CoAir@IAH From United States of America, joined Feb 2001, 271 posts, RR: 0 Reply 1, posted (12 years 3 months 2 weeks 1 day 9 hours ago) and read 1043 times:
I don't think that is going to offered anymore.
The only reason CoAir ever did the LAX-IAH-EWR and MCO-EWR runs with the 777 was to train the international flight crews for the 777. I would look for them to add more of the 764's and 762's as they become available.
Ishky15 From United States of America, joined May 2000, 717 posts, RR: 14 Reply 2, posted (12 years 3 months 2 weeks 1 day 9 hours ago) and read 1013 times:
Correction, CoAIR@IAH: Continental will begin using a 777-200 on the EWR-IAH route as flight 205, and the return as flight 62, which continues onto Madrid as a DC-10. I really don't know much about this route, but with the addition of this there will be 4 daily widebody flights between Newark and Houston and v.v.(2 DC-10s, a 767-200, and a 777). More widebody flights will be operated domestically in the fuuture.
ContinentalEWR From United States of America, joined May 2000, 3762 posts, RR: 15 Reply 6, posted (12 years 3 months 2 weeks 1 day 2 hours ago) and read 915 times:
The Newark-Madrid route switches to a 767-400 this spring though.
The Newark-Hong Kong route might create the need
to add a 777 on the many IAH-EWR frequencies to
Over the summer, I would expect to see at least one
777 flying between the two hubs and several more
767's. In years past, at least 3 flights were operated
by DC10's ferrying pax to CO flights to Europe out of
Cba From United States of America, joined Jul 2000, 4530 posts, RR: 3 Reply 8, posted (12 years 3 months 2 weeks 1 day ago) and read 887 times:
IAH will get the European service we deserve once Terminal E is built. Then IAH will be a world class airport. I have heard that Madrid, Rome, and Frankfurt are looking to be the first new European flights from IAH. The IAH-MAD flight would be really succesful because of Latin American connections. Plus Houston is practically bilingual. Although, I think CO could make an IAH-AMS flight work, as there are a lot of people from the oil business going to AMS from Houston.
Toxtethogrady, download Continenta's Electronic Timetable from their website. Just do a search for "Timetable".
Alpha 1 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR: Reply 10, posted (12 years 3 months 2 weeks 1 hour ago) and read 846 times:
Like COAir@IAH said, those are strictly training runs for pilots going to that ship. Very seldom does a plane run on a route for only a month or so. The permanent aircraft on those routes are not and probably will never be a Triple 7.
COexERJ From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR: Reply 12, posted (12 years 3 months 2 weeks ago) and read 827 times:
(Speaking of IAH as a world class airport) Not sure if anyone saw CO's presentation yesterday at the conference, but by 2005 CO expects to have over 3 thousand daily flights, that's a 1,000 more than they have right now! I saw it on the Yahoo! CAL board, I'll look up the URL.
DIST. COST % OF REVENUE.......13.9%......7-10%............$275 MILLION
LOW RISK GROWTH...............2,455......3,400............$175 MILLION
FLEET TYPES...................5...........3...............$125 MILLION
ALLIANCE PARTNERS.............19..........20..............$100 MILLION
BUSINESS MIX..................47.2%.......50-55%..........$100 MILLION
====================================================total $775 MILLION
**Note: CO hopes to reach 3,400 daily departures by 2005...who knows what markets CO will tap in the next 4 years! Also note CO hopes to retire 2 types (DC-10 and MD-80) by 2005. And curiously, only one alliance is forecast for the next 4 years! One can only guess who this might be, but I'd be willing to bet on KLM. Maybe the "Wings" Alliance will form after all.
ScottB From United States of America, joined Jul 2000, 6358 posts, RR: 34 Reply 15, posted (12 years 3 months 1 week 6 days 11 hours ago) and read 741 times:
I suspect that under the "maximum" scheme, there would still be a substantial number of MD-80's in the fleet. After all, at the end of 2005, they'd still have over 30 that would be under 20 years old, and the entire type would still be under 25. If the market opportunities are there, and if the flying can be done with what CO considers an acceptable margin (and if they don't decide that they can operate more efficiently with additional 737-700 and -800 aircraft), then the Mad Dogs will still be around for a few extra years.
