY (with code sharing agreement with ECA on additional 3). Adding up, this is 14 scheduled flights per week in addition to the chartered flights operated by airlines like FCA, TOM etc

I understand that longer flights do not feature in Easyjet's plan however based on the need for capacity from MAN to destinations that GB used to serve, it may be possible that Easyjet continues to operate from MAN.

If not, then Summer 2008 appears to be very promising for CY, ECA, TOM, FCA, and the other charters.



CY@Uk
User currently offlineBanco From United Kingdom, joined Oct 2001, 14752 posts, RR: 53
Reply 10, posted (7 years 6 days 17 hours ago) and read 1928 times:

Quoting HUYfan (Reply 7):
I don't think EZY will continue the Manchester operation.

Oh yes, they will. It's been explicitly stated in the literature to both EZY and GB staff that they will. Manchester slots are not easy to come by, which is partly why Liverpool was chosen. Now they've managed to pick updecent, usable slots and an operation already with a base there. Pretty disastrous news for LPL in the longer term I'd have thought.



She's as nervous as a very small nun at a penguin shoot.
User currently offlineHumberside From United Kingdom, joined Dec 2005, 4927 posts, RR: 4
Reply 11, posted (7 years 6 days 17 hours ago) and read 1904 times:

Quoting Banco (Reply 10):
Pretty disastrous news for LPL in the longer term I'd have thought.

When MAN gets a 3rd runway. MAN does not have enough spare peak time slots to allow EZY to move its whole LPL operation, and the GB deal will only have given EZY a few peak time slots. If EZY stay at MAN Im sure they will be able to complement their LPL operations well, as with BHX/GLA, LIN/MXP and CGN/DTM



Visit the Air Humberside Website and Forum
User currently offlineDavid_itl From United Kingdom, joined Jun 2001, 7396 posts, RR: 14
Reply 12, posted (7 years 6 days 16 hours ago) and read 1884 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting SK736 (Reply 5):
If easyJet thought MAN had any potential they would have been operating from there a long time ag

And they would have done so from 1996/7 (i.e. the time of the LPL base opening) has MAN not dropped their charges as U2 wanted them to. This is something worth bearing in mind - MAN was their airport of choice! However, MAN decided to see what BA would come up with in terms of a hub-style operation, but were left to rue that decision as BA systematically downgraded capacity and frequency on "competing" routes. LPL and U2 signed an "exclusive" deal for 15 to 20 years but contract can, and have, been broken e.g. BA and GT with the franchise agreement.

Quoting Humberside (Reply 11):
When MAN gets a 3rd runway

Not going to happen in either our lifetime or our children's lifetime!


User currently offlineNEMA From United Kingdom, joined Feb 2006, 720 posts, RR: 0
Reply 13, posted (7 years 6 days 16 hours ago) and read 1875 times:

Quoting Gilesdavies (Reply 2):
easyJet has always taken the view that their LPL base sufficently covers the Northwest of England. Plus if easyJet had wanted to into MAN, I think they would have done so by now...

I would tend to agree, ive got to think that Manchester know how to charge airlines top whack!



There isnt really a dark side to the moon, as a matter of fact its all dark!
User currently offlineDavid_itl From United Kingdom, joined Jun 2001, 7396 posts, RR: 14
Reply 14, posted (7 years 6 days 16 hours ago) and read 1851 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting NEMA (Reply 13):
ive got to think that Manchester know how to charge airlines top whack!

which would be news to IATA seeing that they've given them an award for dropping charges (down 30% or so)


User currently offlineNEMA From United Kingdom, joined Feb 2006, 720 posts, RR: 0
Reply 15, posted (7 years 6 days 16 hours ago) and read 1839 times:

Quoting David_itl (Reply 14):
which would be news to IATA seeing that they've given them an award for dropping charges (down 30% or so)

Any idea how they now compare therefore in charges to such as Liverpool?



There isnt really a dark side to the moon, as a matter of fact its all dark!
User currently offlineBanco From United Kingdom, joined Oct 2001, 14752 posts, RR: 53
Reply 16, posted (7 years 6 days 16 hours ago) and read 1826 times:

Quoting Humberside (Reply 11):
Quoting Banco (Reply 10):
Pretty disastrous news for LPL in the longer term I'd have thought.

When MAN gets a 3rd runway. MAN does not have enough spare peak time slots to allow EZY to move its whole LPL operation, and the GB deal will only have given EZY a few peak time slots

Not the point - and not how Easyjet operate either.

Go back 6 years and they had no presence at LGW either. When BA ceded slots post Sept 11th, they got a few rotations and nothing more. They've built their operation into a sizable one even before this purchase of GB Airways. They'll do exactly the same at Manchester - look to build and build and acquire slots - hence disastrous news for LPL in the longer term as I said.



She's as nervous as a very small nun at a penguin shoot.
User currently offlineBy738 From Tonga, joined Sep 2000, 2372 posts, RR: 1
Reply 17, posted (7 years 6 days 15 hours ago) and read 1786 times:

Quoting Humberside (Reply 11):
If EZY stay at MAN Im sure they will be able to complement their LPL operations well, as with BHX/GLA,

Im not sure I understand that. What has BHX and GLA got to do with LPL ?


User currently offlineDavid_itl From United Kingdom, joined Jun 2001, 7396 posts, RR: 14
Reply 18, posted (7 years 6 days 15 hours ago) and read 1750 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting By738 (Reply 17):
What has BHX and GLA got to do with LPL

Think he's referring starting BHX whilst having a base at EMA and similarly for GLA and EDI. Hence the analogy that just because they already operate at an airprot down the road, it does not preclude them from ever opening up a nearby airport.


User currently offlineHumberside From United Kingdom, joined Dec 2005, 4927 posts, RR: 4
Reply 19, posted (7 years 6 days ago) and read 1623 times:

GLA was a typo - I meant EMA. David sums up the point I was trying to make though


Visit the Air Humberside Website and Forum
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
British Open Charters Into MAN? posted Fri Jul 21 2006 00:13:00 by FXramper
Assistance On Idnetifying An Aircraft Into MAN posted Wed Jun 28 2006 19:17:35 by Foxy
It's Official, AA To Move Into Term D 10/29 posted Tue Sep 27 2005 19:11:44 by Apodino
Could Boeing Move 787 Production Line? posted Wed Sep 14 2005 16:54:08 by Lumberton
Airship Floats Into MAN Airspace posted Mon Feb 21 2005 11:10:48 by Planespotterx
EasyJet Still Considering MAN posted Sat Dec 4 2004 15:31:29 by Trident2e
Trident Move To MAN posted Tue Oct 5 2004 21:14:10 by EZYAirbus
If DL Closes DFW, Could AA Move In? posted Thu Sep 2 2004 11:42:21 by SHUPirate1
If You Could Go Back Into Time..... posted Wed Apr 21 2004 19:23:27 by CougarAviator
Will Delta Eventually Move Into WorldGateway? posted Sun Feb 8 2004 03:59:13 by JetsGo