Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
DL/NW Merger - Another Union Opposes  
User currently offlineDeltadude From United States of America, joined Sep 2004, 134 posts, RR: 0
Posted (6 years 6 months 3 weeks 5 days 13 hours ago) and read 7805 times:

fair use:

The International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers said it is joining with a passenger rights group to oppose any mergers by big airlines. The union represents baggage handlers, ticket agents and other employees at Northwest, United and Continental Airlines, but not at Atlanta-based Delta, which is largely non-union.


http://www.ajc.com/services/content/...stories/2008/02/25/delta_0226.html


Gotta love the unions....

87 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineBeaucaire From Syria, joined Sep 2003, 5252 posts, RR: 24
Reply 1, posted (6 years 6 months 3 weeks 5 days 13 hours ago) and read 7794 times:

does not sound good at all,more and more resentments against the merger..
But that would mean any major merger in the US airline-industry will be shelled by unions ?



Please respect animals - don't eat them...
User currently offlineNwab787techops From United States of America, joined Feb 2006, 219 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (6 years 6 months 3 weeks 5 days 13 hours ago) and read 7722 times:



Quoting Deltadude (Thread starter):
ticket agents and other employees at Northwest, United and Continental Airlines, but not at Atlanta-based Delta, which is largely non-union.

I don't think the IAM made it at CO, they are still non-union.


User currently offlineNwaesc From United States of America, joined Aug 2007, 3389 posts, RR: 9
Reply 3, posted (6 years 6 months 3 weeks 5 days 12 hours ago) and read 7605 times:

CO F/A's are represented by the IAM.


"Nothing ever happens here, " I said. "I just wait."
User currently offlineTL8490 From United States of America, joined Sep 2005, 161 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (6 years 6 months 3 weeks 5 days 12 hours ago) and read 7560 times:

Well thats just shocking that the IAM would not be for a merger that would end its representation.

User currently offlineDLPMMM From United States of America, joined Apr 2005, 3592 posts, RR: 10
Reply 5, posted (6 years 6 months 3 weeks 5 days 11 hours ago) and read 7390 times:



Quoting Beaucaire (Reply 1):
But that would mean any major merger in the US airline-industry will be shelled by unions ?

More likely that some unions will be shelled by mergers.


User currently onlineEA CO AS From United States of America, joined Nov 2001, 13599 posts, RR: 61
Reply 6, posted (6 years 6 months 3 weeks 5 days 11 hours ago) and read 7340 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!



Quoting Deltadude (Thread starter):
The International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers said it is joining with a passenger rights group to oppose any mergers by big airlines.

The IAM loves to shout at the rain lately - it's the only way they can feel as if they're still relevant in today's day and age.

(They're not, but don't tell them that - it's fun to watch them preen like they matter)



"In this present crisis, government is not the solution to our problem - government IS the problem." - Ronald Reagan
User currently offlineCLE757 From United States of America, joined Apr 2005, 1136 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (6 years 6 months 3 weeks 5 days 11 hours ago) and read 7301 times:



Quoting TL8490 (Reply 4):
Well thats just shocking that the IAM would not be for a merger that would end its representation.

I'm shocked too! Why would the IAM opose massive job cuts? hmmm



Cleveland the best location in the Nation
User currently offlineDLPMMM From United States of America, joined Apr 2005, 3592 posts, RR: 10
Reply 8, posted (6 years 6 months 3 weeks 5 days 10 hours ago) and read 7186 times:



Quoting CLE757 (Reply 8):
I'm shocked too! Why would the IAM opose massive job cuts? hmmm

"Massive" job cuts are doubtful, but the vote to eliminate union representation is likely after the merger, and the more likely motivation for their public protests.


User currently offlineSLCUT2777 From United States of America, joined Dec 2005, 4060 posts, RR: 11
Reply 9, posted (6 years 6 months 3 weeks 5 days 10 hours ago) and read 7163 times:



Quoting DLPMMM (Reply 9):
"Massive" job cuts are doubtful, but the vote to eliminate union representation is likely after the merger, and the more likely motivation for their public protests.

 checkmark  Given that they will lose the deductions from each of those employees paychecks! Could we ever expect different behavior from any union in America today with declining membership?



