Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Icahn Will Butcher TWA If Given Power  
User currently offlineAA@DFW From United States of America, joined Sep 2000, 397 posts, RR: 0
Posted (15 years 4 months 4 days 10 hours ago) and read 1230 times:

Hi everyone. The following article is by Darryl Jenkins, the Director of the Aviation Institute at George Washington University, Washington, D.C. He writes about Icahn's destructive behavior toward TWA.

Commentary: Don't put Icahn in the pilot's seat

by Darryl Jenkins

WASHINGTON, D.C. - The 15-year wound from Carl Icahn's cash-draining stab at Trans World Airlines has finally brought the once-proud airline to its knees. Down to its last few dollars, TWA declared bankruptcy and proposed to sell its remaining assets to American Airlines. This reluctant and considerate move will, if successful, preserve thousands of jobs and critical air service. Icahn, the craftiest of all corporate raiders and still a significant TWA creditor, however, wants to go out with TWA the same way he came in: by depriving the airline, its customers and its employees a future of stability and success.

Icahn is maneuvering in the courts to block American Airlines' bid to buy TWA and its assets, proposing a plan of his own to purchase the airline. His bid, a combination of financial smoke and mirrors cobbled together after American's initial offer, would stymie the only real hope TWA employees have for employment security. It is ironic that the guy who got TWA into this mess is asking for permission to control its future.

TWA's "Icahn problem" began in 1985. When Icahn took over TWA, some saw him as a white knight financier trying to restore the sagging airline to financial and operational health. In 1988, Icahn took the company private through a leveraged buyout, putting $469 million in his own pocket and loading the company's balance sheet with debt. That was the last year TWA made any money. The leveraged buyout added approximately $1.2 billion in debt to the company. The cash withdrawal by Icahn deprived TWA of working capital needed to grow the airline. The debt, the economic recession of the early 1990s and the spike in fuel prices were the reasons TWA filed for its first Chapter 11.

TWA lost market share to other airlines at the same time that Pan Am and Eastern were closing down. Again, this was caused by Icahn's focus on finance rather than growing the airline. By the early '90s, TWA had the oldest, least cost-efficient fleet in the industry. If Icahn had lived up to his promise to invest in the airline, perhaps TWA would not have ended up in the deep financial pit that led to what appears to be its last bankruptcy filing.

As fuel and interest costs escalated during the early '90s, once-profitable routes were sold to make payments on the Icahn loans. The assets he sold -- access to Heathrow, in particular -- are now some of the most profitable in the industry. Ironically, these assets are now controlled by American Airlines.

During the first TWA Chapter 11 reorganization, Icahn lost control of the company to creditors. But Icahn's departure was not complete. He remained a TWA creditor. As the price of extending repayment of a $180 million debt, Icahn was allowed to purchase TWA tickets at 55 percent of full retail price until 2003. Some reports indicate that Icahn's Karabu Corp. has paid $514 million to buy TWA tickets with a retail price of $925 million. The airline has been unable to recover from Icahn's double whammy: huge debt costs and loss of a significant amount of seat inventory, which strangled its revenue stream.

Despite these and other financial problems, TWA and its employees have rallied in recent years, improving operations and on-time performance. But it wasn't enough. Now Icahn is trying to throw a roadblock into what could be the last hope for TWA's employees and customers by asking the courts to grant financing power to him, not American. A Delaware court approved the American plan to keep TWA operational, but a final hearing on the issue is set for Jan. 27. The judge made the right decision to allow American to provide the financing and the overall structure to improve service to the flying public.

Liquidating and selling off TWA's assets might give Icahn a cent or two more on the dollar, but it makes no sense for TWA employees, for St. Louis or for the other communities the airline serves. American Airlines has put together a sensible, sound proposal with solid financial terms that would serve to shore up TWA's customers, employees and the nation's aviation system.

Giving Icahn the right to bid for TWA would, in effect, turn control of the airline to Icahn once again. It will be sad to lose TWA, but it would be sadder still if Icahn stands in the way of a last, best offer that will preserve jobs and air service and some measure of TWA's great aviation legacy.

Darryl Jenkins is director of the Aviation Institute at George Washington University, Washington

2 replies: All unread, jump to last
User currently offlineB747-437B From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted (15 years 4 months 4 days 9 hours ago) and read 1199 times:

While I agree that Icahn does not deserve control of TWA again, you cannot blame him for trying to block AA's move. Ironically, HE has more at stake in this single transaction than any anyone else due to Karabu.

While Karabu is THE largest contributing factor to TWA's eventual financial failure, one must point out that there exists a significant likelihood of TWA being able to survive independantly should Karabu be restructured. The question before the court should therefore be "What is in TWA's best interests?".

If a group of investors - possibly even involving Icahn - came forward with a rival bid to AA that allowed TWA to remain independant - the court should consider it seriously. Ironically, an Icahn involvement might actually be a safeguard against mismanagement. For all his faults, Carl Icahn is too shrewd a businessman to allow another accidental killing of his golden goose.

User currently offlineAirman99o From Canada, joined Aug 1999, 981 posts, RR: 1
Reply 2, posted (15 years 4 months 4 days 8 hours ago) and read 1177 times:

I have to agree with b-747-437b
There is no way that Icahn is going to let twa get away that easily. This is gong to be one hell of a long battle between American and Him, I would like to see Twa stay independant. Hopefully it will somehow.
If Icahn does get his way, hopefully he has changed his ways from before, and he will not run the airline or have as much to do with it, Hopefullly he will have someone with really good common sence to run it, Hopefuly he will leave compton at the helm and see how it turns out then? Who knows we will just have to wait and see.


Safety is Everyones Responsibility.
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Who Will Save United If They Go Bankrupt? posted Sun Jan 2 2005 10:55:34 by CaptainTim
Star Alliance: Who Will They Pick If UAL Goes? posted Thu Dec 5 2002 03:57:10 by BizJets
What Will Ryanair Do If EasyJet-Go Goes Ahead? posted Sun May 5 2002 13:26:03 by WunalaDreaming
BAE: Will Build RJXs If Customers Still Want Them posted Tue Dec 4 2001 08:38:59 by Flying-Tiger
If Given Chance, Would You Ride On Space Shuttle? posted Fri Apr 27 2001 08:40:55 by LAX
AA Will Cancel TWA's A318/A319 Orders posted Wed Mar 21 2001 20:26:09 by Western737
Karabu Bites Back: Icahn Bid For TWA Submitted posted Mon Mar 5 2001 19:22:25 by DCA-ROCguy
St. Louis Rams Will Rename TWA Dome Soon posted Wed Feb 28 2001 21:20:36 by TWFirst
San Diego Will Lose $BILLIONS If No New Airport! posted Sun Oct 1 2000 18:28:01 by Trvlr
More Indications FLL Will Be TWA Focus City posted Thu May 18 2000 20:35:42 by TWFirst