Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Kingfishers First A340-500 (pic)  
User currently offlineDeaphen From India, joined Jul 2005, 1379 posts, RR: 2
Posted (1 year 9 months 3 weeks 4 days 5 hours ago) and read 12937 times:

Here she is, probaby waiting final colours , maybe she will adorn AI colours for the lease you think?

http://i40.photobucket.com/albums/e213/deaphen/IMG_2854.jpg

Regards
Nitin


I want every single airport and airplane in India to be on A.net!
41 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineThorben From Germany, joined Sep 2005, 3233 posts, RR: 4
Reply 1, posted (1 year 9 months 3 weeks 4 days 5 hours ago) and read 12910 times:



Quoting Deaphen (Thread starter):
Here she is, probaby waiting final colours , maybe she will adorn AI colours for the lease you think?

Very nice, I've been waiting for this, thanx for sharing. I think the colours will stay like that, but there'll be AI stickers on it. IT logo on the engines will be painted over.

What else is around at TLS? IT A332, TP A332. Some more outside these days?

User currently offlineAstuteman From United Kingdom (England), joined Jan 2005, 6148 posts, RR: 84
Reply 2, posted (1 year 9 months 3 weeks 4 days 5 hours ago) and read 12875 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!



Quoting Deaphen (Thread starter):

Pardon my ignorance. Is this plane an "IGW" variant?

Regards

User currently offlineThorben From Germany, joined Sep 2005, 3233 posts, RR: 4
Reply 3, posted (1 year 9 months 3 weeks 4 days 5 hours ago) and read 12870 times:



Quoting Astuteman (Reply 2):
Pardon my ignorance. Is this plane an "IGW" variant?

 yes 

http://www.airbus.com/en/presscentre...s/06_04_24_a340500_kingfisher.html

The aircraft are the latest high gross weight versions, allowing higher payloads to be transported.


User currently offlineAstuteman From United Kingdom (England), joined Jan 2005, 6148 posts, RR: 84
Reply 4, posted (1 year 9 months 3 weeks 4 days 5 hours ago) and read 12875 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!



Quoting Thorben (Reply 3):

Many thanks, my friend.  thumbsup 

Regards

User currently offlineRJ111 From United Kingdom, joined Sep 2004, 3059 posts, RR: 9
Reply 5, posted (1 year 9 months 3 weeks 4 days 4 hours ago) and read 12684 times:

All A340-5/6 will be of the HGW variety from now on.

A nastily heavy 174t.  Sad


Journey in Royalty
User currently onlinePowercube From Australia, joined Jul 2007, 231 posts, RR: 1
Reply 6, posted (1 year 9 months 3 weeks 4 days 4 hours ago) and read 12642 times:

So are HGW A345s capable of carrying a decent amount of revenue cargo on missions like SFO-BLR or can we still expect to hear about weight restrictions? Regardless wide-body Airbuses look fantastic in the IT livery  Cool

User currently offlineTriniA340 From Trinidad And Tobago, joined Nov 2005, 95 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (1 year 9 months 3 weeks 4 days 4 hours ago) and read 12532 times:

So how far can an A345HGW fly fully loaded? And a regular A345?


· longer · larger · farther · faster · higher · quieter · smoother ·
User currently offlineRJ111 From United Kingdom, joined Sep 2004, 3059 posts, RR: 9
Reply 8, posted (1 year 9 months 3 weeks 4 days 4 hours ago) and read 12492 times:

A tasty 9000nm is the listed range with max pax.

The 365t MTOW version had 8500nm and the 372t had 8650nm IIRC.


Journey in Royalty
User currently offlineAstuteman From United Kingdom (England), joined Jan 2005, 6148 posts, RR: 84
Reply 9, posted (1 year 9 months 3 weeks 4 days 4 hours ago) and read 12474 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!



Quoting TriniA340 (Reply 7):
So how far can an A345HGW fly fully loaded? And a regular A345?

