Erela From Finland, joined Oct 2000, 152 posts, RR: 0 Posted (12 years 10 months 1 week 6 days 4 hours ago) and read 6043 times:
Any comparison could be done between these two Korean airlines? Korean Air is more international with its network and Asiana is concentrated in domestic- does Asiana have international flights? Where? Which one of these two is better in quality? Which one cheaper?
Mason From United States of America, joined Jun 1999, 748 posts, RR: 1 Reply 1, posted (12 years 10 months 1 week 6 days 4 hours ago) and read 5978 times:
Of course Asiana has international flights! Some that come to mind are Seattle, LAX, Sydney, HKG, LHR? I'm not sure on that one, but I think they fly to one or two places in Europe. I have flown on both, and think that given KE's record, Asiana is by far surperior. That is just my opinion. Even though KE would put many US airlines to shame, their record just can't be ignored. Sorry, guys. If given the choice, I'd fly Asiana. Their fleet includes 747-400, 767-300, 737-800, and I think 737-400. There might be more, but those are the ones I'm sure on. Hope this helps.
Aking8488 From United States of America, joined Nov 2000, 129 posts, RR: 0 Reply 2, posted (12 years 10 months 1 week 6 days 4 hours ago) and read 5970 times:
Yes, Asiana does fly to the U.S., albeit a very limited schedule. I believe they code-share with AA. I do know for sure they fly to LA on at least a daily basis. As far as service, KE is very good internationally and probably better than most U.S. domestic airlines. I haven't flown Asiana internationally but domestically (w/in Korea), it's virtually identical to KE. Price too.
Winds Aloft From United States of America, joined Jan 2001, 38 posts, RR: 0 Reply 5, posted (12 years 10 months 1 week 6 days 4 hours ago) and read 5957 times:
Yes, they do code-share with AA. I've flown with them multiple times out of JFK to Seoul and from Seoul to Manila (most recently a month ago). It is hard for me to compare them with Korean since I've only flown Korean once, but Asiana's service has been excellent each time and I wouldn't hesitate to fly with them again in the future.
Watewate From Canada, joined Nov 2000, 2284 posts, RR: 2 Reply 11, posted (12 years 10 months 1 week 5 days 19 hours ago) and read 5899 times:
I personally prefer KE- primarily for its network reach and service. I found OZ to be a very bland airline- unlike much of Asia based airlines. Maybe I prefer KE because I still have that start-up image of OZ, but since I've forgiven KE's safety record, it's an easy win for KE.
BTW, OZ will always be the second carrier in Korea keeping KE's prices in check. Not that it's a bad thing, but it really is crazy two almost identical airlines competing out of same airport. It happens elsewhere, but OZ must tread its waters carefully with KE's recent improvements (safety and founding of SkyTeam along with other world-class airlines). OZ will have to attract more diverse crowd of passengers and they can't do it alone with their branding. Perhaps OneWorld is the right one.
Erela From Finland, joined Oct 2000, 152 posts, RR: 0 Reply 13, posted (12 years 10 months 1 week 5 days 13 hours ago) and read 5890 times:
Thanks for your replies! Winds Aloft, you mentioned flying from Seoul to Manila several times with Asiana- could you estimate the approximate fare for that leg or did you buy all your tickets from the US? Wonder if it´s also cheaper to fly to the US from Seoul than to Europe...?
Winds Aloft From United States of America, joined Jan 2001, 38 posts, RR: 0 Reply 15, posted (12 years 10 months 1 week 5 days 11 hours ago) and read 5878 times:
I bought my ticket in the U.S. and paid $1,140 for an economy-class round-trip from New York to Manila via Seoul. I'm afraid I don't know the specific price for the Seoul-Manila leg. I can tell you they normally use a 763 on that leg, but they occasionally use a 744 as well. And the flight is normally quite full. Sorry I couldn't be of more help.
AsianaAirlines From United States of America, joined Sep 2000, 198 posts, RR: 1 Reply 16, posted (12 years 10 months 1 week 5 days 9 hours ago) and read 5875 times:
A lot of my filipino friends go on Asiana for a JFK-Manila via Seoul flight. But I believe that Asiana has much more diverse passengers in all It's US-SEL flights, compared to Korean Air. In my flight, their were only 55% koreans, and the rest were non-koreans. I also heard that during this spring, Asiana will join OneWorld, I'm sure that this will help a lot, with American and British Airways, making Asiana a much much better airline.
Airnewzealand From New Zealand, joined Oct 2000, 2538 posts, RR: 6 Reply 17, posted (12 years 10 months 1 week 5 days ago) and read 5856 times:
i Have never travelled Asiana but if you want to know something.... All korean based Airlines will be very good, Korean Air has not had a crash in just over three Years. There last was 98.
That is a sign that they are doing something to bring there Safety record to scratch.
If you are going on price then Asiana would be the best. Asiana flights around Asia and in Korea are a little cheaper than Korean Air.
But if you are going on Aircraft, i would choose Korean air as they have started to fit there aircrafts with PTV's. Asiana will only have PTV's in there new 777. Korean Air are fitting them in there 777, A330, 747 and some 737 aircraft.
They usually operate the B777 on this route.
Korean Air had many different Nationalities on board the last flight i went on. Many coming from Germany and England. Over 50% of the flight had non-asian passengers on board.
DatamanA340 From South Korea, joined Dec 2000, 547 posts, RR: 0 Reply 22, posted (12 years 10 months 1 week 4 days 1 hour ago) and read 5784 times:
Actually the worst year for KE was 99, I think. But don't forget that most of recent KE accidents were cargo planes or domestic flights to small regional airports. Actually, the worst accident in Guam wasn't not only for KE, but with Guam control authority.
Actually, as a Korean, I think KE flight will be safer than OZ's. OZ is suffered from so many smaller troubles. At least KE international flights are almost free from such troubles.
Well, I'm not to blame OZ. OZ recently had alliance with CX, and it's thought that OZ would join OW. OW has no actual Chinese inland network and OZ has the biggest network into China PR among non-Chinese liners. I think CX-OZ in OW fits well.
And OZ fleet: OZ doesn't have 330s and 737NGs. OZ's 737 fleet is only -400/500, and under replacing with new 321s. OZ cancelled all 330 orders and is going to get 777s. (I'm sad for no 330. I wished OZ has both 330 and 340.)
Toxtethogrady From United States of America, joined Dec 2000, 962 posts, RR: 0 Reply 23, posted (12 years 10 months 1 week 4 days 1 hour ago) and read 5785 times:
KE has a reputation to live down, but they do have much of the US covered. I'd think Asiana might be interested in Houston, but they're drifting into the OneWorld orbit, which kills that possibility. Still, if CO buys DL, maybe the DFW service will be switched or extended to Houston...
Watewate From Canada, joined Nov 2000, 2284 posts, RR: 2 Reply 24, posted (12 years 10 months 1 week 4 days ago) and read 5777 times:
About the Guam incident, Korean families have sued and recently settled for x million of dollars. I have the article book marked at home and I'll post it on Wednesday when I get back home from Miami. This settlement means that the accident was not the fault of KE's wholly- but it was a combination of poor equipment AND KE pilot error
25 AsianaAirlines: As a korean-american myself, a lot of my white friends think that Asiana is an asian based airline with having hubs all over Asia. And then I tell the
26 Airnewzealand: Sorry guys for the mistake i made. I thought it was DEC. 98 Cheers mikey