Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
US Mergers: Two Brands, One Company?  
User currently offlineCJAContinental From United Kingdom, joined May 2006, 459 posts, RR: 0
Posted (6 years 8 months 1 week 12 hours ago) and read 2780 times:

Will the mergers employ one brand for both airlines, or keep the two brands like KLM-AIR FRANCE? Personally, I'd prefer if the two brands were kept, I would have also thought that this would be most beneficial for the airlines involved.

Thoughts...


Work Hard/Fly Right.
4 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineCentrair From Japan, joined Jan 2005, 3598 posts, RR: 20
Reply 1, posted (6 years 8 months 1 week 12 hours ago) and read 2761 times:

Does the KL/AF merger have something to do with domicile?

I thought it might be good for say DL/NW to have a new parent company and then keep two mainline brands, but in the end it might be confusing. Yet...they could make the "mainline" be one name and then use the other name as restricted sub carrier. Kind of like Cathay and Dragonair. Both are part of the Swire group and carry out different mission and with different product styles. Cathay is higher-grade, can do longer routes and operates only widebodies, while Dragonair does some regional wide-body routes but also has a fleet of narrow-bodies.

Branding is hard and a company likes to keep its brands clear. Remember the NEW coke? Bad Branding idea.



Yes...I am not a KIX fan. Let's Japanese Aviation!
User currently offlineFlyASAGuy2005 From United States of America, joined Sep 2007, 7004 posts, RR: 11
Reply 2, posted (6 years 8 months 1 week 11 hours ago) and read 2699 times:

I don't see this being necessary in the US market. The "cost savings" that can be realized in a truly merged company, i.e., same name, same HQ, same operating certificate, one work-force, etc cannot be seen in two sepearate companies. With two foreign "state" airlines if you will, that's another story. And as it has been stated before, if AF could makr AF-KLM one company, they would.


What gets measured gets done.
User currently offlineRoseFlyer From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 9666 posts, RR: 52
Reply 3, posted (6 years 8 months 1 week 8 hours ago) and read 2520 times:

It doesn't make sense to keep two brands. The names Northwest and Delta are brands and identities, but they do not represent countries like Air France/KLM. Airline brands in the United States come and go. When AA and TWA joined together, there were two very strong brand names there, but in the end one just disappeared. Airlines put a lot of money into investing in their brand name. From advertising to credit cards, they work to create a brand that people recognize. One cohesive brand makes an airline stronger.

Now the companies behind those brands are different. Keeping separate identities may happen for a while. The people behind the airlines could remain rather separate. However the uniforms and paint on the outside of the airplanes need to be the same.



If you have never designed an airplane part before, let the real designers do the work!
User currently offlineJustlump From United States of America, joined Jan 2007, 158 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (6 years 8 months 1 week 5 hours ago) and read 2351 times:

Branding does have an effect. However, out in the field, you would be shocked at how many passengers have no idea which carrier they have booked for their flight. They show up at the airport, walk to the nearest counter and claim to booked on the flight that leaves around 1pm. They have no paperwork, they are unsure of their carrier, and they have no idea which connecting hub they will travel through. This seems crazy, but it happens dozens of times a week.

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Air France/KLM/Delta/Northwest - One Company? posted Fri Dec 16 2005 02:49:52 by Btriple7
America West Gives Oklahoma City Two-for-One posted Fri May 6 2005 14:07:28 by Squirrel83
Why Should US Airways Be The One To Go Down posted Sun Feb 13 2005 00:32:40 by SonOfACaptain
US Airways Agrees To One-Year Extension For PIT posted Thu Oct 9 2003 21:29:53 by N670UW
US Mergers, Another Scenario... posted Tue Sep 16 2003 04:20:56 by OzarkD9S
US Axes Two More Markets posted Mon May 19 2003 04:17:28 by MAH4546
Two In One Day? posted Tue May 7 2002 19:16:15 by PROSA
KLM/NWA One Company? posted Wed Feb 13 2002 01:17:11 by UA752
If Boeing And EADS,BAE Became One Company posted Tue Dec 5 2000 08:53:45 by Boeing in pdx
DHL Worldwide Express Is Now One Company posted Fri Oct 6 2000 15:43:32 by N768DH