Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Possible Commercial C-17  
User currently offlineYaki1 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Posted (15 years 3 months 4 weeks 1 day 15 hours ago) and read 1457 times:

An article ran in last Fridays Boeing news and todays SeattleTimes, they are studying a possible commercial C-17 derivative, designated the BC-17X.


8 replies: All unread, jump to last
User currently offlineB747 From United States of America, joined May 1999, 245 posts, RR: 2
Reply 1, posted (15 years 3 months 4 weeks 1 day 15 hours ago) and read 1411 times:

It is totaly up to the US Air Force, as they are the ones who paid for it's developement. I read an article in Air Force times last week that stated the C-17 would not be good for most cargo carriers, because it lacks range, and holds cargo outsized in nature, so it would do alot of sitting around waiting for a load that would require it. Also the Air Force is considering taking the C-17 off of the 'Munitions List" which currently keeps it out of anyone other than the USAF's hands. If that happens Boeing will be allowed to market it. Also the article stated that it would be very expensive because of the miltary applications it has on it, while some of the countermeasures could be taken off reducing expense, things like the airdrop system, and other systems were unable to be removed because it is part of the design.

At Pope, where not happy, until you're not happy!
User currently offlinePrebennorholm From Denmark, joined Mar 2000, 7141 posts, RR: 53
Reply 2, posted (15 years 3 months 4 weeks 1 day 14 hours ago) and read 1405 times:

The article begins:

When Boeing's C-17 military cargo jet carried Keiko the killer whale to freedom two years ago, the flight grabbed headlines around the world. It was the only aircraft with enough heft and agility to ferry the 9,050-pound mammal and drop him off at a tiny airstrip near his native waters in Iceland.

But it does not tell that after landing with Keiko on the tiny dirt airstrip on Heymaey, Iceland it was sitting there for two weeks while having its landing gear repaired....!
Anyway, it was really impressive that it could actually have made it with a little better luck. Last time I landed there it was in a BN Islander, and I didn't think that the RWY was one inch too big.
I just wonder if there is a civil market for such an expensive and specialized plane. At the time when the AN-124 overcapacity dries up, then this world will be filled with old and cheap 747 classics ready for a fast cargo conversion, some including a front door.
If it's a question about lifting outsized cargo out of short runways, then there is always the option to take off with almost empty fuel tanks to the nearest real airport for refueling. An old 747 or even a brand new Airbus Beluga will do that much more cost efficient.
For buying such a plane, and make it earn money, there really has to be a very special transport demand, which seems to be unknown today. You can't make money on having a plane for transporting killer whales to Iceland once every fifty years.
Best regards, Preben Norholm

Always keep your number of landings equal to your number of take-offs
User currently offlineKROC From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (15 years 3 months 4 weeks 1 day 11 hours ago) and read 1373 times:

Isn't there an MD-17, which was a civilian version of the C-17? It is also to my understanding that the C-17 wouldn't be quite applicable to civilian use as mentioned above. Its abilitys to land and take off on extremely short runways are more or less not needed in the civilian world. It would be great for oversized cargo, but is there demand enough for cargo airlines to spend the money for these planes, just for the oversized cargo?

User currently offlineCtbarnes From United States of America, joined Mar 2000, 3491 posts, RR: 47
Reply 4, posted (15 years 3 months 4 weeks 1 day 10 hours ago) and read 1361 times:

I remember seeing models of the MD-17 at Farnborough back in 96, but never heard anything since then. Perhaps there was little customer interest.

Charles, SJ

The customer isn't a moron, she is your wife -David Ogilvy
User currently offlineContinentalFan From United States of America, joined Oct 2000, 360 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (15 years 3 months 4 weeks 1 day 10 hours ago) and read 1361 times:

I remember reading on this forum that the decision to see the C-17 depended on the US military guaranteeing some amount of business to whoever buys them over 10 years or so.


User currently offlineHawaiian717 From United States of America, joined May 1999, 3241 posts, RR: 6
Reply 6, posted (15 years 3 months 4 weeks 1 day 7 hours ago) and read 1344 times:

McDonnell Douglas did indeed build two commercial C-17s, designated MD-17. Nobody bought them, however, and the aircraft were converted to C-17s and delivered to the US Air Force. Now the idea is back again, only this time designated BC-17X.

User currently offlineFedExHeavy From United States of America, joined Aug 2000, 226 posts, RR: 1
Reply 7, posted (15 years 3 months 4 weeks 22 hours ago) and read 1317 times:

Well don't count out the cargo version just yet, I mean FedEx did go after the A380F and that plane is slated to be huge.
Have a nice day!

So far this is the oldest I've been.
User currently offlineRayChuang From United States of America, joined Jun 2000, 8362 posts, RR: 4
Reply 8, posted (15 years 3 months 4 weeks 22 hours ago) and read 1311 times:

I don't think there is a market for a commercial version of the C-17A. The problem is the plane is built to such a specific need that it won't fit into the need of any large freighter airline I know of.

Also, there is a massive surplus of Il-76 "Candid" freighters, so the need for freighters that can fly into short fields in places like much of African is already met. Many ex-Soviet Il-76's are now flying around the Middle East and Africa.

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Commercial C-17's Coming posted Sat Jul 21 2001 01:11:29 by AlaskaMVP
Possible Strike At NW As From 17 Jan.? posted Thu Jan 12 2006 19:50:23 by SK601
Commercial Versions Of The C-5 And C-17 posted Thu Jun 16 2005 16:13:31 by FlyPIJets
SQ FRA/JFK/FRA 299,17 € - Same DAY Return Possible posted Wed Apr 24 2002 18:02:01 by Lhuaaua
Commercial Jets: Is Flying Upside Down Possible? posted Wed Feb 27 2002 03:58:18 by Asgeirs
C-17 Commercial ? posted Tue Jan 19 1999 03:12:05 by FedEx
Possible Disruption At LHR posted Thu May 24 2007 12:52:12 by 747438
Boeing ‘close’ To Launching BC-17 posted Wed May 23 2007 15:25:52 by WINGS
A Vs B Commercial posted Mon May 21 2007 21:05:57 by Aeroman444
Earliest Booking For RTW Trip Possible? posted Sun May 20 2007 15:50:42 by CXfirst