DELTA Air Lines; The Only Way To Fly from Salt Lake City; Let the Western Heritage always be with Delta!
User currently offlineBinMonster From United States of America, joined Jan 2007, 215 posts, RR: 0
Reply 10, posted (6 years 6 months 3 weeks 5 days ago) and read 6781 times:



Quoting TL8490 (Reply 4):
Well thats just shocking that the IAM would not be for a merger that would end its representation.

DL ramp has said NO to the TWU twice in the last ten years.

Quoting DLPMMM (Reply 6):
More likely that some unions will be shelled by mergers.

 checkmark   checkmark 
They risk losing a current revenue stream.  stirthepot 


User currently offlineEssentialPowr From United States of America, joined Sep 2000, 1820 posts, RR: 2
Reply 11, posted (6 years 6 months 3 weeks 4 days 23 hours ago) and read 6649 times:

Sounds like the deal is off for now, and for good reason. Less choice for the traveling public, aviodance of the inevitable furloughs... and no bounus for the most easily interchangeable component in the airline business...the Execs!!! Yeah, sure the Senior Executive Assistant to the Associate VP of Revenue Enhancement DESERVES her $1.5 million stock option, but I'm glad she won't get it!

User currently offlineAlitalia744 From United States of America, joined Mar 2000, 4749 posts, RR: 44
Reply 12, posted (6 years 6 months 3 weeks 4 days 23 hours ago) and read 6640 times:



Quoting EssentialPowr (Reply 12):
Sounds like the deal is off for now, and for good reason.

No it doesn't.



Some see lines, others see between the lines.
User currently offlineRwy04LGA From United States of America, joined Jul 2005, 3176 posts, RR: 8
Reply 13, posted (6 years 6 months 3 weeks 4 days 23 hours ago) and read 6622 times:



Quoting Deltadude (Thread starter):
Gotta love the unions....

No, we don't!  no   thumbsdown 

Quoting BinMonster (Reply 11):
DL ramp has said NO to the TWU twice in the last ten years.

It'll be thrice in twelve years two years from now.  Big grin



Just accept that some days, you're the pigeon, and other days the statue
User currently offlineEssentialPowr From United States of America, joined Sep 2000, 1820 posts, RR: 2
Reply 14, posted (6 years 6 months 3 weeks 4 days 23 hours ago) and read 6604 times:

Quoting Alitalia744 (Reply 13):
Quoting EssentialPowr (Reply 12):
Sounds like the deal is off for now, and for good reason.



Quoting Alitalia744 (Reply 13):

No it doesn't.

That's how I interpreted this exerpt from an AP release today:

"Other conditions include that the combined airline be called Delta and be headquartered in Atlanta. Officials familiar with the talks have said those criteria have already been met, as have most other issues, except for pilot integration.

"Rest assured that we will not complete a transaction unless all of these conditions are met," the Delta executives said in the memo. "We have a strong stand-alone plan. We will maintain our attention on executing that plan while we continue to look at strategic alternatives."

Not too long ago, Delta and Northwest seemed all but certain to announce a combination soon."

That still could happen, but the pilot impasse has jeopardized a deal.

There isn't going to be any of this pilot seniority integration crap from here on out...either the pilots are happy with it, or the deal is stopped cold.

[Edited 2008-02-26 19:44:54]

User currently offlineSLCUT2777 From United States of America, joined Dec 2005, 4060 posts, RR: 11
Reply 15, posted (6 years 6 months 3 weeks 4 days 23 hours ago) and read 6587 times:



Quoting EssentialPowr (Reply 15):
That still could happen, but the pilot impasse has jeopardized a deal.

There isn't going to be any of this pilot seniority integration crap from here on out...either the pilots are happy with it, or the deal is stopped cold.

At least they are trying to fix it before merging unlike HP+US. Look what a disaster the latter has been!



DELTA Air Lines; The Only Way To Fly from Salt Lake City; Let the Western Heritage always be with Delta!
User currently offlineEssentialPowr From United States of America, joined Sep 2000, 1820 posts, RR: 2
Reply 16, posted (6 years 6 months 3 weeks 4 days 22 hours ago) and read 6528 times:



Quoting SLCUT2777 (Reply 16):
At least they are trying to fix it before merging unlike HP+US. Look what a disaster the latter has been!

exactly... And its nothing new, either, but the millions the Wall Street suits and airline execs have made while work groups are taking pay cuts is going to stop.


