Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
NWA/KLM To Begin LHR-DTW/MSP/SEA  
User currently offlineB742 From United Kingdom, joined Mar 2005, 3768 posts, RR: 19
Posted (6 years 9 months 2 weeks 5 days 2 hours ago) and read 14083 times:

Just received an email from Flying Blue to say that KLM/NWA will begin a joint venture from London Heathrow.

Quote:

Northwest Airlines, in cooperation with its joint venture partner, KLM Royal Dutch Airlines, is pleased to announce three new daily non stop flights from London Heathrow Airport to Detroit, Minneapolis/St. Paul and Seattle.

Beginning in the spring of 2008 and operating from London Heathrow Terminal 4, KLM Northwest's new non stop services will conveniently connect London Heathrow with more than 250 destinations throughout the United States for customers travelling via Northwest's Detroit and Minneapolis/St. Paul hubs, and Seattle gateway.

World Business Class travellers can enjoy an array of features including 60 inches of space between seats, 110-volt personal laptop power port, cycling lumbar support, a six-way adjustable headrest and four seat-back storage pockets. An on demand in-flight entertainment (IFE) system is available in both cabins, offering travellers a choice of 40 movies, four short-subject video programs, 56 different audio selections, six games, shopping and in-flight information.

Effective 30 March (first inbound flight commences 29 March):
Minneapolis/St Paul
NW 103 London Heathrow/Minneapolis 1425/1725
NW 104 Minneapolis/London Heathrow 2145/1215 +1

Effective 2 May (first inbound flight commences 1 May):
Detroit
NW 101 London Heathrow/Detroit 0850/1230
NW 102 Detorit/ London Heathrow 1750/0705 +1

Effective 2 June (first inbound flight commences 1 June):
Seattle
NW 105 London Heathrow/Seattle 1830/2055
NW 106 Seattle/London Heathrow 2220/1615 +1

In addition to the London Heathrow services, Northwest will also continue to operate daily round-trip flights between London Gatwick and Detroit, giving customers two great options from the South East. All flights are now on sale.

More flexibility. More opportunity to earn Flying Blue Miles from London Heathrow!

KLM and Northwest Airlines have also joined forces to offer you more destinations than ever to the USA from London Heathrow, giving you more opportunity to earn Flying Blue Miles.

To find out more, or to book flights, visit the KLM website at www.klm.com.

Rob!  wave 

92 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineDocLightning From United States of America, joined Nov 2005, 19735 posts, RR: 59
Reply 1, posted (6 years 9 months 2 weeks 5 days 2 hours ago) and read 14047 times:

Anyone know what planes they're using for these routes?

I would suppose it's a 330 given the IFE in both classes.


User currently offlineB742 From United Kingdom, joined Mar 2005, 3768 posts, RR: 19
Reply 2, posted (6 years 9 months 2 weeks 5 days 2 hours ago) and read 14048 times:

Interesting to note that LGW will retain DTW flights. However will they continue to be A333 or will they move to 757 flights?

I assume DTW/MSP will be the A333 with SEA being the A332 into Heathrow?

Rob!  wave 


User currently offlinePSU.DTW.SCE From United States of America, joined Jan 2002, 7591 posts, RR: 27
Reply 3, posted (6 years 9 months 2 weeks 5 days 2 hours ago) and read 14051 times:

Good news to hear.

This helps to explain some of the shuffle in NW's Trans-Atlantic fleet for next summer, hence why we will see a NW 744 & KLM pick up one of the DTW-AMS flights to allow for the A330's to pick up the net-new TATL flying next summer which will be PDX-AMS, SEA-LHR, MSP-CDG, and DFW-AMS (KLM)

Also explains that the focus next summer will be on the additional A330 flying, and table the additional 757 flying for another year.


User currently offlineHUYfan From United Kingdom, joined Oct 2001, 1407 posts, RR: 3
Reply 4, posted (6 years 9 months 2 weeks 5 days 1 hour ago) and read 13909 times:

Does this mean an end to Eindhoven or Rotterdam flights?

Regards

Mike


User currently offlineUnited777 From United States of America, joined May 1999, 1657 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (6 years 9 months 2 weeks 5 days 1 hour ago) and read 13801 times:

WOW!! Great for SEA. I always thought it made sense for NW to create SEA a focus city for international flights. Hopefully the A333 will be used than switched to the 787.

