Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Would US Airways Be More Successful At EDI?  
User currently offline8herveg From United Kingdom, joined Aug 2006, 1258 posts, RR: 0
Posted (7 years 1 month 4 weeks 18 hours ago) and read 2807 times:

Does anyone think US Airways would be more successful at EDI instead of GLA? It just seems GLA is better suited for leisure routes and EDI is better suited for business routes.

Would there not be better links between PHL and EDI?

6 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineGkirk From UK - Scotland, joined Jun 2000, 24964 posts, RR: 56
Reply 1, posted (7 years 1 month 4 weeks 18 hours ago) and read 2783 times:

Quoting 8herveg (Thread starter):
Does anyone think US Airways would be more successful at EDI instead of GLA? It just seems GLA is better suited for leisure routes and EDI is better suited for business routes.

Would there not be better links between PHL and EDI?

I hope this isn't another case of what GLA has, then EDI should have instead?
 banghead 

As for the question (if it's an honest one), then probably not. Edinburgh actually has more scheduled flights to the US than GLA now has, so US are better off at GLA.



When you hear the noise of the Tartan Army Boys, we'll be coming down the road!
User currently offlineDLPMMM From United States of America, joined Apr 2005, 3602 posts, RR: 10
Reply 2, posted (7 years 1 month 4 weeks 17 hours ago) and read 2719 times:

Quoting 8herveg (Thread starter):
Does anyone think US Airways would be more successful at EDI instead of GLA? It just seems GLA is better suited for leisure routes and EDI is better suited for business routes.

I would think the opposite as EDI is more tourist, university, and government while GLA is more business and industry. (I've been to both several times).


User currently offlineGkirk From UK - Scotland, joined Jun 2000, 24964 posts, RR: 56
Reply 3, posted (7 years 1 month 4 weeks 17 hours ago) and read 2704 times:

Quoting DLPMMM (Reply 2):
I would think the opposite as EDI is more tourist, university, and government while GLA is more business and industry. (I've been to both several times).

Edinburgh is a higher yielding destination due to it's Banking and Business industries.



When you hear the noise of the Tartan Army Boys, we'll be coming down the road!
User currently offline8herveg From United Kingdom, joined Aug 2006, 1258 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (7 years 1 month 4 weeks 16 hours ago) and read 2641 times:

Quoting DLPMMM (Reply 2):
I would think the opposite as EDI is more tourist, university, and government while GLA is more business and industry

I meant for the people flying FROM these two different airports. As in, most charter airlines fly from GLA and most scheduled airlines fly from EDI!


User currently offlineScottishLaddie From United Kingdom, joined Jan 2004, 2386 posts, RR: 8
Reply 5, posted (7 years 1 month 4 weeks 15 hours ago) and read 2597 times:

US seemed to do pretty well from GLA this summer after a pretty dire summer the previous year. Seems this is partly down to better marketing of the flight. The way they are marketing Scotland as a whole rather than specifically Glasgow, maybe in years to come we'll see them branch out into serving both airports which then gives the pax more choice/flexibility, who knows....

User currently offlineNighthawk From UK - Scotland, joined Sep 2001, 5186 posts, RR: 33
Reply 6, posted (7 years 1 month 4 weeks 14 hours ago) and read 2537 times:

Quoting DLPMMM (Reply 2):
I would think the opposite as EDI is more tourist, university, and government while GLA is more business and industry. (I've been to both several times).

Edinburgh is number one for both tourism and business. Edinburgh is a major financial centre in the UK, with a number of banks based there, including RBS, who have a large presence in the US.

Glasgow is traditionally a heavy industry city, such as steel and ship building, although this is receeding now. these type of industrys dont traditionally require air travel.

If you look at the passenenger stats you will see that traffic at Glasgow is mainly outbound scottish tourists, fueled by the large local population, plus the fact it is the main base of operations for the tour operators, drawing in departing scots from further afield such as Aberdeen, Edinburgh etc.

Edinburgh on the other hand has very little charter traffic, any charters you do find are mainly from abroad bringing tourists into the country. Most links are scheduled - to europes major cities and financial centres. As a result edinburgh is thought to be higher yeilding than Glasgow.

As for the question, Would US Airways be more successfull from EDI? Probably not is the answer, back when they launched then perhaps, they were competing with CO + AA from GLA, whereas EDI just had CO to the US. (unless you also factor in other airlines such as Air Canada, Icelandair and KLM from GLA and LH, KL, AF from EDI). Perhaps then EDI had less competion, however CO had only just launched and the market was still unproven.

Last summer you had just CO from GLA and both CO and DL from EDI, so perhaps last summer it was justified. All in all, I dont think US would see any benefit from switching.



That'll teach you
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Would US Airways Be OK Without The A330 posted Wed Aug 21 2002 06:05:10 by Rj777
Would Concorde Be More Successful With Low Tix? posted Fri Jun 15 2007 03:54:56 by B777a340fan
Could US Airways Be Picking Up EK's A346s? posted Sat Nov 4 2006 23:22:29 by FWAERJ
British Airways CitiExpress Engine Fire At EDI posted Wed Jan 11 2006 17:54:10 by Concorde001
US Airways PHL-MUC Stopped At Gander Today - Why? posted Sat Nov 19 2005 12:54:31 by JetMaster
Manston To Be More Successful Than Heathrow?! posted Tue Aug 30 2005 12:16:25 by Cornish
US Airways Diversion/ Medical Emergency At RSW? posted Sun May 1 2005 23:41:35 by APFPilot1985
Why Should US Airways Be The One To Go Down posted Sun Feb 13 2005 00:32:40 by SonOfACaptain
US Airways Adds 3 More MKE Flights posted Sun Oct 17 2004 20:51:57 by Mkeflyer717
Would US Airways Make It In South America? posted Thu Sep 30 2004 03:34:53 by Upsmd11