User currently offlineAlitalia744 From United States of America, joined Mar 2000, 4749 posts, RR: 44
Reply 17, posted (6 years 6 months 3 weeks 4 days 22 hours ago) and read 6502 times:



Quoting EssentialPowr (Reply 15):
That's how I interpreted this exerpt from an AP release today:

Your interpretation, and respected.

I disagree however.



Some see lines, others see between the lines.
User currently offlineBreaker1011 From United States of America, joined Nov 2007, 938 posts, RR: 2
Reply 18, posted (6 years 6 months 3 weeks 4 days 22 hours ago) and read 6502 times:



Quoting EssentialPowr (Reply 17):
And its nothing new, either, but the millions the Wall Street suits and airline execs have made while work groups are taking pay cuts is going to stop.

Not that I disagree at all with you from a philosophical standpoint, but how exactly is it going to stop? Unless the mothership has landed somewhere and laid out the new rules for planetary corporate assimilation, there's nothing about what's going on here that's going to change the tide of corporate and investor greed.



Life's tough. It's even tougher if you're stupid. J. Wayne
User currently offlineN908AW From United States of America, joined Aug 2005, 934 posts, RR: 1
Reply 19, posted (6 years 6 months 3 weeks 4 days 22 hours ago) and read 6490 times:



Quoting Beaucaire (Reply 1):
does not sound good at all,more and more resentments against the merger..
But that would mean any major merger in the US airline-industry will be shelled by unions ?

Um, yeah...? The IAM said it best in their little blurb that they got over the newswires today...Mergers are great for investors, but not employees. And, so they argued, not passengers. I guess that last one remains to be seen either way.

Quoting DLPMMM (Reply 9):

"Massive" job cuts are doubtful, but the vote to eliminate union representation is likely after the merger, and the more likely motivation for their public protests.

Well, 'massive' is relative, but you can bet your bottom dollar a DL/NW merger would eliminate a couple thousand jobs, the whole point of the merger is to trim 'fat'.



'Cause you're on ATA again, and on ATA, you're on vacation!
User currently offlineConcordeBoy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 20, posted (6 years 6 months 3 weeks 4 days 22 hours ago) and read 6476 times:



Quoting EssentialPowr (Reply 17):
And its nothing new, either, but the millions the Wall Street suits and airline execs have made while work groups are taking pay cuts is going to stop.

...sure will, right about the same time that "Wall Street suits" stop investing and the "work groups" become the executives.


User currently offlineEssentialPowr From United States of America, joined Sep 2000, 1820 posts, RR: 2
Reply 21, posted (6 years 6 months 3 weeks 4 days 22 hours ago) and read 6461 times:

Quoting N908AW (Reply 20):
Well, 'massive' is relative, but you can bet your bottom dollar a DL/NW merger would eliminate a couple thousand jobs, the whole point of the merger is to trim 'fat'.

right. Wall Street is about short term profits, particularly in such highly regulated industries like the airlines.

Quoting Breaker1011 (Reply 19):
there's nothing about what's going on here that's going to change the tide of corporate and investor greed.

True. But thanks to those great folks at Enron, closer scrutiny is being paid to corporate activities. Any merger b/t 2 of the top 6 airlines will have a hard time passing the DOJ without a size reduction... and, the precedent has been set that the seniority lists, particularly of the pilot groups, be preordained or the deal will never happen. That, btw, is exactly what is happening now.

[Edited 2008-02-26 20:50:44]

User currently offlineBreaker1011 From United States of America, joined Nov 2007, 938 posts, RR: 2
Reply 22, posted (6 years 6 months 3 weeks 4 days 22 hours ago) and read 6426 times:

Quoting EssentialPowr (Reply 22):
True. But thanks to those great folks at Enron, closer scrutiny is being paid to corporate activities. Any merger b/t 2 of the top 6 airlines will have a hard time passing the DOJ without a size reduction... and, the precedent has been set that the seniority lists, particularly of the pilot groups, be preordained or the deal will never happen. That, btw, is exactly what is happening now.

Ok - reality check here. The ordeal with the puppet company that was Enron I'm afraid has little or no bearing on an airline industry merger. You might as well compare Dolly Parton to the Three Stooges.

