Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
The Worst Of The European Airports-herald Tribune  
User currently offlineLHStarAlliance From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Posted (6 years 12 months 1 hour ago) and read 11530 times:

http://www.iht.com/articles/2007/12/28/business/wbairport.php?page=1

Worst :

LHR , CDG , FRA , Rome

good AMS , MAD , MUC

Constantin

79 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineBlueFlyer From United States of America, joined Jan 2006, 4180 posts, RR: 2
Reply 1, posted (6 years 12 months 1 hour ago) and read 11457 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

The last two lines of this article are the best ones in my opinion, and one of the reasons why I actually like connecting at IAH as opposed to, say, EWR or ORD. I can eat at Pappadeaux in between two flights!


I've got $h*t to do
User currently offlinePanAm747 From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 4242 posts, RR: 8
Reply 2, posted (6 years 11 months 4 weeks 1 day 20 hours ago) and read 11172 times:

I am surprised at least that DEN did not make the list of best world-wide - it is a remarkably easy airport to navigate, but I've only transferred planes there.

Any surprises on the findings? A.netters have warned of the perils of LHR, CDG, and FRA for years. Is there anyone in the world who has had a pleasant experience transferring at LHR?



Pan Am:The World's Most Experienced Airline - P(oor) S(ailor's) A(irline): San Diego's Hometown Airline-Catch Our Smile!
User currently offlineRC135X From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (6 years 11 months 4 weeks 1 day 20 hours ago) and read 11150 times:



Quoting PanAm747 (Reply 2):
Is there anyone in the world who has had a pleasant experience transferring at LHR?

Yes, actually, in November 2004 my BA319/320 from Oslo to LHR landed late due to congestion, but I was able to get quickly from T4 to T3 via bus, moved expeditiously through the security re-check, and managed to stop at the AA rebooking desk and get upgraded to C for the 777 flight to Chicago. Overall it was comparatively smooth.

Of course I have had my share of nasty connections there, too, but at least I can say they weren't all terrible.  Smile


User currently offlineAlexPorter From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 4, posted (6 years 11 months 4 weeks 1 day 19 hours ago) and read 11096 times:

On a related note, here are what people said in the last Zagat survey that came out last month:

US airports and non-US airports were ranked separately.

Best US Airports:
1. Tampa
2. Denver (tie)
2. Minneapolis (tie)
4. Orlando
5. Detroit

Worst US Airports:
1. NY La Guardia
2. Miami
3. Los Angeles
4. Philadelphia
5. NY Kennedy

Best Non-US Airports:
1. Hong Kong
2. Singapore
3. Munich
4. Tel Aviv
5. Amsterdam

Worst Non-US Airports
1. Paris CDG
2. Beijing
3. Rome FCO
4. London Heathrow
5. London Gatwick

Keep in mind that the Zagat survey is US-centric so it only includes airports that big numbers of Americans use, so smaller non-US airports wouldn't make the list.


User currently offlineSteeler83 From United States of America, joined Feb 2006, 9268 posts, RR: 21
Reply 5, posted (6 years 11 months 4 weeks 1 day 19 hours ago) and read 11081 times:



Quoting LHStarAlliance (Thread starter):
good AMS , MAD , MUC



Quoting AlexPorter (Reply 4):
Best Non-US Airports:
1. Hong Kong
2. Singapore
3. Munich
4. Tel Aviv
5. Amsterdam

I guess in this regard, it would be fair to consider AMS as Europe's 2nd best airport behind MUC. I have heard a number of good things about AMS regarding connections and what not...



Do not bring stranger girt into your room. The stranger girt is dangerous, it will hurt your life.
User currently offlineSandroZRH From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 6, posted (6 years 11 months 4 weeks 1 day 19 hours ago) and read 11065 times:

I agree with AMS and MUC, but MAD, well, the new T4 and T4S are fantastic, but the old terminals are a dump. I understand that there's a lot of construction going on though, so that might change, but right now I wouldn't rate MAD as Europe's third best airport.