User currently offlineFalcon flyer From United States of America, joined Jul 2000, 1326 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (6 years 9 months 2 weeks 5 days 1 hour ago) and read 13742 times:



Quoting United777 (Reply 5):
Hopefully the A333 will be used than switched to the 787.

Does the A330-300 have the range for SEA-LHR ? Just assumed it would be a -200 series.



My definition of cool ? Not trying so hard to be cool.
User currently offlineAzjubilee From United States of America, joined Apr 2000, 3941 posts, RR: 28
Reply 7, posted (6 years 9 months 2 weeks 5 days 1 hour ago) and read 13694 times:

Wow, nothing like trumping the press conference in Seattle. I bet we'll find out the equipment details when the announcement is made stateside. If I had to predict though, 333s for MSP/DTW-LHR. 332 for SEA-LHR and 75A for DTW-LGW. Though being a shorter flight from SEA-LHR than SEA-AMS we just might see a 333 on the new LHR service. I would have thought MSP would still continue to see LGW service, but that might have proven to be too much capasity to London, even if it were on a 757.

Also, interesting to note, the flight numbers are no longer the traditional double digits. I had a feeling that when they renumbered all the PHX flights that used to be in the low 100s, something was up. There are still a handful of double digit flight numers available, but I suspect that will go for Asia expansion. I wouldn't rule out more 75A flying however.


AZJ


User currently offlineRoseFlyer From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 9652 posts, RR: 52
Reply 8, posted (6 years 9 months 2 weeks 5 days 1 hour ago) and read 13679 times:

I think this might be the final straw that sends a lot of UA's frequent flyer pool in SEA over to NW. There was an announcement expected about a new international flight from SEA and now we know. Two airlines competing to LHR. That's good news. In a year SEA will have doubled its number of flights to Europe.

Quoting Falcon flyer (Reply 6):
Does the A330-300 have the range for SEA-LHR ? Just assumed it would be a -200 series.

NW has operated SEA-AMS with the A333, but I've heard that there were weight restrictions sometimes. SEA-NRT/AMS/LHR are all about the same length with SEA-AMS being the longest. Some A330 maintenance is done in SEA as a plane sits in the hangar for about 24 hours each day, so it wouldn't be surprising to see more A330s rotating through.



If you have never designed an airplane part before, let the real designers do the work!
User currently offlineJacobin777 From United States of America, joined Sep 2004, 14968 posts, RR: 60
Reply 9, posted (6 years 9 months 2 weeks 5 days 1 hour ago) and read 13572 times:

Nice to see some more A330's at SEA.. bigthumbsup 




"Up the Irons!"
User currently offlineBurnsie28 From United States of America, joined Aug 2004, 7546 posts, RR: 8
Reply 10, posted (6 years 9 months 2 weeks 5 days ago) and read 13523 times:



Quoting Falcon flyer (Reply 6):
Does the A330-300 have the range for SEA-LHR ? Just assumed it would be a -200 series.

Yes, in fact it did use to fly SEA-AMS for a short time.



"Some People Just Know How To Fly"- Best slogan ever, RIP NW 1926-2009
User currently offlineBurnsie28 From United States of America, joined Aug 2004, 7546 posts, RR: 8
Reply 11, posted (6 years 9 months 2 weeks 5 days ago) and read 13439 times:



Quoting DTW.SCE" class=quote target=_blank>PSU.DTW.SCE (Reply 3):
This helps to explain some of the shuffle in NW's Trans-Atlantic fleet for next summer, hence why we will see a NW 744 & KLM pick up one of the DTW-AMS flights to allow for the A330's to pick up the net-new TATL flying next summer which will be PDX-AMS, SEA-LHR, MSP-CDG, and DFW-AMS (KLM)

Thats true, now it looks as if NW could use more A330's already. There are still a lot of untapped cities they could make work. Such as Munich, Madrid, Rome (Again), Moscow, etc.

Quoting HUYfan (Reply 4):
Does this mean an end to Eindhoven or Rotterdam flights?

Quite possibly, but remember NW and KL share transatlantic revenue 50/50 so the LHR transatlantic routes are likely to make a lot more money. But this raises the question, could they move Eindhoven and Rotterdam to LCY?



