Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
JAT To Reconsider Airbus Deal  
User currently offlineJAT From Canada, joined Feb 2000, 1101 posts, RR: 9
Posted (15 years 3 months 2 weeks 18 hours ago) and read 1940 times:

JAT to Reconsider Airbus Deal, Looks for Cheaper Craft

BELGRADE, Feb 16, 2001 -- (Reuters) Yugoslavia's flagship carrier Jugoslovenski Aerotransport (JAT) said on Thursday it would be forced to reconsider its deal with Europe's Airbus Industrie [ARBU.UL] on a purchase of eight aircraft for financial reasons.

"We have to start serious talks with Airbus," said JAT's development manager Miodrag Markovic, adding that JAT could be forced to look for cheaper solutions.

"We can remain by the agreement but it will certainly have to be redefined. But JAT will have to go either with fewer planes or with a smaller type of planes," he said.

Asked if JAT could drop its Airbus contract for another aircraft supplier, Markovic said: "Such a possibility exists. But it is not only up to JAT to decide, but the government. The decision will depend taking state interests into account."

Airbus representatives are due in Belgrade for talks later this month. Any decision to renegotiate the agreement would have to be made by the Serbian government, the owner of JAT.

In March 1998, JAT signed a letter of intent with Airbus Industrie on a purchase of eight A-319s by 2005. The implementation of the contract was postponed over international sanctions and NATO's 1999 air war against

Markovic said the situation now was different from the one when the deal was signed and that it was too costly for JAT anyway. He said JAT could change its mind and instead buy a smaller A318 aircraft.

Markovic said JAT did not need new planes right away and that its present fleet was meeting demands for its European, Mediterranean and transatlantic flights.

JAT currently has 19 operational planes from a fleet of 30 and three more would soon be ready to fly, Markovic said.

Last December, JAT's general manager Mihailo Vujinovic said the company would go ahead with its Airbus deal.

(C)2001 Copyright Reuters Limited. All rights reserved. Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of Reuters Limited.

Finally, a piece of really good news. The A-319 is compleatly wrong for them. For the job that the A-319 does, JAT already has an aircraft, it is called the B737-300. JAT does not need anything larger than this, they can't even fill it all the time. So, the only way to go is with an AC with lower capacity. If they must go with Airbus then they should get the A-318, the replacement for their DC-9's. The best solution would be to get the B717. It would be the perfect AC for the routes where they can't fill the 737. I hope they revise their choice and make an educated decision without political preassure.

What do you think?

5 replies: All unread, jump to last
User currently offlineCB777 From United States of America, joined Sep 1999, 1216 posts, RR: 2
Reply 1, posted (15 years 3 months 2 weeks 17 hours ago) and read 1900 times:

If Jat has to go with a smaller aircraft then the B737-300 I think they should choose the B717. I think they would look good in them since they already operate the DC-9. Te B717 would be the ideal replacement for DC-9. Do you think Jat will ever fly back to Zagreb, and how is JAT doing financially, are they doing well, And when are the routes to North America going to begin, such as New York and Chicago?


User currently offlineAIR757200 From United States of America, joined Jul 2000, 1579 posts, RR: 7
Reply 2, posted (15 years 3 months 2 weeks 16 hours ago) and read 1878 times:

Or maybe DTW? I remember using DTW service back in '87, full flight on the D10. But, ORD or JFK would be better options I suppose.


User currently offline9A-CRO From Croatia, joined Jun 2000, 1574 posts, RR: 8
Reply 3, posted (15 years 3 months 2 weeks 15 hours ago) and read 1870 times:

it is possible that there will be Zagreb-Belgrade route this year
if JAT will be operating them I hope tey will but new Tupolevs -cheap and good acfts and it would be nice to see these aiplanes
outside CIS

When once you have tasted flight, you will forever walk the earth with your eyes turned skyward...
User currently offlineJAT From Canada, joined Feb 2000, 1101 posts, RR: 9
Reply 4, posted (15 years 3 months 2 weeks 15 hours ago) and read 1873 times:

I do beleive that 2-3 years from now we will be seeing JAT at Zagreb. As far as the financial situation is concerned, I'll post that under a different topic. JAT should start service to North Amerika around May this year. Primary destinations would be YYZ, JFK, ORD. There may be 1 or 2 flights a week to DTW although I am not sure if they will have them in the beginning.


I'd love to hear about your experinece on JAT, if you still remember.....

User currently offlineJAT From Canada, joined Feb 2000, 1101 posts, RR: 9
Reply 5, posted (15 years 3 months 2 weeks 15 hours ago) and read 1870 times:

As far as Tupolevs are concerned the chances are 0.01% I agree, Tupolevs are good plains but their reputation isn't. I don't think that when the average traveler learns that JAT is using Tupolevs they will want to fly them. JAT's current image can't afford to be tarnished (and I hate to say this but it would be) by using Tupolevs. The only airlines that can change the worlds preception on Tupolevs are world renouned carriers such as Lufthansa, British, Swissair, KLM ....

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
"China To Sign Airbus Deal During Blair Visit" posted Sun Sep 4 2005 19:19:02 by Jacobin777
Boeing Aims To Keep Airbus @ Bay No 787 Delays! posted Fri Oct 20 2006 04:26:05 by Coelacanth
WSJ: Eads And BAe Close Airbus Deal posted Fri Oct 13 2006 18:03:23 by N328KF
Airbus:Gov. Influence Comes Back To Haunt Airbus posted Fri Oct 13 2006 15:27:00 by Halibut
Customers Back A380 To Keep Airbus Solvent posted Thu Oct 12 2006 02:07:15 by N328KF
Finnair To Reconsider A350 Order posted Thu Oct 5 2006 21:35:06 by Findigenous
AA To Lease Airbus A320's? posted Tue Aug 1 2006 08:33:27 by Skaggs
JAT To Get New Management posted Thu Jul 20 2006 11:48:49 by Pdanicic
BAE’s Long Journey To An Airbus Exit Strategy posted Mon Jul 10 2006 16:58:56 by Leelaw
FI: Exec Changes Fail To Sway Airbus Customers posted Mon Jul 10 2006 11:43:31 by Leelaw