Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
SQ B777-300ER Makes An Emergency Landing At DEL  
User currently offlineNimish From India, joined Feb 2005, 2509 posts, RR: 4
Posted (2 months 1 week 3 days 7 hours ago) and read 15694 times:

From: http://airlinersindia.s4.bizhat.com/viewtopic.php?p=39938

Quote:
An SQ B777 operating on the Singapore - Paris sector made an emergency landing at DEL yesterday at about 1705 local time after the pilot reported trouble in one of his engines.

The plane landed here without incident and the a/c is still hanging about at DEL. The a/c involved is 9V-SWF type B777-312(ER).

Does anyone know more about this incident? Are the pax accommodated in hotels in DEL, or flown to SIN by a spare 777 or the scheduled SQ services on DEL-SIN?


Latest Trip Report - GoAir BLR-BOM-BLR
46 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineFlySSC From Lebanon, joined Aug 2003, 5155 posts, RR: 50
Reply 1, posted (2 months 1 week 3 days 6 hours ago) and read 15558 times:

The Black series continues for the B77W ...

User currently offlineAguslamm From Argentina, joined Apr 2008, 28 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (2 months 1 week 3 days 6 hours ago) and read 15478 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Anyone keeping track of all the 777-773-77W emergency landings? There have been quite a few lately, is this a coincidence? I have been flying 777s since they startrd in 1995 and always found them very relieble.

User currently offlineBeaucaire From Lebanon, joined Sep 2003, 4032 posts, RR: 18
Reply 3, posted (2 months 1 week 3 days 6 hours ago) and read 15369 times:

(a) 2007 Jun 26 Opr: AF Regn: F-GSQS Sch: PTP-ORY Diverted to: PTP
(b) 2007 Aug ?? Opr: NH Regn: JA7xxA Sch: NRT-??? Diverted to: NRT
(c) 2007 Sep ?? Opr: AF Regn:
(d) 2007 Oct ?? Opr: EK Regn: A6-xxx Sch: BKK-DXB Diverted to: BKK
(e) 2007 Nov 25 Opr: AF Regn: F-GSQE Sch: PEK-CDG Diverted to: LED
(f) 2007 Dec 12 Opr: AF Regn: F-GSQP Sch: ORY-RUN Diverted to: FCO
(g) 2008 Jan 28 Opr: AF Regn: F-GSQO Sch: ORY-RUN Diverted to: MXP
(h) 2008 Feb 01 Opr: SQ Regn: 9V-SWA Sch: SIN-CDG Diverted to: FRA

At least three other incidents -one involving a CO 777 in TLV -have been reported since.(that cause was a faulty sensor-connector )


Please respect animals - don't eat them...
User currently offlineBeaucaire From Lebanon, joined Sep 2003, 4032 posts, RR: 18
Reply 4, posted (2 months 1 week 3 days 6 hours ago) and read 15314 times:

That one was in March :

Air France 777 unscheduled diversion cause inflight shutdown



Lajes (Azores/Portugal) - An Air France plane makes an uncheduled diversion to Lajes international airport (Terceira Island), in Azores, due to engine mechanical troubles on one of the two engines of the plane during a flight over Atlantic Ocean.

The aircraft, a Boeing 777-300ER, registration number F-GSQT, flight number AF620, which was supposed to operate between Paris-Orly (France) international airport and Pointe-à-Pitre-Le Raizet (Guadeloupe/France) international airport with a total passengers number not know at this present time, took-off around noon and was over the Atlantic Ocean when an engine incident occurred. The pilots requested an emergency diversion to Lajes.
The plane landed without further incident and no injuries. No more information were released by the company about the engine problem. The passengers have been disembarked and placed in some hotels to wait for the next departure, the day after.


Please respect animals - don't eat them...
User currently offlineIkramerica From United States, joined May 2005, 14534 posts, RR: 41
Reply 5, posted (2 months 1 week 3 days 5 hours ago) and read 15197 times:

If all are considered IFSD (and not determined to be another problem), then the 77W may not keep ETOPS207 or earn 240. I estimate 1 million engine hours over the last 12 month period for the type, and to keep the best ETOPS rating, you need the type to have fewer than 10 IFSDs. We are at that number now, so they are on the verge. I'm using rough numbers, and it may end up being they have a few IFSD's to "spare."


