Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Ted Double-Ended Jetways Project At Denver  
User currently offlineUSADreamliner From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Posted (7 years 1 month 2 weeks 5 days 16 hours ago) and read 4325 times:

United started testing the dual-end jet bridges on gates for its discount operation Ted at Denver International Airport last year. The bridges allowed passengers to get on and off flights at the front and back ends of an airplane at the same time.
United said last year the bridges cut the boarding time for an Airbus A320 plane to 12 minutes from 18 minutes and cut the amount of time it took to exit the plane to 4.5 minutes from 12 minutes.

United had the bridges on five gates at DIA and had hoped to expand the program to other cities if it was successful.
But in March, one of the new jet bridges malfunctioned and struck the wing of a United Boeing 757 at DIA as it was positioning to unload the plane. The part that malfunctioned was the rear bridge, which was supposed to travel over the wing to dock with the rear door. Nobody was injured, but the plane was damaged.
United removed the section that failed and stopped using the over-the-wing part of the other four bridges.

"We acquired the jet bridges to save time for our customers by enabling them to get on and off planes more quickly. We continue to look for ways to better the experience of our customers."

http://www.denverpost.com/business/ci_7324922

18 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineKELPkid From United States of America, joined Nov 2005, 6428 posts, RR: 3
Reply 1, posted (7 years 1 month 2 weeks 5 days 16 hours ago) and read 4224 times:

Quoting USADreamliner (Thread starter):
But in March, one of the new jet bridges malfunctioned and struck the wing of a United Boeing 757 at DIA as it was positioning to unload the plane. The part that malfunctioned was the rear bridge, which was supposed to travel over the wing to dock with the rear door. Nobody was injured, but the plane was damaged.
United removed the section that failed and stopped using the over-the-wing part of the other four bridges.

So does this mean that the experiment ended in failure, and that there are no more dual jetway bridges in the picture over at UA?



Celebrating the birth of KELPkidJR on August 5, 2009 :-)
User currently offlineFlyingcat From United States of America, joined May 2007, 547 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (7 years 1 month 2 weeks 5 days 16 hours ago) and read 4135 times:

The link to the story has the title "United ditches double-ended jetway project".

According to the rest of the story the second half of the bridges will be removed. Dewbridge is disappointed but remains committed to the technology.

Aren't there other airports in the US where these type of gates are in use. I remember hearing that WN used some in certain airports.

Were they also unhappy with the technology?


User currently offlineBoston92 From United States of America, joined Aug 2006, 3390 posts, RR: 7
Reply 3, posted (7 years 1 month 2 weeks 5 days 15 hours ago) and read 4081 times:

Quoting Flyingcat (Reply 2):
Aren't there other airports in the US where these type of gates are in use. I remember hearing that WN used some in certain airports.

Well United uses them for widebody aircraft at DEN as well. These are different than the ones referred to here, correct?



"Why does a slight tax increase cost you $200 and a substantial tax cut save you 30 cents?"
User currently offlineJspitfire From Canada, joined Feb 2005, 308 posts, RR: 2
Reply 4, posted (7 years 1 month 2 weeks 5 days 12 hours ago) and read 3879 times:

Westjet uses them in YVR with great success. They have the only 3 dual bridge gates at the airport. The plane does have to be parked fairly precisely though, if it is off by more than about a foot, the rear bridge cannot be used.

User currently offlineLASOctoberB6 From Japan, joined Nov 2006, 2380 posts, RR: 1
Reply 5, posted (7 years 1 month 2 weeks 5 days 12 hours ago) and read 3846 times:

I've seen pictures of KLM's planes at AMS use the double-jetway system... Have they ever had any problems with those?


[NOT IN SERVICE] {WEStJet}
User currently offline777STL From United States of America, joined Dec 2004, 3766 posts, RR: 3
Reply 6, posted (7 years 1 month 2 weeks 5 days 12 hours ago) and read 3810 times:

Quoting Flyingcat (Reply 2):
Aren't there other airports in the US where these type of gates are in use. I remember hearing that WN used some in certain airports.

I *think* WN uses them at OAK, maybe PHX as well.



PHX based
User currently offlineKELPkid From United States of America, joined Nov 2005, 6428 posts, RR: 3
Reply 7, posted (7 years 1 month 2 weeks 5 days 11 hours ago) and read 3717 times:

Quoting Jspitfire (Reply 4):
Westjet uses them in YVR with great success. They have the only 3 dual bridge gates at the airport. The plane does have to be parked fairly precisely though, if it is off by more than about a foot, the rear bridge cannot be used.

Can they use it on the 600 series 737? I'll bet they'll have like a 5 minute boarding process if they did  Wink



Celebrating the birth of KELPkidJR on August 5, 2009 :-)
User currently offlineAirframeAS From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 14150 posts, RR: 24
Reply 8, posted (7 years 1 month 2 weeks 5 days 11 hours ago) and read 3701 times:

Quoting 777STL (Reply 6):
maybe PHX as well

Nope, we have no dual jetbridges here at PHX.



A Safe Flight Begins With Quality Maintenance On The Ground.
User currently offlineUA772IAD From Australia, joined Jul 2004, 1739 posts, RR: 3
Reply 9, posted (7 years 1 month 2 weeks 5 days 7 hours ago) and read 3545 times:

Quoting Boston92 (Reply 3):
Well United uses them for widebody aircraft at DEN as well. These are different than the ones referred to here, correct?

You are referring jet bridges that are used for doors 1L and 2L on widebodies (747 and 777). I believe B32, 34, 36 and 39 are the only other gates at DEN that have these. These aren't the "over the wing" bridges.


