Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
AA Route Rumors  
User currently offlineSFOQQAA From United States of America, joined Aug 2007, 96 posts, RR: 1
Posted (6 years 7 months 6 days 13 hours ago) and read 15421 times:

Let me preface this by saying I am just repeating what I've heard while traveling on AA recently. Nothing official, just fun speculation. New routes mentioned were SFO-AUS, DEN-LGA, MCI-MIA and the return of MCI-STL. Anyone have any thoughts or further insight?

126 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineOzarkD9S From United States of America, joined Oct 2001, 5010 posts, RR: 21
Reply 1, posted (6 years 7 months 6 days 13 hours ago) and read 15388 times:

Would love to see STL-MCI return. 4x a day on Connection would about cover it.


Next Up: STL-LGA-RIC-ATL-STL
User currently offlineLAXdude1023 From India, joined Sep 2006, 7511 posts, RR: 24
Reply 2, posted (6 years 7 months 6 days 13 hours ago) and read 15312 times:



Quoting SFOQQAA (Thread starter):
Nothing official, just fun speculation. New routes mentioned were SFO-AUS, DEN-LGA, MCI-MIA and the return of MCI-STL.

Im not so sure about AUS-SFO because AA flies AUS-SJC. AA really needs to think about AUS-MIA. That would make more sense to me.



Stewed...Lewd...Crude...Irreverent...Belligerent
User currently offlineSFOQQAA From United States of America, joined Aug 2007, 96 posts, RR: 1
Reply 3, posted (6 years 7 months 6 days 13 hours ago) and read 15279 times:



Quoting LAXdude1023 (Reply 2):
Im not so sure about AUS-SFO because AA flies AUS-SJC. AA really needs to think about AUS-MIA. That would make more sense to me.

The talk I had heard was that SJC was going to go down one AUS flight and SFO was picking it up. Leaving SJC with 2 flights and SFO with 1. I know SJC has been slowly reduced...


User currently onlineMaverickM11 From United States of America, joined Apr 2000, 17361 posts, RR: 46
Reply 4, posted (6 years 7 months 6 days 13 hours ago) and read 15261 times:



Quoting SFOQQAA (Thread starter):
DEN-LGA

I don't think they are allowed to fly this since it's outside of the LGA range restriction and they haven't been grandfathered into the rights like UA or F9.



E pur si muove -Galileo
User currently offlineSxf24 From United States of America, joined Aug 2007, 1257 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (6 years 7 months 6 days 13 hours ago) and read 15221 times:

Where would the slots and aircraft necessary to operate 3 daily (the minimum to be somewhat competitive) LGA-DEN come from?

I also think the rumor of STL-MCI is just that. If AA was going to jump in and compete against WN, they would have done it when oil was lower.


User currently offlineNYCAAer From United States of America, joined Jul 2004, 692 posts, RR: 3
Reply 6, posted (6 years 7 months 6 days 12 hours ago) and read 15084 times:

I've heard a rumor from several of my co-workers that ORD-DEL may be discontinued and the route transferred to JFK, but nothing substantial. AA is really stagnating on int'l growth, compared to CO and DL.

User currently offlineAirbusaddict From United States of America, joined Aug 2007, 415 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (6 years 7 months 6 days 12 hours ago) and read 14866 times:

Well DFW-FSD and DFW-CID are both possibilities because they both have high passenger numbers to DFW and FSD Officials are talking to AA about the grant they have.


Finally F9! FSD-DEN 7-4-2011
User currently offlineLAXdude1023 From India, joined Sep 2006, 7511 posts, RR: 24
Reply 8, posted (6 years 7 months 6 days 11 hours ago) and read 14735 times:



Quoting Airbusaddict (Reply 7):
Well DFW-FSD and DFW-CID are both possibilities because they both have high passenger numbers to DFW and FSD Officials are talking to AA about the grant they have.

AA already flies DFW-CID. I think DFW-BOI coming back at least seasonally would be good. DFW-GEG would also be nice.



Stewed...Lewd...Crude...Irreverent...Belligerent
User currently offlineSuper80DFW From United States of America, joined Oct 2007, 1689 posts, RR: 11
Reply 9, posted (6 years 7 months 6 days 11 hours ago) and read 14593 times:

What about a OKC-MIA or OKC-LGA route? The MIA route would maybe need a CR7 due to people taking lots of luggage. www.faremeasure.com says that 284 people travel from Oklahoma City to New York everyday. I could see that route with a M80.