DOJ is interested in excessive route overlap that would hinder competition or increase the risk of a monopoly in a given market. There's a 3% - yes, 3% route overlap in a DL/NW combination. And there's no virtual market monopolies that a combined NW/DL would create that don't **ALREADY EXIST** today (MSP, DTW, CVG, SLC, MEM). So in the end, there's nothing the DOJ will look at and say "shed it." Now the BOD's on the other hand may eventually force some hub consolidation, but that will be a purely internal issue and have nothing to do with regulators.

What precedent are you speaking of with the "preordained pilot deal?" Sure, there's some great lessons to be heeded out there (HP/US), but no legal precedent has been set. Is it a good idea to strike an accord prior to entry? Absolutely. Is it required? Not at all. As others have stated, is this deal is to happen, it will happen despite the senority issue. The recent posturing in ATL and MSP from management are just a gentle way of saying "get it done boys" and I do think the boys will get it done.

If you don't want to see a merger, that's cool. I myself could care less. But let the facts prevail and guide us. There's enough BS on here already on both pro and cons sides.

[Edited 2008-02-26 21:16:55]

[Edited 2008-02-26 21:26:53]


Life's tough. It's even tougher if you're stupid. J. Wayne
User currently offlineEssentialPowr From United States of America, joined Sep 2000, 1820 posts, RR: 2
Reply 23, posted (6 years 6 months 3 weeks 4 days 20 hours ago) and read 6353 times:



Quoting Breaker1011 (Reply 23):
The ordeal with the puppet company that was Enron I'm afraid has little or no bearing on an airline industry merger.

Only in the levels of scrutiny from any entity...

Quoting Breaker1011 (Reply 23):
What precedent are you speaking of with the "preordained pilot deal?"

Just the AP story released today that indicates the pilot seniority integration issue is the major barrier remaining...

Quoting Breaker1011 (Reply 23):
But let the facts prevail and guide us

The facts? See above.


User currently offlineBeertrucker From United States of America, joined Dec 2005, 403 posts, RR: 0
Reply 24, posted (6 years 6 months 3 weeks 4 days 20 hours ago) and read 6333 times:

I see a lot of people saying that they are not coming to an agreement so the deal is off. I see a lot of people saying they will work it out.

My feeling is to this. I think it speaks well of Delta and Northwest that they are still sitting there trying to work things out. They are trying to make both sides happy. Some might remember the Northwest and Republic merger back in the day. Now that was one of the worst mergers I heard about from other rampers who were around for that. I hear there was still kinda bad feelings about it many years and I mean many years after the fact.

I think them taking the time to try to make it better for both sides is a good thing. Cause if they really wanted to they could just say sorry about your luck we are merging and you will just have to live with it.

So yes Delta/Northwest take the time to work on this so that you can make it work.



