Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Aeroflots Fleet Update  
User currently offlineSushka From United States of America, joined Nov 1999, 4784 posts, RR: 15
Posted (13 years 10 months 2 weeks 5 days 12 hours ago) and read 1109 times:

Has anyone heard about Aeroflot getting a newer fleet in 2001?
I heard that they were interested in A320s This would be great!
I fly on Aeroflot alot I would love to know their plans
thanks
Dave


Pershoyu Spravoyu Litaki!
9 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineKing767 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted (13 years 10 months 2 weeks 5 days 10 hours ago) and read 1055 times:

A320s right after ordering 10 brand new 734s?!? Thats a really stupid move.
-Tom


User currently offlineSashA From Russia, joined May 1999, 861 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (13 years 10 months 2 weeks 5 days 8 hours ago) and read 1034 times:

There have been posts on this forum a while ago about 20+ order by Aeroflot for Airbuses. People were guessing whether that would be narrowbodies, namely A320 family. Widebodies are even more unlikely...

And when the heck do they plan to introduce Tu-204/Tu-214?



An2/24/28,Yak42,Tu154/134,IL18/62/96,B737/757/767,A310/320/319,F100,BAe146,EMB-145,CRJ,A340-600,B747-400,A-330-300,A-340
User currently offlineBrissie_lions From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (13 years 10 months 2 weeks 5 days 6 hours ago) and read 1005 times:

Sasha

Read the last post of mine in the long thread about Aeroflot and Airbus. That should answer your question.

Cheers

Scotty


User currently offlineFalcon Flyer From United States of America, joined Jul 2000, 1330 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (13 years 10 months 2 weeks 5 days 4 hours ago) and read 989 times:

What's so stupid about A320s after 737-400s ? SAS ordered A321s shortly after putting the 737-800 in service. RAM has done the same. The A320 and 737-400 do not necessarily fly similar missions, particularly in terms of range although they may be considered competitors.


My definition of cool ? Not trying so hard to be cool.
User currently offlineBrissie_lions From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 5, posted (13 years 10 months 2 weeks 5 days 1 hour ago) and read 967 times:

This is Russia we are talking of here. Boeing has made MASSIVE, and I mean MASSIVE amounts of investment in Russia, thru "paying" for the first 3 Ilyushin Il-96Ms to be completed, and other projects.

SU will more than likely be going with 737NGs. Don't ask me why I say this, because if I tell you, I will have to kill you. You know, KGB tovarishch and all that.


User currently offlineRyaneverest From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 6, posted (13 years 10 months 2 weeks 4 days 17 hours ago) and read 940 times:

Brissie_lions, do you mean that Boeing actually "sponsored" (or whatever word that is appropriate) the project of Ilyushin 96M? That's a wise move man!! Russian airliners need to be admired. Hopefully their new Tupolevs and Ilyushins will get approval by the western airlines! (And don't say they don't like them just because they're Russian...  )

User currently offlineSushka From United States of America, joined Nov 1999, 4784 posts, RR: 15
Reply 7, posted (13 years 10 months 2 weeks 4 days 14 hours ago) and read 915 times:

Why buy an Ilyushin when you could buy an Airbus or Boeing???????


Pershoyu Spravoyu Litaki!
User currently offlineSashA From Russia, joined May 1999, 861 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (13 years 10 months 2 weeks 4 days 13 hours ago) and read 898 times:

Airbus or Boeing widebodies would probably be way too much for SU's budget. Besides, they're supposed to support Russian manufacturers somehow, being one of the flag carriers of Russia.

And heck, IL-96Ms should be darn good planes!   Four engines, winglets, loads of headroom, Western avionics cockpit (isn't it?)...



An2/24/28,Yak42,Tu154/134,IL18/62/96,B737/757/767,A310/320/319,F100,BAe146,EMB-145,CRJ,A340-600,B747-400,A-330-300,A-340
User currently offlineCfalk From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 9, posted (13 years 10 months 2 weeks 4 days 12 hours ago) and read 885 times:

Russian designs have traditionally been very solid and rugged (some would say over-engineered). Their low points were thirsty and unreliable engines, and electronics 20-30 years behind the times.

Now we have russian aircraft manufacturers who offer western engines and avionics, and Russian engine and electronics manufacturers have access to western technology (through license or joint ventures) to make their products more competitive as well.

It will take a long time before Tupolev, Ilyushin and the rest prove to the airlines and the flying public that their crappy reputaion is unfounded. I sincerely hope they meet with success - having only Boeing and Airbus around in the 100+ seat category is really getting boring.

Charles


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
AeroSur - Fleet Update? posted Thu Apr 9 2009 09:43:15 by Seemyseems
Gulf Air Fleet Update posted Mon Jan 12 2009 12:47:52 by GF-A330
UA Fleet Update posted Wed Dec 10 2008 22:14:47 by United1
SQ Fleet Update posted Wed Feb 6 2008 05:24:16 by Albird87
Hawaiian Air Fleet Update posted Sun Jul 29 2007 02:46:54 by DL767captain
Qantas Investor / Fleet Update posted Thu May 24 2007 02:09:52 by PanAm_DC10
Aerolineas Argentinas: Fleet Update posted Mon Apr 30 2007 03:52:01 by MD11junkie
Aeroflot Fleet Update posted Sun Jan 21 2007 14:37:16 by EGBJ
United Fleet Update posted Fri Oct 20 2006 17:26:26 by MEACEDAR
328JET Fleet Update posted Wed Oct 4 2006 20:44:08 by SkyexRamper