Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Midwest's Cost Of Delayed BE1 Retirement  
User currently offlineKnope2001 From United States of America, joined May 2005, 2919 posts, RR: 30
Posted (6 years 11 months 1 week 1 day 17 hours ago) and read 1794 times:

When Midwest agreed with Great Lakes to take over their BE1 flying back in February, Skyway still submitted bids for the four EAS markets of Escanaba, Ironwood, Manistee and Iron Mountain to cover any interim flying between the end of the current contract (5/27/07) and the actaul date Great Lake started up. These proposals are pretty detailed in both cost and revenue. Great Lakes has still not set a date to take the flying over, and those proposals can give us a good indication of how that delay is affecting Midwest's financial results.

A common misperceptioni s that EAS flying is guaranteed profitable. There's no guarantee. You bid your projected costs and revenue, and the contract builds in a 5% profit. But if actual revenue is less or actual costs are higher, they can be losers.

Here are details, with stats for all four cities lumped together and are shown per day:

Skyway's bid
159.9 pax per day
$10,181 revenue per day
$19,670 cost per day
$10,458 subsidy per day
$969 profit per day

The 159.9 pax per day was based on last year's traffic plus a margin of growth smilar to recent years. (Midwest has seen solid growth in these markets.) Instead, traffic fell well short of those projections, and actually dropped signficantly at ESC, IMT and IWD, just as trafffic has fallen at the bulk of Michigan airports year-over-year.

In addition, the DoT filed an adjustment to their subsidy, basically saying that they'd only subsidize the interim Skyway service at the same rate that Great Lakes bid for. So they are getting less subsidy than they requested for this interim period, too.

Using actual traffic fromt the 3rd quarter and actual subsidy, here's how the four EAS markets look instead:

119.7 pax per day (actual 3rd quarter)
$7,633 revenue per day
$19,670 cost per day
$8,693 subsidy per day (actual based on modified DoT ruling)
$3,344 loss per day

On the basis of reduced traffic and reduced subsidy alone, the EAS flying lost Midwest over $0.3m in the 3rd quarter. That of course assumes costs and revenue were unchanged between February (when they filed this proposal) and now. Any changes in those areas could have made that $300k loss on EAS flying higher or lower.

We don't know what sort of profit or loss the other BE1 flying returned for Midwest in the quarter, but as the BE1's continue to be retired the EAS flying is the majority.

The EAS bids are an unusual opportunity to see specifics on cost and revenue for the BE1 flying, and the numbers do not look very favorable. The longer it takes for Great Lakes to take over, the more it appears to be hurting their bottom line.

2 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineFreshlove1 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted (6 years 11 months 1 week 1 day 16 hours ago) and read 1742 times:

Yes but Skyway can basically name their price for the time that they are being forced to fly the routes until Great Lakes takes over. It is basically like Skyway telling the Government or whoever that it will cost this much to fly it and if we can't get this much we wont do it (cancel the flights daily) so then the Government raises the per fee departure amount to something that is agreed upon and favorable for both then Skyway continues to fly it until Great Lakes comes in. Air Midwest is currently doing the same thing in DUJ,FKL, LWB, and AHN until Gulfstream comes in. They are being forced to fly but are getting more $$$ to fly the route until Gulfstream arrives.

User currently offlineKnope2001 From United States of America, joined May 2005, 2919 posts, RR: 30
Reply 2, posted (6 years 11 months 1 week 1 day 8 hours ago) and read 1616 times:

Quoting Freshlove1 (Reply 1):
Yes but Skyway can basically name their price for the time that they are being forced to fly the routes until Great Lakes takes over. It is basically like Skyway telling the Government or whoever that it will cost this much to fly it and if we can't get this much we wont do it (cancel the flights daily) so then the Government raises the per fee departure amount to something that is agreed upon and favorable for both then Skyway continues to fly it until Great Lakes comes in.

Not at all... that's exactly what the DoT denied with their final order on June 6, 2007 in this case. The DoT said no, they're not going to pay the higher rate requested for the interim period. Neither with the DoT up the subsidy if traffic or revenue falls short of projection.

That, coupled with the statewide drop in traffic at most Michigan airports (as opposed to the increases projected) mean Skyway's revenue on these routes is likely well short of meeting costs.


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
How To Calculate Cost Of Flying A Passenger? posted Thu May 24 2007 12:46:26 by Temph0
Cost Of Painting An Aircraft posted Mon Apr 9 2007 18:34:58 by KingAirMan
Cost Of Inflight Movies To Airlines posted Sun Apr 8 2007 01:43:49 by SuseJ772
Cost Of Serving A F.C. Meal On 11 Hr Flt. posted Thu Oct 5 2006 03:07:55 by 747hogg
A380 Dev Costs Including Cost Of Problems? posted Tue Oct 3 2006 21:19:42 by Art
Cost Of Painting A Plane? posted Fri Jul 28 2006 22:14:19 by YULYMX
What Is The Cost Of A Dead A350? posted Wed Jul 19 2006 08:11:27 by Art
Cost Of Airbus Delays posted Mon May 15 2006 16:34:20 by Katekebo
Question About The Cost Of Insurance For Airlines posted Thu May 11 2006 03:14:52 by Scalebuilder
Cost Of Building An Airport posted Mon May 1 2006 19:42:29 by AirxLiban