Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Why No DL Or AA 747's Anymore?  
User currently offlineAmtran727 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Posted (13 years 10 months 4 weeks 14 hours ago) and read 2591 times:

I know that DL and AA bought 741's and eventually returned them (DL much more quickly) but then AA reinstatred some SP service in 1987 for a few years. Why dont they use the planes anymore or order new ones? I don't think their load factors are too low, (or are they?). Here's a wild idea a WN or TZ 747, now that would be awesome, but unfortunately, will Never happen. Any thoughts?

Good Day, Amtran727 Big grin

14 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineBH346 From United States of America, joined Jan 2000, 3265 posts, RR: 14
Reply 1, posted (13 years 10 months 4 weeks 14 hours ago) and read 2559 times:

The low factors were low. That's why they were taken out of service. (I'm pretty sure that was why. If I am wrong feel free to correct me)

BH346



Northwest Airlines - Some People Just Know How to Fly
User currently offlineConair From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2000, 196 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (13 years 10 months 4 weeks 14 hours ago) and read 2553 times:

As far as I remember the three American A/L B747SP's were a stopgap measure for use on their newly acquired transatlantic routes back in 1991 until they got deliveries of the MD11's and additional B767 aircraft.

User currently offlineBaec777 From United States of America, joined Oct 1999, 1231 posts, RR: 1
Reply 3, posted (13 years 10 months 4 weeks 14 hours ago) and read 2540 times:

American. Delta both staying with what they got right now, the Triple 7s (777s) is much enough for them at the moment.

AA, DL will not need those Boeing 744s right now until they have a very high load factors. It doesn't have to be like United or Northwest these days.

Baec777  Big thumbs up


User currently offlineBA319-131 From United Kingdom, joined Jan 2001, 8596 posts, RR: 54
Reply 4, posted (13 years 10 months 4 weeks 14 hours ago) and read 2526 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Neither AA or DL have any need for the 744.They are happy to run higher frequency's with 767/777/AB6 planes than fewer 744 flights.

In addition the twins are more economical to run,especially in the winter season when the trans atlantic routes suffer from a drop in demand.

I would bet my last $ that neither DL or AA will ever buy the 744.

BA319-131



111,732,3,4,5,7,8,BBJ,741,742,743,744,752,762,763,764,772,77L,773,77W,L15,D10,30,40,AB3,AB6,A312.313,319,320,321,332,333
User currently offlineArt at ISP From United States of America, joined Jan 2001, 183 posts, RR: 1
Reply 5, posted (13 years 10 months 4 weeks 11 hours ago) and read 2476 times:

Delta really never planned to operate the 747. They needed them to compete in the early seventies because of serious delays (RR bankruptcy) in the delivery of the L-1011. They leased 5 747's from Pan Am I believe, and those aircraft were delivered right from Boeing (hence the -132 designation). ( I could be wrong with the details, but I know that thje DL 747's wound up with PA).

American Airlines dumped the 747's the first time due to low load factors. As more DC-10's came on line the 747's were removed from service. Bob Crandall has always hated the 747, and with the exception of a brief time in 1984 with JFK-LAX and with the SP-s they were gone.

I believe Don Carty has inherited his ex boss's dislike for the 747 so I doubt you'll ever see a 744 in AA livery. Also the only way we're likely to see a 744 in DL colors would be for them to take over NW.

Art at ISP


User currently offlineRayChuang From United States of America, joined Jun 2000, 8046 posts, RR: 5
Reply 6, posted (13 years 10 months 4 weeks 11 hours ago) and read 2469 times:

If I remember it, AA did get a bunch of ex-Pan Am 747SP's in the latter half of the 1980's for their DFW to Europe and DFW-NRT routes for a number of years until the MD-11 became available.

Unfortunately, the MD-11's proved a bit short on range, and AA didn't buy as many as McD wanted. Small wonder why AA was one of the first airlines to get the 777-200ER when Boeing made it available--and AA could end up with over 50 772ER's for their international operations.


User currently offlineNorthStarDC4M From Canada, joined Apr 2000, 3077 posts, RR: 36
Reply 7, posted (13 years 10 months 4 weeks 11 hours ago) and read 2464 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
CHAT OPERATOR

Delta did buy the 747s from Boeing, and BTW they were the 1st Boeings Delta ever ordered (becasue CE Woolman wouldnt buy a boeing to save his soul).
They were traded back to Beoing in a 727 deal and ended up with PanAm

the AA 747SPs came from TWA when AA bought the LHR routes.



Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.
User currently offlineRedraider From United States of America, joined Oct 2000, 531 posts, RR: 2
Reply 8, posted (13 years 10 months 4 weeks 11 hours ago) and read 2444 times:

AA got the ex TWA SP's when they began DFW-Tokyo service in the late 80's.

They only got 2 as well.



My wife can't wrestle, but you should see her box.
User currently offlineBlink182 From United States of America, joined Oct 1999, 5485 posts, RR: 15
Reply 9, posted (13 years 10 months 4 weeks 11 hours ago) and read 2445 times:

I believed that AA operated the SPs into the early 90s. I think that when they bought the SEA-NRT route, they flew the SP on it forawhile because there weren't enough MD-11s in the fleet yet.
Today, American and Delta don't need the 747. Both airlines are fine and doing well with 777s and untill they get enough asian routes, I doubt we will see a 747 in either airlines fleet. If either airline were to order the 747, I would say AA. If the AA/TWA merger goes through, AA will operate a lot of flights to Asia that TWA currently own the rights to, but don't operate. Even then, I think AA will be better off flying 777's to Asia. They operate them to Osaka,and Tokyo, and the 777 does very well on the route, AA is going to launch Taipei service, so lets see if the 777 does its job there.
If you look in the history books, the 747 has actually put many small airlines out of business, because they were too expensive to operate, and the loads weren't high enough. Ward Air, Nationair,Caledonian are just a few of those. PAN AM also got in trouble with the 747 too. The routes they operated needed an A310 or A300, but they put a 747 on the route and that airline is no longer around.
rgds,
blink182



Give me a break, I created this username when I was a kid...
User currently offlineToxtethogrady From United States of America, joined Dec 2000, 1465 posts, RR: 0
Reply 10, posted (13 years 10 months 4 weeks 11 hours ago) and read 2440 times:

They both committed for the MD-11, thinking the 747-400 was a bad fit for their markets. Boy, did they kick themselves later. Now both are replacing the MD-11 with the 777...

User currently offlineRedraider From United States of America, joined Oct 2000, 531 posts, RR: 2
Reply 11, posted (13 years 10 months 4 weeks 11 hours ago) and read 2433 times:

The 744 is still a bad fit for their markets.


My wife can't wrestle, but you should see her box.
User currently offlineAmtran727 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 12, posted (13 years 10 months 4 weeks 9 hours ago) and read 2410 times:

Yeah, It seems doubtful we'll the 744 at DL or AA. But hey you never know.

Good Day, AMTRAN727  Smile


User currently offlineToxtethogrady From United States of America, joined Dec 2000, 1465 posts, RR: 0
Reply 13, posted (13 years 10 months 4 weeks 9 hours ago) and read 2410 times:

...so they could ditch their MD-11's. Otherwise, they'd have a problem (whether to buy Airbus or not...)

User currently offlineOrlo3 From United States of America, joined Sep 2000, 139 posts, RR: 0
Reply 14, posted (13 years 10 months 3 weeks 6 days 19 hours ago) and read 2373 times:

On a visit to a 767 cockpit after a delta flight into Tampa, the captain told me that Delta was rumored to be looking into the 747-400 for expansion into China.

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Why No Low Fares GVA-ZRH Anymore? posted Sun Dec 10 2006 00:29:40 by RootsAir
Why No EWR Or IAH To BUR On CO? posted Wed Nov 22 2006 03:28:19 by COEWRNJ
Why No F Class On AA 767-300s posted Thu Sep 14 2006 03:20:59 by Albird87
LOT And JAT, Why No A320 Or 737NG? posted Mon Mar 6 2006 01:00:20 by MD90fan
DL Or AA To SCL? posted Tue Oct 11 2005 08:07:48 by Mason
Why No VS Or SQ At O-Hare? posted Sun Oct 2 2005 19:58:01 by Daron4000
SEA.. Why No JAL Or ANA Or CX Service? posted Mon Aug 22 2005 12:51:20 by B6sea
Why No DL Service To Kona? posted Wed Jul 13 2005 08:36:13 by AV8AJET
Why No Airbus Or Boeing RJ? posted Fri Jun 17 2005 05:12:22 by Airbus3801
Why No IAM Or Amfa Flaming? posted Thu May 19 2005 02:33:00 by 1rocco