I thought ZRH might be up there though.


User currently offlineAsturias From Spain, joined Apr 2006, 2156 posts, RR: 16
Reply 7, posted (6 years 11 months 4 weeks 1 day 19 hours ago) and read 11033 times:

MAD certainly isn't better than BCN. I'm just not seeing it. CDG isn't all that bad. Terminal 2 is fine, though T1 is a bit awkward at times. Transfer is no problem there and service excellent.

BCN and MAD are void of service, as many Spanish airports are, unfortunately.  Sad

MAD is fine, but not as neat as BCN.

OSL is a damn fine airport and well run, but ice-fogs in the winter can put a stop to it. CPH is most excellent as well.

LHR is a third-rate dump. Just avoid. Warn others. Unless you can send your mortal enemies there to suffer.

saludos

Asturias



Tonight we fly
User currently offlineRayChuang From United States of America, joined Jun 2000, 8037 posts, RR: 5
Reply 8, posted (6 years 11 months 4 weeks 1 day 18 hours ago) and read 11018 times:

Hopefully, LHR will be better--at least for OneWorld members--once Terminal 5 opens. With T5, at least when you fly British Airways (BA) once you land at LHR you can easily transfer to a shorter-range intra-European BA flight.  Smile

User currently offlineAbrelosojos From Venezuela, joined May 2005, 5130 posts, RR: 55
Reply 9, posted (6 years 11 months 4 weeks 1 day 18 hours ago) and read 11002 times:



Quoting SandroZRH (Reply 6):
I agree with AMS and MUC, but MAD, well, the new T4 and T4S are fantastic, but the old terminals are a dump. I understand that there's a lot of construction going on though, so that might change, but right now I wouldn't rate MAD as Europe's third best airport.

I thought ZRH might be up there though.

= I think this is a spot on analysis. I am surprised ZRH did not make it as its such a pleasant environment along with AMS. MUC - I am not too much of a fan. MAD T4 is good - the rest is ok. I also like smaller hubs like CPH and BRU.

And no surprised with either Zagat or IHT list of the worst ... my new year resolution is to avoid CDG.

Cheers,
A.



Live, and let live.
User currently offlineMilan320 From Canada, joined Jan 2005, 872 posts, RR: 11
Reply 10, posted (6 years 11 months 4 weeks 1 day 15 hours ago) and read 10848 times:

Can't agree more about the rainbow tunnel in FRA. Add to that, lack of seating anywhere. But, I shouldn't complain, I'm going through LHR 3 days from now. Good thing it's only a connecting flight ... which is better than having LHR as your final destination.

I'm surprised they didn't mention CPH. The queues at Terminal 3 to check-in for any Star Alliance flight are awful.

/Milan320

[Edited 2007-12-30 00:09:08]


I accept bribes ... :-)
User currently offlineBrianDromey From Ireland, joined Dec 2006, 3929 posts, RR: 9
Reply 11, posted (6 years 11 months 4 weeks 1 day 14 hours ago) and read 10743 times:



Quote:
To be fair, London, as a target of terrorism, has particularly pressing security issues. Nevertheless, the lines for passport control for non-EU citizens can take hours, even at odd times of the day. I recently had the misfortune to arrive at Heathrow from Rome late at night, around the same time as jumbos from Moscow; Almaty, Kazakhstan; Islamabad; Lagos; and other far-flung locations.

He should try the queues at any US airport for immigration, non-US citizens. 3hrs at IAD once, and the officers were about as rude as it was possible to be.
And what Jumbos from Moscow, they are A320(BA, BD, RU)/767 (BA, Transaero), A320/757 from Almanty, 343 from Lagos. Methinks the story was embellished somewhat.

Quoting PanAm747 (Reply 2):
A.netters have warned of the perils of LHR, CDG, and FRA for years. Is there anyone in the world who has had a pleasant experience transferring at LHR?

