Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Question About An Atlantic Route  
User currently offlineDavepartridge From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2007, 3 posts, RR: 0
Posted (6 years 10 months 2 weeks 2 days 3 hours ago) and read 2115 times:

Hi

I recently flew from London to Orlando on holiday but our flight was delayed, when we finally took off over an hour late the pilot informed us he should be able to make up the time by going direct. I was under the impression that all traffic for North America went via the NATs due to ETOPs regulations. We flew a 777-200 and from what I could tell from the map he went pretty much over the Azores and then over Bermuda so I'm guessing that this gave us the 2 hour flying time to emergency airports? Also if this is clearly possible to take this route why isn't it more widely adopted by more airlines as a time and cost saving?

Any info welcome
Dave

10 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineFredOlsen From Germany, joined Oct 2007, 4 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (6 years 10 months 2 weeks 2 days 2 hours ago) and read 2076 times:

Observed the same two weeks ago out of FRA to ATL. Instead of heading north we turned south and went over France, northern Spain over the pond directly to ATL.
It could be that the azores routing was choosen due to strong head winds on the northern route.


User currently offlineOly720man From United Kingdom, joined May 2004, 6741 posts, RR: 11
Reply 2, posted (6 years 10 months 2 weeks 2 days 2 hours ago) and read 2076 times:

Did you go on the 28th October?

http://flightaware.com/live/flight/B...7/history/20071028/1203Z/EGKK/KMCO

On the 27th October the plane went the same way and took 20 mins less.

http://flightaware.com/live/flight/B...7/history/20071027/1020Z/EGKK/KMCO

The usual way takes about the same time (or less or more, depending on wind, etc)

http://flightaware.com/live/flight/B...7/history/20071018/1026Z/EGKK/KMCO

Quoting Davepartridge (Thread starter):
Also if this is clearly possible to take this route why isn't it more widely adopted by more airlines as a time and cost saving?

Too many planes? Easier to have distinct, and parallel air corridors to control separation where there is no reliable means of radar or other coverage.



wheat and dairy can screw up your brain
User currently offlineDavepartridge From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2007, 3 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (6 years 10 months 2 weeks 2 days 1 hour ago) and read 2038 times:

Thanks for this

Only question it doesn't answer is about the ETOPS regs, do the Azores and Bermuda have it covered?


User currently offlineOly720man From United Kingdom, joined May 2004, 6741 posts, RR: 11
Reply 4, posted (6 years 10 months 2 weeks 2 days ago) and read 1941 times:



Quoting Davepartridge (Reply 3):
Only question it doesn't answer is about the ETOPS regs, do the Azores and Bermuda have it covered?

Yes. Any twin across the atlantic will go near iceland/eastern seaboard or closer to the Azores/Bermuda as long as it stays within the time allowed for diversion. On a BA MAN-JFK flight once, when you used to be able to go to the cockpit, the pilot showed me the flight plan with 120minute (?) flight time circles centred at Shannon, Keflavik, the Azores and Gander, and the flight should ideally always be inside one of the circles so it would be within the necessary flying time to a diversion field.



wheat and dairy can screw up your brain
User currently offlinePlymSpotter From Spain, joined Jun 2004, 11655 posts, RR: 60
Reply 5, posted (6 years 10 months 2 weeks 2 days ago) and read 1916 times:

It could well be that you were still flying above (in terms of latitude) the Jetstream. It normally rises up from the Azores to a position north of the British Isles meaning that it's far more economical to avoid it's strong headwinds and fly North over Iceland. However, with it being so much lower this year and already dropping back south again, it could be that the direct path was wholly unaffected by it. Incidentally - it's lower latitude this year also caused all of the bad weather in the UK over the summer.


Dan Smile



...love is just a camouflage for what resembles rage again...
User currently offlineAirbazar From United States of America, joined Sep 2003, 8385 posts, RR: 10
Reply 6, posted (6 years 10 months 2 weeks 1 day 23 hours ago) and read 1867 times:



Quoting Davepartridge (Thread starter):
he went pretty much over the Azores and then over Bermuda so I'm guessing that this gave us the 2 hour flying time to emergency airports? Also if this is clearly possible to take this route why isn't it more widely adopted by more airlines as a time and cost saving?

That route is longer than the standard GC route by about 400nm. It was most likely taken in order to avoind strong head winds rather than to makeup time. It just so happens that sometimes a shorter route with stong head winds can take a little longer than a longer route with less head winds. Strange routes like that happen all the time during the Winter season. Some times they go really far north, other times really far south. In the first year that LHR operated MUC-BOS they operated year round and I was on a flight that left MUC turned south and went across the south of France, northern Spain and straight across to BOS. Another time I flew MUC-IAD where we went right over Reykjavik and past Montreal before turning south to IAD.


User currently offlineTimz From United States of America, joined Sep 1999, 6836 posts, RR: 7
Reply 7, posted (6 years 10 months 2 weeks 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 1723 times:

As long as all the alternates are available, 138-minute ETOPS is enough to cover the North Atlantic (which maybe is why they adopted that figure). 120-minute ETOPS leaves a small no-go triangle which you'd think would be easy to avoid.

(By "North Atlantic" I mean the Europe-to-US territory. You could define "North Atlantic" to cover, say, a MEX-DKR flight, which 138 minutes probably wouldn't cover.)


User currently offlineStylo777 From Germany, joined Feb 2006, 2976 posts, RR: 12
Reply 8, posted (6 years 10 months 2 weeks 1 day 19 hours ago) and read 1659 times:



Quoting FredOlsen (Reply 1):
Observed the same two weeks ago out of FRA to ATL. Instead of heading north we turned south and went over France, northern Spain over the pond directly to ATL.

this flight is operated by 343 so there is hardly any ETOPS issue


User currently offlineDavepartridge From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2007, 3 posts, RR: 0
Reply 9, posted (6 years 10 months 2 weeks 1 day 2 hours ago) and read 1444 times:

Where does the 138 minute ETOPs come from, is that for ER range aircraft such as the 777? I thought it was a strict 120 minutes.

User currently offlineFredOlsen From Germany, joined Oct 2007, 4 posts, RR: 0
Reply 10, posted (6 years 10 months 2 weeks 1 day ago) and read 1390 times:

@Stylo777

If you use DL, than it is a 763


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
What Is The Shortest Atlantic Route? posted Sun Jun 12 2005 09:23:46 by Emrecan
Most Successful Trans-Atlantic Route posted Sat Jul 17 2004 20:19:51 by GLAGAZ
ATL-MXP Most Profitable DL's Trans-atlantic Route posted Thu Nov 20 2003 23:08:40 by Sarrebal
Need North Atlantic Route Charts posted Fri Feb 2 2001 01:40:46 by Cdeanda
Virgin Atlantic Route Applications: What Planes? posted Sat Dec 9 2000 21:46:13 by Englandair
South African/South Atlantic Route posted Sat Apr 1 2000 08:20:45 by Lima
Fleet / Route Status Of Virgin Atlantic? posted Fri Sep 14 2007 00:58:06 by Kaitak744
Virgin Atlantic, What Planes On Specific Route posted Sat Apr 30 2005 17:48:48 by JMJAirways
Atlantic "Triangle" Route posted Thu Jan 27 2005 17:30:20 by Planespotterx
Virgin Atlantic Toronto Route posted Mon Jun 24 2002 04:20:12 by AC330