"Things change, friends leave, life doesn't stop for anybody." -- EAT'EM UP EAT'EM UP KSU!!
User currently offlineLAXdude1023 From India, joined Sep 2006, 7511 posts, RR: 24
Reply 10, posted (6 years 7 months 6 days 11 hours ago) and read 14558 times:



Quoting NYCAAer (Reply 6):
I've heard a rumor from several of my co-workers that ORD-DEL may be discontinued and the route transferred to JFK, but nothing substantial. AA is really stagnating on int'l growth, compared to CO and DL.

That would be the death of it. Theres competition on NYC-DEL (AI and CO). ORD still has a large market to India, but no nonstop compeititon. The market at ORD might not be as much as NYC or California, but its still substantial.

One flight I would like to see come out is DFW-MAD at some point. Its been brought up several times. Maybe it will stick next time around.



Stewed...Lewd...Crude...Irreverent...Belligerent
User currently offlineBingo From United States of America, joined Nov 2006, 359 posts, RR: 0
Reply 11, posted (6 years 7 months 6 days 11 hours ago) and read 14517 times:



Quoting LAXdude1023 (Reply 2):
AA really needs to think about AUS-MIA

I think youre right. I've seen a recent shift in IT outsourcing moving to Latin America. Theres a big tech sector in AUS (ie Dell,Oracle,Etc) and the Latin American Gateway to the US is MIA (esp for AA). This would make it easier for lots of my colleagues to fly in and out. Hopefully they give this serious thought....


User currently offlineAABB777 From United States of America, joined Oct 2007, 528 posts, RR: 0
Reply 12, posted (6 years 7 months 6 days 11 hours ago) and read 14517 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

If ever possible, the one route AA would love to add would be DCA-SAT. If AA has the opportunity to get additional landing/takeoff slots at DCA look for this route to be the first to pop up.

User currently offlineJacobin777 From United States of America, joined Sep 2004, 14968 posts, RR: 60
Reply 13, posted (6 years 7 months 6 days 11 hours ago) and read 14496 times:



Quoting NYCAAer (Reply 6):
I've heard a rumor from several of my co-workers that ORD-DEL may be discontinued and the route transferred to JFK, but nothing substantial. AA is really stagnating on int'l growth, compared to CO and DL.

..I've been hearing this rumour for almost a year now....

Quoting LAXdude1023 (Reply 10):

That would be the death of it. Theres competition on NYC-DEL (AI and CO). ORD still has a large market to India, but no nonstop compeititon. The market at ORD might not be as much as NYC or California, but its still substantial.

 checkmark 



"Up the Irons!"
User currently offlineLonghornmaniac From United States of America, joined Jun 2005, 3278 posts, RR: 45
Reply 14, posted (6 years 7 months 6 days 11 hours ago) and read 14497 times:



Quoting AABB777 (Reply 12):

Why SAT? I would think AA would add AUS-DCA long before SAT?

Cheers,
Cameron


User currently offlineSFOQQAA From United States of America, joined Aug 2007, 96 posts, RR: 1
Reply 15, posted (6 years 7 months 6 days 11 hours ago) and read 14456 times:



Quoting AABB777 (Reply 12):
If ever possible, the one route AA would love to add would be DCA-SAT. If AA has the opportunity to get additional landing/takeoff slots at DCA look for this route to be the first to pop up.

You think? I don't get this one. But maybe the demand is there.

Quoting Longhornmaniac (Reply 14):
Why SAT? I would think AA would add AUS-DCA long before SAT?

 checkmark  I can see them building up AUS more. If AUS were within the perimeter rules for LGA, you'd see that route for sure!


User currently offlineFoxBravo From United States of America, joined Nov 2003, 2993 posts, RR: 4
Reply 16, posted (6 years 7 months 6 days 10 hours ago) and read 14420 times:



Quoting MaverickM11 (Reply 4):
I don't think they are allowed to fly this since it's outside of the LGA range restriction and they haven't been grandfathered into the rights like UA or F9.

As far as I know it's the city (DEN) that's grandfathered, not the airlines. F9 didn't exist until long after the perimeter rule was in place. For what it's worth, CO also operated LGA-DEN for a while when they had a hub at Stapleton.