Fly HI
25 EssentialPowr : Making it work... what is the benefit to the average citizen or airline employee? Less competetition, pay cuts and furloughs? Sounds great!
26 DLPMMM : Gee, for the employees it could mean more pay and a more secure future with a healthier airline. For the average citizen it can mean a more stabil ai
27 EssentialPowr : Airlines are (attempting) to merge to cut costs. Oil is $100 bbl, which is higher than most of their projections by 15%-45%. That "miss" in the price
28 Beaucaire : There are still some airlines that make more than enough money (at least outside the US ) -the latest examples of BA,AF,LH and IB have shown that desp
29 DLPMMM : I't just not worth my time to explain economics to you, and you really don't want to understand anyway. If you really want to understand the airline
30 EssentialPowr : Then why are you on the forum? Tell you what, you keep from teaching me economics, and I'll save you from learning from my background... Aaahh, what
31 ER757 : I think you answered your own question earlier in the same post...right here: If they have fuel costs 15%-45% higher than their projections, then the
32 Rwy04LGA : I will be able to nonrev all over Asia instead of just NRT, ICN, and PVG. We just got our profit-sharing checks and a pay raise is imminent. Merge NO
33 EssentialPowr : Airlines are stable from a customer perspective. There is no profitable industry on the planet that is stable, internally, at any give time due to th
34 Post contains images ER757 : Really? Not from this customer's perspective!
35 NWAESC : Not with Steenland and/or Anderson in the mix.
36 Post contains links DLPMMM : OK sparky, you want an education? Here you go: Consolidation = Industry Pixy Dust? (by Breaker1011 Feb 12 2008 in Civil Aviation)?threadid=3842235&se
37 Post contains links and images Allstarflyer : Been through 2 furloughs in the airlines in less than 4 years, still in the airlines and think this possible merger has the potential of benefitting
38 Post contains images DLPMMM : Thank you for making very cogent points. I just find myself short on patience.
39 Goingboeing : Yes...just look at all the happy TWA employees over at AA. This is correct. They are GREAT for investors - for about a week (long term in Wall Street
40 Post contains links and images DeltaL1011man : BTW guys this has already been posted IAM Opposes Airline Mergers (by Like2flyguy Feb 25 2008 in Civil Aviation)?threadid=3861934&searchid=3862366&s=
41 Breaker1011 : Why does everyone keep bringing up AA/TW in this discussion? AMR bought TW on the cheap and the timing was bad giving the industry crisis shortly the
42 DLPMMM : Considering that ALL the TWA employees would have lost their jobs in a matter of a few days, AA actually saved alot of jobs for TWA employees. Not yo
43 Goingboeing : Actaully, AA would have been better off to let TWA fail and take what they wanted. Integrating work groups didn't make the merger go all that well. A
44 DLPMMM : You first said this as a harbinger of downsizing: And then this when it is pointed out to you that all the TWA employees would have lost their jobs in
45 EssentialPowr : I will leave it to you, within the current thread, to educate me. Not as much as I do yours. Make your point on this thread. Most normal people don't
46 EssentialPowr : 1. Could (could????) mean more pay...Please cite a specific merger example in which this happened. 2. Define "stability" from a customer perspective.
47 Post contains links and images Allstarflyer : . . . you mentioned that, but then you said this . . . Basically, you said authoritatively that "airlines are stable from a customer perspective" and
48 EssentialPowr : I defined it and did not refer to my opinion as an economic fact, and was consequently asking DLPMMM to define. Here's what I said: So now this is yo
49 Post contains images Allstarflyer : The issue of "stability" started with DLPMMM's post prior to yours here   , in which you mentioned the following . . . . . . which is followed by th
50 EssentialPowr : Then tell me why, from you or DLPMMM's perspective, they are unstable? Why do you disagree? Nothing but opinions from an anet perspective. When the c
51 Post contains images Allstarflyer : And yours is backed up by . . . ? I see nothing but inflated opinion and not much evidence to back it up. Perhaps you could share why you're such an
52 DLPMMM : I gave you the link to a complete thread that goes into great detail. You replied with: Which tells me that you don't really want an answer to your q
53 Post contains links EssentialPowr : Yeah, the RR is a solid determinant from people such as yourself you confuse opinions with facts...not to mention, perspectives as a customer vs empl
54 EssentialPowr : Allstarflyer and DLPMMM Neither of you have probably heard of Mike Boyd, but in addition to the U of Nebraska at Omaha Airline Customer Satisfaction d
55 Goingboeing : Why, you're forgetting about the profit sharing. Although you are correct, when airline employees are asked for concessions two or three times, and g
56 EssentialPowr : Absolutely right on the money. I said: in response to: Airline work groups had to give up 15-20% of their pay to get a 10% profit sharing check... Ho
57 DLPMMM : I'm sorry you are a 20 years experienced ramper out of work, but that does not change the facts.
