Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Air France -- Launch Customer For B777-300X  
User currently offlineGoA340 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Posted (15 years 4 months 2 weeks 1 day 15 hours ago) and read 1814 times:

My topic is based on the Flight International Magazine article. The airline will potentially order up to 16 of the type to replace B747-100/200s, starting in Sep 2003. A blow to Airbus? I think yes and no. Yes because, AF will choose the type over the A340-600 and no because being an already a GE-90 customer, the order makes a lot of economic sense. I think, being an anti-RR airline, AF will only buy A340-500s when it will be offrered with an alternative engine....(i.e. a blown CFMI)

13 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineAsdf From Austria, joined Mar 2014, 0 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (15 years 4 months 2 weeks 1 day 14 hours ago) and read 1659 times:

Don't you think that Air France could get Airbus to change that- like it did for the A-318's? I'm still confused about how this is not a blow to Airbus.

User currently offlinePandora From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (15 years 4 months 2 weeks 1 day 5 hours ago) and read 1632 times:

AF's preference for 777-300X over the A340-600 may because of economics.

User currently offlineFlyAA757 From United States of America, joined Jun 1999, 1014 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (15 years 4 months 2 weeks 1 day 4 hours ago) and read 1634 times:

AFR really needs to curtail the number of aircraft types in its fleet. Currently, there are:
737-200, -300, -500
A319, A320, A321
A310-200, -300
B767-300(2 engine types)
A340-300
B777-200ER
B747-100,-200, 300, 400

-A318s will replace the 737-200s. Ill bet the 733s will be returned to the lessors in favor of more A319s.

-The A310s and 767s will be replaced by a common type, either 767-400, or A330-200. Tough decision. The 332 will have better fleet commonality with the A343s, but in a sizeable order, this advantage is lost. An order for 15 a/c is expected. Perhaps Boeing will try to boost the 764 order log. cheap prices and quick availability are big plusses.

-More B772s are on order, and will replace the last of the 747-100s by the end of the year.

-The 773s/A346s would replace the 742s and 743s, and allow for growth. The GE90 would allow for 1 less engine type to be added, and a common type rating.
Overall, the 777-328X(ER?) seems like it will be a good idea for AFR. KLM is rumored to be very interested as well.

The 'new' fleet would contain 735, 318/319/320/321, 764 or 332, 772/773, 744. The number of main types will be reduced from 13 to 5. The number of engine types will be reduced from 11 to 5. All of this consolidation would seemingly improve efficiency, and therefore, profitability.


User currently offlinePanman From Trinidad and Tobago, joined Aug 1999, 790 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (15 years 4 months 2 weeks 1 day ago) and read 1615 times:

Hmm maybe I am wrong but weren't the first few (note I said first few for those of you who are eager to jump down people's throats) Airbus purchases by Air France more for politcal reasons for than economical reasons?

PaNmAn


User currently offlineGoA340 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 5, posted (15 years 4 months 2 weeks 18 hours ago) and read 1608 times:

Airbus or Boeing purchases are not political anymore among European Airlines (at least for most of them). Lufthansa is a private airline and still preferred Airbus predominently for their fleet. BA is the same preferring rather Boeing (until at least the big narrowbody order) eventhough British Aerospace is a major contributor to Airbus and finally Swissair which is both private and having nothing to do with the EU and Airbus will have an all Airbus fleet by 2002. Even though the French are accused of being anti-American I think they have a lot more merit than most American carriers which are subjectively Boeing oriented. Air France is not only a predominently government owned but also has been supportive of Airbus all along but this did not prevent them also being a big 777 customer.

User currently offlineCX747 From United States of America, joined May 1999, 4467 posts, RR: 5
Reply 6, posted (15 years 4 months 2 weeks 18 hours ago) and read 1600 times:

Thats a laugher. Most airline purchases in Europe are no longer political! I won't get into it because that is not the subject of the post. Air France is trying to privatize itself as we speak. As it privitizes it seems to be looking more and more at the 777 and not the homemade A340. Less government intervention? The BA order definately was for political and economical reasons.


"History does not long entrust the care of freedom to the weak or timid." D. Eisenhower
User currently offlineGoA340 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 7, posted (15 years 4 months 2 weeks 18 hours ago) and read 1603 times:

What about AA, DL, and CO? I think they have far less merit that AF. What does the fact that AF privatizing itself have to do with the airline purchasing 777? If there was a government intervention in BA's case why didn't it happen before?? I guess you had no comment on the Swissair and LH issues....perhaps you dont have a pro-Boeing argument for it....

