Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Would Skybus Close A City Before It Starts?  
User currently offlineJetBlueJackets From United States of America, joined Oct 2007, 175 posts, RR: 0
Posted (7 years 4 weeks 1 day 20 hours ago) and read 2962 times:

Loking at the prices still available for cities like SWF, MKE and CHA, does anyone think SX may pull the plug on these cities even before starting? Even "strong performing" cities like RIC was initially have tapered off drastically...


...discuss

22 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineMAH4546 From Sweden, joined Jan 2001, 33289 posts, RR: 71
Reply 1, posted (7 years 4 weeks 1 day 20 hours ago) and read 2944 times:

I don't see why not. It's not a very rare thing. Allegiant at Baton Rouge (2003) and Marion (2007); American Airlines at Barcelona (in 2003; they are starting BCN this year, again) and Newcastle (2005); LTU to Melbourne, FL (2007); Northwest to Madrid (2003); Qantas to Chicago (2002); South African Airways to Chicago (2006). If routes don't perform well, even in advance, it's best to cut them.


a.
User currently offlineFlynavy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (7 years 4 weeks 1 day 19 hours ago) and read 2920 times:

And Monarch to Norfolk (ORF).

User currently offlineQuagmire123 From United States of America, joined Sep 2007, 89 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (7 years 4 weeks 1 day 12 hours ago) and read 2811 times:

Just keep in mind with SX that ticket price doesn't completely give an indication of how full a given flight is. The shorter the route, the less the ticket prices can be to where they can still make the profit margin they want.

User currently offlineItsnotfinals From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 4, posted (7 years 4 weeks 1 day 12 hours ago) and read 2786 times:

By all means, SX should adjust it's business model as needed to ensure adherence to business plan projections and burn rate, they seem to have a mature leadership group that responds decisively when needed, much like G4 seems to be doing too.

The ticket prices reflected on the SX website don't tell the whole story.

VX was offering a buy one get one free special for Transcons last week , making their yields quite low, yet nobody was on anet saying anything negative about that.

[Edited 2007-12-01 06:56:32]

User currently onlineSuper80DFW From United States of America, joined Oct 2007, 1698 posts, RR: 11
Reply 5, posted (7 years 4 weeks 1 day 6 hours ago) and read 2602 times:

NW on DFW-LGA was stopped before it started


"Things change, friends leave, life doesn't stop for anybody." -- EAT'EM UP EAT'EM UP KSU!!
User currently offlineRwSEA From Netherlands, joined Jan 2005, 3135 posts, RR: 2
Reply 6, posted (7 years 4 weeks 1 day 6 hours ago) and read 2555 times:

AMS-BLR on NW was cancelled the day before the inagural flight!

User currently offlineMAH4546 From Sweden, joined Jan 2001, 33289 posts, RR: 71
Reply 7, posted (7 years 4 weeks 1 day 6 hours ago) and read 2537 times:

It is interesting to note how Skybus ticket prices don't tell the whole story when they are low, but when they are high, they tell a lot.  Yeah sure


a.
User currently offlineJetBlueJackets From United States of America, joined Oct 2007, 175 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (7 years 4 weeks 1 day 5 hours ago) and read 2516 times:



Quoting MAH4546 (Reply 7):

agreed...it's very obvious that that jack up the prices 3 days before departure, as well as weekends and holidays....does anyone want to guess how the ticket prices are alloted?

10 for $10
10 for $20
15 for $30...

etc etc etc


User currently offlineItsnotfinals From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 9, posted (7 years 4 weeks 1 day 5 hours ago) and read 2508 times:



Quoting MAH4546 (Reply 7):
It is interesting to note how Skybus ticket prices don't tell the whole story when they are low, but when they are high, they tell a lot.

they don't tell us anything either way, without their business plan , or their operating numbers the only information that can be posted are the data points that are available:

1. Average LF's were 77% over the summer season
2. Average fares are 90-100 dollars each way
3. Ancillary sales are above expectation
4. They received additional financing from a division of the Bank of China for 17 A319's on top of the initial 160 million in credit facilities available
5. They have added frequency to several existing cities, indicating some sort of demand that works for their management
6. They dropped 2 cities and 3 frequencies to the west coast in response to higher oil prices, and refocused assets on higher utilization via shorter turns.


Does this mean they are profitable? No, it's just information that has been factually verified and has been posted for people that want to know about what SX is doing.

If in the mean time 4-5 people would like to interpret these as negatives and say SX will be out of business, then they can certainly do that.

I think it would be good to ask each of the anti-sx posters what will the date be that SX ceases operation, that will be good to reference at a further date  Smile


User currently offlineMtnWest1979 From United States of America, joined Nov 2005, 2485 posts, RR: 1
Reply 10, posted (7 years 4 weeks 1 day 5 hours ago) and read 2464 times:

Funny how people will pay for everything @ $10 or whatever, but I feel for the last minute pax who get the high priced ticket and still have to pay for everything. I think if I had a $250 SX vs $300 WN say CMH-BUR*, I'd take the WN flight. But that's just me.
*- No actual fares used, just a quick off the top of my head made up comparison.

OK, just did real comparison:
SX 12/26 ow CMH-BUR $390
WN 12/26 ow CMH-BUR bs$384, reg $359

SX in Jan from $120,$140, and $160
WN Jan 17th $139,220,359,and 384.

So by BOB on SX for high fare, what are you saving? Time, I guess.

[Edited 2007-12-01 14:33:31]


"If it ain't broke, don't fix it!"
User currently offlineSkyyMaster From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 11, posted (7 years 4 weeks 1 day 4 hours ago) and read 2460 times:

If they do, CHA would get my vote for most likely candidate. That's a route that makes zero sense, despite the idea they are trying to attract northern Atlanta flyers. It is a route doomed to failure if they do start it, so why not?

User currently offlineFlynavy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 12, posted (7 years 4 weeks 15 hours ago) and read 2301 times:

If their SGJ operation goes tango-uniform, all they have to do is rent a flat-bed semi, break down their "terminal" there, and haul it to wherever they decide to serve next. Who'd-a-thunk-it? A mobile terminal.




 scratchchin 


User currently offlineSkyyMaster From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 13, posted (7 years 4 weeks 10 hours ago) and read 2209 times:

That SGJ thing is pathetic. The first good tropical storm, and that thing is outta here. I understand it was thrown up in a hurry, but it certainly doesn't exactly instill a sense of seriousness on behalf of pax when they see that as the "terminal".

User currently offlineBurnsie28 From United States of America, joined Aug 2004, 7567 posts, RR: 8
Reply 14, posted (7 years 4 weeks 10 hours ago) and read 2188 times:

Haha that SGJ terminal is a great joke. Also, NW dropped an Indian city the day before it was to start.


"Some People Just Know How To Fly"- Best slogan ever, RIP NW 1926-2009
User currently offlineGregarious119 From United States of America, joined Jun 2006, 534 posts, RR: 0
Reply 15, posted (7 years 3 weeks 6 days 13 hours ago) and read 2119 times:



Quoting SkyyMaster (Reply 13):
That SGJ thing is pathetic. The first good tropical storm, and that thing is outta here. I understand it was thrown up in a hurry, but it certainly doesn't exactly instill a sense of seriousness on behalf of pax when they see that as the "terminal".

I'll bet that their baggage comes quick!


User currently offlineSkyyMaster From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 16, posted (7 years 3 weeks 6 days 12 hours ago) and read 2077 times:



Quoting Gregarious119 (Reply 16):
I'll bet that their baggage comes quick!

LOL. One would hope so! I'd be terribly unhappy if it were lost. I assume there aren't too many amenities in that tent, but hey, save those $$$ to buy overpriced items onboard.  Smile


User currently offlineItsnotfinals From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 17, posted (7 years 3 weeks 6 days 12 hours ago) and read 2061 times:

Quoting SkyyMaster (Reply 17):
to buy overpriced items onboard

wow, 8 dollars fora sandwich on the airplane and 5 dollars for a beer versus 8-10 dollars in the airport and 7 dollars for a beer...ya, thank goodness airport terminals have food!  


Ironically the same people that think SX caters to trailer trash, are the same people that compain about spending a few dollars for food.  Smile

[Edited 2007-12-03 07:35:19]

User currently offlineSacamojus From United States of America, joined Dec 2006, 228 posts, RR: 1
Reply 18, posted (7 years 3 weeks 6 days 11 hours ago) and read 2014 times:



Quoting Itsnotfinals (Reply 18):
Ironically the same people that think SX caters to trailer trash, are the same people that compain about spending a few dollars for food.

People spend more money on vacation on stupid things than they ordinarily would.

