Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
May Be AA Will Abandon The 717  
User currently offlineJiml1126 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Posted (13 years 7 months 3 weeks 3 days ago) and read 1487 times:

Why?check this report from news.airwise.com

Two airlines have inquired about 35 106-seater Boeing 717 jetliners on order from troubled Trans World Airlines Inc. which may come back on the market if a proposed merger with American Airlines parent AMR Corp. goes ahead.

AirTran Holdings Inc., which like TWA ordered 50 of the airplanes, and Midwest Express Holdings Inc. have said they might snap up TWA's 717s, which could be available at attractive prices.

Boeing has already delivered 15 717s to TWA and about 30 to AirTran.

By April Midwest Express will decide on USD$1 billion worth of new orders for 20 100-seat jets to replace DC-9s and MD-80s at its main airline plus 20 regional jets for its Skyway Airlines unit, which had planned to buy the discontinued 44-seat Fairchild Dornier 428JET.

Spokeswoman Lisa Bailey said Midwest Express was considering the 717 and a competing model, the A318, from Boeing rival Airbus Industrie.

"The 717s have availability in mid-2002 and the A318 in 2003," she said, noting the airline had enough fleet flexibility to go with either model.

AMR has not yet decided the fate of the 35 undelivered TWA 717s. If it abandons them, it could spell an opportunity for Midwest Express.

Aside from the TWA and AirTran deals, which were reportedly done at big discounts from the current list price of USD$35 million per plane, Boeing has secured only 53 more orders with leasing companies and small airlines.

I don't care if AA abandoned 717 or not, just don't get the 318s. (Don't u guys think is strange that AA got tons of 738 in the future then another load of 318 joining AA's fleet?)




10 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineTupolev154B2 From United States of America, joined Jun 2000, 1332 posts, RR: 2
Reply 1, posted (13 years 7 months 3 weeks 2 days 23 hours ago) and read 1395 times:

SAS operates 736's and will be operating A321's and I believe that one Chinese airline also has A320's and a few 737NG's on order. However, given AA's exclusive fleet renewal contract with Boeing, a silver A318 will never happen.

User currently offlineJAL From Canada, joined Apr 2000, 5085 posts, RR: 8
Reply 2, posted (13 years 7 months 3 weeks 2 days 22 hours ago) and read 1385 times:

I agree, we will never see a A318 in American livery.


Work Hard But Play Harder
User currently offlineScaredflyer21 From United States of America, joined Oct 2000, 355 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (13 years 7 months 3 weeks 2 days 21 hours ago) and read 1349 times:

I think the 717 would be a great replacement for aa's aging fleet of F100's

User currently offlineTWA717_200 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 4, posted (13 years 7 months 3 weeks 2 days 20 hours ago) and read 1336 times:

Everyone seems to think that the 717 would be a great replacement for AA's F100's except for AA.

Apparently, they must be as sentimental to American as that one pair of old underwear are to us men. Let 'em keep the old things if they want. I guess they really mean that much to them.


User currently offlineBaec777 From United States of America, joined Oct 1999, 1231 posts, RR: 1
Reply 5, posted (13 years 7 months 3 weeks 2 days 20 hours ago) and read 1325 times:

I also agree that Boeing 717-200 can replace these Fokker 100 planes, so... why not the A318 as well...??

Baec777  Big thumbs up


User currently offlineILUV767 From United States of America, joined May 2000, 3141 posts, RR: 8
Reply 6, posted (13 years 7 months 3 weeks 2 days 20 hours ago) and read 1315 times:

What AA is going for is to eliminate their fleet types down to 3. They are going to have the 737, 757/767 and the 777. They will probably get the 736 to replace the F100s, 73Gs to replace the MD-80's and of course continue getting 738's to replace teh 727.

User currently offlineTWA717_200 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 7, posted (13 years 7 months 3 weeks 2 days 19 hours ago) and read 1308 times:

Why not the 318? Because the 318 is for long, thin routes. Not the short, thin routes that the F100 currently flies and the 717 is designed for.

User currently offlineAA737-823 From United States of America, joined Mar 2000, 5831 posts, RR: 11
Reply 8, posted (13 years 7 months 3 weeks 2 days 16 hours ago) and read 1276 times:

Okay, here is a plan that I have been pushing for awhile, I really think it would work.

AA is what I am talking about, of course.

The 738 would continue to replace the 722 fleet, that's sensible. BUT here is where I differ from AA:

I think that they SHOULD definitely replace the F100 with the 712. But, I think that an even better idea is to replace the MD-80s with The 717-300. They could launch the plane. IT MAKES SO MUCH SENSE TO ME. The 717 is so cheap to fly. AND the 717 is just a newer version of the MD-80.

AND the 717 is quite a bit cheaper that a 737.

That's what I think they should do.

Randy


User currently offlineToxtethogrady From United States of America, joined Dec 2000, 1312 posts, RR: 0
Reply 9, posted (13 years 7 months 3 weeks 2 days 15 hours ago) and read 1260 times:

AA has three 100-seat aircraft, and none of them is what they need! What they need are some shiny new 737-500 and 600 aircraft. Fleet commonality helps out in the spare parts department and with pilot and mechanic familiarity (just ask CO and WN). Hey, I hear Continental is going to phase out their 500's. Maybe a trade can be worked...

User currently offlineNUair From Malaysia, joined Jun 2000, 1181 posts, RR: 0
Reply 10, posted (13 years 7 months 2 weeks 5 days 8 hours ago) and read 1225 times:

With the old fokker 70's and 100's comming of age along with the thousands of MMD-80's and DC-9's and 737's I think it's time for the airlines to make some serious decisions on new short haul 100 passenger jets. The 717 is a mystery to me and seems to be a question on a lot of peoples minds that nobody is able to answer. It seems to be the ideal repalcement, smaller and more economical then the 737's but large enough to serve the smaller markets with jet service. Everyone is talking about the 737 and 318 as ideal replacements but are they may be too much for the routes that currently use the older F 70/100 and MD's. And what about the BAE146, CRJ's or EMB's as replacements.

I'm anxious to see what the decision will be and if anyone has any ideas or insight please let me know. I think this is a much more relevant topic to current airline operations then the super jumbos that will pop out later this decade and very few and far between.

NUair



"How Many Assholes we got on this ship?" - Lord Helmet
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
AA Does Want The 717 And UA The A330 posted Tue Jan 9 2001 23:30:20 by CX747
Will There Be More Orders For The Boeing 717? posted Fri Nov 25 2005 04:18:50 by Kaitak744
Will TWA's New 717's Be Delivered In AA's Colors? posted Sat Apr 28 2001 19:32:44 by Che
Will It Be Possible To Relieve The Relief Pilot? posted Tue Sep 26 2006 20:51:07 by Tangowhisky
What Will Be Virgin's Reaction To The Delay? posted Wed Jun 14 2006 10:10:46 by Ctang
Why Did AA Abandon The Denver Hub posted Tue Apr 18 2006 06:35:24 by AAden
The End Of Eujet May Be Nigh. posted Mon Dec 6 2004 12:14:52 by 7LBAC111
What Will Be In Faro For The Championships? posted Wed May 26 2004 15:40:34 by GLAGAZ
Why Didn't AA Keep The 717? posted Sat May 15 2004 23:23:41 by Akjetblue
Boeing - Likelihood That 717 Line May Be Closed posted Fri Mar 5 2004 16:22:59 by BestWestern