Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
CRJ's May Have To Be Grounded Due To Crew Shortage  
User currently offlineAirbusCanada From Canada, joined Nov 2004, 331 posts, RR: 0
Posted (7 years 1 month 4 weeks 9 hours ago) and read 10238 times:

As most of the U.S. majors are re-hiring pilots again, a lot of the CRJ pilots are moving to the larger narrowbody jets in the States. The LCC%u2019s with their sizeable fleet are also attracting a lot of CRJ pilots. Worldwide CRJ Pilot attrition rate is running around 25%, and its%u2019 probably much higher in the U.S. As a result, the U.S. regional are now hiring pilots straight out of flying school to keep their CRJ fleet off the ground.

Unfortunately, this does not solve the problem. There are only about 37 CRJ simulators available worldwide to do initial training for new CRJ pilots. Not a single CRJ Level D simulator was built since 2003. All the current simulators are completely booked for the next few months and all the major CRJ operators are desperately looking for simulator time all over the world. Current high attrition rate among CRJ pilots is perceived as a temporary problem, business case for constructing in new CRJ simulators does not look very promising, since it will take about ten years to make a profit on any new simulator investment. If things go the way they are going right now, it won%u2019t be too long before operators are forced to park their CRJ Jets due to crew shortage.

How are the Embraer/MD operators doing? Are they also facing such high attrition rate?

Deliveries.......................................................................
Active 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Currentl Active Fleet 1365. ( 976 -100/200/440 series, 388-700/900 series)
N.America active CRJ fleet : 1073,
Rest of the world:
Expected deliveries about 200 (2208-2012) mostly 900/1000 series aircrafts.
About 50-100 aircrafts are parked at this point....

List of CRJ simulators....
1. Montreal %u2013 BATC
2 x CRJ200*
(CRJ200 #2 RFT June 2007)
1 x CRJ700/900

2. Toronto %u2013 CAE
1 x CRJ200
1 x CRJ200/900*
(RFT June 2007)

3. Seattle %u2013 CAE
1 x CRJ700

4. Cincinnati %u2013 FSI
4 x CRJ200
1 x CRJ700

5. Charlotte %u2013 CAE
1 x CRJ200
1 x CRJ200/700
6. Salt Lake City - FSI
3 x CRJ200
1 x CRJ200/700

7. Phoenix %u2013 CAE
1 x CRJ200/700/900

8. Denver %u2013 CAE
1 x CRJ200/900*
(RFT July 2007)
1 x CRJ200/700

9. Memphis - FSI
3 x CRJ200
10. Atlanta - FSI
4 x CRJ200
1 x CRJ700

11. Dallas/Fort Worth - FSI
1 x CRJ200*/700
(*CRJ200 Pending)

12. Madrid - CAE
1 x CRJ200/700/900*
(CRJ900 upgrade Q3 2007)

13. Morlaix %u2013 Brit Air
1 x CRJ200/700
14. Berlin %u2013 CST Lufthansa
2 x CRJ200
1 x CRJ700/900

15. St. Louis - FSI
1 x CRJ200
1 x CRJ700/900*
(RFT Aug 2007)

16. Qingdao %u2013 CAE/Shandong
1 x CRJ200

Total 37 FFS. only one outside U.S/EU.

36 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineCptRegionalJet From Germany, joined Oct 2007, 123 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (7 years 1 month 4 weeks 8 hours ago) and read 10160 times:

Interesting....seems to be the same problem everywhere.

User currently offlineKohflot From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (7 years 1 month 4 weeks 8 hours ago) and read 10064 times:

This site indicates there are also sims in the MSP area:

http://www.panamacademy.com/a01_airline_training/simulators01.html

I noticed they don't list an IAD location anymore. Perhaps the CRJ-200 sim in Minneapolis was moved there after the demise of ACA/FlyI.


User currently offlineDashTrash From United States of America, joined Aug 2006, 1563 posts, RR: 2
Reply 3, posted (7 years 1 month 4 weeks 6 hours ago) and read 9915 times:

Most regionals are having staffing problems right now. Years of low pay, lousy schedules, and poor treatment have caught up to them.

The majors hiring pilots has certainly made a dent in staffing levels, but it is not the biggest problem. That would be the fact that there are fewer pilots applying the regional airlines that there have been in the past. Add in that most regional airline management failed to realize that staffing would become a problem, and did not ramp up hiring / upgrades in advance of this.

