Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Is FlyBe Trying To Blame SAS For Q400 Incidents?  
User currently offlineCumulus From United Kingdom, joined Aug 2006, 1402 posts, RR: 1
Posted (6 years 12 months 6 hours ago) and read 6712 times:

Bearing in mind FlyBe is one of the biggest Q400 operators, anything detrimental to the reliability of the Q400 isn't going to help them.

This article from the evening paper here in Southampton, one of FlyBe's biggest bases.



Big version: Width: 1070 Height: 1287 File size: 354kb


Big version: Width: 1037 Height: 1304 File size: 453kb



What Goes Up Must Come Down, Hopefully In One Piece!
25 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineGilesdavies From United Kingdom, joined Dec 2003, 3038 posts, RR: 2
Reply 1, posted (6 years 12 months 6 hours ago) and read 6647 times:

The online version of this article may be more easyer to read:
http://www.dailyecho.co.uk/search/di..._of_aircraft_amid_safety_fears.php

I can see why FlyBE is quick to defend the aircraft, this is the backbone of their fleet and have got to instill public confidence in the aircraft for members of the public who live near airports and people boarding these flights... If they keep quiet, passengers are not going to know what to think and will be afraid to fly them - It does not take much for a media scare to prevent people boycotting the airline!

I don't think they are blaming SAS and in my view seem to be keeping quite an open mind... They are right to explain there is a number of differences in the way both airlines operate the aircraft and conditions they operate. On the face of it, they seem to have confidence in Bombardier...


User currently offlinePlymSpotter From Spain, joined Jun 2004, 11672 posts, RR: 60
Reply 2, posted (6 years 12 months 6 hours ago) and read 6627 times:

No, I don't think they are trying to blame SAS and I don't think the article is either, they are both keeping an open mind. The article states that:

"FlyBe said it would wait and see if investigations into the latest incident revealed issues with SAS's maintenance procedures"

Whilst FlyBe's own statement reads:

"FlyBe awaits with interest the publication of independent reports into the SAS short haul fleet and looks forward to learning of any issues with operating procedures with the aircraft or with SAS's maintenance procedures"

That's definately not saying that it's SAS's fault - it's sitting on the fence until the verdict is out. As part of SAS's Q400 maintenance is done at EXT, along with FlyBe's own planes, it really wouldn't pay them to come out and say that it was a maintenance issue!


Dan 

[Edited 2007-10-31 12:37:38]


...love is just a camouflage for what resembles rage again...
User currently offlineCumulus From United Kingdom, joined Aug 2006, 1402 posts, RR: 1
Reply 3, posted (6 years 12 months 6 hours ago) and read 6591 times:

Quoting PlymSpotter (Reply 2):
That's definately not saying that it's SAS's fault it's sitting on the fence until the verdict is out. As part of SAS's Q400 maintenance is done at EXT, along with FlyBe's own planes, it really wouldn't pay them to come out and say that it was a maintenance issue!

I was thinking that, but comments like the SAS fleet is "old" and operates in "extreme conditions" is a bit of a spin.....



What Goes Up Must Come Down, Hopefully In One Piece!
User currently offlinePlymSpotter From Spain, joined Jun 2004, 11672 posts, RR: 60
Reply 4, posted (6 years 12 months 6 hours ago) and read 6551 times:

Quoting Cumulus (Reply 3):
I was thinking that, but comments like the SAS fleet is "old" and operates in "extreme conditions" is a bit of a spin.....

Yes, definately. 6-7 years is not old and, as the main thread on the DHC8-Q400 discussed, the Oresund is not particularly salty. Spin though is spin - at the end of the day it's there to make you look better and you passengers feel safer!


Dan Smile



...love is just a camouflage for what resembles rage again...
User currently offlineFlyCaledonian From United Kingdom, joined Dec 2003, 2095 posts, RR: 3
Reply 5, posted (6 years 12 months 4 hours ago) and read 6332 times:

FlyBe has a load of Embraer 145s it inherited from BA COnnect it wants to offload. SAS wants to offload its Q400s. What about a fleet swop?