"Some People Just Know How To Fly"- Best slogan ever, RIP NW 1926-2009
User currently onlineMAH4546 From Sweden, joined Jan 2001, 32799 posts, RR: 71
Reply 12, posted (6 years 9 months 2 weeks 5 days ago) and read 13366 times:

Seattle-Europe is getting overcrowded. Yields are going to start to suffer, and somebody is going to bite, although I don't think it will be NW's LHR route.


a.
User currently offlineAirCop From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 13, posted (6 years 9 months 2 weeks 5 days ago) and read 13275 times:



Quoting B742 (Thread starter):
NW 105 London Heathrow/Seattle 1830/2055
NW 106 Seattle/London Heathrow 2220/1615 +1

Is it just me, but these times are awful, figuring customs time in SEA, won't connections be limted?


User currently offlineVasu From United Kingdom, joined Apr 2005, 3916 posts, RR: 0
Reply 14, posted (6 years 9 months 2 weeks 5 days ago) and read 13244 times:

Interesting that they're also keeping LGW-DTW! Will there be enough demand from LON (bear in mind BA ending direct flights), or will we see mostly connecting passengers?

User currently offlineKL591 From United Kingdom, joined Apr 2007, 22 posts, RR: 0
Reply 15, posted (6 years 9 months 2 weeks 5 days ago) and read 13234 times:

What slots will KLM be giving up at LHR to start these flights, or is NW getting the slots from elsewhere?

KL591


User currently offlineThreepoint From Canada, joined Oct 2005, 2140 posts, RR: 9
Reply 16, posted (6 years 9 months 2 weeks 5 days ago) and read 13194 times:

Well that answers the questions in this thread: Seattle New International Service? (by Alexinwa Dec 7 2007 in Civil Aviation)

Many posters had this advance info, and the speculation is that SAS and/or BA may see yields from Seattle fall as a result. We shall see.



The nice thing about a mistake is the pleasure it gives others.
User currently offlineANother From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 17, posted (6 years 9 months 2 weeks 4 days 23 hours ago) and read 13067 times:



Quoting HUYfan (Reply 4):
Does this mean an end to Eindhoven or Rotterdam flights?

See my post here.


User currently offlineCubsrule From United States of America, joined May 2004, 23034 posts, RR: 20
Reply 18, posted (6 years 9 months 2 weeks 4 days 23 hours ago) and read 13045 times:



Quoting AirCop (Reply 13):
Is it just me, but these times are awful, figuring customs time in SEA, won't connections be limted?

But what connections would they try to capture? The Hawaii flights are not well-timed to connect to/from Europe even if the flight arrived SEA earlier.



I can't decide whether I miss the tulip or the bowling shoe more
User currently offlineANother From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 19, posted (6 years 9 months 2 weeks 4 days 23 hours ago) and read 13010 times:



Quoting Cubsrule (Reply 18):
But what connections would they try to capture?

BLI? IIRC Skybus has identified a large market there  duck 


User currently offlineCubsrule From United States of America, joined May 2004, 23034 posts, RR: 20
Reply 20, posted (6 years 9 months 2 weeks 4 days 23 hours ago) and read 12987 times:



Quoting ANother (Reply 19):
BLI? IIRC Skybus has identified a large market there

Geez, I forgot all about BLI. What's wrong with me? Perhaps NW should purchase some 380s to dedicate to SEA-BLI (along with MKE-ORD, PGD-RSW, and SGJ-JAX).



I can't decide whether I miss the tulip or the bowling shoe more
User currently offlineHumberside From United Kingdom, joined Dec 2005, 4920 posts, RR: 4
Reply 21, posted (6 years 9 months 2 weeks 4 days 23 hours ago) and read 12978 times:



Quoting Vasu (Reply 14):
Interesting that they're also keeping LGW-DTW! Will there be enough demand from LON (bear in mind BA ending direct flights), or will we see mostly connecting passengers?

Im surprised they are keeping Gatwick. NW is the one airline I expected to leave Gatwick completely. However I presume they must have a fair few passengers for whom Gatwick is their prefered choice (such as those living or working in South London) and can therefore justify keeping Gatwick as well



Visit the Air Humberside Website and Forum
User currently onlineMAH4546 From Sweden, joined Jan 2001, 32799 posts, RR: 71
Reply 22, posted (6 years 9 months 2 weeks 4 days 23 hours ago) and read 12944 times:



Quoting Threepoint (Reply 16):

Many posters had this advance info, and the speculation is that SAS and/or BA may see yields from Seattle fall as a result. We shall see.

