Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Are Singpapore Airlines And Ansett A Good Combinat  
User currently offlineSingapore_Air From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2000, 13742 posts, RR: 19
Posted (13 years 7 months 6 days 9 hours ago) and read 852 times:

With rumours spreading that SIA are about to take a stake in Ansett, (although both airlines deny the rumour with SIA saying that they don't comment on rumours), do you think they are a good combination? It is known that if SIA threw some money in AN's way, they could expand their fleet. However, what does that say about the way they're running themselves?

Also rumour has it (again!) that AN has "requested" 6 of SIA's Megatops. However I don't see this as happenning as SIA are wanting to build on capacity.




Anyone can fly, only the best Soar.
3 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineAduum From Australia, joined Sep 2000, 335 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (13 years 7 months 6 days 9 hours ago) and read 842 times:

Ansett from what I've heard has higher service(international) standards than SQ, is directly in competition with QF, and many more bonuses which make these two airlines highly compatibal.

I hope they do get some cash from SIA.
Hehehe.
Cause they really need it.

Aduum.


User currently offlineGardermoen From Australia, joined Jul 1999, 1522 posts, RR: 1
Reply 2, posted (13 years 7 months 6 days 9 hours ago) and read 842 times:

They are indeed a good match, and if not for Air New Zealand getting in their way, the Ansett/SQ relationship would be miles ahead than it is right now. For a long time, SQ has wanted a foothold in the Australian market, at one point it tried to grab a share of QF(before BA got it).
Singapore Airlines can provide a lot to Ansett, in terms of capital, fleet, service enhancements etc. They are both leaders in terms of cabin service, and this can only get better. Routewise, SQ will play a big part in feeding traffic through SIN on to non-Ansett ports. I beileve AN will focus on Northern and nearby Asia, the PAcific and West coast USA, and the rest(namely, Western Asia and Europe) will be via SQ.
SQ is short on capacity now and needs all its planes for its own routes, so at the moment AN will not be getting any 744s. This means its plans to launch SYD-LAX service appears to be on hold.


User currently offlineJubilee777 From Singapore, joined May 1999, 528 posts, RR: 1
Reply 3, posted (13 years 7 months 6 days 8 hours ago) and read 833 times:

Yes, SIA and Ansett make quite a good pair, if not for the intervention of the so called "ugly stepmother". AN has a very good Australian network, which SIA wants, since it is the most frequent visitor to Australia. The small size of AN allows SIA to help it enter into the international aviation scene, and thus reaping benefits for both AN and SQ. NZ's land area is small and thus does not attract SQ.

SIA are going to receive 15 planes this coming year, so this increase in capacity MAY allow SIA to release the planes to AN.


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Are American And United Good Airlines To Fly On? posted Sun Feb 20 2000 07:28:28 by VirginA340
What Airlines Are Operating 737NG And A32X? posted Mon Jun 10 2002 15:24:15 by TriStar500
What Airlines Are GCR, CF And QC? posted Thu Nov 8 2001 00:36:01 by Pe@rson
What Airlines Are LA, LR And TA posted Sun Oct 8 2000 05:40:38 by Dellatorre
North American Airlines? And Obama Flight posted Sat Aug 22 2009 12:53:07 by BOACVC10
How Are 'tax, Fees And Charges' Calculated? posted Mon Aug 17 2009 11:35:39 by Musapapaya
Airlines And Their Terminals At ATH posted Tue Jul 28 2009 09:03:27 by Tobias2702
Aegean Airlines And Long Haul? posted Fri Jul 3 2009 03:15:50 by AlitaliaMD11
Why Are Great Lakes And Cape Air Unique? posted Thu Jun 25 2009 00:40:07 by Tharanga
Shanghai Airlines And China Eastern To Combine posted Sun Jun 7 2009 20:37:01 by EddieDude