Let's Go British Caledonian!
User currently offlineDanny From Poland, joined Apr 2002, 3514 posts, RR: 3
Reply 6, posted (6 years 12 months 3 hours ago) and read 6236 times:

I am not surprised that Flybe is careful at what they are saying. Grounding of Q400 would effectively shut them down.

User currently offlineXT6Wagon From United States of America, joined Feb 2007, 3417 posts, RR: 4
Reply 7, posted (6 years 12 months 3 hours ago) and read 6144 times:

Quoting PlymSpotter (Reply 4):
Yes, definately. 6-7 years is not old

you must note that the Q400 and other turbo props age at a far different rate than most commercial aircraft. They might rack up in one year the cycles that a long haul jet takes 10 years to accumulate. So in many respects a 10 year old Q400 has been kicked around alot more than a 30 year old 747.


User currently offlineMultimark From Canada, joined Jul 2006, 796 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (6 years 12 months 2 hours ago) and read 6063 times:

There's no story here, Flybe has not had problems with their Q400's.

I am a bit surprised they're having those air contamination problems with the 146. That's been a known problem with the BAE for years.


User currently offlineSandyb123 From UK - Scotland, joined Oct 2007, 1119 posts, RR: 0
Reply 9, posted (6 years 12 months 2 hours ago) and read 6010 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

I don't think that Q400 gear problems on 146 air quality issues are Flybe's biggest problem. I flew with them recently... never again! Very expensive for a 'budget ariline' and service was very poor. Return flight CDG-EDI had no catering (not even water) on 2 hour flight because the catering had to be offloaded because of 'weight issues' - nice.

Sandy B



Member of the mile high club
User currently offlinePrebennorholm From Denmark, joined Mar 2000, 6484 posts, RR: 54
Reply 10, posted (6 years 12 months ago) and read 5887 times:

Flybe is at least bending the truth when when then write: "The thing is that there are Q400 operators across the world and until we hear more from the investigation this is a problem confined to Scandinavia."

The corroded internal treads, which made the eyebolt and actuator separate, causing the two SAS accidents in September, was subsequently found in various stages of development "across the world" on not brand new Q400s. They should thank SAS for having removed that time bomb on the Flybe fleet.

If they call 5-6-7 years planes "old", then it will be interesting to notice when they will retire their own fleet in case they don't want to tell their customers that they fly old planes.

Quoting XT6Wagon (Reply 7):
...in many respects a 10 year old Q400 has been kicked around alot more than a 30 year old 747.

Right, but that's accounted for when designing short haul planes - including the 747SR. 19 years old ATR-42 in this country are considered modern planes. 25 years old Icelandic F-50 and 30 years old Dash 7 in Greenland are not considered new, rather middle age with no plans for retirement. And hey, their airports are generally exposed to much more ocean salt than Danish airports, and certainly much more than CPH.

Maybe planes - like ham - last longer when constantly kept in the fridge?  Wow!

Also the greater part of those 5-6-7 years old SAS Q400 replaced 30 years old "domestic" single class configured DC-9s flying the same short haul routes. And what happened to those DC-9s? Some were sold to NW who equipped them with hush kits and fly them today, and retire them when?

Quoting Sandyb123 (Reply 9):
I don't think that Q400 gear problems on 146 air quality issues are Flybe's biggest problem. I flew with them recently... never again! Very expensive for a 'budget ariline' and service was very poor.

Anyway I think that Flybe has a bright future, mainly because of their Southampton hub. Several of my colleagues living in southern England have switched from BA to Flybe for their travel to Europe, not because they hate BA, not because they love Flybe, but only because they are willing to accept almost any inconvenience if they can avoid setting foot on LHR turf. A pleasant little car drive plus Flybe at Southampton make that possible.



Always keep your number of landings equal to your number of take-offs, Preben Norholm
User currently offlineCumulus From United Kingdom, joined Aug 2006, 1402 posts, RR: 1
Reply 11, posted (6 years 11 months 4 weeks 1 day 18 hours ago) and read 5724 times:

Quoting FlyCaledonian (Reply 5):
FlyBe has a load of Embraer 145s it inherited from BA COnnect it wants to offload. SAS wants to offload its Q400s

I thought BA kept its 145s from BA Connect?



