Sponsor Message:
Civil Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
SQ006 Interim Report Due Fri?  
User currently offlineLutfi From China, joined Sep 2000, 775 posts, RR: 0
Posted (13 years 7 months 1 day 18 hours ago) and read 1106 times:

Supposedly the interim investigation report on SQ006 will be released Friday.

Interim report means the investigators release all the facts known so far, rather than the causes.

Rumours so far:

- The Captain was on an illegal roster, he hadn't been given enough rest in the days before the flight by SQ

- SQ ops may have called up the crew, to "check" if they were going to try and take off in the bad weather, or cancel the flight and cost money for hotel rooms. This, in SQ culture, is tantamount to an order to try and take off.

- SQ are going to revamp their flight operation department, bringing in a RSAF general.

- SQ are having to alter their policies on 1 Capt/ 2 FO long haul operations which have come under intense scrutiny.

- SQ are having great difficulty hiring new foreign pilots. Salaries and conditions are too low compared to other world class airlines.

Hopefully all flight safety departments will learn from this sad experience. Cutting corners to save costs, pressuring crew to operate rosters that are too tiring, and putting commercial concerns first can lead to disaster


3 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineChiawei From United States of America, joined Nov 2000, 944 posts, RR: 1
Reply 1, posted (13 years 7 months 1 day 16 hours ago) and read 1078 times:

I have to defend SQ in this case. Because the items you mentioned are typical of all airlines, the only difference is that SQ has the mis-fortune of crashing.

I have seen many US carrier pilots that are way overworked. So not suprise to see that SQ has similar problems.

There are just too many planes with too few excellent pilots. Also majority of Asian carrier's flight crew often only consist of one fully qualified Captain and a bunch of less experienced FO/SO.


User currently offlineSingapore 777 From Australia, joined May 1999, 1015 posts, RR: 3
Reply 2, posted (13 years 7 months 1 day 16 hours ago) and read 1077 times:

Even Cathay Pacific or Malaysia Airlines?

User currently offlineSingapore_Air From United Kingdom, joined Nov 2000, 13742 posts, RR: 19
Reply 3, posted (13 years 7 months 1 day 12 hours ago) and read 1065 times:

Yes I would think so. The person who posted the roumours: You didn't get them of pprune by any chance would you. Not dissing you but they seem so full of SQ this and SQ that, but your also forgetting the ATC, CI pilots (to a lesser extent), the runway lights, the runway lights!!!!, and the weather (although that has been ruled out)

I don't expect any hoo ha-s when this comes out. It's merely factual and won't tell us "why" anything happenned.
But we'll see.



Anyone can fly, only the best Soar.
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
CX 2004 Interim Report posted Wed Aug 11 2004 16:07:44 by Cathay Pacific
Due FRI @BHX B717 Turkmenistan posted Thu Apr 22 2004 23:28:18 by BHXviscount
SAS Group Interim Report January-June 2003. posted Mon Aug 11 2003 17:24:48 by Scandinavian
TPE Is NOT Responsible For SQ006 Crash: Report posted Thu Oct 10 2002 22:45:55 by Bigo747
SQ006 Crash Report posted Fri Apr 26 2002 08:10:43 by Singapore_Air
SQ6 Report Due In Mid-February posted Sat Jan 5 2002 11:30:09 by Singapore_Air
AF Concorde Final Report Due posted Sun Dec 30 2001 18:01:57 by Gordonroxburgh
SAS Interim Report, Cuts And Comments From CEO posted Tue Nov 6 2001 13:49:25 by TR
SQ006 Report To Be Released On Friday posted Tue Apr 23 2002 00:47:17 by Singapore_Air
Article: SQ006 Report May Stir Controversy posted Fri Mar 29 2002 23:57:28 by Singapore_Air