At my airline, the union warned management over a year ago that staffing problems would pop up sometime in 2007. Those problems popped up about April. It started with the more junior first officers jumping ship to go to other regionals. That has slowed a little, but now the mid seniority level captains are leaving for other carriers. The result is still being short of first officers, and now short of captains as well. Since we're still short in the right seat, the company can't pull the needed FOs off the line for upgrade training to re-staff the left seat.

We're still having trouble getting applicants in the door as well. No growth, six year upgrade, outstation basing, horrible schedules, etc, and I would apply here either.


User currently offlineItsnotfinals From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 4, posted (7 years 1 month 4 weeks 6 hours ago) and read 9901 times:

I would welcome the demise of CRJ's , they have seriously backed up several major airports. JFK should ban all CRJ's <70 seats immeadiately before the FAA forces the 20% cut in flights that has been threatened.

User currently offlineAirbusCanada From Canada, joined Nov 2004, 331 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (7 years 1 month 4 weeks 6 hours ago) and read 9889 times:

The Panam CRJ sims are not operational anymore. I think they are being bought up by FSI and/or CAE.
FSI have moved one sim from Australia (Ansett) to one of their U.S. locations, not sure about the date, but i think its right after the fall of Ansett.
FSI have moved one sim from france France to St. Luois this summar.


User currently offlineWingnutMN From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 653 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (7 years 1 month 4 weeks 6 hours ago) and read 9845 times:

XJ bought a CRJ200 sim from someone and is having it based at Pan Am in MSP. It should be operating by the end of November. They also are buying a CRJ900 sim. Word around is that XJ is going to have 900 sim built brand new for them. That one won't be available until next summer!

WingnutMN



Any landing you can walk away from is a good landing! It's a bonus if you can fly the plane again!!
User currently offlineLuisca From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 7, posted (7 years 1 month 4 weeks 6 hours ago) and read 9799 times:

Ad to the problem that a lot of flight schools are paying their instructors more than first year pay at the regionals. I know several people that would have to take a 45% pay cut to go to a regional.

User currently offlineAirbusCanada From Canada, joined Nov 2004, 331 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (7 years 1 month 4 weeks 6 hours ago) and read 9714 times:

Quoting WingnutMN (Reply 6):

They are gettign the CRH-200 bombardier, not a new sim but it was in storage for a while.
AS for the 900, is that a new or used simulator ?


User currently offlineTango-Bravo From United States of America, joined Jun 2001, 3806 posts, RR: 29
Reply 9, posted (7 years 1 month 4 weeks 5 hours ago) and read 9554 times:

Quoting Itsnotfinals (Reply 4):
I would welcome the demise of CRJ's , they have seriously backed up several major airports. JFK should ban all CRJ's

 checkmark  Although I would for sure add ORD to the list as well. It would be poetic justice if the right thing were to happen for the "wrong" reason, ie CRJs grounded for lack of flight crew rather than for the right reason, which would be RJs being banned from major airports that have become clogged by senseless multiple RJ flights where 2-3 flight movements replace one mainline movement carrying the same number of pax between the same points. On second thought, lack of RJ flight crews due to poor pay and working conditions would also be a "right" reason for high-priced RJs being parked.

It's long past time for aspiring new pilots to stop hoisting themselves by their own petard by working for the regionals; perhaps many more than in the past have finally caught on to what they have been doing to their prospects of stepping up to "the big leagues" by working for cheap in the regional sweatshops.



Quoting DashTrash (Reply 3):
We're still having trouble getting applicants in the door as well.

But I thought there were hundreds if not thousands of highly qualified applicants for every vacancy, clamoring to fly for airlines, even for the regionals. Wink So we have been told, at least, by those who believe that all pilots are way overpaid. You know the line... "market wages" dictate that regional pilots should earn no more than around $20k annually, mainline no more than $30-40k or some such absudity.


User currently offlineBok269 From United States of America, joined May 2007, 2104 posts, RR: 0
Reply 10, posted (7 years 1 month 3 weeks 6 days 20 hours ago) and read 9151 times:

The problem isn't unique to the CRJs. All regional airlines, operating aircraft from the Be1900 to the E-175, are feeling the crunch right now. Pay at the regionals for hte most part sucks, and depending on where you are, so do QOL and work rules. Most view the regionals as a stepping stone, and with 5 out of 6 legacy carriers hiring, plus the abundance of LCCs and Cargo carreriers, many are moving on to greener pastures. While some flights may have to be cancelled, an entire fleet of CRJ's most likely wouldn't.