58 Val : If the ugly merger between US Airways and America West is representative of how modern-day airline mergers will commence, you can't really blame them
59 Post contains links MKE22 : http://www.sltrib.com/business/ci_8421155 Just an article updating things.
60 Goingboeing : I'll bet the fact is this...you are one of those who said "nobody should make $75,000 to sling bags". Is that correct? If so, consider this - are YOU
61 Goingboeing : One other thought DLPMMM....how much more are Pan Am employees making after their merger with Delta?
62 Post contains links and images Allstarflyer : Goingboeing, I appreciate the response (although, it would help to include your link ), and Essential, you score a point for responding to reply 47.
63 Post contains links Goingboeing : It would be here
64 Essentialpowr : When and where are you going to provide a single fact? Childish remarks only prove you are cluelesss...
65 DLPMMM : I supplied a link to an entire thread going into great detail about the economics of legacy and LCC airlines in the USA. You refused to read it, and
66 EssentialPowr : Baloney. Sure, they know it is an embedded cost, but that's like saying people are interested in grain futures when they buy steak at the grocery sto
67 EssentialPowr : You stated earlier that I had a question, which I did not. You offered me an economics lesson, which I neither feel you are qualified to give, nor do
68 DLPMMM : You should learn econ somewhere, because your economic analysis of the induatry makes no logical sense. It is like trying to debate why the water is
69 Post contains images Allstarflyer : Another swing and a miss from you, EP, but then striking out is a common theme for you. Good. Note this as well . . .    Let's find out more about
70 Breaker1011 : Someone delete this thread please? The same 3 or 4 users arguing back and forth at every sentence each types is just not any fun to read anymore. Give
71 EssentialPowr : Clearly, but Im waiting for you to do that. Right. I have no idea what Im talking about, because you do. Prove it. Offer something. Quantum theory? F
72 Allstarflyer : Lock it, maybe. But delete it? And I don't mind giving it a rest. I'm just glad I had the opportunity to punch an egoist repeatedly in the nose. Peop
73 Allstarflyer : But let's wait, though, if you don't mind - EP has just been active on this thread, and I'd like to see if he has the capacity to address the comments
74 EssentialPowr : Easy, tough guy.
75 EssentialPowr : Easy, tough guy. I'l give you the same questions:
76 Post contains images Allstarflyer : The ability to get a ticket fast here in the information age has nothing to do w/the airlines being stable. That doesn't point towards stability - th
77 Breaker1011 : Just couldnt do it - sorry[Edited 2008-03-03 20:25:16]
78 EssentialPowr : Keep to the topic. Teach me something. Man, you write alot...but say nothing. All you do is dispute my points! Go make yours, or answer: Condensed ju
79 Post contains images Allstarflyer : EP, when you say stuff like this, and also "man, you write alot...but say nothing", it just means the rest passed over your head. I'm content that ob
80 Allstarflyer : EP, do you care to address in these forums (or even just to me in a PM) why you're such an expert? I thought I'd learned something about the customer
81 EssentialPowr : Im looking for a succint point. Is this an election? Read this twice... We all know that rapid fuel price increases sped NW, DL, etc in to bankruptcy
82 EssentialPowr : Because the most interesting way to provide input to personality types like you, that see themselves as experts, is to provide consistent and credibl
83 Allstarflyer : Like said, Fred, what I've said has flown over your head. I never said I was an expert, like you say (reply 82) that I have. I'm here to learn new thi
84 EssentialPowr : I wish I knew what you said... Yeah, you know this industry from Juan Trippe forward (even though you were born in 1980)... Can't wait until an ETOPs
85 Post contains images Allstarflyer : After my post here, you can have the last word, and I hope the mods lock it up afterward. There's several things I pointed out that you failed to add
86 EssentialPowr : Im not willing to retract anything Ive said, but if you feel it necessary that is your issue. As I surmised, you are a rookie in this industry yet yo
87 Bobnwa : EP and Allstar, isn't it time to get a life and get off the thread. go take a walk or go to the movies. Do either of you really care what the other th
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
DL-NW Merger: Fleet Outcome posted Thu Feb 7 2008 06:52:00 by DL767captain
What Would A Possible DL/NW Merger Look Like? posted Fri Oct 19 2007 23:00:40 by Jrlander
DL/NW Merger Theory posted Tue Oct 4 2005 01:10:26 by TL8490
DL/NW Merger, Your Thoughts? posted Thu Sep 22 2005 18:23:39 by Aa777flyer
Speculation On DL/NW Merger posted Thu Sep 15 2005 04:46:11 by Flydl2atl
Dalpa Opposes DL+UA Merger posted Tue Nov 20 2007 16:10:59 by SLCUT2777
DL In Merger Talks With NW: WSJ Part 2 posted Sat Jan 13 2007 08:20:06 by ANCFlyer
US/DL/UA/CO/AA/NW Merger posted Thu Nov 16 2006 22:25:36 by JBo
A DL/NW/CO Super Merger? posted Thu Jan 19 2006 23:28:43 by 1337Delta764
DL-NW Vs. DL-CO Vs NW-CO Merger posted Tue Nov 29 2005 22:08:36 by 1337Delta764