I like LHR, its not all that bad really. Ive transited there about a dozen times and never had a problem. The connections booked have been sensible and gone smoothly. Its not as well layed out as AMS or as glamorous as DXB but it functions reasonably well given the demands placed on aging facilities.

Quoting Steeler83 (Reply 5):
I have heard a number of good things about AMS regarding connections and what not...

AMS definately very good for transfers. Although queues at the transfer desks can be long and slow.

Brian.



Next flights: MAN-ORK-LHR(EI)-MAN(BD); MAN-LHR(BD)-ORK (EI); DUB-ZRH-LAX (LX) LAX-YYZ (AC) YYZ-YHZ-LHR(AC)-DUB(BD)
User currently offlineLHRjc From Netherlands, joined Apr 2006, 1964 posts, RR: 19
Reply 12, posted (6 years 11 months 4 weeks 1 day 14 hours ago) and read 10696 times:



Quoting AlexPorter (Reply 4):
5. London Gatwick

I'm suprised to see LGW on this list. Whilst I only ever use the North Terminal and BA (or Titan, Monarch, or whoever is operating their flights), I never have issues there. Sometimes the queues for immigration are quite high on arrivals but I'm an IRIS user so manage to skip that part. Luggage always seems pretty quick to come out, unless flying UK/Ireland routes where it seems to take forever.

Quoting RayChuang (Reply 8):
Hopefully, LHR will be better--at least for OneWorld members--once Terminal 5 opens. With T5, at least when you fly British Airways (BA) once you land at LHR you can easily transfer to a shorter-range intra-European BA flight.

 checkmark  Having been inside T5 and played the part of a connecting pax on one of the trials, transitting T5 looks to be really easy and painless. Of course when there's a queue of 500 people in front I may not be quite so positive, but on the face of it it looks good. No more being bussed around between T1 and T4, fantastic, although you do get quite an inisght into the baggage system on those journeys  Smile



"Our 319's are very reliable. They get fixed very quickly."
User currently offlineSK601 From Belgium, joined Jun 2005, 976 posts, RR: 4
Reply 13, posted (6 years 11 months 4 weeks 1 day 13 hours ago) and read 10651 times:



Quoting LHStarAlliance (Thread starter):
Worst :

LHR , CDG , FRA , Rome

I was at CDG yesterday. I must say that I've used CDG only as final destination, not as transfer airport. We arrived at terminal 2F (after a loooooooooooong taxi from the arrival runway). It took us only 20 minutes from the moment we exit the aircraft to boarding the RER to Gare du Nord. The trainstation is located in 2D. Signage was plentyful and clear. For those conncting, a AF lady was at the arrival gate assisting those who needed it. At the end of the jetway I saw a nice flatscreen tv indicating the gates of the connecting flights. To me it didn't seem so bad at all.

When returning, check in was friendly, so were the security agents. Once at the gate, terminal 2F doesn't have much to offer in terms of catering and shopping is not as widely available as for example in AMS.


User currently offlineMir From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 21867 posts, RR: 55
Reply 14, posted (6 years 11 months 4 weeks 1 day 13 hours ago) and read 10614 times:



Quoting PanAm747 (Reply 2):
I am surprised at least that DEN did not make the list of best world-wide - it is a remarkably easy airport to navigate, but I've only transferred planes there.

It's a nice looking facility, and easy to get around as you said, but it's got nothing amenity-wise that really distinguishes it from other airports. Security lines can also be rather long.

Quoting PanAm747 (Reply 2):
A.netters have warned of the perils of LHR, CDG, and FRA for years. Is there anyone in the world who has had a pleasant experience transferring at LHR?

No. Going between terminals 1 and 3 is bad enough - forget about going between 1 and 4. Ironically enough, what would have been a decent experience transferring at LHR (one BA flight at T4 to another) turned into the worst transferring experience when I realized that I had forgotten my passport on the first plane. Yes, I know I can't hold that against LHR.  Smile

I have had pleasant experiences transferring at CDG, however. Everyone rails about it, but I always manage to get to where I'm going in a reasonably quick manner. It's not my favorite airport to connect at because of the hassle of the buses, but I'd take it over LHR in a heartbeat.