User currently offlineLuv2cattlecall From United States of America, joined Sep 2007, 1650 posts, RR: 2
Reply 10, posted (7 years 1 month 2 weeks 5 days 6 hours ago) and read 3486 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

I was on a few TED flights back when they used them and boy does it speed things up. If I'm not mistaken, don't both the bridges dock themselves to the aircraft? I've always thought that jetBlue should have gotten these things in their new terminal, the times I've been on flights with them where they use the rear airstairs have definitely been a pleasant improvement.


When you have to breaststroke to your connecting flight...it's a crash!
User currently offlineJspitfire From Canada, joined Feb 2005, 308 posts, RR: 2
Reply 11, posted (7 years 1 month 2 weeks 4 days 21 hours ago) and read 3286 times:

Quoting Luv2cattlecall (Reply 10):
If I'm not mistaken, don't both the bridges dock themselves to the aircraft?

At YVR the rear bridge is entirely automatic. The agent simply presses a button, and the bridge does everything by itself. The front bridge is still manoeuvred manually.

Quoting KELPkid (Reply 7):
Can they use it on the 600 series 737

I know they use it on the 700 and 800s, but I think the 600s were a bit too short...

It's really neat to watch the overwing bridge; It must be a pretty complex system to allow it to go over the winglet and into such a tight position over the wing and just in front of the horizontal stab.


User currently offlineADent From United States of America, joined Dec 2006, 1405 posts, RR: 2
Reply 12, posted (7 years 1 month 2 weeks 4 days 17 hours ago) and read 3146 times:

I used it once on TED. It was nice since I usually get stuck in the back of the plane since I am not a Premier - my seat was right near the jetway.

The failure was structural, not due to a failure in the automated system.


User currently offlineApodino From United States of America, joined Apr 2005, 4317 posts, RR: 6
Reply 13, posted (7 years 1 month 2 weeks 4 days 12 hours ago) and read 2979 times:

Is it just me, or does it seem like every high tech thing in DEN that is supposed to bring aviation into the 21st century end up flopping. Between the automatic baggage system, the winter meltdown last year even though the airport was supposedly weather proof, and now the jetway failure. Maybe some airline picked another airport for the guinea pig (CO in IAH or AA in DFW for example) something might actually work.

User currently offlineFrontierflyer From United States of America, joined Aug 2007, 216 posts, RR: 1
Reply 14, posted (7 years 1 month 2 weeks 4 days 11 hours ago) and read 2949 times:

Don't forget the crumbling concrete

User currently offlineFutureSDPDcop From United States of America, joined Feb 2006, 1293 posts, RR: 5
Reply 15, posted (7 years 1 month 2 weeks 4 days 11 hours ago) and read 2886 times:

Quoting 777STL (Reply 6):
I *think* WN uses them at OAK, maybe PHX as well.

I'm gonna have to say no to OAK as most of my traveling on WN takes me up to OAK. Not even the new gates (27-32) have the dual jetways. I believe ALB has dual jetways however.


User currently offlineFrontierflyer From United States of America, joined Aug 2007, 216 posts, RR: 1
Reply 16, posted (7 years 1 month 2 weeks 4 days 10 hours ago) and read 2823 times:

They should load by window middle and then aisle seats to make things go quicker.

[Edited 2007-11-01 21:36:14]

User currently offlineKL5147 From Netherlands, joined Aug 2005, 337 posts, RR: 0
Reply 17, posted (7 years 1 month 2 weeks 3 days 16 hours ago) and read 2618 times:

Quoting LASOctoberB6 (Reply 5):
I've seen pictures of KLM's planes at AMS use the double-jetway system... Have they ever had any problems with those?

As far as I know the did not.
One jet-way of the double ended jet-way a the C-pier, not the over-the-wing-part, is sometimes used by narrow bodies too.
But I think the double ended Jetways at AMS are from a different design then those at DEN



"The world is just a click away!"
User currently offlineDesertAir From Mexico, joined Jan 2006, 1478 posts, RR: 0
Reply 18, posted (7 years 1 month 2 weeks 3 days 2 hours ago) and read 2434 times:

This thread reminds me of the times when PSA allowed passengers to exit their 727s through the rear stairway. I did this a number of times in Burbank. As a frequent WN flyer I find the exiting process frustrating at times when people do not wait their turn and rush past those attempting to retrieve thier bags from the overheads. The double entrance and exits would really speed the processes up and reudce frustration.

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
New United Express Facility Opens At Denver posted Tue Apr 24 2007 16:30:35 by BA
TSA Missed 90% Of Bombs At Denver Airport posted Mon Apr 2 2007 18:01:44 by Clickhappy
DL Landing Incident At Denver Int'l Airport posted Thu Oct 12 2006 02:50:17 by Brick
Help ID'ing A 747 At Denver Int'l posted Tue Sep 19 2006 03:51:36 by Brick
Past AA Crashes At Denver posted Thu Jun 1 2006 05:31:41 by AAden
F9 Company Store At Denver HQ? posted Wed Nov 23 2005 09:07:39 by USAFHummer
$1.5 Million Proposed For Terminal Project At AZO posted Fri Nov 18 2005 23:10:43 by KarlB737
True Story At Denver Airport. posted Tue Nov 1 2005 12:44:56 by VS773ER
Another Crash At Denver Centennial posted Sun Aug 14 2005 05:30:23 by DLKAPA
Two UA A320's Tangle At Denver Int'l posted Thu Aug 4 2005 18:56:19 by Brick