Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Why No Continental GUM-US Mainland?  
User currently offlineFlyf15 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Posted (15 years 3 months 3 hours ago) and read 2130 times:

Continental has a sizeable operation in Guam, yet no nonstop from Guam to the US Mainland...why not? There is a GUM-HNL-IAH flight, does that support all the traffic adaquately?

GUM-LAX could be flown with either a B767-200ER or B777-200ER. GUM-IAH could be flown by the B777-200ER.

4 replies: All unread, jump to last
User currently offlineThomacf From United States of America, joined Sep 2000, 550 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (15 years 3 months 2 hours ago) and read 2102 times:

I'm guessing there is really no demand to fill a widebody on this route. I still don't understand why CO has a hub in Guam. The pop. can't be that high to have alot of O&D traffic. Why would anyone want to fly CO to Asia and have to make numerous connections from the mainland? I don't understand this hub at all?

User currently offlineCOexERJ From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (15 years 3 months 2 hours ago) and read 2101 times:

Correct me if I'm wrong, but I think there used to be a GUM-LAX flight. Flyf15, with CO's shortage of widebodies I doubt you'll see a GUM-Mainland flight anytime soon. Besides, AirMike feeds mainly from Japan, not the mainland. CO and AirMike are in the process of phasing out all DC-10's leaving AirMike with only 738's. Who knows what the future holds, but with CO committed to international expansion out of EWR first, and IAH second, putting a 777 or 767 in GUM would be a serious misallocation of much-needed equipment.


User currently offlineCOexERJ From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (15 years 3 months 2 hours ago) and read 2091 times:


As I alluded to in my previous post, COmicronesia (CMI or "AirMike") relies on traffic to/from Japan. Many of the small micronesian islands are extremely popular with Japanese tourists. True, not much O&D from GUM, but a small hub in the middle of some of the most beautiful little islands in the Pacific isn't a bad idea, and suprisingly, AirMike has load factors which are fairly high.


User currently offlineTrvlr From United States of America, joined Feb 2000, 4430 posts, RR: 19
Reply 4, posted (15 years 3 months 2 hours ago) and read 2073 times:

IMO It's better (easier, more cost-effective) for CO anyway to just put pax on a flight to NRT and have them connect on codeshare flights from the Northwest hub.

Aaron G.

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Why No Tupolev In US posted Tue Oct 31 2006 23:02:27 by KingAirMan
Why No Gulf-GVA-US/Canada Route posted Tue Aug 15 2006 12:59:14 by Beijing21
Why No Westbound Flights US/Canada -> Africa posted Thu Dec 8 2005 10:01:12 by ETStar
Why No 773s For US Airlines? posted Mon Jun 28 2004 20:06:59 by BCAInfoSys
Why No CO, DL, US @ Heathrow posted Sat Apr 17 2004 21:54:25 by M&m
CO GUM Hub, Why No Nonstops To Mainland? posted Sun Sep 12 2004 03:11:03 by 727Stretch
Why No US Carriers To TIJ? posted Sun Oct 15 2006 16:34:18 by RobertS975
Why No CO EWR - GUM? posted Tue Sep 26 2006 04:55:55 by Cessna057
Why No Bin Extensions On NW Or US 757-200s? posted Wed Sep 20 2006 20:47:57 by 1337Delta764
Why No 763s For Continental? posted Tue Jul 11 2006 20:36:19 by LY777