-Mir



7 billion, one nation, imagination...it's a beautiful day
User currently offlineJetfan From Germany, joined Mar 2006, 53 posts, RR: 0
Reply 15, posted (6 years 11 months 4 weeks 1 day 13 hours ago) and read 10567 times:



Quoting SandroZRH (Reply 6):
well, the new T4 and T4S are fantastic

Immigration services in T4S are a shame, they know IB has a lot of arrivals in the morning and could plan for that, which they don't do, because it's cheaper to have pax wait forever. Big down for MAD here. Much less immigration hassle in FRA.


User currently offlineGorgos From Greece, joined Dec 2007, 232 posts, RR: 0
Reply 16, posted (6 years 11 months 4 weeks 1 day 13 hours ago) and read 10538 times:

I like AMS. Wonder why Zurich is not in the list. ZRH is very pleasent for transferring. However, when buying something change is given in local currency. Also, there are extra passport checkpoints. When travelling within the EU, this can be irritating.

User currently offlineFlySSC From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 7428 posts, RR: 57
Reply 17, posted (6 years 11 months 4 weeks 1 day 13 hours ago) and read 10487 times:

Most of the people who keep repeating "CDG is sooo BAD !" actually never went to CDG !

It is so easy and common to repeat some good old beliefs !

The fact is that CDG improved a lot in the past 5 years. Signage is everywhere and clear.
The indications are much better, the Automatic Train for transferring between CDG1 & CDG2 is now well operating and is sooo convenient.
The opening of the Satellite S3 and the soon full reopening of the 2E makes everything much easier. Not to mention the future S4 and Regional Terminal T4.
CDG1 is undergoing major renovation and is becoming one of the easiest and pleasant Terminal in Europe.
There is much more "Customer Assistance" everywhere in the Terminals to help passengers, and "YES !" they DO speak English too !


User currently offlineOkees From Canada, joined Sep 2005, 424 posts, RR: 5
Reply 18, posted (6 years 11 months 4 weeks 1 day 12 hours ago) and read 10470 times:

I dont know based on what these results are, but the only bad thing i can say about CDG is that its boring. I have transfered there many many times, lots of signs, lots of english signs too, frequent busses, helpful staff, and i found transferring very easy. The new terminal 2E is beautiful. Large, spacious, huge windows (in fact its all windows), nice duty free, comfy chairs, and wireless internet. So ya, heres my 2 cents about CDG, i dont think its worthy of being in the top 5 worst airports.

okees



mobs jakis
User currently offlineLO231 From Belgium, joined Sep 2004, 2392 posts, RR: 22
Reply 19, posted (6 years 11 months 4 weeks 1 day 12 hours ago) and read 10422 times:



Quoting FlySSC (Reply 17):
Most of the people who keep repeating "CDG is sooo BAD !" actually never went to CDG !

So very true!

Quoting Okees (Reply 18):
heres my 2 cents about CDG, i dont think its worthy of being in the top 5 worst airports.

Me neither. My only drawback for CDG is that I'd usually arrive in CDG by Thalys train from Brussels-Midi and have to transfer with the luggage, but for the rest I found CDGto bevery easy and smooth to pass through...

I think some people transfer there with the idea it will be bad before hand... How about buying ticket on another airline and pay more? You'd think after one bad experience you'd avoid like a plague, but noooo, some are just doing it over and over again, and then moan...

Regards,
LO231



Got both LO 788 frames already, next LO E95 and 734 BRU-WAW-BRU
User currently offlineOA260 From Ireland, joined Nov 2006, 27327 posts, RR: 60
Reply 20, posted (6 years 11 months 4 weeks 1 day 11 hours ago) and read 10300 times:

Best ::

ZRH / AMS / ATH / IST / BHD / MUC / CPH

Worst :

CDG / LHR ( hope it changes with T5 ) !! /

Quoting FlySSC (Reply 17):
Most of the people who keep repeating "CDG is sooo BAD !" actually never went to CDG !