Of all the things to worry about... the Wookie has no pants.
User currently offlineAguslamm From Argentina, joined Apr 2008, 28 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (2 months 1 week 3 days 5 hours ago) and read 15134 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

good job! and BA crash in LHR, I trust boeing is evaluating the incidents to make corrections...something wrong with the engines?

User currently offlineIkramerica From United States, joined May 2005, 14534 posts, RR: 41
Reply 7, posted (2 months 1 week 3 days 5 hours ago) and read 15105 times:



Quoting Aguslamm (Reply 6):
something wrong with the engines?

well, considering they are currently within the very stringent ETOPS207 guidelines, claiming there is "something wrong" is a bit much. I mean, it's meeting the most reliable engine standard in commercial aviation!

Now, I am sure that GE is looking at why they are close to the limit here, especially with AF who's had 1/2 of the shut downs. it might be a maintenance issue in the field (something GE wouldn't have found in their test environment with their test engineers babying the engines).


Of all the things to worry about... the Wookie has no pants.
User currently offlineNorcal773 From United States, joined Feb 2007, 939 posts, RR: 8
Reply 8, posted (2 months 1 week 3 days 5 hours ago) and read 15031 times:



Quoting FlySSC (Reply 1):
The Black series continues for the B77W ...

Huuh? Don't you think that's over-kill? Take a chill pill, there's no 'black series' and GE will figure it out.


If you're going through hell, keep going
User currently offlineZeke From Hong Kong SAR, PRC, joined Dec 2006, 3274 posts, RR: 40
Reply 9, posted (2 months 1 week 3 days 5 hours ago) and read 15030 times:

I think this is the second 773ER diversion into DEL this year, one also reported on Feb 18, 2008.

http://www.channelnewsasia.com/stori...aporelocalnews/view/329124/1/.html


Cathay Pacific celebrates expansion of services to India
User currently offlineFlySSC From Lebanon, joined Aug 2003, 5155 posts, RR: 50
Reply 10, posted (2 months 1 week 3 days 5 hours ago) and read 14964 times:



Quoting Ikramerica (Reply 7):
Now, I am sure that GE is looking at why they are close to the limit here, especially with AF who's had 1/2 of the shut downs. it might be a maintenance issue in the field (something GE wouldn't have found in their test environment with their test engineers babying the engines).

If it was a maintenance issue, AF would have had 100% of the IFSD problems. Last time I checked, AF is not responsible for SQ's B77W maintenance ... Note also that AF operates 24 B773ER against 13 or 14 for SQ so statistically, it makes more sense that AF more incidents than SQ.

User currently offlineCatdaddy63 From United States, joined Apr 2007, 105 posts, RR: 0
Reply 11, posted (2 months 1 week 3 days 3 hours ago) and read 14530 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

The actual flight hours for the type has to be increasing rapidly with many new frames having been delivered and many more to come. The quantity of IFSD's will logically increase while the rate based on flight hours will begin to decrease. Operators are probably still learning the quirks of these engines as well, and pilots will always err on the side of caution when EICAS shows anything abnormal, and rightly so.

User currently offlineChecksixx From United States, joined Mar 2005, 787 posts, RR: 0
Reply 12, posted (2 months 1 week 3 days 3 hours ago) and read 14421 times:



Quoting Beaucaire (Reply 4):
Lajes (Azores/Portugal) - An Air France plane makes an uncheduled diversion to Lajes international airport (Terceira Island), in Azores, due to engine mechanical troubles on one of the two engines of the plane during a flight over Atlantic Ocean.

The aircraft, a Boeing 777-300ER, registration number F-GSQT, flight number AF620, which was supposed to operate between Paris-Orly (France) international airport and Pointe-à-Pitre-Le Raizet (Guadeloupe/France) international airport with a total passengers number not know at this present time, took-off around noon and was over the Atlantic Ocean when an engine incident occurred. The pilots requested an emergency diversion to Lajes.
The plane landed without further incident and no injuries. No more information were released by the company about the engine problem. The passengers have been disembarked and placed in some hotels to wait for the next departure, the day after.

This was on the Air Force website also...I'll see if I can find their article.

User currently offlineTdscanuck From Canada, joined Jan 2006, 2928 posts, RR: 22
Reply 13, posted (2 months 1 week 3 days 3 hours ago) and read 14146 times:



Quoting Aguslamm (Reply 2):
Anyone keeping track of all the 777-773-77W emergency landings?