"The researchers explain: "Irrespective of one's total wealth, the very amount of resources in a specific account influences how freely resources are spent. For example, travelers may spend money more liberally while on vacation than when at home because travelers carry more cash than is their usual custom." from the science daily

Quoting Gregarious119 (Reply 16):
I'll bet that their baggage comes quick!

Funny Joke but I hope you read my link to the article. I think SGJ would have to be more concerned about a powerful thunderstorm than a tropical system. Besides I am sure that the tent meets the regulations for weather.


User currently offlineItsnotfinals From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 19, posted (7 years 3 weeks 6 days 10 hours ago) and read 1959 times:



Quoting Sacamojus (Reply 19):
travelers may spend money more liberally while on vacation than when at home because travelers carry more cash than is their usual custom." from the science daily

Absolutely, people are in a good mood when they are going to vacation and they buy things they normally would not.

It's kind of funny how people who want to pay 20-80% more for a ticket so they can buy on board also complain about SX. SX might actually be a little better in that on even shorter flights of any length you can still get food. On a major BOB is typically not even offered on flights less than 2.5 hours, so if you want food you can't even get it on the legacy .carriers.

Quoting Sacamojus (Reply 19):
Besides I am sure that the tent meets the regulations for weather.

It's also funny that DEN land-side terminal is also a tent technically yet no one trashed on that terminal for being a "tent"

"including a central atrium that is walled by glass and covered by a translucent tensile membrane roof."

http://www.flydenver.com/diabiz/info/research/passenger.asp


User currently offlineSkyyMaster From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 20, posted (7 years 3 weeks 6 days 8 hours ago) and read 1855 times:



Quoting Itsnotfinals (Reply 18):
Ironically the same people that think SX caters to trailer trash, are the same people that compain about spending a few dollars for food.

I note in other threads you get highly offended and agitated when people "put words in your mouth" or make implications based on statements you did not make. Not once on any thread did I ever use the word trailer trash. Thus, if you are going to make condescending statements to the effect, do not do so under a quote of mine. If you feel a need to make such remarks, please do so on a totally separate post, thank you.


User currently offlineItsnotfinals From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 21, posted (7 years 3 weeks 6 days 7 hours ago) and read 1833 times:

Quoting SkyyMaster (Reply 21):
Not once on any thread did I ever use the word trailer trash

I didn't mean to imply you said that. Sorry if you took it that way.


remember that keeping things civil goes both ways.

[Edited 2007-12-03 11:54:33]

User currently offlineLuv2fly From United States of America, joined May 2003, 12150 posts, RR: 49
Reply 22, posted (7 years 3 weeks 6 days 7 hours ago) and read 1779 times:



Quoting Itsnotfinals (Reply 26):
90,000 people last month alone flew SX on only 5 aircraft, that once agian, is a fact.

Yes that is a fact one of the few we have, and on that we can agree!

Also I did notice that you "finally" ponied up a link so I am not to big of a person to admit I was wrong about what I posted.

 Yeah sure  Silly  Yeah sure  Yeah sure  Silly  Silly  Yeah sure  Yeah sure  Silly  Silly  Yeah sure  Silly



You can cut the irony with a knife
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
AA Drop NCL-JFK Before It Starts posted Fri Dec 16 2005 13:25:22 by Nighthawk
747Adv: Dead Before It Starts? posted Mon Jan 17 2005 22:14:25 by Eg777er
NW Cancels DFW-LGA Before It Begins posted Fri Aug 31 2007 23:00:39 by DeltaFFinDFW
Possibility Of Skybus Focus City At GYY? posted Thu Aug 2 2007 23:47:14 by FWAERJ
UX Upgrades GIG-MAD Before It Begins! posted Fri Sep 29 2006 03:12:23 by LipeGIG
FunJet Ends Local Service At RFD Before It Begins posted Thu Dec 22 2005 18:45:46 by KarlB737
City Star Airlines Starts posted Fri Nov 5 2004 12:31:42 by Flying-Tiger
NOW Airlines Goes Bust - Before It Takes Off! posted Wed May 26 2004 22:40:39 by Gilesdavies
SWA Will Add 1 City Before Years End posted Tue Oct 21 2003 21:06:50 by SunValley
Want To Fly On A MD-11, Before It's Too Late posted Wed Jan 1 2003 21:11:10 by Paulianer