I have been through CDG many times on my way to MIA/HAV/IAD/SXB/ATH.


User currently offlineAirGabon From Switzerland, joined Dec 2003, 892 posts, RR: 2
Reply 21, posted (6 years 11 months 4 weeks 1 day 11 hours ago) and read 10273 times:

CDG Terminal 2F, 2C, 2E and the new S3 connected bt rail to 2E are just great, clear, clean and easy. No problem at all.

User currently offlineTeva From France, joined Jan 2001, 1875 posts, RR: 15
Reply 22, posted (6 years 11 months 4 weeks 1 day 10 hours ago) and read 9838 times:

I agree with the fact that CDG has improved a lot, and that a lot of problems that have been created with the collapse of 2E will be solved next year when it re-opens next year.
However, there is still a very bad point, and I don't see any improvement coming, thanks to Sarko (when he was "ministre de l'interieur"):the passport control. While the number of pax has exploded, the number of policemen didn't follow the same direction.
It is a shame. And if so many passengers miss their connections, that is a good contributing factor.
Most of the time, even if 10 desks are built, you only have 2 or 3 policemen !!!
I can't imagine what it will be with the A 380 !!!
For a country that wants to keep its rank as N°1 tourist destination, it is a shame to have this as a first contact.
I have been to several "3rd world countries". Passport control has been easier and faster, even in countries famous for their bureaucratic practices.
Teva



Ecoute les orgues, Elles jouent pour toi...C'est le requiem pour un con
User currently offlineBennett123 From United Kingdom, joined Aug 2004, 7809 posts, RR: 3
Reply 23, posted (6 years 11 months 4 weeks 1 day 10 hours ago) and read 9816 times:

One that should get plaudits is the new ATH, 20 mins from front desk to departure lounge or 20 mins from plane to landside is pretty good. Afor the old ATH nuff said. Another is Stockholm, which is a very nice airport.

I did not find FCO to be too bad, at least it is easy to get from the train to plane amd vice versa.

AMS and MUC both deserve their places, as no LHR and JFK.

One airport which is pretty grim, (unless you are going Business) is CAI.


User currently offlineDoona From Sweden, joined Feb 2005, 3772 posts, RR: 13
Reply 24, posted (6 years 11 months 4 weeks 1 day 10 hours ago) and read 9768 times:



Quoting Milan320 (Reply 10):
The queues at Terminal 3 to check-in for any Star Alliance flight are awful.

I agree, the queues are too long, but on the other hand, the actual check-in procedure is the quickest I've ever experienced.