This route would make sense, as it's consistent with AA's strategy of developing LGA as a focus city with nonstops from to most major destinations (including other airlines' hubs, such as DTW, CLT, ATL, CVG and MSP).



Common sense is not so common. -Voltaire
User currently offlineBoeingFever777 From United States of America, joined Jul 2009, 409 posts, RR: 54
Reply 17, posted (6 years 7 months 6 days 10 hours ago) and read 14406 times:



Quoting SFOQQAA (Reply 3):
The talk I had heard was that SJC was going to go down one AUS flight and SFO was picking it up. Leaving SJC with 2 flights and SFO with 1. I know SJC has been slowly reduced...

Slowly reduced?

They drop (1) n/s flight on Sat. They still fly (3) daily n/s S-F on MD80. They downgraded due to the 757's were needed elsewhere.

The NERDBIRD flights are still very popular/full here in AUS.

If anything AA would go AUS-MIA, AUS-BOS/JFK plus (2) daily AUS-SNA.



Faire du ciel le plus bel endroit de la terre.
User currently offlineRwSEA From Netherlands, joined Jan 2005, 3081 posts, RR: 2
Reply 18, posted (6 years 7 months 6 days 10 hours ago) and read 14380 times:

I'm still waiting for MIA-SEA to compliment AS's daily flight. The O&D is there, and under the current timing, there's a double-connect on the return from the Caribbean.

User currently offlineSFOQQAA From United States of America, joined Aug 2007, 96 posts, RR: 1
Reply 19, posted (6 years 7 months 6 days 10 hours ago) and read 14356 times:



Quoting BoeingFever777 (Reply 17):
Slowly reduced?

They drop (1) n/s flight on Sat. They still fly (3) daily n/s S-F on MD80. They downgraded due to the 757's were needed elsewhere.

I wasn't talking about the route, more the total operation at SJC. I have no doubt the Nerdbird is still very popular!


User currently offlineMrSTL From United States of America, joined Sep 2005, 468 posts, RR: 1
Reply 20, posted (6 years 7 months 6 days 10 hours ago) and read 14340 times:



Quoting OzarkD9S (Reply 1):
Would love to see STL-MCI return. 4x a day on Connection would about cover it.

Me too, the connection opportunites for those out of MCI would also increase, and could substantially decrease total travel times on some routes for those AA fliers out of MCI.


User currently offlineBoeingFever777 From United States of America, joined Jul 2009, 409 posts, RR: 54
Reply 21, posted (6 years 7 months 6 days 10 hours ago) and read 14279 times:



Quoting SFOQQAA (Reply 19):
I wasn't talking about the route, more the total operation at SJC

Need to be more clear in your posts.

SJC has been in downgrade for awhile... No Intl. flights to NRT & TPE anymore.  Sad



Faire du ciel le plus bel endroit de la terre.
User currently offlineBingo From United States of America, joined Nov 2006, 359 posts, RR: 0
Reply 22, posted (6 years 7 months 6 days 10 hours ago) and read 14278 times:



Quoting SFOQQAA (Reply 15):
You think? I don't get this one. But maybe the demand is there.

I could totally see DCA to SAT being a big route. SAT has a huge military population down there. Especially Air Force. With the Pentagon right next to DCA and all the other bases in the area, they could easily fill that slot.

DCA to Aus would be nice too. I usually do the DCA-IAH-AUS jump on CO. Direct would be nice if it were on a 737 instead of 4 hours in an EM145. I know UA has a direct from IAD but thats UA and its IAD two last resorts for me.


User currently offlineB752OS From United States of America, joined Dec 2005, 1322 posts, RR: 0
Reply 23, posted (6 years 7 months 6 days 10 hours ago) and read 14219 times:



Quoting RwSEA (Reply 18):
I'm still waiting for MIA-SEA to compliment AS's daily flight. The O&D is there, and under the current timing, there's a double-connect on the return from the Caribbean.



Quoting BoeingFever777 (Reply 17):
They drop (1) n/s flight on Sat. They still fly (3) daily n/s S-F on MD80. They downgraded due to the 757's were needed elsewhere.

The NERDBIRD flights are still very popular/full here in AUS.

If anything AA would go AUS-MIA, AUS-BOS/JFK plus (2) daily AUS-SNA.

