JAL Maiden Flight To SIN In 1958 — Civil Aviation Forum

Sponsor Message:


My Starred Topics \| Profile \| New Topic \| Forum Index \| Help \| Search

JAL Maiden Flight To SIN In 1958

DocPepz From Singapore, joined May 2001, 1763 posts, RR: 6
Posted (1 year 7 months 1 week 17 hours ago) and read 1043 times:

Hi

Wonder if any of you guys would know what type of aircraft JAL flew to SIN on its maiden flight in 1958, and what the frequency of service was? Tried to google it but couldn't find any such information.

Today they're doing double daily NRT, daily KIX (with a daily tag-on to KUL)

10 replies: All unread, jump to last

FlashFlyGuy From Australia, joined Jan 2007, 437 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (1 year 7 months 1 week 17 hours ago) and read 1007 times:

From History of Japan Air Lines (1958)

Quote:
5.8 Began service to Singapore (DC6B).

http://www.jal.com/en/history/history/

EDIT - it doesn't say the frequency though.

[Edited 2008-04-30 11:04:47]

FlashFlyGuy From Australia, joined Jan 2007, 437 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (1 year 7 months 1 week 16 hours ago) and read 956 times:

Timetable image from the 8th May 1958 edition - actual date of commencement of Singapore service, indicates service 3x week.

Ex Tokyo on Thursday, Saturday and Monday
Ex Singapore on Friday, Sunday, Tuesday.

http://www.timetableimages.com/ttimages/complete/jl58/jl58-3.jpg

http://www.timetableimages.com/ttimages/jl.htm

[Edited 2008-04-30 12:17:50]

DocPepz From Singapore, joined May 2001, 1763 posts, RR: 6
Reply 3, posted (1 year 7 months 1 week 16 hours ago) and read 953 times:

FlashFlyGuy

Thanks so much for your quick response. You've been a great help!

Cheers.

FlashFlyGuy From Australia, joined Jan 2007, 437 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (1 year 7 months 1 week 16 hours ago) and read 949 times:

No worries. Wink

Glad I could help.

Ryanair!!! From Singapore, joined Mar 2002, 4296 posts, RR: 28
Reply 5, posted (1 year 7 months 1 week 2 hours ago) and read 756 times:

This service commenced just 12-13 years after the Imperial Japanese Army surrendered and returned the island back to the British. I wonder how the people would have felt then watching a Japanese plane touch down in Singapore?

Welcome to my starry one world alliance, a team in the sky!

FlashFlyGuy From Australia, joined Jan 2007, 437 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (1 year 7 months 6 days 20 hours ago) and read 641 times:

Quoting Ryanair!!! (Reply 5):
This service commenced just 12-13 years after the Imperial Japanese Army surrendered and returned the island back to the British. I wonder how the people would have felt then watching a Japanese plane touch down in Singapore?

I wonder the same myself. Considering, for example, that there are probably some Aussie WW2 Diggers left (that were imprisoned by the Japanese), that refuse to buy or use anything made in Japan, still to this day -- 63 years later! So you can imagine how the locals might have felt after only a short decade or so.

Although basically, JAL at that time was probably majority controlled by the "USA". I know that maintenance was done by UA and the pilots were Americans.

EXAAUADL From United States, joined Jun 2006, 4083 posts, RR: 1
Reply 7, posted (1 year 7 months 6 days 20 hours ago) and read 625 times:

Quoting FlashFlyGuy (Reply 6):
Although basically, JAL at that time was probably majority controlled by the "USA". I know that maintenance was done by UA and the pilots were Americans.

I didnt know MX was done by UA, wouldnt it have made more sense for NW or PA?

FlashFlyGuy From Australia, joined Jan 2007, 437 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (1 year 7 months 6 days 19 hours ago) and read 584 times:

Quoting EXAAUADL (Reply 7):
I didnt know MX was done by UA, wouldnt it have made more sense for NW or PA?

Neither did I till yesterday. Sort of explains why they flew Tokyo to San Francisco - makes sense to rotate the DC-6's through for maintenance with UA there.

http://www.timetableimages.com/ttimages/jl5402i.htm

[Edited 2008-05-01 09:02:09]

Viscount724 From Switzerland, joined Oct 2006, 10856 posts, RR: 9
Reply 9, posted (1 year 7 months 6 days 11 hours ago) and read 473 times:

Quoting FlashFlyGuy (Reply 8):
Quoting EXAAUADL (Reply 7):
I didnt know MX was done by UA, wouldnt it have made more sense for NW or PA?

Neither did I till yesterday. Sort of explains why they flew Tokyo to San Francisco - makes sense to rotate the DC-6's through for maintenance with UA there.

UA's SFO maintenance base also came in handy when a JL DC-8-62 landed in the water a couple of miles short of the runway approaching SFO in 1972, luckily with no fatalities and not even anything more than very minor injuries. The aircraft had little structural damage, mainly (engines, landing gear, flaps etc. It was repaired by UA and returned to service 4 months later.
http://aviation-safety.net/database/record.php?id=19681122-0

The aircraft in question 4 years before and 10 years after the incident.

View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

[Edited 2008-05-01 16:58:40]

Ryanair!!! From Singapore, joined Mar 2002, 4296 posts, RR: 28
Reply 10, posted (1 year 7 months 6 days 9 hours ago) and read 430 times:

Wow... Look at the photo on the left! You can see the white gloved flight attendants walking away from the aircraft! Man... those were the days.

Welcome to my starry one world alliance, a team in the sky!

Top Of Page

Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics: