NYC777 From United States, joined Jun 2004, 4295 posts, RR: 46 Posted (2 years 3 weeks 4 days 1 hour ago) and read 7465 times:
Well Jon's blog... http://www.flightblogger.blogspot.com/ and Jon is promising some interesting updates regarding the 787 as well as other aviation related news. Glad to have Jon back....would love to hear what he's hearing!!!
Pnwtraveler From Canada, joined Jun 2007, 1204 posts, RR: 0 Reply 2, posted (2 years 3 weeks 4 days 1 hour ago) and read 7447 times:
Yahooo!!! Bout time we get some real news again rather than wonton speculation. Well won't end the speculation but the real scoup is far more facinating. Welcome back Jon and look forward to hearing from you again!
NYC777 From United States, joined Jun 2004, 4295 posts, RR: 46 Reply 4, posted (2 years 3 weeks 4 days ago) and read 7229 times:
Quoting Milan320 (Reply 3): Great but perhaps it should be called BoeingBlogger .... Anything not to do with Boeing ever on his blog in the past?
/Milan320
Well maybe you should start an "Airbusblogger" site. BTW, Jon is going to be covering more than just the 787 or Boeing on his sight.
EI321 From Iraq, joined Jul 2009, 0 posts, RR: 0 Reply 10, posted (2 years 3 weeks 3 days 23 hours ago) and read 6956 times:
Quoting Teme82 (Reply 9): Quoting NYC777 (Reply 4):
Well maybe you should start an "Airbusblogger" site.
Hey hey !!! That is for WINGS to do list next
While it would be nice to see an Airbus blog, I dont thing there is enough going on with their two most active programmes at the moment (A380 & A350) to warrent a fresh blog every few days.
Im delighted to see Jons blog return because it offers a true and unbiased insight into the 787 programme, unlike Randys blog!
ScrubbsYWG From Canada, joined Mar 2007, 1290 posts, RR: 0 Reply 11, posted (2 years 3 weeks 3 days 23 hours ago) and read 6931 times:
Quoting Pnwtraveler (Reply 2): Yahooo!!! Bout time we get some real news again rather than wonton speculation. Well won't end the speculation but the real scoup is far more facinating. Welcome back Jon and look forward to hearing from you again!
While jon seems to have more contacts than most, his blog is still that, a blog. Its not official, you never know what people's agenda's are(the people he gets info from), and so on. We have others on the site that talk to people from boeing(or so they say) and some of that doesnt get nearly the credibility that his blog gets for some reason. Again, until it comes out of boeing's mouths, it is still speculation.
Sphealey From United States, joined May 2005, 296 posts, RR: 0 Reply 12, posted (2 years 3 weeks 3 days 23 hours ago) and read 6875 times:
> Its not official, you never know what people's agenda's
> are(the people he gets info from), and so on.
That has been true of all sources of information ranging from traveling bards to the Wall Street Journal since the dawn of human intelligence (125,000 years?). Blogs and the Internet generally have just made that more apparent to people outside the very small world of the owners of the traditional media (and the even smaller world of the academic professors of the theory of knowledge).
ScrubbsYWG From Canada, joined Mar 2007, 1290 posts, RR: 0 Reply 13, posted (2 years 3 weeks 3 days 23 hours ago) and read 6810 times:
Quoting Sphealey (Reply 12):
That has been true of all sources of information ranging from traveling bards to the Wall Street Journal since the dawn of human intelligence (125,000 years?). Blogs and the Internet generally have just made that more apparent to people outside the very small world of the owners of the traditional media (and the even smaller world of the academic professors of the theory of knowledge).
i know that. but there are some here on anet that seem to think if it isn't written on flightblogger it is not true.
IAD787 From United States, joined Jun 2005, 470 posts, RR: 40 Reply 14, posted (2 years 3 weeks 3 days 19 hours ago) and read 6617 times:
Yep, it's true, I'll be relaunching later this week! I'll let you know what I'm up to VERY SOON. The blog will have a new URL and I'll let you all know where it'll be. I'll have A LOT more time to devote to it also. I'll be covering a lot more than just the 787 from here on out.
BlueSkys From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR: Reply 15, posted (2 years 3 weeks 3 days 18 hours ago) and read 6527 times:
Quoting IAD787 (Reply 14): Yep, it's true, I'll be relaunching later this week! I'll let you know what I'm up to VERY SOON. The blog will have a new URL and I'll let you all know where it'll be. I'll have A LOT more time to devote to it also. I'll be covering a lot more than just the 787 from here on out.
