Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Air Canada B-767 Diversion To PIT  
User currently offlineSafetyDemo From United States of America, joined Sep 2007, 310 posts, RR: 0
Posted (6 years 9 months 5 days 9 hours ago) and read 6525 times:

Hi Everyone,

I reported to work in PIT today and saw, sitting just off the "C" gates, an Air Canada Boeing 767. It was surrounded by fire trucks, had air stairs attached to 1L, and apparently the nosegear was being paid special attention to.

I wouldn't know how to go about finding online what flight it was or why it came here ... so does anyone know?

Thanks!

-safetyDemo

PS - Hope my US friends enjoyed their Thanksgiving!


Please direct your attention to the flight attendants in the cabin...
23 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineLexy From United States of America, joined Jun 2006, 2515 posts, RR: 8
Reply 1, posted (6 years 9 months 5 days 9 hours ago) and read 6510 times:

Airline Air Canada
Flight Number 401
Departure City (Airport) , ()
Departure Time
Arrival City (Airport) Pittsburgh, PA (PIT)
Arrival Time 11/22/2007 10:32 AM
Remaining Flight Time 00:00
Aircraft Type Boeing 767-200
Current Altitude 0 feet
Current Groundspeed 0 mph
Flight Status Arrived


I believe it was from Montreal, but I may be wrong on that.



Nashville, Tennessee KBNA
User currently offlineRP TPA From United States of America, joined Oct 1999, 852 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (6 years 9 months 5 days 9 hours ago) and read 6463 times:

AC401 (YUL-YYZ) diverted to PIT because of YYZ weather (snow). It was then further delayed due to a "broken tow lug", whatever that is. Arrived PIT 1035, departed at 1518.

Incredibly, we had another YUL-YYZ flt a bit later (AC255) that also diverted to PIT because of weather. Arrived at 1043, departed at 1219. At least that one didn't have a "broken tow lug". So, PIT had 2 Rapidair flts sitting there at the same time. Must have been a helluva morning in Toronto.


User currently offlineNorthStarDC4M From Canada, joined Apr 2000, 3005 posts, RR: 37
Reply 3, posted (6 years 9 months 5 days 9 hours ago) and read 6438 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
CHAT OPERATOR



Quoting RP TPA (Reply 2):
Must have been a helluva morning in Toronto.

1st major winter storm of the year= chaos in Toronto... no fun getting to work this morning... 2 hours doing what would take me 30 minutes most days. YYZ must of been a mess, though i did hear departures pounding off of Runway 23 while i was stuck on Derry Rd.



Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.
User currently offlineTdscanuck From Canada, joined Jan 2006, 12709 posts, RR: 80
Reply 4, posted (6 years 9 months 5 days 8 hours ago) and read 6378 times:



Quoting RP TPA (Reply 2):
It was then further delayed due to a "broken tow lug", whatever that is.

It's the piece of the nose gear where the tug's tow bar attaches. If the ground crew gets too...enthusiastic...they can damage the towing lug.

Tom.


User currently offlineKELPkid From United States of America, joined Nov 2005, 6370 posts, RR: 3
Reply 5, posted (6 years 9 months 5 days 5 hours ago) and read 6174 times:



Quoting Lexy (Reply 1):
Airline Air Canada
Flight Number 401
Departure City (Airport) , ()
Departure Time
Arrival City (Airport) Pittsburgh, PA (PIT)
Arrival Time 11/22/2007 10:32 AM
Remaining Flight Time 00:00
Aircraft Type Boeing 767-200
Current Altitude 0 feet
Current Groundspeed 0 mph
Flight Status Arrived


I believe it was from Montreal, but I may be wrong on that.

I know that this is a long shot, but what are the chances that this was the Gimli Glider? Anyone have the tail number?



