Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Is Delta Ending DSM-SLC?  
User currently offlineDbo861 From United States of America, joined May 2004, 861 posts, RR: 1
Posted (6 years 4 months 3 days 23 hours ago) and read 2011 times:

It's not bookable on the website after Jan 6. I thought this route was doing well.

5 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineEXAAUADL From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted (6 years 4 months 3 days 23 hours ago) and read 2000 times:

I think it was but a 1000 mile flight on a CRJ with $90 fuel isnt going to work. I ma sure loads were good. We're begining to see the end of the CRJ adn ERJ, at least for flights over 500-700 miles.

User currently offlineFlyPNS1 From United States of America, joined Nov 1999, 6485 posts, RR: 24
Reply 2, posted (6 years 4 months 3 days 23 hours ago) and read 1996 times:

It appears so, although some routes being cut this winter may reappear in the spring/summer.

Looks like XNA-SLC, LIT-SLC, MKE-SLC have been (or will be) cut as well.


User currently offlineTan Flyr From United States of America, joined Aug 2000, 1897 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (6 years 4 months 3 days 23 hours ago) and read 1958 times:



Quoting EXAAUADL (Reply 1):
I think it was but a 1000 mile flight on a CRJ with $90 fuel isnt going to work. I ma sure loads were good. We're begining to see the end of the CRJ adn ERJ, at least for flights over 500-700 miles.

I was under the impression that it was the SHORTER flights on CRJ/ERJ that were in trouble due to fuel. (Thus CO's move back to turbo props at EWR)

It seems to me that once at cruise for a 500-1000 mile segment the RJ should not have significant fuel penalty. It is those 150-300 milers that kill fuel economy in an RJ (particularly at $90.00 USD per BBL of oil).

If I'm wrong, some one please advise, but that was my understanding for some time. ( I believe we will see the move back to turbo-props (Q-400?? or something else) accelerate in coming months/ years.


User currently offlineEXAAUADL From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 4, posted (6 years 4 months 3 days 22 hours ago) and read 1888 times:



Quoting Tan Flyr (Reply 3):
It seems to me that once at cruise for a 500-1000 mile segment the RJ should not have significant fuel penalty. It is those 150-300 milers that kill fuel economy in an RJ (particularly at $90.00 USD per BBL of oil).

If I'm wrong, some one please advise, but that was my understanding for some time. ( I believe we will see the move back to turbo-props (Q-400?? or something else) accelerate in coming months/ years.

No it has always been the opposite. Not talking about CASM here but total costs. Long flights are fuel intensive. Also while a DH8 might be more efficient than a CRJ on a 150 mile flight, that still doesnt effect the comparison of a CRJ v CRJ between a 500 and 1000 mile flight.......A CRJ is best on a 250-500 mile flight. Beyond that, CASM no longer falls and might even rise on long 1000+ flights


User currently offlineEMB170 From United States of America, joined Nov 2007, 644 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (6 years 4 months 3 days 22 hours ago) and read 1873 times:



Quoting Tan Flyr (Reply 3):
If I'm wrong, some one please advise, but that was my understanding for some time. ( I believe we will see the move back to turbo-props (Q-400?? or something else) accelerate in coming months/ years.

Maybe yes, maybe no. The problem with Q400s is that you better be able to realize long-enough term fuel savings over the CRJ700/900 and EMB170/175 to justify the purchase/lease of the aircraft and time and money spent training new crews. Unless you're doing like F9 is doing with L4 (starting from scratch so it doesn't matter) or like 9E is doing with Colgan (beginning to phase out the old, outdated aircraft that aren't in production anymore with a new type), it's not necessarily viable to do so. Plus, don't forget the age-old passenger mantra of, "don't put me on that noisy little plane with the spinny things on the wings".

These wouldn't be the first routes from SLC that have been cut...like others have said, I'd bet that SLC to DSM, XNA, LIT, MKE, (and my hope) IND will re-appear once more, larger CRJ-900 aircraft become available to OO. As DL is now saying they want 50% of their mainline flight schedules to be international, more of the burden is going to be brought to bear on the connection carriers.

EMB170, who would (admittedly biased) like more IND service (from all airlines) to be *cough* mainline *cough*...



Can passenger jets fly as fast as my feet do? Let's find out...
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Is Delta Getting More 767-300ERs? posted Mon Nov 12 2007 11:49:22 by Kaitak744
How Is Delta Doing On JFK-KBP Route? posted Wed Nov 7 2007 14:47:29 by Addd
How Is Delta Doing With Their JFK-LGW Flights? posted Mon Sep 17 2007 04:17:24 by 747fan
Is Delta To Fly To Australia? posted Fri Aug 3 2007 06:01:06 by Downunderflyer
Is Delta Cutting Service In BTR? posted Sun Jul 15 2007 23:04:16 by Ryanrap1
What Happen To Delta On IND-SLC? posted Tue Jun 19 2007 00:15:15 by Boeing743
How Is Delta's ATL-JNB Flight Doing? posted Sun Jun 17 2007 09:32:04 by Umfolozi
Flight Loads For Delta Connection SLE-SLC posted Wed Jun 13 2007 03:06:01 by KPDX
New Delta Livery In SLC Monday April 30! posted Tue Apr 17 2007 20:13:29 by Dl757md
The Luggage Nightmare That Is Delta posted Mon Apr 2 2007 00:02:34 by B777A340Fan