Vega9000 From Portugal, joined Aug 2006, 141 posts, RR: 0 Reply 21, posted (2 years 3 weeks 3 days 13 hours ago) and read 5616 times:
Quoting ScrubbsYWG (Reply 11): While jon seems to have more contacts than most, his blog is still that, a blog. Its not official, you never know what people's agenda's are(the people he gets info from), and so on. We have others on the site that talk to people from boeing(or so they say) and some of that doesnt get nearly the credibility that his blog gets for some reason. Again, until it comes out of boeing's mouths, it is still speculation.
Huh? I, for one, always assumed that his blog, although unofficial, was sanctioned (or at least authorised) by Boeing. A sort of "connection" to the airline enthusiasts community, if I can put it this way. Hence the "exclusive" great pictures of the 787 early stages, and the interruption when trouble was on the horizon. Now that everything seems to be back on track, the blog starts again...
Just my
Don't believe anything you read on the net. Except this. Well, including this, I suppose.
Welcome back, Jon! May I suggest adding a legal disclaimer onto that website of yours for YOUR protection? You might want to do that.... I have already done that on my MySpace.
A Safe Flight Begins With Quality Maintenance On The Ground.
Teme82 From Finland, joined Mar 2007, 711 posts, RR: 0 Reply 24, posted (2 years 3 weeks 3 days 11 hours ago) and read 4967 times:
Quoting AirframeAS (Reply 23): Welcome back, Jon! May I suggest adding a legal disclaimer onto that website of yours for YOUR protection?
Correct me if I'm wrong but did the federal court in some where in US rule that bloggers enjoy the same protection than normal journalist does? But I agree disclaimer is best way to protection.
DistantHorizon From Portugal, joined Oct 2005, 223 posts, RR: 0 Reply 25, posted (2 years 3 weeks 3 days 7 hours ago) and read 3825 times:
Quoting Vega9000 (Reply 21): Quoting ScrubbsYWG (Reply 11):
While jon seems to have more contacts than most, his blog is still that, a blog. Its not official, you never know what people's agenda's are(the people he gets info from), and so on. We have others on the site that talk to people from boeing(or so they say) and some of that doesnt get nearly the credibility that his blog gets for some reason. Again, until it comes out of boeing's mouths, it is still speculation.
Huh? I, for one, always assumed that his blog, although unofficial, was sanctioned (or at least authorised) by Boeing. A sort of "connection" to the airline enthusiasts community, if I can put it this way. Hence the "exclusive" great pictures of the 787 early stages, and the interruption when trouble was on the horizon. Now that everything seems to be back on track, the blog starts again...
Exacly my thoughs!
I wonder if the program suffers another delay wil the blog, again, be "interrupted"...
DH
26 ScrubbsYWG: Well, if that is the case, jon was somewhat less than truthful in the sense he said many times he was not connected with boeing in any way, got most
27 DistantHorizon: Correct. But I believe that what Vega9000 wanted to say is that, after tho shock, everyone tend to focus again on the main thing: putting this bird o
28 Pnwtraveler: I see conspiracy theorists are hard at work again. No doubt the 9/11 stuff has gotten boring for them and it isn't time for the next round of the JFK
29 AirframeAS: Under the first amendment, he is allowed to a blogger and the contents of whats on it (Freedom of Speech). But the first amendment does not protect h
30 Ikramerica: If only you knew what you were talking about... Seriously, my guess as to why he was away, was that his blog got sponsorship, became a company, and h
31 NYC777: I know for a fact that there was no sinister machinations behind the temporary stoppage of the blog and that it has nothing to do with Boeing. There
32 Observer: Holy smokes, some of the stuff here is over the top. "While jon seems to have more contacts than most, his blog is still that, a blog. Its not officia
33 ScrubbsYWG: say what? I think your comment was a bit over the top, and i'm trying to figure out how you came to think i wrote something sinister. and comparing i
34 IAD787: Scrubbs, I couldn't agree more with you on that. Those timelines did keep changing, and they were overly optimistic. A week here, a week there. What
35 JetBlueGuy2006: Glad to see you on your way back. I always enjoyed reading what you had to say.
36 DistantHorizon: I believe you. Really. No need to call bad things to anyone. I surely didn't. Still, it is legitimate to see things differently from you. Being grown
37 Vega9000: Gentlemen, you're reading far too much on what I wrote... Fair enough. However... What secret plan? I didn't say anything about a secret plan! And the
38 Sphealey: I don't think the vast majority of large corporations out there really understand blogs, citizen journalism, or the communications possibilities of t
Sponsor Message: 
From United States, joined Jun 2004, 4295 posts, 
From Canada, joined Jun 2007, 1204 posts, 
From Sweden, joined Jan 2005, 855 posts, 
From , joined Dec 1969, posts, 
From Finland, joined Mar 2007, 711 posts, 
From Iraq, joined Jul 2009, 0 posts, 
From Portugal, joined Aug 2006, 141 posts, 
.gif){kind=small}
From United Kingdom (England), joined Jul 2003, 8923 posts, 
Printer friendly format 