According to the Airbus website, the "nominal still-air range with maximum passengers" (which I presume to mean "and no cargo") is :-

8 670 Nm for the 820 000 lb "regular" A345 and
9 000 Nm for the 837 000 lb IGW A345.

So an extra 330 Nm.

Regards

User currently offlineGr8Circle From Canada, joined Dec 2005, 2364 posts, RR: 2
Reply 10, posted (1 year 9 months 3 weeks 4 days 4 hours ago) and read 12439 times:



Quoting Deaphen (Thread starter):
maybe she will adorn AI colours for the lease you think?

When is AI taking these planes on lease and any idea on which sectors they will be used.....?

User currently offlineTriniA340 From Trinidad And Tobago, joined Nov 2005, 95 posts, RR: 0
Reply 11, posted (1 year 9 months 3 weeks 4 days 3 hours ago) and read 12285 times:

Ok, those listed are the ranges with max pax & luggage etc, but without extra cargo. My question is how far can they fly at MTOW? I know the range for any fully loaded aircraft is much less than what the manufacturers advertise.


· longer · larger · farther · faster · higher · quieter · smoother ·
User currently offlineCV990 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 12, posted (1 year 9 months 3 weeks 4 days 3 hours ago) and read 12091 times:

Hi!

I like very much Kingfisher's livery infact...but I'm also noting a very nice brand new TP A330-200 in the back!!! This might be one of the two that will delivered during February, either CS-TOM or CS-TON!
Regards

User currently offlineOldAeroGuy From United States, joined Dec 2004, 2818 posts, RR: 61
Reply 13, posted (1 year 9 months 3 weeks 4 days 2 hours ago) and read 11955 times:



Quoting TriniA340 (Reply 11):
My question is how far can they fly at MTOW?

The quoted ranges are at MTOW.

Do you mean at MZFW?


Airplane design is easy, the difficulty is getting them to fly - Barnes Wallis
User currently offlineTriniA340 From Trinidad And Tobago, joined Nov 2005, 95 posts, RR: 0
Reply 14, posted (1 year 9 months 3 weeks 4 days 2 hours ago) and read 11837 times:

Maybe I didn't explain myself properly. How far can a fully-laden A345 fly? Certainly not 9000nm!


· longer · larger · farther · faster · higher · quieter · smoother ·
User currently offlineA342 From Germany, joined Jul 2005, 3827 posts, RR: 1
Reply 15, posted (1 year 9 months 3 weeks 4 days 2 hours ago) and read 11756 times:



Quoting TriniA340 (Reply 14):
Maybe I didn't explain myself properly. How far can a fully-laden A345 fly? Certainly not 9000nm!

About 7000nm. See page 56 of this document:

http://www.content.airbusworld.com/S...C/DATA_CONSULT/AC_A340-500-600.pdf

But I suspect that's the non-HGW aircraft.

BLR-SFO is 7576nm.


Exceptions confirm the rule.
User currently offlineOldAeroGuy From United States, joined Dec 2004, 2818 posts, RR: 61
Reply 16, posted (1 year 9 months 3 weeks 4 days 2 hours ago) and read 11665 times:



Quoting TriniA340 (Reply 14):
How far can a fully-laden A345 fly?

At MZFW and with a 380 tonne MTOW, on the order of 6800 - 7000 nm.


Airplane design is easy, the difficulty is getting them to fly - Barnes Wallis
User currently offlineTriniA340 From Trinidad And Tobago, joined Nov 2005, 95 posts, RR: 0
Reply 17, posted (1 year 9 months 3 weeks 4 days 2 hours ago) and read 11598 times:

Where can one find payload-range charts for various aircraft? I think the answers will be in there....


· longer · larger · farther · faster · higher · quieter · smoother ·
User currently offlineRJ111 From United Kingdom, joined Sep 2004, 3059 posts, RR: 9
Reply 18, posted (1 year 9 months 3 weeks 4 days 1 hour ago) and read 11421 times:

This range Range/Payload chart (page 56) for the A340-500/600 suggest the aircraft can fly approximately 7200nm with a full payload (ignoring the insignificant reduction due to MLW and fuel reserves). Obviously that is subject to vary depending on the standard things wind, takeoff height ect.