BOS-AUS could use another daily flight. B6 offers a single daily flight and they don't even capture half of the 384 daily pax market.

Quoting RwSEA (Reply 18):
I'm still waiting for MIA-SEA to compliment AS's daily flight. The O&D is there, and under the current timing, there's a double-connect on the return from the Caribbean.

Wouldn't AS just add a second daily flight, if not year round, but seasonal as they do with BOS? Speaking of which, it would be nice if they would keep that flight year round.


User currently offlineWesternA318 From United States of America, joined Oct 2004, 5647 posts, RR: 24
Reply 24, posted (6 years 7 months 6 days 10 hours ago) and read 14182 times:

Personally, I'd love to see additional frequencies to ORD from SLC, resumption of SLC-STL, and maybe even SLC-MIA...


Next trip: SLC-LAX-JFK-LAX-SLC on AA, gotta say goodbye to my beloved 762!
25 Post contains links AABB777 : The demand is there. If AA is able to get the additional slots, look for this route. Guaranteed. According to www.faremeasure.com AA carries over 39%
26 Gigneil : I believe that SAT is outside the perimeter. NS
27 RwSEA : Yes, they could. The problem is that it would tie up a plane for an entire day. AA used to operate the route and it would be nice to see them bring i
28 SFOHORIZON : The rumor about the imminent demise of the ORD-DEL route has been circulating for years.... I'll repeat what I said 6 months ago. My flight attendant
29 FlyingJHawk : MCI-MIA would be a great service especially in the winter for Caribbean destinations. I am not sure that AA wants to compete against WN for STL for wh
30 Gigneil : Your flight attendant friend has absolutely no insight into the profitability of the flight. None. Full planes can easily be losing money. I'm not be
31 SFOHORIZON : Perhaps he does, perhaps he doesn't..... You wouldn't know, and neither would I. But if someone who works for AA says the flight is doing well, I'd f
32 ElmoTheHobo : JFK-DUS, JFK-NCE, JFK-GVA have all been rumored on these boards, though Kennedy-Geneva was one of the destinations they were considering with 757s. At
33 Jacobin777 : ....while certainly full planes don't = profits...given AA's proclivity to end loss-making flights (even lower-yielding flights such as ORD-NGO) and
34 Ebs757 : So was ORD-ANC a few years ago. Still don't know the whole story behind trashing that one
35 PanAm747 : It is inconceivable to me that given the market between the extreme southern San Joaquin Valley and the state of Texas, there is no connection between
36 Post contains images MaverickM11 : I think that was part of AA's "we're going to pretend the market isn't seasonal and not fly seasonal routes" push
37 Post contains images FXramper : Add CDG from SJC. For some time now, AA has wanted a second destination in Germany. A return to DUS has been rumored for some time. JFK was the prefe
38 Ripcordd : ORD-DEL Makes money its full F/J/Y most of the time. And ALWAYS the plane is loaded with as much cargo as it can fly both ways they make a nice little
39 FXramper : Flight # Departs: Arrives: 158 ORD 4:55 p.m. DME 12:15 p.m. Next Day 159 DME 2:40 p.m. ORD 4:50 p.m. Same Day Should already be loaded in the system.
40 Post contains images Boeingfever777 : I'll say EGE...
41 Post contains images Boeingfever777 : This flight has been upgraded to 777... Uncle Jim not that old yet to transfer to 777 metal f/t.
42 Iowaman : AUS-MIA is long rumored, but for right now the Eagle ERJ fleet is stretched very thin.
43 WesternA318 : Looks like JAC? Speaking of AA's mainline....looks like the 757 in the pic needs a repaint, lol
44 Dc10s2hnl : Maybe when this Eagle drama and scope-clause issues settle down, we'd be able to see more CR7s in the fleet, yeah? SBA currently gets a CR7 to DFW, p
45 MAH4546 : AUSMIA will happen. It will be mainline not Eagle. It was supposed to have launched by now but keep gettin pushed back. MIA to SEA and MCI are only a
46 JDAirCEO : With only a few upgs and/or AAdvantage tkts given on this flight in advance, it's easy to tell the flight does well because very few upgs are cleared
47 B752OS : Are you sure about that? My sister is booked on AS 25, which is the season second daily flight. I would not be surprised if AA does not start BOS-AUS
