Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Virgin Blue Ignores Lessons Of ValuJet Tragedy!  
User currently offlinePeh From Australia, joined Nov 2006, 340 posts, RR: 0
Posted (6 years 12 months 23 hours ago) and read 5829 times:

This story in this morning's Sydney Morning Herald has my blood BOILING!

http://www.smh.com.au/news/national/...dent/2007/11/29/1196037074505.html

Twice last year Virgin Blue's maintenance crew transported expired oxygen cylinders on board its passenger jets. Absolutely no, zero, nadda care was taken to secure the trigger pins.

The ValuJet 592 tragedy is still very fresh in my mind and I am mortified that the lessons learnt could be so easily forgotten by Virgin Blue's maintenance crew.

[Edited 2007-11-29 12:47:40]


Flown: ATR72, DASH 8, 737, 747, 767, 777, A300, A320, A321, A330, A340, MD80
8 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineSh0rtybr0wn From United States of America, joined Aug 2007, 528 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (6 years 12 months 23 hours ago) and read 5754 times:

Bad idea. We've all seen the Documentary on Flight 592; lets hope the people who handle and ship oxygen containers have too. The main deck melted and caved during the flight. Terrible.

Shouldn't there be a warning about shipping them on the containers themselves?


User currently offlineHightower From Denmark, joined Sep 2007, 48 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (6 years 12 months 23 hours ago) and read 5665 times:

Sad! I hope the ones responsible will be "punished" with 10 hours of watching the documentary of flight 592 again and again...  Angry


Take action and responsibility to do yours for the environment... thx
User currently offlineAirTran737 From United States of America, joined Apr 2004, 3705 posts, RR: 12
Reply 3, posted (6 years 12 months 23 hours ago) and read 5639 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

I am at a loss for words. I can't even begin to say how bad this could have ended up for those passengers. The person who accepted that shipment should be criminally charged. Makes you wonder if they are properly filling out their DG Paperwork, if they were then the person accepting the shipment would have noted the following.

Directly from the IATA Dangerous Goods Regulations Manual

Chemical Oxygen Generators UN3356
Class/Div 5.1 Oxidizer
Packing Group II
Passenger/Cargo Aircraft FORBIDDEN
Cargo Aircraft Only FORBIDDEN

O2 Generators are not allowed on aircraft period! This is an unacceptable error.



Nice Trip Report!!! Great Pics, thanks for posting!!!! B747Forever
User currently offlineSpeedbird128 From Pitcairn Islands, joined Oct 2003, 1648 posts, RR: 2
Reply 4, posted (6 years 12 months 22 hours ago) and read 5409 times:



Quoting Sh0rtybr0wn (Reply 1):
Shouldn't there be a warning about shipping them on the containers themselves?

Their claim will be they were going on an aeroplane - not a ship !

This is unforgiveable - in an industry where simple errors lead to loss of life, you'd think that 'systemic' errors wouldn't creep in to the handling and freight of dangerous goods. Zero safety culture there then. What sort of licensing does this 'Jet Care' have?

But, being in the safety conscious sector, I know all too well that there are *lots* of things that shouldn't happen, but do... And as long as nothing happens as a result, the 'originator' will believe it is OK to continue doing so...

But then again, I think more people have died in motor vehicle accidents than in aviation history.... Nobody says a word about that... Aviation is so 'sensational'.



A306, A313, A319, A320, A321, A332, A343, A345, A346 A388, AC90, B06, B722, B732, B733, B735, B738, B744, B762, B772, B7
User currently offline57AZ From United States of America, joined Nov 2004, 2556 posts, RR: 2
Reply 5, posted (6 years 12 months 16 hours ago) and read 4975 times:



Quoting Speedbird128 (Reply 4):

But then again, I think more people have died in motor vehicle accidents than in aviation history.... Nobody says a word about that... Aviation is so 'sensational'.

True. It should also be remembered that civil aviation is in a rapid expansion period and during rapid expansion, corners will be cut and crashes will happen. Aircraft crashes are today's version of the great train wrecks of the last century. When the railroads were rapidly expanding in the late 19th century, thousands of employees were maimed or killed every year. If an accident killed only employees, their deaths were mentioned only in passing (if at all). Kill a handful of passengers and the story would get brief coverage. Kill a bunch of them and you'd get two or three days of good headlines out of it. Same goes for airplane crashes-the more passengers killed, the more papers you sell.

As for the shipment of the hazmat, evidently the airline dropped the ball and there should be additional scrutiny placed on the maintenance groups. Furthermore, there should be real penalties for violations of the regulations that the Aussies have. Association rules are all and good, but state regulation with penalties that have teeth are much more effective.



"When a man runs on railroads over half of his lifetime he is fit for nothing else-and at times he don't know that."
User currently offlinePeh From Australia, joined Nov 2006, 340 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (6 years 12 months 13 hours ago) and read 4735 times:



Quoting AirTran737 (Reply 3):
The person who accepted that shipment should be criminally charged.

I completely agree but we'll probably have to wait for another tragedy before that happens. I hope the authorities don't adopt an 'oh well, no harm done' approach.

I'll be following this very closely!



Flown: ATR72, DASH 8, 737, 747, 767, 777, A300, A320, A321, A330, A340, MD80
User currently offlineAerorobNZ From Rwanda, joined Feb 2001, 7334 posts, RR: 13
Reply 7, posted (6 years 11 months 4 weeks 1 day 20 hours ago) and read 2868 times:



Quoting AirTran737 (Reply 3):

Everything you said is absolutely correct. I think they should face an IATA disciplinary hearing, if such a thing exists. And Compensation offered to each of the Passengers and Cabin Crew that were put at undue risk. I would include tech crew, but if it was disclosed to the Captain on his NOTOC, then he is a party to it. If it wasn't then he also should be compensated.


User currently offlinePeh From Australia, joined Nov 2006, 340 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (6 years 11 months 4 weeks 1 day 16 hours ago) and read 2627 times:

The thing that gets me is that if a passenger was found to have transported explosive devices in their luggage, the police would be called, arrests made and serious charges laid. Why should this be any different?


Flown: ATR72, DASH 8, 737, 747, 767, 777, A300, A320, A321, A330, A340, MD80
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Video Of Virgin Blue 737-800 VH-VUG Being Built posted Tue Jan 16 2007 05:20:51 by RobK
Speculation Of A SQ Takeover Of Virgin Blue posted Tue Jul 26 2005 05:22:49 by Travel
Virgin Blue Wins Low-cost Airline Of The Year posted Fri May 20 2005 06:44:27 by Squirrel83
Patrick Seizes Control Of Virgin Blue posted Fri Mar 18 2005 07:42:17 by CXoneWorld
Will Patrick Corp Get Control Of Virgin Blue posted Tue Mar 15 2005 04:44:18 by Star_member
Branson To Lose Control Of Virgin Blue posted Wed Sep 10 2003 20:07:37 by Wirraway
Virgin Blue Calls For Release Of Accc Report posted Mon Jun 3 2002 15:59:35 by Carnoc
Flotation Of Virgin Blue posted Mon Apr 15 2002 22:12:11 by Go Canada!
100 Days Of Virgin Blue Operations posted Tue Dec 12 2000 07:34:32 by Aussie_
Virgin Blue New Website posted Fri Nov 23 2007 18:28:09 by CXfirst