That's not speculation. Other airlines will see yields fall in Seattle. It will happen naturally. The speculation is how far they will fall.



a.
User currently offlineRoseFlyer From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 9652 posts, RR: 52
Reply 23, posted (6 years 9 months 2 weeks 4 days 23 hours ago) and read 12905 times:



Quoting MAH4546 (Reply 12):
Seattle-Europe is getting overcrowded. Yields are going to start to suffer, and somebody is going to bite, although I don't think it will be NW's LHR route.

I'm thinking that we'll be seeing BA reduce some frequency because of the competition. We'll probably see them drop to a single daily flight. With the number of people that fly to ORD/JFK/DTW/PHL and other European gateways for connections, I don't think that the routes will suffer too much. However load factors will be low in the winter. Hopefully yields will stay up with the steady supply of business traffic on the route.

Quoting AirCop (Reply 13):
Is it just me, but these times are awful, figuring customs time in SEA, won't connections be limted?

I'm guessing the flight will be almost exclusively O/D. NW has nothing to connect to, and AS already codeshares with BA, so I don't think they are too worried about them. Connecting traffic could boost the load factor some, but I'm guessing that NW already has a good feel for how much the AS feed helps since they've operated the SEA-AMS route for years.



If you have never designed an airplane part before, let the real designers do the work!
User currently offlineStitch From United States of America, joined Jul 2005, 31012 posts, RR: 86
Reply 24, posted (6 years 9 months 2 weeks 4 days 23 hours ago) and read 12871 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!



Quoting AirCop (Reply 13):
Is it just me, but these times are awful, figuring customs time in SEA, won't connections be limted?

SEA is AS' main hub and they partner with NW and KL (as well, ironically, BA), so this new route may be depending on AS and QX connections to help support it.