48 Klwright69 : I do not see it... There is simply too much competition.. Next summer CO is ramping up EWR-DEN to 5x/day.. UA serves both EWR and LGA. F9 serves LGA.
49 CIDflyer : AA has operated DFW-CID for the past 7 years, 6x daily. Did you mean RAP? I could see FSD-DFW at some point in the future. AA has a big whole in the
50 Ualcsr : I'd like to see MIA-ASU make a come back, and of course, it's just a matter of time before we see MIA to a northeast Brasilian city.
51 BA744PHX : What about PHX-LAX/JFK??? DL is running 2 daily JFK and 4 daily LAX. Would be nice if AE was back for at least 3 or 4 daily to LAX. and 1 mainline dai
52 LHPDX : I wish AA would restart PDX-STL agian!
53 Cubsrule : AA has moved away from seasonal routes. ORD-GLA is another example. Both routes did fine in season, but the season was short. Demand from STL to PDX
54 DTWAGENT : I wish AA would put more flights from DTW to MIA on. This 7:30a outbound and 10:00pm return to DTW is not good. I sell alot of seats on a new Non-stop
55 Miaami : Rumor of MIA-NRT if/when the 787 is ever in AA colors
56 Georgiabill : My thoughts MHT-DFW twice daily and MHT-MIA to maximize connections to Ccarribean and Americas
57 Georgiabill : Sorry for my typo Caribbean
58 JetBlueAUS : Word has told me that JetBlue plans on beefing up their AUS presence (in '08) since it is a station that performs very well.
59 Klwright69 : Spot on. That is why I can't see AA reentering the market.
60 Rockinflyer : I know I've said it before, but lets get a couple of BUR-ORD frequencies in there. They'd have it all to themselves and the market is definitely read
61 Tommy767 : Not a new route but I would love to see EWR-LAX get upgraded to 767s again.
62 Post contains images FXramper : So I chatted today with 'the man' from JFK. He was whining about crew scheduling jerking him off FCO and flying him on ZRH. Also...apparently, they je
63 B752OS : Considering AA not longer operates PVD-DFW, I would put the chances of MHT seeing service before they restart PVD at very slim, along with MIA-MHT. P
64 IADLHR : I have wondered about the possibility of ABQ-MIA. WN has had ABQ-MCO and ABQ-TPA for while now and seems to be doing quite well with those flights. So
65 M992910 : I was just in Austin for Xmas, and the airport was busy as ever. I think American will increase its capacity out of AUS this year, possible making it
66 ABQ747 : I highly doubt AA would even consider flying ABQ-MIA. If anything, I could see WN flying ABQ-FLL.
67 AABB777 : AA has also upgraded the ORD-DME route from a 763 to a 772.
68 Boeingfever777 : See replys 39 & 42...
69 Byrdluvs747 : Milan was added as well. In my opinion, there are four routes that AA needs to add on to fill the regional holes in their network. International: US-
70 Post contains images Jacobin777 : HKG basically has different set of bi-laterals than mainland China.....O8 has stated they want to start HKG-ORD, which might hopefully give AA the op
71 Byrdluvs747 : I couldn't remember what the talks were named. That's interesting. I didn't know about O8's plans. I don't think AA will have much choice. If the rar
72 RC135X : Given the telecoms industries in Sweden and Finland, as well as oil in Norway, it might make sense to bring back some variant of the old AA80/81 from
73 FXramper : Agreed. AA should be leasing 787 from ILFC in the future. When this happens, ORD-HKG would be a 1st tier route fleet managers would consider.
74 Post contains images Jacobin777 : ..don't know off the top either.... ..yep, OAK and ORD have been "short-listed" from the start for North America.... ...I wouldn't expect to see AA c
75 Post contains images FXramper : An order from AA outright hinges on the new deal with pilots AMR is facing. It has been SOP for AMR to use new a/c, new routes, etc as leverage to ne
76 JetBlueAUS : AUS-LGB will not happen. LGB is slot restricted and all the slots are taken. Even if they did have slots, I am sure they would not use it on AUS. A s
77 Steeler83 : I posted this in another thread, but it would be neat if they made AUS into a small focus city with service to MCO, FLL, TPA, ORD, LAS, SLC, SAN, BUR