That said, they only have 66 left, and retiring 15-20 narrowbodies (and pretty diverse group of 'em, coming from New York Air, Republic, Hawaiian, Muse Air/TranStar, Alaska - judging from past registrations) isn't that big of a deal with all the new 737's they're buying.
777gk From United States of America, joined Jun 2000, 1641 posts, RR: 20 Reply 16, posted (12 years 3 months 1 week 6 days 7 hours ago) and read 728 times:
I have heard that Continental has plans to serve nearly 3000 daily flights by 2003. Most of this will be accomplished through the deliveries of the ERJ's, of which about 170 or so remain, with many new cities being offered. We just announced service to Asheville, NC, and Zacatecas, MX, yesterday, both of which were expected. Be on the lookout for new transborder flights with the ERJ from Cleveland. A few more things on the way are new services to the West Coast from IAH with the 145XR, to smaller markets. The ERJ-145XR gives us incredible flexibility, since it can reach to Florida from EWR, Colorado and almost all the East Coast from CLE, and either coast from IAH, as well as deep into Latin America. Another order of 777s and/or 767s are in the works, and some rumors of the 767-300 have bounced around, but none with any evidence. We are gearing up for a big growth spurt, and hopefully my salary will reflect that!
Ishky15 From United States of America, joined May 2000, 717 posts, RR: 14 Reply 17, posted (12 years 3 months 1 week 6 days 7 hours ago) and read 709 times:
That's great that Continental will be ordering more widebodies, the 767-300 would be very nice in Continental colors. I'm hoping for an order of 12 more 777s for a total of 30, eleven more 767-400s for a total of 35, and 9 more 767-200s for a total of 20. I'd also like to see new service to Brazil from Houston and Newark as well as the return of Santiago. A flight to Osaka would be nice from Newark, as there are already more than a dozen flights from the Midwest and Pacific to Osaka but none from the East Coast.
DesertJets From United States of America, joined Feb 2000, 7673 posts, RR: 19 Reply 19, posted (12 years 3 months 1 week 6 days 6 hours ago) and read 688 times:
With the addition of approx 150 mainline aircraft, the numbers in the projections don't seem to include express which 777gk stated has about 150 ERJs on order, it would seem that some of these new flights will not be confined exclusively to IAH, CLE, EWR. As it goes right now Newark is more or less full, and even once the runways and terminal projects are done at Houston and the runways at Cleveland are done I have a hard time believing that those two can fully absorb 1,000 flights. So it begs the question, where are they going to go? Presumably some more will go to LGA. Perhaps a 4th hub or another large RJ expansion like the one at LaGuardia???? With nearly 300 aircraft at maximum growth coming online between mainline and express you gotta wonder.....
Stop drop and roll will not save you in hell. --- seen on a church marque in rural Virginia
Ishky15 From United States of America, joined May 2000, 717 posts, RR: 14 Reply 20, posted (12 years 3 months 1 week 6 days 5 hours ago) and read 679 times:
I noticed that, too, DesertJets. Continental needs to open up a 4th hub in order to accomodate 1000 new flights. RJs would most likely be the main aircraft as they have many of them being delivered. Perhaps they could open up a RJ hub in San Juan, Los Angeles, New Orleans, or San Diego, as all of these cities are quite underserved by a largely dominant carrier. If it wasn't for the congestion fo LaGuardia, many of those 1,000 new flights would be going there. It looks like now Continental will be limited to serving Buffalo, Houston, Madison, Richmond, Orlando, Cleveland, Grand Rapids, and Fort Lauderdale out of LGA.
Ishky15 From United States of America, joined May 2000, 717 posts, RR: 14 Reply 23, posted (12 years 3 months 1 week 5 days 10 hours ago) and read 631 times:
I agree with Cba. Maybe Continental Express could open up sveral minihubs on the West Coast or serve a bunch of point to point routes. The ERJ-145X can probably fly all the way rom San Dieg to Seattle, allowing any city pair from California through Orgeon and Washington.
Continental itself will be commencing a huge transatlantic expansion from Newark over the next five years. Obvious canidates are Munich, Barcelona, Nice, Athens, Berlin, Moscow, and Istanbul.