25 AlexPorter : There could be some short-haul late evening Alaska/Horizon connections in that area. However, I think most of it will be O&D as SkyTeam is going to be
26 Threepoint : That is speculation. Other airlines will likely see yields fall in Seattle. It may happen naturally. The speculation is whether or how far they may f
27 Flighty : Yes, to point out the obvious, NW is really getting serious about SEA. SEA-China is probably in the cards.
28 RwSEA : Good to see NW's plans to LHR. I'm still not convinced LHR will be the goldmine that everyone thinks it will be, but more power to 'em. Even though I
29 Stitch : Shanghai Air will fly SEA-PVG once they get their 787s in 2009, so if NW does SEA-PEK, that would be quite nice.
30 Mason : Does NW plan to offer connecting options in LHR, and if so, on AF or what? What sorts of connections are available on AF out of LHR? Or perhaps they'r
31 Humberside : AF's only LHR service is to CDG
32 RoseFlyer : What connections can be offered from LHR that NW doesn't offer already through AMS? It looks like Oneworld will keep LHR as its only Europe destinati
33 B752OS : I don't see NW putting a 787 on the SEA-LHR route. I am sure they are panning on using the planes to either open up ne routes, or fortify existing ro
34 Kohflot : Hainan starts SEA-PEK next summer. The next Asia route needed from SEA is HKG, which may be compelling for NW with the 787. But like NW adding LHR, I
35 Incitatus : SEA-LHR is only getting service because Seattle is the only city NW can serve into LHR at 4pm with more than a remote chance of making money. It all b
36 Jetjack74 : Another routes we keep hearing about is the return of LAX/SEA-KIX, and a KIX-SGN route in the coming year. The SGN route is one NW has wanted to star
37 ElmoTheHobo : In short, yes, but it'll be one of the longer A330-300 routes. SEA-AMS was the longest scheduled A330-300 flight. They aren't going after connecting
38 Post contains links FWAERJ : NW's official press release is right here: http://biz.yahoo.com/bw/071210/20071210005960.html?.v=1 On a side note: In the press release, Steenland men
39 Junction : Good grief. This makes at least 7 SEA-Europe flights a day next summer: NW 34 SEAAMS 100P 740A 1 332 AF 49 SEACDG 205P 850A 1 332 LH 491 SEAFRA 230P 9
40 Jetjack74 : Internal communique: To: All XXXXX XXXXXXXXX From: XXXXX XXXXXXXXX Date: December 10, 2007 Subject: New Service to London’s Heathrow Airport I
41 Jetjack74 : No, just maybe an effort to woooo the public with an enviromentally-friendly campaign to recycle our soda cans on-board the aircraft.
42 Transpac787 : Is the 332 really an hour slower than the 777 on this route?? Why KIX-SGN and not NRT-SGN?? AFAIK, the only connections out of KIX are TPE, SPN, and
43 SupraZachAir : They'll still have a multitude of conx available on QX throughout WA, OR, ID, and B.C. No such luck to Montana, though...
44 Basrabob : what I think is so ironic is that neither KLM or NW has released a press statement on it , but it is on sale..a strange set of affairs .You would have
45 Viscount724 : SEA-AMS was not the longest A330-300 route. KE has been using the 333 ICN-PRG for a few years. That's more than 200 nm further than SEA-AMS. AC also
46 Cubsrule : Bilateral issues.
47 Daron4000 : IIRC, unless the Vietnam-US bilateral is changed, UA is the only flag carrier that can serve SGN and so it woudl seem that this is not in the cards fo
48 Post contains links Cubsrule : That's actually unclear. UA's application for SGN stated that two carriers could serve Vietnam. Regardless, there's a separate issue http://dmses.dot
49 Transpac787 : The biateral issue is the number of flag carriers allowed, not the city pairs.
50 RwSEA : LH is starting SEA-FRA with a 333, which is slightly further than SEA-AMS. Either way, SEA-AMS would make more sense for the 333 than would SEA-LHR,
51 Cubsrule : It's Japan at all as the bilateral stands now. The thought is that since VN has requested SGN-KIX-LAX, the government of Vietnam is more likely to ac
52 EVA777SEA : Skyteam put out a publication awhile ago with the cities they intended to serve out of LHR after open skies, and SEA was on that list. This is not so
53 ElmoTheHobo : Longest Northwest A330-300 route. Either way the route is feasible with the A330-300, it'll be interesting to see how the business side plays out.
54 Usdcaguy : It's important to remember the benefits of later arriving/departing times for SEA-LHR-SEA: 1. Arriving at 1615 allows the customer to check in at his/
55 ThreeIfByAir : Hopefully ICE is not going to understaff customs/immigration, but at least there won't be other international flights arriving at the same time. AS/Q
56 PSU.DTW.SCE : As said, DTW-LGW will switch to a 75A once DTW-LHR begins in June. They did, the press releases came out today (Monday). SEA-LHR will be an A330-200.
57 Centrair : Are those flight numbers the Codeshare or the actual numbers? I have never seen an NW trans-atlantic or trans-pacific international flight with 3 digi
58 Sxf24 : Why would NW want to connect Montana to LHR via SEA and QX when then can send passengers through MSP on their own metal?
59 ER757 : I think they will - the 747 should stick around until the impact of the NW flight on BA's load factors becomes clear. My feeling is that BA may event
60 Runway23 : The connections really are of little interest. The few cities which QX serve which NW doesn't serve from MSP are negligeable. Let's not forget that L
61 BAW716 : Hi, have a question for you. Upon what facts (or assertions, even), are you making that conclusion? If you are looking at pure competition, I believe
