Qantas737 From Australia, joined Jul 2000, 738 posts, RR: 4
Reply 3, posted (14 years 3 months 2 weeks 1 day 17 hours ago) and read 694 times:
Why does it have to still have the "Top" in the name?? Its not just a hump up front like a 747, its got a whole new deck. So in my opinion they wont carry on the "Top" into the A380. Why? Whole new aicraft, and it has a complete top deck not just a hump.
Phileo From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 4, posted (14 years 3 months 2 weeks 1 day 15 hours ago) and read 680 times:
I think SIA would adopt a much artistic name (something to do with their Singapore girls) instead of a boring computer hard disk like name. Well, this was being proven with their A340 (Celestar) and B777 (Jubilee).
Singapore_Air From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2000, 13748 posts, RR: 18
Reply 5, posted (14 years 3 months 2 weeks 1 day 15 hours ago) and read 677 times:
Hmm. But the A380 isn't artisitc that's the point. The A340 and 777 signify elegant names and swishy-swoshy. But the 747 is bulky hence Top, and the A380, well that's just a beautiful fat elephant. So an artistic name wouldn't really fit.