Celebrating the birth of KELPkidJR on August 5, 2009 :-)
User currently offlineArrow From Canada, joined Jun 2002, 2676 posts, RR: 2
Reply 6, posted (6 years 9 months 5 days 5 hours ago) and read 6165 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!



Quoting KELPkid (Reply 5):
I know that this is a long shot, but what are the chances that this was the Gimli Glider? Anyone have the tail number?

Zero chance. Glider was retired just a few weeks ago. There was a thread on it.



Never let the facts get in the way of a good story.
User currently offlinePITrules From United States of America, joined Jun 2000, 3155 posts, RR: 4
Reply 7, posted (6 years 9 months 5 days 5 hours ago) and read 6105 times:



Quoting RP TPA (Reply 2):
Incredibly, we had another YUL-YYZ flt a bit later (AC255) that also diverted to PIT because of weather.

The other flight was an A-320. Both aircraft landed within one minute of each other.



FLYi
User currently offlineMEL From Canada, joined Oct 1999, 1098 posts, RR: 13
Reply 8, posted (6 years 9 months 5 days 4 hours ago) and read 6039 times:

The Gimli Glider was NOT retired weeks ago. It was intended to be retired, but is still flying. Today the Glider was in Vancouver, operating a 14:30 departure Vancouver-Montreal, so no, the Glider was not in Pittsburgh.


NO URLS in signature
User currently offlineFLYACYYZ From Canada, joined Jan 2004, 1914 posts, RR: 12
Reply 9, posted (6 years 9 months 5 days 4 hours ago) and read 6027 times:



Quoting Arrow (Reply 6):
Zero chance. Glider was retired just a few weeks ago. There was a thread on it.

The thread refuted that myth. I saw the aircraft in YVR yesterday.



Above and Beyond
User currently offlineDCAYOW From United States of America, joined Nov 2003, 602 posts, RR: 3
Reply 10, posted (6 years 9 months 4 days 21 hours ago) and read 5875 times:

I am perplexed by the choice of diversion airport. It seems weird a Canadian domestic flight would fly all the way down to PIT to divert, if they could have flown to PIT - couldn't they have flown at least back to Ottawa (YOW) or onto London (YXU)? The passengers were not pre-cleared to enter the US so I am sure CBP made those poor people sit on the plane the entire time.

Just weird...



Retorne ao céu...
User currently offlineYHMYYZspotter From Canada, joined Sep 2006, 197 posts, RR: 1
Reply 11, posted (6 years 9 months 4 days 20 hours ago) and read 5750 times:



Quoting DCAYOW (Reply 10):
I am perplexed by the choice of diversion airport. It seems weird a Canadian domestic flight would fly all the way down to PIT to divert, if they could have flown to PIT - couldn't they have flown at least back to Ottawa (YOW) or onto London (YXU)?

Or what about Hamilton (YHM). We barely had any snow here in this area. It amazes me why the first snow storm takes everyone by surprise still. We live in Canada! It's like its a shock to people that its snowing in November hahaha....


User currently offlineLongHauler From Canada, joined Mar 2004, 4927 posts, RR: 43
Reply 12, posted (6 years 9 months 4 days 20 hours ago) and read 5750 times:



Quoting DCAYOW (Reply 10):
I am perplexed by the choice of diversion airport.

PIT is about number 10 on the choice list of alternates for YYZ. If it was used, it is because the top 9 were not suitable.

Weather was very bad in southern Ontario yesterday.



Never gonna grow up, never gonna slow down .... Barefoot Blue Jean Night
User currently offlineArrow From Canada, joined Jun 2002, 2676 posts, RR: 2
Reply 13, posted (6 years 9 months 4 days 18 hours ago) and read 5634 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!



Quoting FLYACYYZ (Reply 9):
The thread refuted that myth. I saw the aircraft in YVR yesterday.

Oops. Guess I stopped reading it too soon. Sorry about that. Why the sudden change in plans?