78 LAXdude1023 : I dont see AA going into the ORD-HKG market and I dont think they will. Honestly I have my doubts about CX too. I would bet that O8 might be the firs
79 SFOQQAA : Do you think AA would ever expand internationally from SFO? I don't see Europe from there, but maybe they could make NRT work from there. I know they
80 Post contains images LAXintl : Absolutely. Without having clarity on labor cost into the future it would be foolish to order something you might not be able to operate competitivel
81 Post contains images Jacobin777 : ...while everyone will have their own sides to take..lets hope they all get this concluded quickly....hopefully everyone realizes the only way for AA
82 STT757 : AUS-JFK is a business route, if they can't fly into AUS from LGA I don't see them going for JFK. They tried the LGA-HOU-AUS flight for a few years an
83 LAXdude1023 : I agree. I would see the 787 being used for DFW-Asia instead of DFW-Europe or Latin America. For the life of me, I wouldnt see AA interested in DFW-A
84 Post contains images Jacobin777 : ..I do agree with that assessment...if CX however get established on the route and then O8 comes and decreases prices, I still think CX would probabl
85 Oakjam : Didn't AA fly from SFO-LHR or was that the connecting flight to JFK. I would like to see AA return to OAK from JFK.
86 SFOQQAA : Personally, I'd like to see AA do the following at SFO. - Add 4th frequency to MIA - Add 3rd frequency to STL - Add new routes to AUS, RDU, BNA, XNA -
87 BigGSFO : ...I'd also like to see AA and AS take over the empty terminal 2 at SFO.
88 Legacyins : The reduction in aircraft has nothing to do with demand for NW at SFO NW got rid of their fuel hungry 742 and DC-10s. The A330 was a natural replacem
89 Jacobin777 : I've found the SFO-AAClub to be fairly decent-sized...maybe a bit more up to date, as it "feels" a bit old.. ...I probably agree with that, however e
90 SFOQQAA : I'd love to see AA operations moved to T2 at SFO. Something tells me though that Virgin will make that move once they begin to ramp up. I don't think
91 Post contains images Steeler83 : I was actually referring to the statement about B6, not AA My apologies for the off-topic and ambiguous response... In any event, I am still wonderin
92 LAXintl : It certainly did. When NWA's entire Asia operation was run with 747s, SFO-NRT was downgraded to a DC-10 which it remained for a few years. At the fir
93 Bartond : I never hear anything much about AA and any plans they have to serve MUC. Would an ORD-MUC , MIA-MUC or DFW-MUC flight not work? Maybe this is the sam
94 AJMIA : Very True. While AA is not adding planes most new routes (except those where equipment usage is being increased) will require something to be cut. Wh
95 Post contains images LAXdude1023 : AA will start flying DFW-Africa when they start flying MIA-China, which is to say never. You could give Mark any destination, and he'll tell you why
96 Post contains images SFOQQAA : I could see BOS-LHR going down to 1 a day and the elimination of BOS-CDG and BOS-SAN. SJC-AUS, RDU-LGA, and BNA-LAX aren't going anywhere for now. Bu
97 AJMIA : Hmmm you are probably right... I hope LGA-RDU goes down to a three or four times daily with S80s rather then multiple Eagle flights. Seems like a was
98 SFOQQAA : The S80 route to RDU is actually very popular as it continues on to AUS. The customers love it because they avoid ORD and DFW and it tends to have a
99 Longhornmaniac : Absolutely not. SJC-AUS caters to a very specific market, and from what I've been told, is nearly always full. I understand full doesn't equal profit
100 AJMIA : Holding my breath and keeping my fingers crossed for AUS-MIA. It seems that AA is beefing up more routes from MIA then starting new ones. I really th
101 BOStonsox : Last I heard AA was paying to have their side of Terminal B in BOS renovated. It seems to me that if they cut more routes from Boston spending the mon
102 Longhornmaniac : I forgot to mention AUS-BOS. Like MIA, once upon a time we had BOS. I could see AA starting AUS-BOS. With almost 300 passengers/day, and B6 having the
103 Cubsrule : The music industry express? It won't be going anywhere. There's plenty of Y/paid F demand on that flight.
