Like2flyguy From United States of America, joined Jan 2008, 95 posts, RR: 0 Posted (5 years 2 months 4 weeks 1 day 5 hours ago) and read 1273 times:
In opposition to a possible linkup between Delta Air Lines and Northwest Airlines, the International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers made a statement on Monday, February 25, 2008 that they would "oppose any merger that negatively impacts [their] members and the traveling public". According to the union's District 143, the district that represents customer service agents and ramp workers at Northwest Airlines, members of the IAM's Transportation Merger Team are meeting with other parties and individuals who are against airline mergers on a regular basis, including key representatives from the Senate and House of Representatives:
Delta and Northwest are not required to gain permission from union groups before combining. However, support of the pilots and other employee groups at both airlines would be essential in escalating the deal. ALPA, the union representing pilots at both Delta Air Lines and Northwest Airlines, have continued their discussions of merging seniority lists over the weekend as the two carriers are on the brink of making a merger announcement. Inside sources say any continued delay of formally announcing a merger plan could put the entire transaction at risk. Shares of Delta and Northwest were trading lower on Monday as investors began to worry that a deal will not happen anytime soon.
Airline analyst reactions are mixed. Information from inside sources involving pilot negotiations last week provided "rumored" situations as those talks progressed. Because additional information was not "leaked" the last few days of last week and over the past weekend, some analysts believe this could be an indication that a deal is close at hand. Others believe this could be an indication the deal is at a standstill.
Luvfa From United States of America, joined May 2005, 437 posts, RR: 5 Reply 1, posted (5 years 2 months 4 weeks 1 day 3 hours ago) and read 1180 times:
Of course. Any merger will result in loss of jobs. The IAM has a duty to look out for its membership.
DeltaL1011man From United States of America, joined Sep 2005, 8589 posts, RR: 8 Reply 2, posted (5 years 2 months 4 weeks 1 day 2 hours ago) and read 1144 times:
Ikramerica From United States of America, joined exactly 8 years ago today! , 21029 posts, RR: 60 Reply 3, posted (5 years 2 months 4 weeks 1 day ago) and read 1058 times:
Quoting DeltaL1011man (Reply 2): I think they know that if DL/NW merge IAM is most likely out.
Makes sense...
Quote: "oppose any merger that negatively impacts [their] members and the traveling public"
Translation: "we oppose any merger that results in our losing power..."
Every member could be retained and given a raise, but if the IAM is out, they would still be opposed for the sake of the "traveling public."
Of all the things to worry about... the Wookie has no pants.
Ouboy79 From United States of America, joined Nov 2001, 3999 posts, RR: 23 Reply 5, posted (5 years 2 months 4 weeks 23 hours ago) and read 1014 times:
Not the big bad scary IAM. They just don't want to get spanked again like US Airways did during the bankruptcies and merger. :-P
Any opinion/comment posted is that of my own and not that of Southwest Airlines Co.
AirFrnt From United States of America, joined Jul 2004, 2775 posts, RR: 43 Reply 6, posted (5 years 2 months 4 weeks 18 hours ago) and read 915 times:
Talk about a misleading title. Even the article says that they will oppose it, if it negativly affects them, not a blank check opposition like the article implies. However, it's kind of pointless. The only that that unions have done over the last 20 years is put their companies out of business.