Never let the facts get in the way of a good story.
User currently offlineSafetyDemo From United States of America, joined Sep 2007, 310 posts, RR: 0
Reply 14, posted (6 years 9 months 4 days 18 hours ago) and read 5619 times:

The number on the plane was something like 621. I briefly got a chance to spot it as the aircraft taxied past on its way to 28R. But I honestly only remember the number on the nosegear door started with a "6" (which they probably all do? The 767s?)

Anyway - thanks for the responses. What a long day for everyone involved!

-safetyDemo



Please direct your attention to the flight attendants in the cabin...
User currently offlineCNZ3 From Canada, joined Mar 2006, 132 posts, RR: 0
Reply 15, posted (6 years 9 months 4 days 18 hours ago) and read 5593 times:



Quoting SafetyDemo (Reply 14):
The number on the plane was something like 621. I briefly got a chance to spot it as the aircraft taxied past on its way to 28R. But I honestly only remember the number on the nosegear door started with a "6" (which they probably all do? The 767s?)

621 is C-FVNM, the oldest in the fleet.


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Derek Manning




D94 D95 DH1 DH2 DH4 CR2 CR7 CRA CR9 E45 E70 E75 E90 319 320 321 734 73G 739 752 753 762 763 764 313 333 388 L1011 77L 77
User currently offlineDTWAGENT From United States of America, joined Jan 2006, 1283 posts, RR: 0
Reply 16, posted (6 years 9 months 4 days 16 hours ago) and read 5458 times:

From what I was able to get on the FAA web site. YYZ was having snow and freezeing rain issues for most of the day. At one point they listed a 4 hour delay in arrival flights because of the weather. But then again it is the goverment web site.....

chuck


User currently offlineUnited_Fan From United States of America, joined Nov 2000, 7483 posts, RR: 7
Reply 17, posted (6 years 9 months 4 days 16 hours ago) and read 5427 times:

Jeez,they could have came to ROC. That's alot closer than PIT. Though,I don't think we have any 'heavy' gates for 767's.


'Empathy was yesterday...Today, you're wasting my Mother-F'ing time' - Heat.
User currently offlineFLYACYYZ From Canada, joined Jan 2004, 1914 posts, RR: 12
Reply 18, posted (6 years 9 months 4 days 15 hours ago) and read 5357 times:



Quoting Arrow (Reply 13):
Oops. Guess I stopped reading it too soon. Sorry about that. Why the sudden change in plans?

Think they must need the lift as we head into the busy holiday period as they have stepped up 767-300XM conversions

FINS 641/681/682 will be off line undergoing refurbishment in November &
FINS 637/683/684 will be off line undergoing refurbishment in December.

Of note...these are all ex-CP metal.



Above and Beyond
User currently offlineCayMan From Canada, joined Aug 2003, 905 posts, RR: 9
Reply 19, posted (6 years 9 months 4 days 14 hours ago) and read 4995 times:



Quoting FLYACYYZ (Reply 18):
FINS 641/681/682 will be off line undergoing refurbishment in November &
FINS 637/683/684 will be off line undergoing refurbishment in December.

Of note...these are all ex-CP metal.

Good to hear I flew YOW LHR on one of these ex CP 763s recently, by the way service was just great and I had the middle 3 all to myself on an otherwise full flight---but boy that a/c was on its last legs in terms of the interior---BADLY in need of a re-fit.


User currently offlineVisityyj From Canada, joined Jun 2000, 519 posts, RR: 0
Reply 20, posted (6 years 9 months 4 days 14 hours ago) and read 4965 times:



Quoting DCAYOW (Reply 10):
couldn't they have flown at least back to Ottawa (YOW) or onto London (YXU)?

Looking at flightaware it does look at least one of them tried YXU: http://flightaware.com/live/flight/ACA401

My question is why they dispatched them in the first place, surely it didn't deteriorate that badly in the 1-hour window.