104 MAH4546 : MIAMUC on AA has no realistic shot of working. Air Berlin already flies the route with low fares to boot. The largest Germany market from MIA is and a
105 Mikesairways : Slightly off topic, but I flew out of SJC, A9 is now Southwest, A10 looks like its becoming Southwest, which only leaves A12, A13, A14 for AA Mainline
106 SFOQQAA : I believe WN is moving into some of those gates as they are doing construction that is affecting one or two of their gates down on the A1-4 side. How
107 SANFan : I'm curious why you think BOS-SAN will/should be eliminated by AA? B6 entered the market on 6/28/2007 (that's 6 months ago) and AA is still flying th
108 MAH4546 : The yields on the route have taken quite a hit. Not as bad as many expected (I thought the flight was as good as gone after this past summer), but it
109 SANFan : Attn jetBlue: why don't you just add a second SAN-BOS n/s starting in a couple of months and put poor old American out of their misery on this route?
110 LAXdude1023 : AA's death watch list huh? Which routes would you consider to be on it? BOS-CDG was my first thought too.
111 MAH4546 : BOSMAN and DFWZRH, but they were already cut. DFWCCS was on it, and for all purposes, it was "cut". AA continues to operate one flight a week, but on
112 LAXdude1023 : I thought LAX-SJO did ok. It runs on a seasonal basis as it is. As for DFW-MBJ, I always thought that if AA cut one of the two routes they opened at
113 MAH4546 : It does okay, but AA doesn't want to run seasonal routes anymore with three exceptions: Alaska, Mexican beach resorts, and ski routes. If AA can't ge
114 LAXdude1023 : I guess what would be harder for me to understand is if DFW-MBJ operates in greater frequency than DFW-LIR, would that indicate that DFW-MBJ is more
115 MAH4546 : It just indicates that Montego Bay is a bulk tourist market, lot's of people on vacation packages going to all-inclusive resorts in Jamaica. Guanacas
116 B752OS : BOS doesn't need AA to start SEA as year round BOS has 2 daily flights and 3 daily on a seasonal basis. They already compete with B6 on BOS-SAN. Peop
117 MAH4546 : 2x daily year-round. The third seasonal has been cut permanently.
118 B752OS : Interesting considering you can still book on AS 25 which is the seasonal second frequency.
119 Post contains links MAH4546 : I noticed that too. AS is parking two MD80s, and the schedule cuts follow on the link: http://flyertalk.com/forum/showthread.php?t=762243 I don't kno
120 SFOQQAA : Heard there was a possibility AA was going to reduce RJ flying at LGA and bring back mainline service. Mentioned was LGA-MCI, LGA-RDU (increase S80 fe
121 Iwannagothere : What about ORD-CLT mainline? I guess just too much competition from UA and US. This must go mainline eventually because of the eagle sale right?
122 Aruba : I know it's unlikely but I hope they do a BDL-LHR or any airline do it.
123 HPAEAA : not at all. Eagle will still fly for AA, just be owned by another company...
124 Steeler83 : I posted a question about this some 60 posts earlier that I don't think anyone answered. What would that mean for their ops at PIT, since PIT is all-
125 MAH4546 : I wouldn't rule out PIT mainline returning to Dallas and Miami. I don't know when mainline can return to PIT, though. There is a grace period in whic
126 Cubsrule : AA isn't at all competitve on ORD-CLT... less frequency than UA/US and no mainline (FL also flies mainline to MDW from CLT). However, AA gets a fair
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
AA: Route Change FRA-ORD To DUS-ORD? posted Fri Oct 7 2005 10:25:42 by ChiefT
AA Route Cuts: BNA-ATL/TRI, ORD-YYC posted Mon Jun 20 2005 00:10:48 by MAH4546
Where Can I See AA Route Maps? posted Tue Jun 22 2004 13:04:45 by Chris78cpr
New AA Route: LGA-BDA posted Sun Feb 22 2004 03:51:18 by MAH4546
Odd AA Route: SEA-BOS posted Thu Jan 15 2004 18:14:18 by United777
New AA Route: SNA-JFK posted Thu Feb 20 2003 21:11:36 by Flyingbronco05
Any One Have A Current AA Route Map? posted Fri Mar 15 2002 21:36:38 by Vw
AA Route Maps? posted Tue Jan 9 2001 06:07:59 by PropilotJW
Aa Route Map Plz Help posted Fri Jul 30 1999 20:09:29 by Dfw-man
Why Only AA And AF On CDG-MIA Route? posted Mon Oct 29 2007 12:21:02 by LY777