Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Scott Hamilton On Reporting The (Aviation) News  
User currently offlineLumberton From United States of America, joined Jul 2005, 4708 posts, RR: 19
Posted (8 years 6 months 3 weeks 2 hours ago) and read 3764 times:

He ends his weekly commentary with some excellent perspective on covering the issues "out there" in aviation today.
Here are a few of his points:

This falls into that not-sure-how-to-classify-it category
We marvel at how people, inside and out, of Boeing and Airbus, and their supporters,
often react to news stories, analyst reports and blogs. The vitriol that often emerges in
response to some report never ceases to amaze us, and reactions within Boeing and
Airbus often demonstrate a total misunderstanding of real world workings of media,
blogs and observers.
It’s natural for Airbus and Boeing people to be defensive about negative news, or
anything that is perceived not to be positive. But honest, credible writers from whatever
walk of life have to be willing to discuss the good and the bad. . . .

We’re aware of instances in which the manufacturers have cut off writers and analysts
because of things written they did not like. We know of at least one case where efforts
were made to get the reporter fired and others in which serious attempts were made to
discredit reporters or analysts with other reporters or their bosses. Such efforts merely
reinforce the resolve of the writers and analysts to demonstrate they can’t be intimidated.
Another friend, Richard Aboulafia, is often the target of criticism. He’s loathed (that’s the
only word for it) by pro-Airbus people who think Richard is anti-Airbus. While we think
that Richard is sometimes too harsh on Airbus and we completely disagree with his anti-
A380 position, his observations are on the whole have little to quibble with in our view.
We engage a good-natured tit-for-tat debate over the A380 and related issues that we both
enjoy even if we go away thinking the other guy is nutty.
Although Richard is viewed as in Boeing’s pocket, he was very critical of Boeing’s
miserly research and development funding from 1997-2003, the lack of strategy and
incompetent management under Phil Condit. People forget those days (just as they ignore
our hammering Airbus during the A380/A350 mess or asking the question of ILFC’s
Steve Hazy that blew up the A350 program as it then existed).
It just happens to be Boeing’s turn back on the hot seat now, but this, too, shall pass.
Once the 787 enters service and certainty is forthcoming over the 747-8 and 777F
programs, all will be forgotten. The airplanes will be great products.

There's much more, but you'll have to read the entire commentary. I just thought it was a remarkably candid account of the difficulties of covering this business and being in the middle where everyone can take their shots at you. Sounds like the frustration isn't merely confined to a.net!

"When all is said and done, more will be said than done".
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Rolling On 10; The Next Irish Aviation Thread posted Thu Feb 22 2007 20:01:29 by Kaitak
Why Do The News Go On About The Moon And Typhoon posted Mon Feb 19 2007 19:45:29 by FCA767
Scott Hamilton Says Forgeard "Man Of The Year" posted Mon Jan 22 2007 22:03:07 by Pygmalion
Indian Aviation News! Update On IC And 9W posted Thu Mar 10 2005 05:39:50 by MrNiji
The Real News On April 1, 2004 posted Thu Apr 1 2004 23:08:52 by Flairport
Analysts's View On The Aviation Industry posted Wed Sep 19 2001 06:32:40 by United Airline
News From On Board The Aircraft. posted Wed Sep 12 2001 04:07:37 by DeltaBoy777
Who Shapes The Future Of The Aviation posted Wed Oct 17 2007 21:22:20 by AWombat
UK Aviation News Thread! posted Fri Aug 3 2007 23:38:15 by Revo
Mexico Aviation News posted Fri Jul 13 2007 18:57:30 by Jpintoa