FAA, EASA, Boeing, and GE.

Quoting Aguslamm (Reply 2):
There have been quite a few lately, is this a coincidence?

Yes, based on evidence to date.

Quoting Aguslamm (Reply 2):
I have been flying 777s since they startrd in 1995 and always found them very relieble.

They are. They still have one of the lowest IFSD rates and highest dispatch reliabilities in commercial aviation.

Quoting Ikramerica (Reply 5):
If all are considered IFSD (and not determined to be another problem), then the 77W may not keep ETOPS207 or earn 240.

You'd only revoke ETOPS rating on the type if the shutdowns were uniformly distributed across the fleet. They're not.

Quoting Ikramerica (Reply 5):
I estimate 1 million engine hours over the last 12 month period for the type, and to keep the best ETOPS rating, you need the type to have fewer than 10 IFSDs.

The fleet accumulates about 200000 hours per month, or 1.2 million flight hours per year. That's 2.4 million engine hours per year. You're out by at least a factor of two.

Tom.

User currently offlinePIAflyer From United States, joined Jun 2007, 63 posts, RR: 0
Reply 14, posted (2 months 1 week 3 days 1 hour ago) and read 12866 times:

so what are they going to do, ferry it back

User currently offlineTdscanuck From Canada, joined Jan 2006, 2928 posts, RR: 22
Reply 15, posted (2 months 1 week 3 days 1 hour ago) and read 12391 times:



Quoting Tdscanuck (Reply 13):

The fleet accumulates about 200000 hours per month, or 1.2 million flight hours per year. That's 2.4 million engine hours per year. You're out by at least a factor of two.

Apparently, I can't do math today.

200000 hours per month is 2.4 million flight hours per year, or 4.8 million engine hours per year.

Tom.

User currently offlineAircanada014 From Canada, joined Oct 2005, 1195 posts, RR: 0
Reply 16, posted (2 months 1 week 3 days ago) and read 11917 times:

Lets hope none of AC B777-200LRs or B777-300ERs run the same problem as other carriers since AC have GE's too on their new planes.

User currently offlineEA772LR From United States, joined Mar 2007, 791 posts, RR: 0
Reply 17, posted (2 months 1 week 3 days ago) and read 11729 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

"Twin Engine for Too Many IFSD"  duck 
I'm sure Boeing and GE are certainly trying to figure out why they've a recent number of IFSDs.


If you always do what you've always done, then you'll always be what you've always been!
User currently offlineSandroZRH From Switzerland, joined Feb 2007, 2338 posts, RR: 20
Reply 18, posted (2 months 1 week 3 days ago) and read 11681 times:



Quoting FlySSC (Reply 10):
Note also that AF operates 24 B773ER against 13 or 14 for SQ so statistically, it makes more sense that AF more incidents than SQ.

The comparison between SQ and AF is irrelevant.

You'd have to compare AF's fleet to the whole GE equipped 77W fleet currently in service to bring some sense into this statement, and since AF does not operate half of all GE 77Ws out there, it still seems that they had a large number of all the IFSD despite their relatively small number of 77Ws in operation compared to the worldwide fleet.

It may just be bad luck, but you can't deny facts.

And what makes you so sure that there might not be a fault on AF's part?


Pilots, Swiss Made.
User currently offlineLAXCDG From France, joined Apr 2008, 38 posts, RR: 0
Reply 19, posted (2 months 1 week 2 days 23 hours ago) and read 11357 times:

The 772 with GE engine was and is not affected as much by IFSD. The 77W is really the one affected by this problem. I doubt that this is a maintenance issue with AF.AF has been operating 777-200 ER for the late 90's with GE engines and I dont recall any real issue as with 77W. AF is also the first airline who took delivery of 77W,dont you think that if mx was a problem,those IFSD wouldn't have happened earlier?? And those IFSD are happening now with SQ,NH (?), same story here, never heard of any IFSD with their 772,but on 77W yes.Are we going to blame their mx also?

The real question is, could it be an issue with the GE 90 - 115 B?? To me It start to look that way.

User currently offlineRuscoe From Australia, joined Aug 1999, 1006 posts, RR: 1
Reply 20, posted (2 months 1 week 2 days 23 hours ago) and read 11240 times: