Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
All New Aircraft Are Looking Alike?  
User currently offlineLoveField From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Posted (13 years 9 months 5 days 18 hours ago) and read 1603 times:

Greetings fellow airliner enthusiasts! Does anyone else feel as I do, that the "new-generation" of airliners are all looking alike? The A320 resembles the 737 and 757s which are smaller versions of the 767 which resembles the 777..etc..etc. And to take that issue a few steps further, most airlines seem to be adopting the all-white fuselage, large block, bill-board style letters leaving only the tail art to amuse and amaze the public. I don't mean to come off negative but I sure miss the 707,DC8,DC9..etc.. the differences in design, sounds, colors... and I miss the brightly decorated interiors of the past as well. Let me know your views on this subject.

8 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineMit From United States of America, joined Dec 2000, 166 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (13 years 9 months 5 days 18 hours ago) and read 1567 times:

With regards to exterior structure, aircraft design is becoming a mature field. Presumably, there are a relatively few number of ideal shapes from a cost-efficiency point of view. Over a century of trial and error, aircraft designers have honed in on what those ideal designs are. It's like evolution. Think about the variation seen in the body structure of fish.

Barring a quantum technological leap to blended wings or something similarly bizarre, airliner design will become increasingly homogenous. It's a shame, but that's where the money is.


User currently offlineVirginFlyer From New Zealand, joined Sep 2000, 4575 posts, RR: 41
Reply 2, posted (13 years 9 months 5 days 10 hours ago) and read 1540 times:

The A320 resembles the 737 as much as the DC-8 resembles the 707...

The 737 is NOT a smaller version of the 767, nor to a large extent is the 757.

As for paint schemes, I think there are quite a few nice ones out there. It is also reflective of modern culture and art.

I see you are new to airliners.net, so welcome! I am sure that as you dig deeper into the world of aviation, you will come to see how different individual aircraft are (heck if they were the same, we wouldnt have these damned A vs B wars all the time now would we!)



"So powerful is the light of unity that it can illuminate the whole earth." - Bahá'u'lláh
User currently offlineDandy_don From United States of America, joined May 2000, 202 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (13 years 9 months 5 days 5 hours ago) and read 1508 times:

I agree...that is why we all like the dc10, L1011, 727 and anything with 4 engines!!

User currently offlineN960AS From Switzerland, joined Apr 2000, 466 posts, RR: 7
Reply 4, posted (13 years 9 months 5 days 4 hours ago) and read 1498 times:

Hello, my name is the Boeing 717.


Click for large version
Click here for full size photo!

Photo © Michael Carter



I was originally named the MD-95 and that's my rightful name, as I'm closely related to the DC9/MD80/MD90 family, the best planes IMHO, wink wink. However one of those monopolizing seattle based companies took me over and renamed me! Anyway, I have engines mounted in the rear and a 'T-tail'! Some RJs kind of look like me too. I share your sentiments, but us twin jets are very economic. Remember about A340s, 747s, MD11s, Avros and some Russian planes though.

(boy I feel silly for writing that).

J


User currently offlineChristianbothe From Germany, joined Jan 2000, 124 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (13 years 9 months 4 days 22 hours ago) and read 1478 times:

Yes, right...
I mean, talk about faces. This aircraft has a face that somehow looks like a pilot had to look like in old movies. It looks like being a really tough guy, having seen the world and some less comfortable parts of it, yet being a gentleman, knowing how to wear a tie and a uniform and being well-shaved:

Click for large version
Click here for full size photo!

Photo © Dietmar Schreiber


This aircraft looks like people waiting for the tram in an old movie: They are there, but you almost don't notice them as they are nameless people, a grey mass without individuality:

Click for large version
Click here for full size photo!

Photo © Henry Jr Godding



 Wink/being sarcastic
Sorry if I hurt anybody's feelings.

 Smile/happy/getting dizzy christian


User currently offlineRIX From United States of America, joined Aug 2000, 1787 posts, RR: 1
Reply 6, posted (13 years 9 months 4 days 17 hours ago) and read 1452 times:

Welcome to the forum! Yes, almost all the airliners that are currently in production have the same configuration (as far as I understand, that is what you mean, so I'm not trying to explain you they are not the same  Smile...). Actually, everything bigger than 717 is either 737/320/204/757/767/330/777 or 340/96/747/380. Less types and much less manufacturers than in, say, 60-s, and no more big props! Remember,

DC3/4/6/7, Constellation
Viscount, Il18, Vanguard, L188, Britannia, Tu114
F27/An24
Comet
Tu104/124
707/DC8
Caravelle
DC9/1-11/Tu134
Trident/727/Tu154
VC10/Il62
Yak40

Then, in 70-s, when many of those were still in service, plus
DC10/L1011
737
747
A300
Concorde

But I hope to see something really NEW in the skies again...


User currently offlineMidway DC9-10 From United States of America, joined Sep 2000, 265 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (13 years 9 months 4 days 14 hours ago) and read 1439 times:

Lovefield,

I had this same thought years ago when all the Airbus planes were being announced. I grew up in the 80's when we still had the wide variety of planes that had the t-tail, the four engines on the wings, and the trijets. I almost forgot the Convair 580's and many commuter props. I always liked to be able to see this type of variety. It is a shame that all the manufacturers are designing planes with an engine on each wing. Unfortunately, from a business standpoint I imagine there are reasons for this. Take as many pictures of the older planes as you can before it is too late.

Long live the 80's.

Dave


User currently offlineCdfMXTech From United States of America, joined Jul 2000, 1341 posts, RR: 26
Reply 8, posted (13 years 9 months 4 days 11 hours ago) and read 1424 times:

I don't know about that (aircraft looking the same).
If any Boeing/Airbus aircrafts resemble one another it would be these pairs:

B757 - A321
B767 - A300

That is where it stops...at best


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Air Koryo Looking For New Aircraft posted Wed Aug 30 2006 19:28:04 by 777way
Silk Air Looking For New Aircraft posted Tue Mar 7 2006 21:34:13 by CX747
Are New Aircraft Replacing Older Aircraft? posted Sun Aug 28 2005 22:15:56 by Leigh pilgrim
Gulf Air Looking For New Aircraft & Public Listing posted Tue May 24 2005 06:14:44 by MEA
Rumor, Copa's New Order Are All 737-800's! posted Fri Apr 29 2005 02:34:05 by Luisca
How Are Bombardier's Plans For New Aircraft Going? posted Sun Feb 6 2005 19:19:58 by BALandorLivery
What New Liveries Are You Looking Forward To?! posted Sun Sep 15 2002 18:17:21 by Englandair
Air Malta. Are They Concidering New Aircraft? posted Wed Feb 13 2002 23:33:13 by Air Orange
New Liveries Are All Boring! posted Fri Nov 30 2001 12:02:07 by FFlyer
JetBlue - New Aircraft Maintenance Contract posted Mon Dec 11 2006 17:06:44 by Werdywerd