62 LHPDX : Maybe BA will retaliate and start serving PDX.............................
63 B752OS : I honestly don't think NW would expand TATL services to MIA and SFO for the pure fact that both of those airports are home to large basis by UA and A
64 NorthstarBoy : I wonder if the times are for aircraft rotation purposes, i assume that the aircraft will come in from LHR, make the turn at Sea then the same aircraf
65 Runway23 : MIA currently has service by AA, BA and VS. Obviously that makes quite a bit of sense with both having hubs on each end. However, compare MIA to othe
66 RwSEA : If NW hadn't just announced PDX-AMS, I think BA would have been a good possibility. Maybe in a couple years if AMS does well, and FRA holds its posit
67 Runway23 : I'm not arguing the business case for flying LHR-SEA. It has been in the pipeline for a very long time now and makes sense both operationally and (ho
68 MAH4546 : You might be surprised next summer then (2009, not 2008). What SkyTeam is essentially doing is creating a Heathrow network using four airlines - AF,
69 Post contains images Connector4you : It depends... have a smooth connection to YVR both ways (half an hour to an hour like) at a decent price (CAN $ 800 return YVR-LHR tax included !!!)
70 KevinSmith : I am excited about this new route. *Fingers crossed* If I get the job I put in for that would make getting home to MN much easier.
71 Voodoo : Just thinking ... Would be nice if NW extended the flight to do LHR-AMS-LHR as a 'KLM' flight the way I assume AF will do LHR-CDG with the 777s on the
72 Bobnwa : It would require another set of slots for NW to do LHR-AMS-LHR which are hard to come by at LHR. Don't think you will see that.
73 Sxf24 : Why would NW need to worry about getting their code on a LHR-AMS flight? They operate a bazillion US-AMS flights already and could care less about co
74 Post contains images Voodoo : Uh to make money and possibly increase AMS-US service even if via LHR? I believe I made my comparison clear enough even if it is a rhetorical one. AF
75 Aisak : I don't think so. AF LON-LAX flights will originate at LAX, probably doing a W pattern like CDG-LAX-LHR-LAX-CDG. Look at the dates. LAX-LHR begins on
76 Voodoo : Ok. I hadn't seen that explicitly stated until now. It does makes sense even if it is something new to consider....which I guess we will be seeing mo
77 Aisak : Well, don't they do CDG-LAX-PPT? Or BA-QF with stopovers in Asia for that matter... It's pretty much the same. The only diference with LAX-LHR is the
78 Revo : All 3 new routes are to be operated with A330
79 Incitatus : Most people worth their salt will have an early arrival arrangement with a hotel, paying extra or not, if they walk out of an airplane at 5, 7 or 11a
80 Bobnwa : I don't agree with that statement. Very few travelers have an early arrangement with a hotel. They may have a request but not an arrangement. Very fe
81 Ctbarnes : The flight also arrives just in time for the late afternoon rush hour, if you're trying to get to Central London. The traffic is a killer, and the Tu
82 Scorpy : Is it really worth keeping the LGW station open for a single 757 flight? Seems a fair amount of overhead when they are already serving LON.
83 Cslusarc : I'm sure that keeping LGW open is just a temporary measure until NW/KL can decide if they want to add a second daily DTW - LHR frequency.
84 Post contains images Seamefly : This flight will be switched to 787 once the a/c is available. And it's rumored that NW would like to start SEA-SYD with the 787 also. So it might of
85 RwSEA : I don't know if SEA-SYD is in the cards, but if NW is planning to use the 787 on SEA-LHR then there's certainly something brewing. If NW uses the 787
86 Cubsrule : I'm not so sure... if NW has business contracts which have an expressed preference for LGW, a 75A seems like the perfect aircraft. While LHR is no do
87 Post contains links United777 : NW could be the first airline to fly the 787 Dreamliner home to Seattle. Excerpt from a KOMO TV interview with Neal Cohen, Northwest's executive vice
88 Bobnwa : It is not expensive at all if NWA has zero employees there and contracts out all work, which is the way it is now.
89 RoseFlyer : Business class travelers have early arrangements at hotels. When you fly on business, in business or first class, your company will almost always hav
90 Flighty : With massive ramp-downs at LGW across many airlines, yields at LGW are bound to improve. I don't see why LGW flights would be cut entirely. LGW has i
91 Hjulicher : With BA leaving DTW, I think it makes perfect sense that NW would keep a second LGW flight. Clearly there is enough traffic for two daily flights, as
92 BAW716 : I doubt that. They'll start it with the A332, then upgrade to the A333 if they need the extra capacity (the beautiful thing about having both in the
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Northwest (Pinnacle) To Begin RFD-DTW-May 2 posted Fri Jan 28 2005 00:20:49 by KarlB737
Oneworld Reports BA To Begin LHR-DEN/PHX/SAN posted Fri Oct 4 2002 03:45:38 by Clipper471
KLM To End Widebody Flights To LHR posted Sat Nov 24 2007 05:04:57 by HB-IWC
SQ A380 SIN-LHR-SIN Service To Begin In January posted Mon Sep 17 2007 11:56:41 by AA7295
KLM To SEA? posted Fri May 11 2007 05:04:41 by Dutchdragon
Korean To Begin Freighter Service To SEA. posted Sat May 13 2006 10:34:20 by Gunsontheroof
Regent Air: JFK/ORD/IAH/DTW/MSP To HNL? posted Mon Apr 18 2005 19:34:29 by Timz
NWA-KLM & Skyteam Where To Collect/redeem posted Sun Nov 14 2004 23:44:38 by Flyhigh69
Air Marshals To Begin Flying KLM/matinair posted Sat Jul 3 2004 13:23:05 by Soups
Mesa To Begin PHX-MSP posted Mon Apr 5 2004 16:33:16 by Av8rPHX