Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Popular Mechanics A380 Article...  
User currently offlineBlatantEcho From United States of America, joined Sep 2000, 1916 posts, RR: 1
Posted (13 years 8 months 1 week 4 days 15 hours ago) and read 1666 times:

There is an article in this months Popular Mechanics about the new era of "flying hotels". This toses a lot of respect I had for this rag out the window.

There is nothing really about the technology in the A38- in the article. It is a fanciful piece based on the PR statments of Airbus and Boeing. The pictures they show are the same fanciful ideas as the 747 was dreamed up with so many decades ago. Showers in suites, bars and what not. It is an generally uniformed, and boring article on the newest and certainly most intriguing developments in air travel. They also manage to site a a plane that looks more like that Russian 757...(Tu-245??) than an A330, as an A340....

Pretty poor if you ask me, not what I have come to expect from Popular Mechanics. Anyone else have some thoughts on this?

Regards,
BlatantEcho


They're not handing trophies out today
9 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineAirbus A380 From Singapore, joined Jan 2001, 522 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (13 years 8 months 1 week 4 days 13 hours ago) and read 1604 times:

The "Russian 757" you mentioned was actually the Tupolev Tu-204-XXX.

Airbus A380. Flagship of 21st Century Air Travel.


User currently offlineJaysit From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (13 years 8 months 1 week 4 days 8 hours ago) and read 1574 times:

I saw the Popular Mechanics article too. It was a piece of fluff filled with idiotic fanciful drawings of huge lobbies, bedrooms with showers, etc, etc. It was, perhaps, the worst article on the A380 to appear in the popular press.

Perhaps, they were thinking of the Emir of [insert your favorite rich Gulf nation here]'s private A380, which I'm sure one of those rich Gulf potentates will eventually purchase.


User currently offlineJMJ From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (13 years 8 months 1 week 4 days 8 hours ago) and read 1564 times:

I haven't read the article but the level of substance in your average PM magazine is usually very low. I've never been satisfied after having read an article, especially a cover one, in PM, only disapointed. The content is never anything but real fluff. Whenever I have looked forward to reading something, I always ended up wondering why they even bothered to write the article- there was no real info in it at all.

User currently offlineJMJ From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 4, posted (13 years 8 months 1 week 4 days 8 hours ago) and read 1558 times:

Oh yeah, and if PM really thinks that the A380 is going to be flying hotel they're really living in fantasy land. What it WILL be is a way to cram 10000 people into one plane like sardines. It doesn't have to be that way but I'm betting that's what's going to happen. I don't mind flying big planes but not if the size is an excuse to jam in more and more people rather than put a few more in and give the poor coach travelers a little breathing space. Does anyone really want to be in the middle seat of some crazy confuguration ( 12-100-12) !  Smile Ok a liiiiiittle exagerated, but not much!!

User currently offlineVngd4me From United States of America, joined Dec 2000, 238 posts, RR: 4
Reply 5, posted (13 years 8 months 1 week 4 days 6 hours ago) and read 1541 times:

I saw the cover of the mag & picked it up just for that article. After reading it I was equally as unimpressed and agree with it being a fluff flilled not too technical article.

User currently offlineLuckySevens From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 6, posted (13 years 8 months 1 week 4 days 5 hours ago) and read 1526 times:

I was very disappointed with the article but it reminded me of the old 747 classic "articles". Same fluff.
The one I liked was the TO wieght of 1.2 billion pounds. Just had a quiet chuckle and tossed it in the recycle bin.


User currently offlineJMJ From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 7, posted (13 years 8 months 1 week 4 days 1 hour ago) and read 1489 times:

1.2 billion pounds? Wow, I guess they ARE going to stuff a lot of people in there.  Smile

User currently offlineTristar2000 From Canada, joined Dec 2000, 274 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (13 years 8 months 1 week 4 days ago) and read 1484 times:

I have to admit the article is kind of weak.

1- "1.2 billion pounds"... hmmm okay if you say so, it's just going to be 2000 times the 747.

2- "You don't see many Douglas DC-10 and Lockheed L-1011 jumbos in passenger service these days. And the companies that built them are now parts of other corporations...."

I truly can't see the point in this second statement they make. Lockheed is not part of another corporation these days. Second, if Douglas is now part of Boeing, correct me if I'm wrong but I don't think it's really because of the DC-10.

But I did buy the thing... before I read it

Regards,
Steven


User currently offlineGearup From Canada, joined Dec 2000, 578 posts, RR: 1
Reply 9, posted (13 years 8 months 1 week 4 days ago) and read 1484 times:

To the folks on this forum who all have a good knowledge of commercial aviation, it is disapointing when you see a publication being so superficial and just plain inaccurate. It makes you wonder if all the other non aviation stuff written in it is rubbish also! But then how often have you seen a caption in a newspaper showing a photograph of a DC-8 which says "A Boeing 707 like this one was involved in an incident..........." The fact is, the general press rarely get it right even about simple things to do with aviation.


I have no memory of this place.
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
An-225 Article In Popular Mechanics 1/2003 posted Mon Dec 16 2002 00:36:30 by Mirrodie
A380 Featured In Popular Mechanics posted Wed Feb 28 2001 21:55:28 by Delta A380-100
A380 Article - Airliner That Fell To Earth posted Sat Oct 7 2006 03:21:47 by BCAInfoSys
New A380 Article On Flight Revue posted Thu Jul 6 2006 09:34:56 by Ikarus2006
ORD Making Room For A380 (article) posted Thu Dec 1 2005 14:20:22 by LON-CHI
German FAZ: Eye-Catching New A380 Article (quotes) posted Fri Aug 19 2005 23:20:34 by Udo
A380 Article In The Seattle Post-Intelligencer posted Mon Jan 24 2005 18:29:14 by Gorbidog
A380 Article On The BBC Website posted Fri May 7 2004 09:01:10 by Tjr16698
A380 Article From BusinessWeek posted Thu Nov 20 2003 16:23:52 by FDXmech
An Interesting A380 Article posted Mon Jan 29 2001 03:09:13 by UAL-Fan