User currently offlineEXAAUADL From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 21, posted (6 years 9 months 4 days 13 hours ago) and read 4663 times:

Why couldnt they go back to YUL or YOW?

It would be quite risky to divert to the USA. What if the plane goes out of service and you have a bunch of Canadian pax with no papers to enter the USA?


User currently offlineLongHauler From Canada, joined Mar 2004, 4927 posts, RR: 43
Reply 22, posted (6 years 9 months 4 days 12 hours ago) and read 4321 times:



Quoting EXAAUADL (Reply 21):
Why couldnt they go back to YUL or YOW?

They were not above alternate limits at the time of departure. YXU was barely above limits but is not that well equipped to handle a B767. Close to YYZ, which were also below limits were YHM, BUF, YTR and IAG. PIT was likely only being held as a "technical alternate". Meaning it is required, and legal, but not likely to be used.

YYZ ATC which is running at close to maximum at the best of times, likely had to slow down inbound traffic, and the holding fuel was used up. This is very rare, but does happen. I have held PIT as an alternate for YYZ probably 10 times in the last year, and never had to use it.

Not having a close look at the flight plan, I do see that the aircraft was in the air for over 3:30, which means he was holding a LOT of fuel for a :55 flight. I am sure no one in flight dispatch ever though that holding times in YYZ would get close to 2 hours!!! It happens!



Never gonna grow up, never gonna slow down .... Barefoot Blue Jean Night
User currently offlineAndyinPIT From United States of America, joined Sep 2007, 320 posts, RR: 0
Reply 23, posted (6 years 9 months 4 days 10 hours ago) and read 3627 times:



Quoting Tdscanuck (Reply 4):
It's the piece of the nose gear where the tug's tow bar attaches. If the ground crew gets too...enthusiastic...they can damage the towing lug.

Tom.

95% of the ramp works for UA in PIT have 15+ years with the company. So it's not some vendor/scab outfit doing work for $7.00/hr, our guys know what they're doing. The AC 767 had a different tow bar hook up versus our 767's. We've had our widebodies divert in from IAD all the time, with no problem. So we had to borrow a towbar for the right configuration from ASI. After pushback the towbar got wedged against the "lug" and after repeated attempts to get it disconnected, the lug tore away from the nose gear, but only half of it actually tore off. So a world of problems came about. #1. As noted above, Pax could not get off the plane. #2. Since the plane couldnt be towed or pushed, it had to remain out on the ramp, which prompted the fire dept. to dispatch to the scene (disabled aircraft) and #3. Air Canada did NOT want a contract mechanic working on one of their aircraft, at all. So there was a back and forth argument to get this mechanic to saw off the rest of the lug and let the plane get the hell out of there. FINALLY it was able to, and off it went.


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Incident KIX; Air Canada Forced JAL To Go Around posted Tue Oct 23 2007 06:02:16 by SMOLT
Air Canada 'Jetz' Down To One Aircraft? posted Fri Aug 3 2007 00:23:15 by CXH
Two Air Canada Airbus Flights To Kcrw? posted Tue May 15 2007 04:37:14 by CRWDude
Air Canada 767-200 At SJC Today - What Happened? posted Thu May 3 2007 05:10:22 by AAL151Heavy
Did Air Canada Ever Fly To Stansted? posted Mon Apr 30 2007 15:36:54 by 8herveg
Air Canada Summer Schedule To Europe posted Sun Mar 25 2007 09:28:30 by Abhi
Air Canada E190 SAN To YYZ posted Sun Jan 14 2007 23:05:27 by SANSCOTT744
Air Canada A340 Return To YYC? Possible Emergency? posted Mon Dec 25 2006 00:18:08 by Vio
Air Canada..Charging U.S. Taxes To Yanks 'nCanada? posted Thu Jul 13 2006 10:02:22 by FireFly
New Air Canada 767-300 Interiors... posted Tue Jun 27 2006 16:46:37 by Dmanmtl