B747 From United States of America, joined May 1999, 245 posts, RR: 2
Reply 1, posted (13 years 7 months 3 weeks 2 days 7 hours ago) and read 1060 times:
It is totaly up to the US Air Force, as they are the ones who paid for it's developement. I read an article in Air Force times last week that stated the C-17 would not be good for most cargo carriers, because it lacks range, and holds cargo outsized in nature, so it would do alot of sitting around waiting for a load that would require it. Also the Air Force is considering taking the C-17 off of the 'Munitions List" which currently keeps it out of anyone other than the USAF's hands. If that happens Boeing will be allowed to market it. Also the article stated that it would be very expensive because of the miltary applications it has on it, while some of the countermeasures could be taken off reducing expense, things like the airdrop system, and other systems were unable to be removed because it is part of the design.
Prebennorholm From Denmark, joined Mar 2000, 6451 posts, RR: 54
Reply 2, posted (13 years 7 months 3 weeks 2 days 6 hours ago) and read 1054 times:
The article begins:
When Boeing's C-17 military cargo jet carried Keiko the killer whale to freedom two years ago, the flight grabbed headlines around the world. It was the only aircraft with enough heft and agility to ferry the 9,050-pound mammal and drop him off at a tiny airstrip near his native waters in Iceland.
But it does not tell that after landing with Keiko on the tiny dirt airstrip on Heymaey, Iceland it was sitting there for two weeks while having its landing gear repaired....!
Anyway, it was really impressive that it could actually have made it with a little better luck. Last time I landed there it was in a BN Islander, and I didn't think that the RWY was one inch too big.
I just wonder if there is a civil market for such an expensive and specialized plane. At the time when the AN-124 overcapacity dries up, then this world will be filled with old and cheap 747 classics ready for a fast cargo conversion, some including a front door.
If it's a question about lifting outsized cargo out of short runways, then there is always the option to take off with almost empty fuel tanks to the nearest real airport for refueling. An old 747 or even a brand new Airbus Beluga will do that much more cost efficient.
For buying such a plane, and make it earn money, there really has to be a very special transport demand, which seems to be unknown today. You can't make money on having a plane for transporting killer whales to Iceland once every fifty years.
Best regards, Preben Norholm
Always keep your number of landings equal to your number of take-offs, Preben Norholm
KROC From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (13 years 7 months 3 weeks 2 days 3 hours ago) and read 1022 times:
Isn't there an MD-17, which was a civilian version of the C-17? It is also to my understanding that the C-17 wouldn't be quite applicable to civilian use as mentioned above. Its abilitys to land and take off on extremely short runways are more or less not needed in the civilian world. It would be great for oversized cargo, but is there demand enough for cargo airlines to spend the money for these planes, just for the oversized cargo?
Hawaiian717 From United States of America, joined May 1999, 3195 posts, RR: 7
Reply 6, posted (13 years 7 months 3 weeks 1 day 23 hours ago) and read 993 times:
McDonnell Douglas did indeed build two commercial C-17s, designated MD-17. Nobody bought them, however, and the aircraft were converted to C-17s and delivered to the US Air Force. Now the idea is back again, only this time designated BC-17X.
RayChuang From United States of America, joined Jun 2000, 8017 posts, RR: 5
Reply 8, posted (13 years 7 months 3 weeks 1 day 14 hours ago) and read 960 times:
I don't think there is a market for a commercial version of the C-17A. The problem is the plane is built to such a specific need that it won't fit into the need of any large freighter airline I know of.
Also, there is a massive surplus of Il-76 "Candid" freighters, so the need for freighters that can fly into short fields in places like much of African is already met. Many ex-Soviet Il-76's are now flying around the Middle East and Africa.