Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
PVG-YUL In 2008-2009?  
User currently offlineAircellist From Canada, joined Oct 2004, 1729 posts, RR: 8
Posted (7 years 3 weeks 3 days 5 hours ago) and read 2190 times:

This morning, on Radio-Canada, I heard an interview of Montr�al's Mayor, G�rald Tremblay, who is in Shanghai with a trade delegation, and he told the reporter that, along with a representative of ADM (A�roports de Montr�al), they had a meeting at Shanghai Airlines, and they were looking to a direct liaison between Shanghai and Montr�al in 2008 or 2009.

Any chance of it happening for real?

I did a search and fond nothing about it.

13 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineSebring From Canada, joined Jul 2004, 1666 posts, RR: 14
Reply 1, posted (7 years 3 weeks 3 days 5 hours ago) and read 2169 times:

Considering that there was a story recently about the Chinese allocating all new North American frequencies for 2008-09 without any designations for Montreal, I highly doubt it. Given the current state of relations between Canada and China, it also appears that there is little likelihood that China will soon confer on Canada designated tourism status which would be needed to really boost tourism numbers from China to Canada. So if I were a betting man, I'd bet against.

User currently offlineFlyyul From Italy, joined Jun 2000, 4999 posts, RR: 51
Reply 2, posted (7 years 3 weeks 3 days 3 hours ago) and read 2074 times:

Sebring,

Agreed 100%.. however, its coming from Gerald Tremblay, so there is some credibility to the rumour. I still dont buy it, and I would agree with your bet against it.


User currently offlineEXAAUADL From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (7 years 3 weeks 3 days 3 hours ago) and read 2062 times:

Is there a large Chinese population in YUL...does Shanghai Airlines code with AC so you could get conenction to say YHZ, YOW, even BOS, BDL?

User currently offlineSebring From Canada, joined Jul 2004, 1666 posts, RR: 14
Reply 4, posted (7 years 3 weeks 3 days 3 hours ago) and read 2062 times:

Quoting Flyyul (Reply 2):

Agreed 100%.. however, its coming from Gerald Tremblay, so there is some credibility to the rumour. I still dont buy it, and I would agree with your bet against

They can pitch whatever they want, but the Chinese don't seem to have it on the radar for 08-09. Shanghai Airways doesn't even fly to Canada yet. It's only going to start codesharing with AC. At this point, they are behind other Chinese international carriers in exploring Canadian routes. It would seem more likely that they will work with AC a while, perhaps start a route to YVR or YYZ, before getting into an all-new market for Chinese airlines. I also imagine YYC has more allure right now than YUL. A better idea for Tremblay might be to go to Cote Vertu Ouest and check out their plans for China.

[Edited 2007-11-02 14:32:59]

User currently offlineSebring From Canada, joined Jul 2004, 1666 posts, RR: 14
Reply 5, posted (7 years 3 weeks 3 days 3 hours ago) and read 2055 times:

Quoting EXAAUADL (Reply 3):
Is there a large Chinese population in YUL...does Shanghai Airlines code with AC so you could get conenction to say YHZ, YOW, even BOS, BDL?

There is a Chinese population, but nothing like the one in YYZ or YVR, and AC already offers people in YOW and YHZ good connections to China. Unless the Chinese tourism market really grows, and there is that obstacle that neither Canada nor the US are designated Chinese tourism destinations which greatly constrains the numbers, a YUL service seems far-fetched.


User currently offlineFLYYUL From Italy, joined Jun 2000, 4999 posts, RR: 51
Reply 6, posted (7 years 3 weeks 3 days 3 hours ago) and read 2047 times:

Fair enough..

But my question is why would Tremblay make a categoric statement, saying that they are "close" to reaching a deal. That implies negotiation based on some solid grounds for feasibility of the service.

Im not saying your wrong, but is it possible that we are missing something?


User currently offlineSebring From Canada, joined Jul 2004, 1666 posts, RR: 14
Reply 7, posted (7 years 3 weeks 3 days 3 hours ago) and read 2038 times:

How close is close and how categoric was he?

You know about close only counts in horseshoes.

Here are the 2008-09 route designations

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?p...1082&sid=ayKziNsynIMw&refer=canada


I'm also going to guess that with no 787s coming now until 2009, their 2008 expansion plans are already being pushed back, meaning it would be 2010 before they have enough planes to offer service to Canada.


[Edited 2007-11-02 14:48:15]

[Edited 2007-11-02 14:54:52]

[Edited 2007-11-02 14:55:44]

User currently offlineFLYYUL From Italy, joined Jun 2000, 4999 posts, RR: 51
Reply 8, posted (7 years 3 weeks 3 days 2 hours ago) and read 2001 times:

Sebring,

My question then becomes, why did Tremblay make such a statement? Knowing what we know, is Shanghai being disingenuous?


