Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Flight School Or Service Academy?  
User currently offlineShawn Patrick From United States of America, joined Jan 2000, 2608 posts, RR: 16
Posted (13 years 10 months 5 days 6 hours ago) and read 1365 times:

This is a question mainly for current pilots. Which way would you recommend getting your schooling to become an airline pilot? A flight school, such as ERAU, or a service academy, such as USAF?

Which points should I consider?
Which route did you take?

Yes, I have read JetCareers.com through and through, but I would like some of your opinions.

Thanks!

6 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineShawn Patrick From United States of America, joined Jan 2000, 2608 posts, RR: 16
Reply 1, posted (13 years 10 months 5 days 4 hours ago) and read 1339 times:

.

User currently offlineMit From United States of America, joined Dec 2000, 166 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (13 years 10 months 5 days 3 hours ago) and read 1332 times:

The main considerations that come to my mind are money, risk and lifestyle.

Money: Private training is quite expensive ($25K+) and will probably have you in a low-status, low paying jobs for a number of years before making the majors. Military training is absolutely free with decent pay, great benefits and a superb college education thrown in. Your first civillian job will likely be with a major as well.

Risk: The military is a big commitment with no guarantees. If you lose your medical or washout, you're stuck with them for four years. Upside is that if you do make pilot, you have an excellent flying job that you can sit on until you choose to enter the civillian market. The civillian route has much more flexibility, less downside risk, and is more accomodating of medical problems or slow learning. Both routes offer a not insignificant risk of killing you in the process; don't know which is more dangerous, though.

Lifestlye: Military life can be hard. You go to combat survival school and eat kill-it-yourself raw rabbit. You're a soldier, they might send you to South Korea or an aircraft carrier. You also get to see the world and fly exciting airplanes. With civillian training you get to maintain whatever type of existence you like.

I could go on, but I need to learn about antibiotics.
Also, look into some middle route like ROTC.

Cheers,

Mit


User currently offlineWEAPON From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (13 years 10 months 5 days 2 hours ago) and read 1328 times:

one of the things that made me not join the military for flying was this...the military flies all of these cool planes. F-18's, F-15's, B-2 Bombers, and A-10's. But understand this...those airplanes are built for a specific purpose in WAR. When you enlist, you basically saying that for the good of your country, you will die. Another downside I saw was this...could you really live with yourself if you bombed a town or what not, and killed a whole bunch of innocent people? I couldn't do it man. Besides, you are bombing a country. That country possibly has an arsenal that can bring your plane down. Remember, T/O's should equal landings in aviation. You might take off from an A/C Carrier, but you might not return...

User currently offlineShawn Patrick From United States of America, joined Jan 2000, 2608 posts, RR: 16
Reply 4, posted (13 years 10 months 5 days 1 hour ago) and read 1327 times:

Can't you fly cargo???

User currently offlineMit From United States of America, joined Dec 2000, 166 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (13 years 10 months 5 days 1 hour ago) and read 1321 times:

Yes, you can fly cargo, you can fly AWACS, you can ECM aircraft, you can fly tankers, you can fly special ops rescue helicopters (probably not what you're after, but it's an option.) All of those, helicopters excepted, are more airline type ops anyway.

But while "WEAPON" may have a pacifist streak, many people are clearly capable of taking on the role. And while the armed forces have at times killed innocent people and many of their own pilots, they also stopped Hitler and Hussein. Decide what's right for you


User currently offlineWEAPON From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 6, posted (13 years 10 months 5 days ago) and read 1316 times:

Whoa, hold on man. I am not taking a pacifist look at anything. I am taking a realistic look at this. Let me ask you this. If you are flying an AWACS, or a KC-135, are you telling me a Russina MiG won't shoot you down because you aren't in a fighter jet? All I was saying was that you can learn to fly w/o putting yourself in more danger than what already comes associated with flying period. I have nothing against military pilots. I think what they do is admirable. Me personally, do not see myself putting my life on the line for a country that will forget about me after I "crash & burned."

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Flight School Or Air Force Reserves posted Mon Apr 16 2001 09:12:42 by ASA_737
Par 61 Flight School @ PDK (or Maybe RYY) posted Fri Feb 24 2006 02:53:17 by SuseJ772
New Flight School In SLC? posted Mon Sep 25 2006 04:13:17 by Sushka
Flight School In Thailand posted Mon Jul 24 2006 05:35:55 by Superfly
Things To Look For In A Flight School posted Sun Jul 9 2006 11:07:57 by AAden
Flight School posted Tue Oct 11 2005 05:31:18 by Stoicescu
Priorities In Flight School Selection posted Mon Sep 19 2005 16:46:16 by Happy-flier
Need Help!...flight School Question posted Fri Sep 16 2005 07:10:05 by Chicago757
Money For Flight School... posted Thu Aug 11 2005 07:58:06 by Alee
What Is More Booked? Flight VS2 Or VS46? posted Mon Apr 18 2005 05:09:01 by Squirrel83