However it's not clear what MTOW version the aircraft is, i'd guess it's the 372t version based on the suggested range at max pax. Knowing this i'd maybe add 200nm to the that for the 380t version. It's also not clear from that data what the max payload of the 380t version is. The data on Airbus's site suggest that would be slightly lower (than the non-HGW version) as the OEW increases more than the MZFW.

Anyway, i'd estimate an on-paper 7400nm with a full payload.

[Edited 2008-01-19 12:28:34]


Journey in Royalty
User currently offlineTriniA340 From Trinidad And Tobago, joined Nov 2005, 95 posts, RR: 0
Reply 19, posted (1 year 9 months 3 weeks 4 days 1 hour ago) and read 11140 times:

Thanks OldAeroGuy, A342 & RJ111. These were the answers I was looking for. Too bad only 12 more A345s to be delivered!


· longer · larger · farther · faster · higher · quieter · smoother ·
User currently offlineHAWK21M From India, joined Jan 2001, 27734 posts, RR: 60
Reply 20, posted (1 year 9 months 3 weeks 4 days 1 hour ago) and read 11075 times:

Nice one Nitin.
Also check your pm.
regds
MEL


Think of the brighter side!
User currently offlineKeesje From Netherlands, joined Apr 2001, 9758 posts, RR: 51
Reply 21, posted (1 year 9 months 3 weeks 4 days 1 hour ago) and read 10547 times:


7200nm and 9000nm from Mumbai

It painfully becomes clear Kingfisher will face serious payload restrictions with the A345 doing Tahiti non-stop ..  worried 

User currently offlineKL911 From Czech Republic, joined Jul 2003, 3286 posts, RR: 19
Reply 22, posted (1 year 9 months 3 weeks 4 days ago) and read 10337 times:



Quoting Deaphen (Thread starter):
Here she is, probaby waiting final colours , maybe she will adorn AI colours for the lease you think?

Did I miss something? Why would a private company which is growing rapidly lease a new plane to a state owned airline that is not even capable of cleaning the inside of its planes, let alone the outside.. ?


Just love RYANAIR!
User currently offlineBlrBird From United States, joined Apr 2005, 550 posts, RR: 2
Reply 23, posted (1 year 9 months 3 weeks 3 days 21 hours ago) and read 8583 times:



Quoting KL911 (Reply 22):
Quoting Deaphen (Thread starter):
Here she is, probaby waiting final colours , maybe she will adorn AI colours for the lease you think?

Did I miss something? Why would a private company which is growing rapidly lease a new plane to a state owned airline that is not even capable of cleaning the inside of its planes, let alone the outside.. ?

IT can only fly international from August 2008 so was the idea of wet leasing aircrafts to AI until then. I read some where that AI is not ready to take on a very short (4-5 mnths) term lease.

User currently offlineBlrBird From United States, joined Apr 2005, 550 posts, RR: 2
Reply 24, posted (1 year 9 months 3 weeks 3 days 21 hours ago) and read 8562 times:



Quoting Keesje (Reply 21):
7200nm and 9000nm from Mumbai

It painfully becomes clear Kingfisher will face serious payload restrictions with the A345 doing Tahiti non-stop ..

IT A345 are going to be based out of BLR so they wont be able to ply with full payload to SFO and JFK I guess...

User currently offlineFrancoflier From France, joined Oct 2001, 1898 posts, RR: 10
Reply 25, posted (1 year 9 months 3 weeks 3 days 17 hours ago) and read 7112 times:



Quoting KL911 (Reply 22):
Did I miss something? Why would a private company which is growing rapidly lease a new plane to a state owned airline that is not even capable of cleaning the inside of its planes, let alone the outside.. ?