Cheers
Mats



Sure, we're concerned for our lives. Just not as concerned as saving 9 bucks on a roundtrip to Ft. Myers.
25 AlexPorter : My experiences with CDG are a bit mixed, but certainly worse than I've had at other airports. Arrival: Arrived on CO to 2A. Taxi took a long time, had
26 Post contains images R2rho : CDG doesn't deserve that ranking, I think it's a pretty decent airport. I haven't been to it after the CDGVAL opened, but I assume Terminal transfers
27 UN_B732 : I"m quite surprised PDX didn't make best US Airports, it's really a nice operation. About FRA, it's gotta be the most disappointing hub after LHR and
28 Francoflier : No wonder CDG gets mixed reviews. EU users are most likely to use terminals 2E and 2F and the newer parts of the airports which are ok. Unfortunately,
29 Post contains images Phatty3374 : Yesterday I flew FCO-CDG-JFK on Air France and I can confirm that neither FCO nor CDG are among the world's best airports... FCO: Easy check-in at FCO
30 Jouy31 : Unless I am mistaken, this would be 2G. CDG4 is not scheduled to open before 2016.
31 GatoVolador : I had a pleasant experience. I connected two OW flights and everything went OK. I'm sure LHR will improve with the new terminal, but anyway I think i
32 Phatty3374 : I agree. Most of the problems at LHR are a result of its congestion. I think that, upon completion of T5, things will improve enough to get it off th
33 Post contains images Jouy31 : Well, I connect through LHR at least once a month, usually between T1 and T4, and it is always stressful. T4 to T4 is ok, but that's not very difficu
34 B747forever : Yepp, twice actually
35 SandroZRH : The new Terminal won't really help solve congestion. What LHR needs is a third runway.
36 Madairdrie : Having been inside T5 too I have to agree with you, I think it will go a long way to solve the transfer issues, and I think it is 2012 when essential
37 Jouy31 : I fully agree. A third runway would help reduce the number of holding patterns around Bromley and also help reduce the taxi time, as it can take up t
38 Readytotaxi : I am surprised to see MCO so high up the list, I usually pass security in the afternoon and have often waited in line for 40mins or more, these guys
39 Flylot : Not a very conclusive study, there are a lot of bad airports out there. Warsaw - to name one. Moscow Sherem - to name a second. Plus many of these air
40 Post contains images Lightsaber : LAX is only #3?!? Why we can work on being #1 Ugh... new terminals! the TBIT is a disgrace. The 1st impression at LAX is... 3rd world. (Worse than 3r
41 Milan320 : Yes that is true. Once checked in also, everything is a breeze. Security, etc. All in all, CPH is good apart from the terrible queue that meets you o
42 44k : I don't see why US airports are considered so much worse. If anything, they are far more traveler friendly than the Euro ones, at least from my experi
43 LO231 : However, it's not CDG's fault that AF loads their flight connections to reservation system that are so difficult to make. I'd never book myself on su
44 Kaitak : Funnily enough, I was in Shannon today, on my way home; certainly a nice airport, but the bar is closed, so no Guinness if your flight is delayed. I c
45 Viscount724 : I think you mean better for British Airways passengers. I'm not aware of any other OneWorld carriers that will be operating from T5. It can't even ha
46 Kaitak : Yes, but don't forget that it will release space at other terminals - particularly T1 - which will make them a little more bearable (or less unbearab
47 BCA2005 : I am looking to book AF LHR-CDG-PEK return in March, as I've never flown with them and really want to fly the B77W. The booking site is also offering
48 Jouy31 : I believe this would be a very good choice.
49 LO231 : Absolutely. Otherwise, its asking for trouble....... regards, LO231
50 Avianca : huh since when MUC has ICE connection?
51 Phatty3374 : Absolutely. 45 minutes is simply not enough time to navigate CDG, or any major airport for that matter. The only reason I booked my tickets the way I
52 Dstc47 : It constantly amazes me how airlines, such as the AF case mentioned, assume that such tight connections will work. Goes back to an era of spare seats
53 Kaitak : A very fair point, I think. Many airports market themselves as allowing v. short connection times (MUC claims 30 mins, I think). I would like to thin
54 Cgnnrw : I used to transfer through AMS quite a lot back in the 1990s and always enjoyed it. I would usually try to allow extra time so I could visit the obser
55 LHStarAlliance : AFAIK it has an own ICE Station