"Reality is wrong, dreams are for real." -Tupac
User currently offlineSaab2000 From Switzerland, joined Jun 2001, 1619 posts, RR: 11
Reply 11, posted (7 years 1 month 3 weeks 6 days 20 hours ago) and read 9120 times:

The CRJ is already an outdated airplane. 80s technology. But 00s prices when they were bought.

Not the same economics as the DC-9 and other airplanes with durable 'techonology'.

The CRJ's days are numbered in years, not decades. That said, the -700 is a 'real' airplane in terms of performance. But it needs a more modern wing and modern avionics and systems. The fact that it is about 15% more fuel efficient than it's Embraer competitor means that the concept is not without merit.

Give it a truly modern wing, modern avionics (saving a couple hundred pounds of weight) and more modern engines and you could have a reasonable 'regional' jet. Especially in the 90-seat version.



smrtrthnu
User currently offlineApodino From United States of America, joined Apr 2005, 4317 posts, RR: 6
Reply 12, posted (7 years 1 month 3 weeks 6 days 20 hours ago) and read 9039 times:

You mentioned the two CRJ simulators at CAE in CLT, what about the CRJ simulator at the USAirways Crew Training facility, also in CLT?

User currently offlineSaab2000 From Switzerland, joined Jun 2001, 1619 posts, RR: 11
Reply 13, posted (7 years 1 month 3 weeks 6 days 19 hours ago) and read 9011 times:

Hey Apodino,

What are the latest rumors in 'Toon Town? I was up there today (visiting the folks) and stopped in Dispatch/Crew Scheduling to say hi.

We need rumors out the 'real world'! Or at least hope!

Bring 'em on!



smrtrthnu
User currently offlinePlanemaker From Tuvalu, joined Aug 2003, 6437 posts, RR: 34
Reply 14, posted (7 years 1 month 3 weeks 6 days 18 hours ago) and read 8934 times:

Quoting Saab2000 (Reply 11):
Give it a truly modern wing, modern avionics (saving a couple hundred pounds of weight) and more modern engines and you could have a reasonable 'regional' jet. Especially in the 90-seat version.

You say that the CRJ700 (EIS 2001) is about 15% more fuel efficient than the E-jet and yet you say that the CRJ's wing is NOT modern enough??? Putting on an even newer wing isn't going to produce any significant gain in performance.



Nationalism is an infantile disease. It is the measles of mankind. - A. Einstein
User currently offlineDispatchguy From United States of America, joined Jan 2006, 1253 posts, RR: 2
Reply 15, posted (7 years 1 month 3 weeks 6 days 14 hours ago) and read 8762 times:

Quoting AirbusCanada (Reply 5):
FSI have moved one sim from Australia (Ansett) to one of their U.S. locations, not sure about the date, but i think its right after the fall of Ansett.

That was a -200 sim which was converted to a -700, and moved to the FSI STL location. They had to replace some panels to bring it to -700 conformity, and the software, and get the feds to bless it.

I wanna say that was in late fall, 2005.



Nobody screws you better than an airline job!
User currently offlineXtoler From United States of America, joined Sep 2007, 953 posts, RR: 0
Reply 16, posted (7 years 1 month 3 weeks 6 days 13 hours ago) and read 8634 times:

Have any of ya'll noticed that some regionals are lowering their standards for letting pilots in? If I were straight out of flight school and I got hired on to fly an RJ be it CRJ or ERJ, I guess I'd be enthusiastic too. Unfortunately, this day and age, flying for regionals is no longer the stepping stone to the majors it is. I don't want to start issues with the regionals, but the best thing someone fresh out of school could do is have a lot of savings, be single, and go to some smallish airline in a "podunk" base and suck it up. The less people at your base of operations, the more flying you may get. If you ain't airport reserve, get a side job and have your uniform ready in the car, just in case you get called in while not getting paid on home reserve. Just remember, flying is a way of life and not a job. If you love it, you'll keep flying. If not, check out being an over the road driver or something. If you actually went to college and had a major, may as well do what you hate and make the most of it.


EMB145 F/A, F/E, J41 F/A, F/E, because my wife clipped my wings, armchair captain
User currently offlineSaab2000 From Switzerland, joined Jun 2001, 1619 posts, RR: 11
Reply 17, posted (7 years 1 month 3 weeks 6 days 11 hours ago) and read 8163 times:

Quoting Planemaker (Reply 14):
You say that the CRJ700 (EIS 2001) is about 15% more fuel efficient than the E-jet and yet you say that the CRJ's wing is NOT modern enough??? Putting on an even newer wing isn't going to produce any significant gain in performance.