Not sure, but I believe it had something to do with Kingfisher not being allowed to fly international flights yet.
There's a weird law apparently in the Indian Civil Aviation books that say that an airline has to operate for 5 years domestically before they can be allowed to go abroad.
Not sure if that info is still current, but from what I've heard from a friend in IT, they're still waiting for that authorization (any time now).

IT bought those A330 and A340s in anticipation to their international flights, but will lease them to AI until they get the approval to use them properly.

It's just old and vague info roaming in the back of my mind, so please feel free to correct me.


Looks like I picked the wrong week to quit posting...
26 Vivekman2006: Something that was pointed out earlier as well.... With AI leasing the IT A345s, IT's international product will be out for the world to see, and expe
27 Post contains images Baroque: So any shortage of breadfruit in Bangalore could be on-going! Otherwise, things will be OK.
28 Cricket: Northern California just about looks achievable at the edge of range - but if IT loads the plane with lots of premium F and J pax, they might be able
29 R2rho: Since you seem to know the "secret" link to the Aircraft Characteristics documents, that Boeing nicely puts up on their site while Airbus secretly hi
30 Post contains images Ronerone: As always, the A345 looks sexy in each and every c/s it wears, and this will be no exception! Regards, Roni
31 Zeke: AFAIK a new airport in BLR will open this year which would allow for unrestricted ops. And a fleet of at least 20 aircraft. As far as I know it is no
32 Gilesdavies: Im confused... Why would Kingfisher or any other airline in India be wanting to purchase brand new A340-500's to fly to Tahiti, when the market is so
33 Thorben: I think Keesje was kidding.
34 Xtoler: Seeing as how US Airways is looking to buy A340's for their PHL to China route, wouldn't this upgrade be beneficial to them?
35 Post contains images Baroque: No he wasn't, it is the best place for breadfruit! Anyway, we know the Dutch never ever joke. [Edited 2008-01-20 05:56:31]
36 Post contains images Thorben: From the unreliable wikipedia: "Breadfruit is one of the highest-yielding food plants, with a single tree producing up to 200 or more fruits per seas
37 Post contains images Heavierthanair: G´day If they take off to the east they will be able to take advantage of the earths rotation. This in combination with improved climbing characteris
38 Post contains images Baroque: While it is found all over S Asia NOW, it was native to the Malay pensinsula and Tahiti, so I imagine the newfound middle class from India will be mo
39 Thorben: When does IT start LHR? I think Bligh doesn't want to return to the UK in a nutshell for the third time. ROFL. Is O'Leary aware of this fruit? This t
40 Post contains links and images A342: No, I'm sorry. Here's where some of the links are from: A Link For Airbus Load/ Range Charts (by SunriseValley Jul 13 2006 in Tech Ops) Well, that's
41 Airbazar: Why not? BLR is neither Hot, High, or Humid, unlike BOM which is 2 out of the 3. The HGW A345 should be able to fly the routes without much issue. Bo
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
First A340-500 For Etihad Airways (EY) posted Wed Mar 29 2006 18:14:32 by B742
Who Will Get The First A340-500? posted Wed Jul 31 2002 16:20:44 by Andie007
Excellent EK A340-500 First Class posted Thu Oct 30 2003 11:23:47 by Joni
First AC A340-500 Picture posted Tue Mar 25 2003 03:20:16 by AC_B777
Airbus A340-500 First Delivery posted Mon Nov 11 2002 17:38:53 by United777
Pic Of SAA's First A340-600 posted Mon Nov 4 2002 21:20:51 by SAA201
A340-500 First Flight posted Mon Feb 11 2002 11:23:01 by VirginFlyer
A340-500's First Flight posted Mon Jan 21 2002 00:34:51 by Spaceman
A340-500 Range/Payload -Specific Questions posted Sat Dec 22 2007 08:00:37 by CF-CPI
CO First B737-900ER PIC posted Wed Dec 19 2007 20:23:35 by CALPilot