User currently offlineSebring From Canada, joined Jul 2004, 1666 posts, RR: 14
Reply 9, posted (7 years 3 weeks 3 days 2 hours ago) and read 1992 times:

Quoting FLYYUL (Reply 8):

My question then becomes, why did Tremblay make such a statement? Knowing what we know, is Shanghai being disingenuous?

Not having heard the comment, I can't interpret it except that when it comes to air services, politicians across Canada grasp at straws and make claims that don't pan out. Besides, since there is nothing firm or official, even good intentions can be expressed as "close" to be fact without risk of being called a liar if nothing materializes in that timeframe.


User currently offlineFLYYUL From Italy, joined Jun 2000, 4999 posts, RR: 51
Reply 10, posted (7 years 3 weeks 3 days 1 hour ago) and read 1953 times:

Sebring, thxs.. I agree with your assesment

User currently offlineYyz717 From Canada, joined Sep 2001, 16335 posts, RR: 56
Reply 11, posted (7 years 3 weeks 2 days 20 hours ago) and read 1843 times:

Quoting FLYYUL (Reply 6):
But my question is why would Tremblay make a categoric statement, saying that they are "close" to reaching a deal. That implies negotiation based on some solid grounds for feasibility of the service.

It's called hype. Or spin. For the folks back home. Fueled perhaps by the giddiness of a Mayor running Canada's 4th largest city (as measured by airport traffic) while visiting China. He has to show something for the wasted tax dollars in sending him over there....a vague non-announcement about a smaller Chinese airline talking about adding YUL service helps.

There is no way a small independent Chinese airline will bet the farm on new service to a minor Cdn market that the larger Chinese carriers have so far shunned, not to mention AC. Not to mention that ULH aircraft would be needed for such a route. Not to mention about 100 other economic realities preventing this from happening any time soon.



Panam, TWA, Ansett, Eastern.......AC next? Might be good for Canada.
User currently offlineLH423 From Canada, joined Jul 1999, 6501 posts, RR: 54
Reply 12, posted (7 years 3 weeks 2 days 9 hours ago) and read 1739 times:

Quoting Sebring (Reply 9):
Not having heard the comment, I can't interpret it except that when it comes to air services, politicians across Canada grasp at straws and make claims that don't pan out.

Exactly. Mayors around the world do this all the time. Take a look at the big hoopla that the mayor of Boston stirred when Hainan announced that they had chosen BOS over a few other US cities, including Seattle. At the same time, cargo flights were announced. The cargo flights have started, Hainan on the other hand will be launching services to the US soon, most likely to SEA.

Fact is, mayors generally don't have the same grasp of airline lingo that we do. Therefore, when an airline announces that they have a certain city on their radar, that gets translated into "we plan on serving your fine city in the near future". Sometimes it happens, sometimes it doesn't. However, I'd see China service out of Montréal as being on the list, but not a priority.

Who knows though. Hopefully Shanghai will prove me wrong.

LH423



« On ne voit bien qu'avec le cœur. L'essentiel est invisible pour les yeux » Antoine de Saint-Exupéry
User currently offlineRP TPA From United States of America, joined Oct 1999, 852 posts, RR: 0
Reply 13, posted (7 years 3 weeks 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 1628 times:

IMO, the closest we'll ever see a direct YUL-China flight will be if/when Canada and China ever come to some kind of agreement to end whatever is causing their latest hissy fit. AC could then start up their long-rumored service to Guangzhou, and use a 767-300 (or, at the rate this is taking, a 787) to fly YUL-YVR-CAN. Maybe it's not a non-stop, but technically it's a direct flight. AC often uses a widebody for the morning flights to YVR to feed their pacific flights, so this one might make sense. But I won't be holding my breath.

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
AI Cleared To Join Star Alliance In Early 2009 posted Sun Oct 14 2007 18:06:16 by LAXDESI
Possible A380 Delivery Delays In 2008 posted Sun Oct 14 2007 12:25:11 by BoeingBus
BA's Next Fleet Decision: 2008-2009 posted Thu Sep 27 2007 19:07:49 by Revelation
Iran Air To Be Privatized In 2008 posted Thu Sep 27 2007 16:34:50 by OwlEye
Air France A380 Test Flight To YUL In Nov. posted Thu Sep 27 2007 10:02:18 by FlySSC
Delta To Malaga In 2008! posted Wed Sep 26 2007 20:36:31 by RAFVC10
Virgin America To Offer Wifi In 2008 posted Thu Sep 13 2007 21:02:10 by Nycbjr
US Airlines New Transatlantic Service In 2008? posted Sun Sep 9 2007 22:11:25 by PHX Flyer
Air China , China Eastern Will Order A380s In 2008 posted Mon Sep 3 2007 11:05:26 by FCKC
SQ A380 Deliveries In 2008 posted Fri Aug 10 2007 11:51:33 by Ua777322