I am obviously not an engineer, so take my comments with that in mind. But I have been told that the fuel burn on the CRJs is about 15% less than on the comparable Embraer. I assume this is due largely to the smaller (by far) cross section.

But I am also convinced that the wing, which has its origins in the early 80s, is not as efficient as what is being made today by Boeing, etc, with blended winglets. The new -900s seem to have an improved wing tip.

Anyway, I am sure that Bombardier has talked about the wing as a place to get improvements and decided it's not worth it economically to invest that much money for a 2%-3% gain in performance.

That said, the CRJ layout in front is old and the cooling components for these heavy screes is also heavy. How about a retrofit for LCD? They weigh less and require less cooling.

Just brainstorming for ideas on how to improve the plane.



smrtrthnu
User currently offlineGoldenshield From United States of America, joined Jan 2001, 6119 posts, RR: 14
Reply 18, posted (7 years 1 month 3 weeks 6 days 11 hours ago) and read 8105 times:

Quoting Saab2000 (Reply 17):
But I am also convinced that the wing, which has its origins in the early 80s, is not as efficient as what is being made today by Boeing, etc, with blended winglets.

Who are you trying to kid? Even what Boeing was putting out in the 80's is not as efficient as what they have today.



Two all beef patties, special sauce, lettuce, cheese, pickles, onions on a sesame seed bun.
User currently offlineNW747-400 From United States of America, joined Jun 1999, 504 posts, RR: 0
Reply 19, posted (7 years 1 month 3 weeks 6 days 8 hours ago) and read 7370 times:

Quoting Saab2000 (Reply 17):
But I am also convinced that the wing, which has its origins in the early 80s, is not as efficient as what is being made today by Boeing, etc, with blended winglets. The new -900s seem to have an improved wing tip.

The CRJ700 and 900 both have incredibly effecient wings and engines. The wings are derived from those found on the Global Express. The wings on these airplanes are solely responsible for the "real airplane performance" you say the 700/900 family has over the 200. The engines are the same as those found on the E-jets.

[Edited 2007-10-27 07:41:25]

User currently offlineSaab2000 From Switzerland, joined Jun 2001, 1619 posts, RR: 11
Reply 20, posted (7 years 1 month 3 weeks 6 days 7 hours ago) and read 7275 times:

Quoting Goldenshield (Reply 18):
Who are you trying to kid? Even what Boeing was putting out in the 80's is not as efficient as what they have today.

Well,sorry for being an idiot. I guess having 4000 hours flying the thing doesn't count for anything.

And yes, I do know that the -700 wing is better. I remember being on the jumpseat of a -700 that was asked to slow way down going into ORD at high altitude (FL200 or so) and the plan felt steady as if it were on the ground. The -200 would have felt like it was going to fall out of the sky.



smrtrthnu
User currently offlineGoldenshield From United States of America, joined Jan 2001, 6119 posts, RR: 14
Reply 21, posted (7 years 1 month 3 weeks 6 days 7 hours ago) and read 7246 times:

Quoting Saab2000 (Reply 20):
Well,sorry for being an idiot. I guess having 4000 hours flying the thing doesn't count for anything.

Your flying experience aside, my point is that the technology and knowledge used to make aircraft in the 80's is not what it is today (thanks to advanced computer design and modelling from the latter half of the 80's onward,) so comparing the 80's designed CRJ wing to Boeing's newest series of wings without comparing it to what Boeing was putting out in the 80's is neither a very fair, nor very logical argument.



Two all beef patties, special sauce, lettuce, cheese, pickles, onions on a sesame seed bun.
User currently offlineSaab2000 From Switzerland, joined Jun 2001, 1619 posts, RR: 11
Reply 22, posted (7 years 1 month 3 weeks 6 days 6 hours ago) and read 7204 times:

Quoting Goldenshield (Reply 21):
Your flying experience aside, my point is that the technology and knowledge used to make aircraft in the 80's is not what it is today (thanks to advanced computer design and modelling from the latter half of the 80's onward,) so comparing the 80's designed CRJ wing to Boeing's newest series of wings without comparing it to what Boeing was putting out in the 80's is neither a very fair, nor very logical argument.