What Goes Up Must Come Down, Hopefully In One Piece!
User currently offlineShamrock604 From Ireland, joined Sep 2007, 4192 posts, RR: 13
Reply 12, posted (6 years 11 months 4 weeks 1 day 13 hours ago) and read 5448 times:

[quote=Multimark,reply=8]Flybe has not had problems with their Q400's.[/quote

Flybe has plenty of problems with the Dash 8.. just thankfully not quite as high profile as SAS's. They are however, pleased with the a/c from an economic standpoint.



Flown EI,FR,RE,EIR,VE,SI,TLA,BA,BE,BD,VX,MON,AF,YS,WX,KL,SK,LH,OK,OS,LX,IB,LTU,HLX,4U,SU,CO,DL,UA,AC,PR,MH,SQ,QF, EY, EK
User currently offlineNoelG From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 13, posted (6 years 11 months 4 weeks 1 day 13 hours ago) and read 5448 times:

I think FlyBE know they have to be careful. If the issue is indeed with the salty atmosphere eroding the landing gear mechanism, it could also affect FlyBE.

Bearing in mind they have bases at many places close to the sea, such as Jersey, Guernsey, Exeter, Southampton, Belfast City etc.


User currently offlineBaron52ta From United Kingdom, joined Apr 2005, 211 posts, RR: 0
Reply 14, posted (6 years 11 months 4 weeks 1 day 13 hours ago) and read 5436 times:

Quoting Cumulus (Reply 11):
I thought BA kept its 145s from BA Connect?

http://www.airliners.net/open.file?id=1284605 is just an eg of their aquisition, note it has the BA blue underside still


User currently offlineFlying Belgian From Belgium, joined Jun 2001, 2396 posts, RR: 9
Reply 15, posted (6 years 11 months 4 weeks 1 day 12 hours ago) and read 5310 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

SAS has encountered many problems because they had very early models of the production. Not the case for BE.

No one will concede that position and certainly not BOMBARDIER and GOODRICH.

Taking the early models of a very new airplane always implies some kind of risks (industrial or safety matters).

Just my POV.


FB.



Life is great at 41.000 feet...
User currently offlineCumulus From United Kingdom, joined Aug 2006, 1402 posts, RR: 1
Reply 16, posted (6 years 11 months 4 weeks 1 day 8 hours ago) and read 4946 times:

Quoting Multimark (Reply 8):
here's no story here, Flybe has not had problems with their Q400's.

Granted, but if there is a proven fault with Q400 it will cause them problems.......



What Goes Up Must Come Down, Hopefully In One Piece!
User currently offlineRoyalAirMaroc From United Kingdom, joined Mar 2007, 187 posts, RR: 0
Reply 17, posted (6 years 11 months 4 weeks 1 day 7 hours ago) and read 4808 times:

Didnt GF encounter problems with salt water on their A320's ?


Life is a Journey, One Which I hope will include alot of Flights !! =]
User currently offlineJER757 From United Kingdom, joined Jun 2006, 350 posts, RR: 0
Reply 18, posted (6 years 11 months 4 weeks 1 day 6 hours ago) and read 4253 times:

Quote:
bosses have been investing heavily in the aircraft, spending around £400,000 on a new order earlier this year

God those Q400's are selling cheap nowadays... I'll take 2!!  duck 



Gale force fog... don't you love it?
User currently offlineTraineepilot From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2005, 78 posts, RR: 0
Reply 19, posted (6 years 11 months 4 weeks 1 day 6 hours ago) and read 4155 times:

Overall the Q400 does have a relatively good safety rating. I am always amazed at how stable they look in strong crosswind compared to a B737 or B757. They always make a smooth landing.