User currently offlineKaitak From Ireland, joined Aug 1999, 12598 posts, RR: 34
Reply 8, posted (15 years 4 months 2 weeks 12 hours ago) and read 1579 times:

This is a very interesting question and unfortunately, it's impossible to discuss it without involving politics. An initial gut reaction would be that, NO WAY would they be allowed to and while I accept that AF is becoming more independent, there is more to it than that. This would be a French airline actually facilitating - as launch customer - the main competitor for a long range French aircraft. Ah, mon dieu!
It will be VERY interesting to watch this unfold. Don't be too surprised either if AF does go for the 340-600. It makes more sense for them to do so, being a well established 320 series/340 operator and the 340-5/600 will have as much range as AF needs. Wait and see!


User currently offlinePandora From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 9, posted (15 years 4 months 2 weeks 5 hours ago) and read 1569 times:

The recent China Airlines order for Airbus A340 and 330 is because of politics. Because US didn't want to help Taiwan if China and Taiwan start a war (until now and that's why China Airlines ordered some more 747s and 7378s).

I've just been to TATE 99 in Taipei, whether or not the above is the case, this is Taiwan's people's speculations, and CHina Airlines denided the claim however.


User currently offlineKaitak From Ireland, joined Aug 1999, 12598 posts, RR: 34
Reply 10, posted (15 years 4 months 1 week 6 days 22 hours ago) and read 1565 times:

I'm afraid I have to disagree with Pandora. Firstly, it would be absolutely unfair to expect the US to go to war with China just for Taiwan (and by no means am I anti-Taiwan - quite the contrary in fact!). It has always been US policy to get Taiwan to keep quiet on the independence issue.
I would accept CAL's contention that there was no political interference from its government. The main reason for the A340 selection was that there would be no ETOPs restrictions; CAL has quite a big US network, which is obviously very important for its future growth. Anyway, Boeing didn't do badly with the biggest ever 744F order; if there was interference, why wasn't that order stopped?


User currently offlineNavion From United States of America, joined May 1999, 1015 posts, RR: 1
Reply 11, posted (15 years 4 months 1 week 6 days 16 hours ago) and read 1561 times:

Good post. I like the thinking on the fleet planning. I would love to see the big 777-200X/-300X beasts!!! I would also like to see the 747-400X. There is just something about the looks and function of those birds which really sends me. I kind of like the look of the new A340-500/-600. They too look like they mean business.

User currently offlineCX747 From United States of America, joined May 1999, 4467 posts, RR: 5
Reply 12, posted (15 years 4 months 1 week 6 days 15 hours ago) and read 1559 times:

Well, the if you really want me explain what happened with Swissair and Lufthansa E-mail me and I will be happy to write back.


"History does not long entrust the care of freedom to the weak or timid." D. Eisenhower
User currently offlineGoA340 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 13, posted (15 years 4 months 1 week 6 days 14 hours ago) and read 1555 times:

Why don't you tell all of us right here so that everbody can learn?? That is the purpose of the forum. But if you absolutely want to e-mail do so --- tka340@hotmail.com

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
UPS And Air France Launch Customers For 777-200LRF posted Fri Jan 14 2005 19:06:38 by FCKC
Air Europa Launch Customer For A350? posted Tue Dec 21 2004 16:58:11 by Henpol747
Airbus/Air France Found Liable For 1992 Crash posted Wed Nov 8 2006 13:25:13 by Gkirk
Delta Becomes US Launch Customer For 777-200LR posted Wed Oct 11 2006 21:17:33 by Leelaw
SIA Cargo Launch Customer For 777LRF? posted Tue Nov 8 2005 14:28:44 by USAF336TFS
LOT - New Launch Customer For 787? posted Sat Sep 10 2005 00:00:02 by Amirs
Air France To Start Using B777-300ER To Beirut posted Tue Jul 26 2005 22:30:59 by BA
FlyBE Launch Customer For ERJ-195 posted Thu Jul 14 2005 20:59:02 by Dogfighter2111
"Air France Got KLM For Free" posted Mon Jul 11 2005 18:21:12 by Bassie2010
HP & US Become Launch Customer For A350 posted Fri May 20 2005 15:40:22 by Squirrel83