I may have spoken poorly, but it was my intent to suggest that the modern Boeing wings are a vast improvement. Look no further than the 737-700 vs the 737-300. Look at the difference in the wing. Huge difference. I am willing to bet the a comparable improvement can be made on the CRJ.



smrtrthnu
User currently offlineGoldenshield From United States of America, joined Jan 2001, 6119 posts, RR: 14
Reply 23, posted (7 years 1 month 3 weeks 6 days 6 hours ago) and read 7179 times:

Quoting Saab2000 (Reply 22):
I may have spoken poorly . . . I am willing to bet the a comparable improvement can be made on the CRJ.

Accepted, and agreed. Anything can be improved. Of course, I'm still waiting on that can opener with built-in LCD screen.



Two all beef patties, special sauce, lettuce, cheese, pickles, onions on a sesame seed bun.
User currently offlineCRJ900 From Norway, joined Jun 2004, 2234 posts, RR: 1
Reply 24, posted (7 years 1 month 3 weeks 6 days 6 hours ago) and read 7165 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting Saab2000 (Reply 17):
But I am also convinced that the wing, which has its origins in the early 80s, is not as efficient as what is being made today by Boeing, etc, with blended winglets. The new -900s seem to have an improved wing tip.

Bombardier calls the CRJ700 wing for "all-new". It is 32 per cent larger than the CRJ200 wing, with full span leading edge slats. I wonder if the new winglets on the CRJ900 and CRJ1000 will become standard on new-build CRJ700 as well (Mesa has 10 on order)?

Will 40-50-seat ERJs also risk being grounded due to pilot shortage or is it only CRJ pilots that are moving on?



Come, fly the prevailing winds with me
25 DashTrash : Pretty much every type of regional airplane out there has a risk of being parked due to crew shortages. It depends on the airline, their attrition, nu
26 Doug_Or : Certainly, but the lack of sim time for the CRJ could be turning into a perfect storm. 1 year ago when I went to training they were talking about sen
27 Super80DFW : To bad they don't hire off of Flight Simulator. 2004 that is. I would love to fly a CRJ but I'm only 14.
28 Riddle274 : Thats ok, if flying is what you want to do, no matter what kind of flying - stay with flight simulator until you can get some lessons under your belt
29 CBPhoto : I just heard yesterday actually from a good friend of mine that XJ CRJ new hires are waiting between 2 and 3 months to get into a sim, thats how backl
30 Acidradio : It's OK. NW at some point has to pay for the messes it creates when it plays its regionals against each other. The fallout has to happen somewhere, a
31 PanAm747 : Okay, I can't resist joining in on this topic, so I'll begin by quoting Strother Martin: "What we have here...is failure to communicate!! We have a co
32 Flyf15 : I, for one, say... good. The CRJ is an advanced 121 jet airliner flying from large hubs to large cities and flights across multiple timezones. It is a
33 Flighty : A predictable situation. A very interesting ripple through the industry. On one hand, you have the post - 9/11 furloughed pilots all back in action. O
34 Apodino : As much as I tend to agree with that statement, the unions themselves have to share some of the blame. Remember, when the CRJ's first came out, and I
35 Bahadir : Pay me a wage where i can pay my rent, eat decent meal and not to depend on wife/dad/mom then i will supply my labor in to the market. Simple as that.
36 Bucky707 : The Delta pilots had no scope preventing CMR from flying the RJ. In fact in 95-96 ASA got several BAE-146s seating just over 100 people. It was only
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Snort! Have To Be 17 To Get A License! posted Thu Mar 9 2000 06:46:05 by 747-600X
What's Meant To Be Happening To TF-ARV? posted Wed Sep 19 2007 20:34:56 by AirbusA346
Air India May Slash Schedules Due To Crew Shortage posted Mon Dec 30 2002 10:49:49 by B747-437B
Air India May Slash Schedules Due To Crew Shortage posted Mon Dec 30 2002 10:47:43 by B747-437B
Would It Be Feasable To Have A Bi-Plane Airliner? posted Tue Oct 16 2007 02:45:22 by A380Heavy
10 A320s For Spring Air (may Be Up To 20) posted Fri Dec 22 2006 06:38:01 by Jimyvr
Mehadrin Airline May Be Launched To Counter El Al posted Tue Dec 12 2006 06:42:43 by Jimyvr
Do You Have To Be Good-looking To Become A FA? posted Mon Nov 13 2006 18:00:46 by B777A340Fan
New Airline Restrictions May Be Here To Stay posted Fri Aug 11 2006 19:35:25 by TACAA320
Argentina Govt' Will Be Able To Have 20% Of AR posted Thu Jun 22 2006 05:05:05 by EZEIZA