User currently offlineIceberg210 From United States of America, joined Dec 2005, 147 posts, RR: 0
Reply 20, posted (6 years 11 months 4 weeks 1 day 6 hours ago) and read 4087 times:

In my opinion there definitely is some problem with the Dash 8's landing gear at least in those models (didn't extend is a problem) and they have found the same problem with other carriers' aircraft so it isn't just confined to SAS. However only at SAS are they having trouble landing with both landing gear extended. I would then suggest that possibly the reason is that the tolerances in maintenance is less at SAS. Now I'm not going to say they are unsafe by any standpoint however there is something to be said about even after the attention these incidents got that we see another one of these. I would think they would be scrounging those landing gears and if they saw even a speck of rust, discoloration or even a speck of dust they'd be replacing the heck out of them because parts are cheaper than planes.

Anyway although I've never flown one I like the Dash 8 Q400 a lot for its economics, looks, and heritage so I wish the best for it and hope for the safety of all airline passengers that these events do not happen again.

Erik Berg



Erik Berg (Foster's is over but never forgotten)
User currently offlineEXTspotter From United Kingdom, joined May 2007, 992 posts, RR: 1
Reply 21, posted (6 years 11 months 4 weeks 1 day 2 hours ago) and read 3877 times:

Quoting Cumulus (Reply 11):
I thought BA kept its 145s from BA Connect?

Someone hasn't been to MAN lately. It crawls with them.

These problems will be solved eventually, it happens all the time to aircraft.

For the Q400, its landing gear, for the 737 it was rudder reversal, for the 146 it is air system problems. I could go on...



AF BE BY FR MV PD SZ U2 VZ DHC6, 8-3/4Q, 732/8, 763ER, A319, A380
User currently offlineCumulus From United Kingdom, joined Aug 2006, 1402 posts, RR: 1
Reply 22, posted (6 years 11 months 3 weeks 5 days 15 hours ago) and read 3644 times:

Quoting Baron52ta (Reply 14):
is just an eg of their aquisition, note it has the BA blue underside still

Where does FlyBe operate the 145 from/to?



What Goes Up Must Come Down, Hopefully In One Piece!
User currently offlineDavid_itl From United Kingdom, joined Jun 2001, 7394 posts, RR: 14
Reply 23, posted (6 years 11 months 3 weeks 5 days 14 hours ago) and read 3569 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting Cumulus (Reply 22):
Where does FlyBe operate the 145 from/to?

Nearly all the ex-BACon routes!


User currently offlineCumulus From United Kingdom, joined Aug 2006, 1402 posts, RR: 1
Reply 24, posted (6 years 11 months 3 weeks 5 days 3 hours ago) and read 3393 times:

Quoting David_itl (Reply 23):

Nearly all the ex-BACon routes!

Which is?!!!!!! Not ex Sou!!



What Goes Up Must Come Down, Hopefully In One Piece!
User currently offlineTeneriffe77 From United States of America, joined Jul 2006, 470 posts, RR: 0
Reply 25, posted (6 years 11 months 3 weeks 4 days 23 hours ago) and read 3300 times:

I was at BHX a few months ago and saw some E-145's in FLYBE colors and I thought they looked pretty good.

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Is It Safe To Buy Tickets For TED In July posted Thu Jun 2 2005 19:30:57 by Ffis34
Is JetBlue Trying To Kill Off Song And Ted? posted Sat May 29 2004 02:46:39 by JetBluefan1
Is Qantas Trying To Scare Off Customers? posted Sat Apr 6 2002 01:57:54 by B-HXB
SAS Fly Your Kids To Northern Sweden For "free"? posted Thu Jul 6 2006 00:23:06 by Robbie86
Who Is Supposed To Be A Vvip For LH's VIP A380? posted Wed Mar 22 2006 13:35:05 by Lufthansi
Is PSA Really Going To Be Profitable For LS? posted Sat Dec 17 2005 18:42:08 by DptMAN
Human Error To Blame For Helios Crash posted Mon Nov 28 2005 02:16:12 by N328KF
Woman Admits Trying To Open Plane Door For Smoke posted Mon Nov 21 2005 14:08:33 by BuyantUkhaa
FOD Is To Blame On Onur's AMS Flight posted Thu May 19 2005 15:55:35 by Bahadir
Crandall Is To Blame... posted Tue Apr 19 2005 16:17:21 by Jdaniel001