56 Bennett123 : I was at AMS in August, the observation deck was still open. However World of Wings is now gone.
57 BuyantUkhaa : I managed 45 minutes in MUC, you need to walk quickly, but it's doable. MUC does not, but the town of Munich does.
58 Airbazar : A couple of years ago I did LIS-MUC-BOS with a 35 min connection time in MUC. My bags made it. the outbound leg was BOS-PHL-LIS with 3 hours connecti
59 R2rho : Now that you mention it, I've only used CDG for European transfers, no intercontinental flights. So that would explain why I have a more positive opi
60 SandroZRH : Often when i look for flights on LH's website, the cheapest option is a 30mins transit in MUC. What a joke.
61 Airbazar : They're building a maglev train that wil lconnect MUC to the city center in 15-20 minutes. I also never quite understood why the ICE does not pass th
62 TravelExec : I can't believe anyone likes MAD T4. It is an absolute nightmare, at least if you are making a change involving R/S/T/U gates and H/J/K gates... (Shen
63 LHStarAlliance : I agree ! Last summer coming from FUE , it was terrible I waited for about 1:30 h for my bags ! And it was a very long way from the Terminal to the B
64 Cjpark : Don't forget about FRA's wonderful security personel. Such pleasant people they make the worst of the TSA look like kind and considerate individuals.
65 Post contains images Lightsaber : Oops... I meant to point out I went in/out of Munich by ICE. I've never made it out to the airport. Sprinter's fare? Happy new year everyone! Lightsa
66 Airbazar : I never had any problems at FRA. Sure the place is a bit cramped and lacking amenities but It's efficient and I never experienced that kind of treatm
67 TravelExec : If you tell them you need to keep it, they will let you... (I need to keep them to prove tax residency)
68 Post contains images R2rho : I have read about that project. Do you mean to say that it is now decided and approved for construction? I have my doubts about its usefulness; I thi
69 Post contains images EUROBUS : MUC is great if your connecting with LH, but if you are thinking of renting a car, either think of going to your final destination walking or hiking!
70 Post contains images EUROBUS : MUC is great if your connecting with LH, but if you are thinking of renting a car, either think of going to your final destination walking or hiking!
71 Post contains images CJAContinental : I prefer Pappasito's myself! Mouthwatering.
72 Scipio : I connected through CDG from Brussels to Washington on AF about five years ago. During the morning, the weather at CDG was bad, so our (turboprop) fe
73 Airbazar : Are you kidding me? It's a 10 minute walk at most, 3 minutes is you're coming into T2. The rental car desks are right in the main building and the wa
74 EUROBUS : Hi Airbazar, Arriving at T2 at MUC you have to walk for miles through underground corridors (although with belts and flashy lights) before reaching th
75 Post contains images Airbazar : T2 doesn't have any underground corridors to the rental car desks. It's a 3 minute walk across the Airport Center from the time you pickup your bags
76 Rookinla : I have absolutely no problem using CDG. Yes, you have to allow a little extra time to connect, especially if you have to change terminals. The most ef
77 Post contains images EUROBUS : Hi Airbazar, You are rally getting me mixed up here! Everytime I have flown in to MUC and gone either to the Sixt or Europcar (they are actually toge
78 Boysteve : From my experience in 2007 I cannot believe that PHL is worse than ORD having connected at both within a week. PHL had wide corridors and piers to th
79 Manny : Can you elaborate what amenities it lacks. As far as long security lines are concerned thats an urban myth. I travel out of DIA very frequently and u
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Airports With The Worst/bumpiest Runways? posted Wed Nov 9 2005 02:10:18 by VH-BZF
Which Are The Top 50 European Airports? posted Wed Jul 16 2003 15:18:08 by Dellatorre
US Airports With The Worst Ground Traffic posted Sat Jun 30 2001 05:33:54 by Co LITE
The Eastern European Aviation Thread posted Tue Jul 24 2007 16:47:32 by KrisYYZ
Chicago Tribune: The Nightmare Of UA 1073 posted Sun Jun 10 2007 15:14:32 by 777fan
The 'love/hate' Airports According To Fodor's posted Mon Mar 19 2007 08:39:07 by SQ452
Aviation Journalism: Best Of The Worst? posted Mon Sep 11 2006 21:51:17 by YYZYYT
TUI : The Biggest European LCC In The Future? posted Fri Apr 28 2006 12:40:27 by FCKC
BA Executive Club, One Of The Worst FF Programs? posted Sat Oct 22 2005 04:52:17 by Kaneporta1
ZRH - Among The Three Best Airports Worldwide posted Wed Oct 12 2005 09:09:31 by Glidepath73